Health Policy and Technology最新文献

{"title":"Individual factors that affect laypeople's understanding of definitions of medical jargon","authors":"David A. Levy ,&nbsp;Harmon S. Jordan ,&nbsp;John P. Lalor ,&nbsp;Jenni Kim Smirnova ,&nbsp;Wen Hu ,&nbsp;Weisong Liu ,&nbsp;Hong Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100932","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100932","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Patients have difficulty understanding medical jargon in electronic health record (EHR) notes. Lay definitions can improve patient comprehension, which is the goal of the NoteAid project. We assess whether the NoteAid definitions are understandable to laypeople and whether understandability differs with respect to layperson characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Definitions for jargon terms were written for laypersons with a 4th-to-7th-grade reading level. 300 definitions were randomly sampled from a corpus of approximately 30,000 definitions. 280 laypeople (crowdsource workers) were recruited; each layperson rated the understandability of 20 definitions. Understandability was rated on a 5-point scale. Using a generalized estimating equation model (GEE) we analyzed the relationship between understandability and age, sex, race/ethnicity, education level, native language, health literacy, and definition writer.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 81.1 % (95 % CI: 76.5–85.7 %) of the laypeople reported that the definitions were understandable. Males were less likely to report understanding the definitions than females (OR: 0.73, 95 % CI: 0.63–0.84). Asians, Hispanics, and those who marked their race/ethnicity as “other” were more likely to report understanding the definitions than whites (Asians: OR: 1.43, 95 % CI: 1.17–1.73; Hispanics: OR: 1.86, 95 % CI: 1.33–2.59; Other: OR: 2.48, 95 % CI: 1.65–3.74). Laypeople whose native language was not English were less likely to report understanding the definitions (OR: 0.51, 95 % CI: 0.36–0.74). Laypeople with lower health literacy were less likely to report understanding definitions (health literacy score 3: OR: 0.51, 95 % CI: 0.43–0.62; health literacy score 4: OR: 0.40, 95 % CI: 0.29–0.55).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Understandability of definitions among laypeople was high. There were statistically significant race/ethnic differences in self-reported understandability, even after controlling for multiple demographics.</div></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><div>We conducted a study to ensure that definitions written for the NoteAid EHR jargon identification tool are understandable. We recruited a diverse group of crowdsource workers and found that overall, the definitions were understandable, but understanding levels varied based on several demographic characteristics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100932"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142758976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Challenges of shared decision-making in virtual care: Whom should we care for, and how?","authors":"Lujia Sun ,&nbsp;Martin Buijsen","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100931","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100931","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This article examines challenges in implementing shared decision-making within virtual care. Virtual care platforms emphasise quick delivery, patient choice and empowerment, offering convenient access to remote medical consultations at patients’ homes. However, shared decision-making is a collaborative and deliberative process that does not prioritise efficiency and individual decisions over the principles of sound medical practice. Recognised as the gold standard in healthcare, extending shared decision-making to virtual care platforms is indispensable, but it would encounter difficulties in implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Combining an empirical methodology with ethical reasoning, an integrated approach facilitates critical discourse on shared decision-making within virtual care settings. This involves an ethical premise concerning shared decision-making norms, followed by an ethical analysis drawing upon empirical findings from literature via keyword searches. Adopting an interdisciplinary perspective, the study merges ethical and social viewpoints to elucidate shared decision-making’s significance and policy implications in virtual care.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The investigation identifies four significant factors that may challenge implementing shared decision-making within virtual care contexts. These include consumer-like behaviours, the absence of pre-existing relationships, information expansion, and physicians’ evolving roles.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>It is concluded that a collaborative approach to a caring relationship that focuses on patients’ needs and values, continuity of care, and medical professionalism is essential to this new integration of virtual care and shared decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100931"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142758975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An insight into the implementation, utilization, and evaluation of telemedicine e-consultation services in Egypt","authors":"Ehab Kamal ,&nbsp;Iman A. F. Aboelsaad ,&nbsp;Yousra A. El-Maradny ,&nbsp;Rasha Ashmawy ,&nbsp;Nermeen Gawish ,&nbsp;Ahmed K. Selem ,&nbsp;Dina Fawzy Abd Elsadek ,&nbsp;Khaled Abdelghaffar","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100951","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100951","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Telemedicine has gained momentum in healthcare, particularly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In Egypt, a government collaboration introduced telemedicine in 2019 to transform healthcare delivery.