Shannon Tse, An-Sofie Van de Kelft, Samuel K Simister, Danielle A Forster, Marcus Lee, Aditya Prinja, Kannan Rajesparan, Abbas Rashid
{"title":"评估肘关节骨折脱位的Wrightington分类系统:一项外部可靠性研究。","authors":"Shannon Tse, An-Sofie Van de Kelft, Samuel K Simister, Danielle A Forster, Marcus Lee, Aditya Prinja, Kannan Rajesparan, Abbas Rashid","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0294.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Complex elbow fracture-dislocations often result in suboptimal outcomes and necessitate a thorough understanding of injury patterns to guide effective management and reduce adverse sequelae. The Wrightington Classification System (WCS) offers a comprehensive approach and considers both bony and soft-tissue disruption, providing clearer guidance for treatment. This is the first external study to assess the reliability of the WCS for elbow fracture-dislocations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A blinded study of patients with elbow fracture-dislocations at a single institution between December 2014 and December 2022 was conducted. Five assessors with a range of experience, including orthopaedic surgeons and radiologists, independently classified injuries using the WCS across three image methods: plain radiograph, 2D CT, and 2D and 3D CT reconstruction images, on two occasions with an eight-week interval. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were evaluated using kappa statistics and the Landis and Koch criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 patients were included in the study. Interobserver reliability was moderate, with mean kappa values of 0.518 (95% CI 0.499 to 0.537), 0.557 (95% CI 0.537 to 0.577), and 0.582 (95% CI 0.562 to 0.601), for radiographs, 2D CT, and 2D and 3D CT reconstructions, respectively. Intraobserver agreement was substantial (mean kappa 0.695 (SE 0.067), 0.729 (SE 0.071), and 0.777 (SE 0.070) for radiographs, 2D CT, and 3D CT reconstructions, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The WCS is a reliable and valuable tool for characterizing elbow fracture-dislocations and guiding surgical interventions. This study found moderate reliability in using the WCS, with higher reliability with combined 2D and 3D CT imaging. Further refinement within the WCS in differentiating between coronoid avulsions, basal, anteromedial, and/or anterolateral facet injuries may help improve reliability and reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 2","pages":"188-192"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Wrightington Classification System for elbow fracture-dislocations : an external reliability study.\",\"authors\":\"Shannon Tse, An-Sofie Van de Kelft, Samuel K Simister, Danielle A Forster, Marcus Lee, Aditya Prinja, Kannan Rajesparan, Abbas Rashid\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0294.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Complex elbow fracture-dislocations often result in suboptimal outcomes and necessitate a thorough understanding of injury patterns to guide effective management and reduce adverse sequelae. The Wrightington Classification System (WCS) offers a comprehensive approach and considers both bony and soft-tissue disruption, providing clearer guidance for treatment. This is the first external study to assess the reliability of the WCS for elbow fracture-dislocations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A blinded study of patients with elbow fracture-dislocations at a single institution between December 2014 and December 2022 was conducted. Five assessors with a range of experience, including orthopaedic surgeons and radiologists, independently classified injuries using the WCS across three image methods: plain radiograph, 2D CT, and 2D and 3D CT reconstruction images, on two occasions with an eight-week interval. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were evaluated using kappa statistics and the Landis and Koch criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 patients were included in the study. Interobserver reliability was moderate, with mean kappa values of 0.518 (95% CI 0.499 to 0.537), 0.557 (95% CI 0.537 to 0.577), and 0.582 (95% CI 0.562 to 0.601), for radiographs, 2D CT, and 2D and 3D CT reconstructions, respectively. Intraobserver agreement was substantial (mean kappa 0.695 (SE 0.067), 0.729 (SE 0.071), and 0.777 (SE 0.070) for radiographs, 2D CT, and 3D CT reconstructions, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The WCS is a reliable and valuable tool for characterizing elbow fracture-dislocations and guiding surgical interventions. This study found moderate reliability in using the WCS, with higher reliability with combined 2D and 3D CT imaging. Further refinement within the WCS in differentiating between coronoid avulsions, basal, anteromedial, and/or anterolateral facet injuries may help improve reliability and reproducibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"volume\":\"107-B 2\",\"pages\":\"188-192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0294.R1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0294.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:复杂的肘关节骨折脱位往往导致不理想的结果,需要彻底了解损伤模式,以指导有效的管理和减少不良后遗症。Wrightington分类系统(WCS)提供了全面的方法,并考虑了骨和软组织的破坏,为治疗提供了更清晰的指导。这是第一项评估WCS治疗肘关节骨折脱位可靠性的外部研究。方法:对2014年12月至2022年12月在同一医院就诊的肘关节骨折脱位患者进行盲法研究。包括骨科医生和放射科医生在内的5名经验丰富的评估人员,通过三种图像方法(平片、2D CT、2D和3D CT重建图像)独立地使用WCS对损伤进行分类,每次间隔8周。使用kappa统计和Landis和Koch标准评估观察者间和观察者内的信度。结果:共纳入73例患者。观察者间信度中等,x线片、2D CT、2D和3D CT重建的平均kappa值分别为0.518 (95% CI 0.499至0.537)、0.557 (95% CI 0.537至0.577)和0.582 (95% CI 0.562至0.601)。观察者内部一致(x线片、2D CT和3D CT重建的平均kappa分别为0.695 (SE 0.067)、0.729 (SE 0.071)和0.777 (SE 0.070))。结论:WCS是诊断肘关节骨折脱位和指导手术治疗的可靠且有价值的工具。本研究发现使用WCS的可靠性中等,使用2D和3D CT联合成像的可靠性更高。进一步完善WCS区分冠状突撕脱、基底、前内侧和/或前外侧关节面损伤可能有助于提高可靠性和可重复性。
Assessing the Wrightington Classification System for elbow fracture-dislocations : an external reliability study.
Aims: Complex elbow fracture-dislocations often result in suboptimal outcomes and necessitate a thorough understanding of injury patterns to guide effective management and reduce adverse sequelae. The Wrightington Classification System (WCS) offers a comprehensive approach and considers both bony and soft-tissue disruption, providing clearer guidance for treatment. This is the first external study to assess the reliability of the WCS for elbow fracture-dislocations.
Methods: A blinded study of patients with elbow fracture-dislocations at a single institution between December 2014 and December 2022 was conducted. Five assessors with a range of experience, including orthopaedic surgeons and radiologists, independently classified injuries using the WCS across three image methods: plain radiograph, 2D CT, and 2D and 3D CT reconstruction images, on two occasions with an eight-week interval. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were evaluated using kappa statistics and the Landis and Koch criteria.
Results: A total of 73 patients were included in the study. Interobserver reliability was moderate, with mean kappa values of 0.518 (95% CI 0.499 to 0.537), 0.557 (95% CI 0.537 to 0.577), and 0.582 (95% CI 0.562 to 0.601), for radiographs, 2D CT, and 2D and 3D CT reconstructions, respectively. Intraobserver agreement was substantial (mean kappa 0.695 (SE 0.067), 0.729 (SE 0.071), and 0.777 (SE 0.070) for radiographs, 2D CT, and 3D CT reconstructions, respectively).
Conclusion: The WCS is a reliable and valuable tool for characterizing elbow fracture-dislocations and guiding surgical interventions. This study found moderate reliability in using the WCS, with higher reliability with combined 2D and 3D CT imaging. Further refinement within the WCS in differentiating between coronoid avulsions, basal, anteromedial, and/or anterolateral facet injuries may help improve reliability and reproducibility.
期刊介绍:
We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.