促进英国髋部骨折的临床试验:国家髋部骨折数据库和常规收集数据的作用和潜力。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
James Webster, Raphael Goldacre, Jennifer C E Lane, Marion Mafham, Marion K Campbell, Antony Johansen, Xavier L Griffin
{"title":"促进英国髋部骨折的临床试验:国家髋部骨折数据库和常规收集数据的作用和潜力。","authors":"James Webster, Raphael Goldacre, Jennifer C E Lane, Marion Mafham, Marion K Campbell, Antony Johansen, Xavier L Griffin","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0846.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability, against an accepted international standard, of a linked hip fracture registry and routinely collected administrative dataset in England to embed and deliver randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, a bespoke cohort of individuals sustaining hip fractures between 2011 and 2016 was generated from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) and linked to individual Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) records and mortality data. Second, in order to explore the availability and distribution of outcomes available in linked HES-Office of National Statistics (ONS) data, a more contemporary cohort with incident hip fracture was identified within HES between January 2014 and December 2018. Distributions of the outcomes within the HES-ONS dataset were reported using standard statistical summaries; descriptive characteristics of the NHFD and linked HES-ONS dataset were reported in line with the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative recommendations for registry-enabled trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case ascertainment of the NHFD likely exceeds 94%. The assessment of the robustness, relevance, and reliability of the datasets was favourable. Outcomes from the HES-ONS dataset were concordant with other contemporaneous prospective cohort studies with bespoke data collection frameworks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support the feasibility of the NHFD and HES-ONS to support a registry-embedded, data-enabled RCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 2","pages":"229-238"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitating clinical trials in hip fracture in the UK : the role and potential of the National Hip Fracture Database and routinely collected data.\",\"authors\":\"James Webster, Raphael Goldacre, Jennifer C E Lane, Marion Mafham, Marion K Campbell, Antony Johansen, Xavier L Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0846.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability, against an accepted international standard, of a linked hip fracture registry and routinely collected administrative dataset in England to embed and deliver randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, a bespoke cohort of individuals sustaining hip fractures between 2011 and 2016 was generated from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) and linked to individual Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) records and mortality data. Second, in order to explore the availability and distribution of outcomes available in linked HES-Office of National Statistics (ONS) data, a more contemporary cohort with incident hip fracture was identified within HES between January 2014 and December 2018. Distributions of the outcomes within the HES-ONS dataset were reported using standard statistical summaries; descriptive characteristics of the NHFD and linked HES-ONS dataset were reported in line with the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative recommendations for registry-enabled trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Case ascertainment of the NHFD likely exceeds 94%. The assessment of the robustness, relevance, and reliability of the datasets was favourable. Outcomes from the HES-ONS dataset were concordant with other contemporaneous prospective cohort studies with bespoke data collection frameworks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support the feasibility of the NHFD and HES-ONS to support a registry-embedded, data-enabled RCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"volume\":\"107-B 2\",\"pages\":\"229-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0846.R1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0846.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是根据公认的国际标准,评估英国髋部骨折相关登记和常规收集管理数据集的适用性,以嵌入和提供随机对照试验(rct)。方法:首先,从国家髋部骨折数据库(NHFD)中生成2011年至2016年髋部骨折患者的定制队列,并与个人医院事件统计(HES)记录和死亡率数据相关联。其次,为了探索相关HES-国家统计局(ONS)数据中可用结果的可用性和分布,在2014年1月至2018年12月期间,在HES中确定了一个更现代的突发髋部骨折队列。使用标准统计摘要报告了HES-ONS数据集中结果的分布;报告了NHFD和相关HES-ONS数据集的描述性特征,符合临床试验转化倡议对注册试验的建议。结果:NHFD的病例确定率可能超过94%。对数据集的稳健性、相关性和可靠性的评估是有利的。来自HES-ONS数据集的结果与其他具有定制数据收集框架的同期前瞻性队列研究一致。结论:我们的研究结果支持NHFD和HES-ONS支持注册表嵌入、数据支持的随机对照试验的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Facilitating clinical trials in hip fracture in the UK : the role and potential of the National Hip Fracture Database and routinely collected data.

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability, against an accepted international standard, of a linked hip fracture registry and routinely collected administrative dataset in England to embed and deliver randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: First, a bespoke cohort of individuals sustaining hip fractures between 2011 and 2016 was generated from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) and linked to individual Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) records and mortality data. Second, in order to explore the availability and distribution of outcomes available in linked HES-Office of National Statistics (ONS) data, a more contemporary cohort with incident hip fracture was identified within HES between January 2014 and December 2018. Distributions of the outcomes within the HES-ONS dataset were reported using standard statistical summaries; descriptive characteristics of the NHFD and linked HES-ONS dataset were reported in line with the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative recommendations for registry-enabled trials.

Results: Case ascertainment of the NHFD likely exceeds 94%. The assessment of the robustness, relevance, and reliability of the datasets was favourable. Outcomes from the HES-ONS dataset were concordant with other contemporaneous prospective cohort studies with bespoke data collection frameworks.

Conclusion: Our findings support the feasibility of the NHFD and HES-ONS to support a registry-embedded, data-enabled RCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信