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This study provides an overview of Egypt's telemedicine initiative, focusing on its infrastructure, utilization, and perceived impact over three years.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;A cross-sectional anonymous online survey of Ministry of Health and Population (MoHP) physicians using telemedicine services was conducted. The survey estimated perceived cost savings and reductions in healthcare delivery wait times, along with identifying facilitators and barriers to telemedicine implementation. It captured sociodemographic characteristics and physician opinions on telemedicine benefits, including perceived face-to-face consultation costs and wait times. The descriptive analysis summarized these findings.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Egypt's telemedicine system includes 200 Distance Medical Diagnosis Units (DMDUs) across governorates. By August 2023, over 97,000 consultations were completed, with consultations tripling in 2023 compared to 2020-2022. Dermatology, internal medicine, and pediatrics were the most requested specialties, with tuberculosis and clinical pharmacy added in 2023. Responses from 214 physicians revealed that nearly 90% estimated external consultation costs under 1000 EGP (32.4 USD), compared to the free telemedicine consultations available to patients. For inpatient consultations, 35% reported waiting times of a day or less. Challenges included technical issues and patient acceptance.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The study offers insights for policymakers to optimize telemedicine services, improve healthcare access, and reduce disparities in Egypt, showing telemedicine's potential to enhance healthcare delivery and patient outcomes.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Public interest summary&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Telemedicine has become a crucial tool in healthcare, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. In Egypt, a collaboration between government ministries launched a telemedicine initiative in 2019. This study explores its impact over three years, focusing on the benefits and challenges of telemedicine as perceived by physicians. The findings are based on a survey of 214 doctors from 21 governorates who use the Ministry of Health and Population's telemedicine services. Results showed that over 97,000 consultations had been performed by mid-2023, with specialties like dermatology and pediatrics in high demand. Most doctors reported significant cost savings for patients compared to face-to-face consultations. However, challenges remain, particularly technical issues and patient acceptance. The study highlights the potential of telemedicine to improve healthcare access and reduce costs, offering valuable insights for policymakers to optimize the system and promote ","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100951"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142703685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework “MARIE” for new drugs","authors":"Akina Takami ,&nbsp;Masafumi Kato ,&nbsp;Hisato Deguchi ,&nbsp;Ataru Igarashi","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100928","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100928","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Value-based pricing (VBP) could improve allocation of healthcare resources. We created and evaluated a simple VBP method that qualitatively considers broad values for drugs.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>First, we established the value elements that determine the value of drugs. Then, we decided on the criteria for scoring the value elements, constructed a method for estimating daily drug prices from the value elements and the maximum number of patients, and used this framework to estimate daily drug prices.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four base value elements and 8 additional elements were identified. We applied our scoring criteria to calculate scores for 39 drugs already listed in Japan and estimated the daily drug price of each drug by creating a conversion table of base drug prices according to base points and maximum number of patients and adding points for additional elements. For all hepatitis C drugs, the estimated daily drug prices were lower than the actual prices, whereas for the other drugs, they were higher or, in some cases, lower.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our VBP framework comprises 4 steps: 1. gathering information on value elements; 2. scoring value elements; 3. calculating the base drug price from the base points and the maximum number of patients by using the conversion table; and 4. calculating the daily drug price by adding points for additional value elements. Our framework, which we refer to as MARIE (multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework), is a versatile, practical, and simple option for pricing new drugs that can be easily adapted to different healthcare environments.</div></div><div><h3>Public Interest Summary</h3><div>Drug prices do not necessarily reflect the values provided by drugs in Japanese current drug pricing system. It is not fully discussed how to quantify the value of drugs for prices by considering a broad range of value elements. We created and evaluated VBP method for drug pricing that would be applicable in Japan considering the current pharmaceutical regulations, medical environment, and availability of data at the timing of pricing negotiation process for new drugs. The study summarizes the value elements to be considered in determining drug prices and proposed VBP framework. It also revealed that qualitative factors can be used for drug pricing. Our proposed approach for drug pricing system enables to capture and reflect broader values of new drug.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100928"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142651572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessing contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on healthcare provider burnout","authors":"Valerie Boksa ,&nbsp;Priyadarshini Pennathur","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100942","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100942","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The prevalence of burnout among healthcare providers has been steadily increasing, with a call to action issued in 2019. Immediately following this call to action, the COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed demand. Use of telemedicine expanded in response to COVID-19 and changed the experience of care delivery for healthcare providers. The impact of telemedicine use during COVID-19 on provider well-being is less well known. This study aims to assess the prevalence of burnout in providers who used telemedicine and to better understand which aspects of telemedicine exacerbate or alleviate provider burnout.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Providers in urgent care clinics were invited to participate in a burnout assessment survey using the Maslach Burnout Inventory questionnaire. The prevalence of burnout, burnout profiles, and correlations were analyzed in the resulting data. Follow-up interviews provided further insight on contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on provider burnout.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Survey results showed that 25 % of the respondents reported one or more burnout manifestations. Contributing and mediating factors were categorized to provide a framework to understand the risk and benefits this technology can pose to workplace stress.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The findings from this study provide technology- and organizational-level recommendations to prevent increased risk of burnout among telemedicine providers. Future research recommendations to better quantify the relationship between burnout and telemedicine use and to effectively design intervention and implementation strategies are discussed.</div></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><div>Considering the high rates of burnout in the healthcare industry prior to the pandemic, the severe demands the COVID-19 pandemic had on healthcare workers, and the drastic workflow changes due to the widespread adoption of telemedicine, it is important to assess current provider burnout levels and collect frontline clinician insights on how telemedicine positively or negatively influences workplace stress. A survey was administered to assess burnout in healthcare workers who provided care via telemedicine. Interviews provided additional insight on how telemedicine affected workplace stress. Survey results showed that 25 % of the respondents reported one or more manifestations of burnout. A correlation was found between personal accomplishment scores and reported months of telemedicine use. Interview and literature findings identified telemedicine design and use characteristics that contributed to and/or alleviated burnout. Results address how organizations can best support their employees who administer care via telemedicine and recommend future studies for research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100942"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142703684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Designing GTP3 prompts to screen articles for systematic reviews of RCTs","authors":"James A Strachan","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100943","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100943","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Satisfactory sensitivity in screening articles for appropriate inclusion in systematic reviews has not yet been achieved using the group of GPT artificial intelligence (AI) systems. One issue in designing prompts for article screening is that while most of the prompt can be validated before use, i.e. on previously published systematic reviews, the part containing the inclusion criteria cannot. This study aimed to advance work in this area by trying to identify a prompt that is robust to variations in the precise wording of inclusion criteria. Prompts with this property should be able to achieve more consistent performance when applied to similar systematic reviews of health topics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prompt, into which alternative wordings (variants) of inclusion criteria could be inserted, was tested on a training dataset of articles identified during the re-run of electronic searches for a single published review. Modification and re-testing of the prompt was undertaken until satisfactory screening sensitivity across six different inclusion criteria variants was achieved. This prompt was then validated by assessing its performance on three “test” datasets, derived from re-run electronic searches from three different reviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A prompt was successfully developed using the training dataset that achieved sensitivities of 95.8 %, 100.0 % &amp; 100.0 % respectively in the three test datasets derived from the three different reviews.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Iterative design and testing on inclusion criteria variants produced a prompt that consistently achieved satisfactory screening sensitivity. The classification process was fast, cheap and had high specificity.</div></div><div><h3>Public Interest Summary</h3><div>Systematic reviews summarise all articles that have tried to answer scientific questions. They are usually the gold standard of evidence in medical science and widely inform healthcare policy. However, they are very expensive and time consuming to write. The initial stage of writing systematic reviews consists of reviewing potentially tens of thousands of scientific abstracts. This process may be able to be automated by artificial intelligence (AI) including GPT3 an AI system operated by OpenAI. Previous attempts to use closely related AI models have not worked likely in part because GPT3´s performance is strongly dependant on the exact instructions or “prompts” given to GPT3. This study investigated a new method of designing these prompts which consistently achieved satisfactory screening performance when tested on articles collected for three previously published systematic reviews.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"14 1","pages":"Article 100943"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142707062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"When blood is not an option. The awareness of bloodless medicine among Polish nurses","authors":"Jan Domaradzki ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Głodowska ,&nbsp;Piotr Jabkowski","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100941","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100941","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Blood transfusions (BTs) are generally safe and potentially life-saving but come with risks. The World Health Organization advocates reducing unnecessary transfusions and using patient blood management strategies and techniques. However, providing bloodless medical care to patients who prefer to avoid blood-related treatments is a challenge. This is because healthcare professionals’ beliefs about blood transfusion may not align with those of their patients. This study delves into Polish nursing personnel's attitudes toward bloodless medicine (BM), highlighting the potential gap between their knowledge and patient needs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an online survey amongst 202 Polish nurses on non-blood management techniques, risks related to BT and BM, and nurses’ educational needs regarding BM.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Although many nurses had some knowledge of BM, Polish nurses’ awareness of non-blood management techniques is relatively low: while less than half knew alternative treatment methods and drugs used in BM, many were unaware of the various risks or side effects related to BM. It also shows that more than three-quarters of nurses believed that patients should have the right to make an informed refusal of BT. While 87.1 % of nurses rated their knowledge about BM insufficient or very poor, 66.3 % did not feel prepared to care for patients who require non-blood management techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study underscores the urgent need to educate nurses on blood conservation methods, blood substitutes, and techniques of non-blood management. Incorporating these into the nursing curriculum is crucial for patients’ safety and well-being and our healthcare system's effectiveness. The potential, impact of these findings on the healthcare system is significant, underlining the urgency and importance of addressing the knowledge gap in non-blood management techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><div>Although the World Health Organization recommends using non-blood management techniques, most nurses providing bloodless medical care to patients who wish to avoid blood transfusion do not feel prepared to care for such patients. This study describes the attitudes of Polish nursing personnel toward bloodless medicine. It demonstrates that Polish nurses do not possess knowledge of non-blood management techniques, and their awareness of patient blood management methods and drugs used in bloodless medicine is low. However, it also reveals a positive aspect: Most Polish nurses are interested in broadening their knowledge of bloodless medicine. This strong motivation to improve their skills and knowledge in this area is encouraging and should be harnessed to drive positive change in the field of bloodless medicine.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100941"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142651677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Evaluating sustainability awareness and practices in podiatry clinics in Spain: A path toward a healthy and sustainable future","authors":"Esther Chicharro-Luna ,&nbsp;Gabriel Gijón-Nogueron ,&nbsp;Angela M.F. Evans ,&nbsp;Alfonso Martínez-Nova","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100940","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100940","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sustainability in healthcare is crucial due to the sector's significant contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions. Medical practices must address environmental impact while maintaining high-quality care and equitable access. In podiatry, sustainable practices can reduce the environmental footprint of clinics and improve long-term healthcare outcomes by promoting prevention and resource efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Cross sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We conducted an online survey with 357 practicing podiatrists, all registered with the General Council of Podiatrists of Spain and with at least one year of professional experience. The survey contained 26 questions focused on sustainability in healthcare, podiatry practices, and environmental impact. The questionnaire included both closed-ended questions and Likert-scale items. Responses were scored and categorized into arbitrary sustainability categories: low (&lt;12), medium (12 to 25), and high (&gt;25).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most respondents (82.6 %) did not regularly use public transport, and 14 % did not engage in any form of physical exercise. More than half of the sample were unaware of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Almost all (98 %) had not measured the carbon footprint of their clinics, yet 34.7 % planned to optimise energy consumption in their clinics. Overall, 41.7 % were categorized as low sustainability, 56.9 % medium, and 1.4 % met high sustainability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Podiatry clinics in Spain demonstrate low sustainability actions and knowledge. Sustainable practice aligns with global environment healthcare urgency, and ensures more responsible podiatric services. This study provides the first baseline data for this issue, availing comparisons across global podiatric healthcare sectors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100940"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142651574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A prospective cost analysis model for financial impact of Connected Care interventions on hospitals’ budget","authors":"Jedidja Lok-Visser ,&nbsp;Jobbe P.L. Leenen ,&nbsp;Heleen M. den Hertog ,&nbsp;Gina van Vemde ,&nbsp;Jeroen Rekveldt ,&nbsp;Jan W.K. van den Berg ,&nbsp;Gijs A. Patijn ,&nbsp;Judith R. Cornelisse-Vermaat ,&nbsp;Gréanne Leeftink ,&nbsp;Jan Gerard Maring","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100926","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100926","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To present a prospective cost analysis (PCA) model for estimating the financial impact of Connected Care interventions in hospitals to support managerial decision-making, and describe its application to three different care pathways.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Input of the developed PCA model consisted of standard of care input and intervention-specific input. The output of the model included: capacity benefits, costs, and reimbursements. The model was applied to three types of interventions in a large Dutch teaching hospital: 1) home telemonitoring for chronic patients (case (COPD), 2) remote aftercare for patients with acute illnesses (case: stroke), and 3) parenteral medication administration at home (case: prosthetic hip or knee joint infections).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Output of the PCA model showed that the cost savings can exceed the intervention costs if an intervention decreases the length of stay of patients. For COPD telemonitoring 10.1 % of the healthcare utilization should be reduced to reach break-even, and for antibiotic treatment at home break-even is reached if 4.6 % of the length of stay is reduced. The cost savings of remote aftercare for stroke patients is focused on reducing outpatient visits, and in the current Dutch reimbursement system this does not completely cover the costs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PCA model is an easy to implement and useful tool for assessing the financial impact of CC interventions from a hospital perspective. It supports decision makers to prospectively assess the cost and capacity benefits of interventions and to inform decisions on implementation. Further studies are needed to extend the model across the entire healthcare continuum.</div></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><div>We present a prospective cost analysis (PCA) model for estimating the financial impact of Connected Care interventions in hospitals to support managerial decision-making. Connected Care interventions are based on an integrated care approach utilizing digital health technologies to enhance patient-centred, collaborative care, where patients receive care at home. Examples are telemonitoring of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, remote aftercare for stroke patients and infusion treatment at home for orthopaedic patients with an infection. These interventions have additional costs, but also save part of the costs of the conventional care, and have benefits in terms of a decrease in outpatient visits or hospitalizations. We provide a model where a hospital can calculate the impact in costs and benefits of Connected Care interventions and test this on these three examples. We show that the cost savings are able to exceed the intervention costs if an intervention has impact on the hospitalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100926"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142651676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Value-based healthcare in oncology: Can it drive transformative shifts in the Middle East and North Africa region?","authors":"Radwa Ahmed Batran ,&nbsp;Mohab Kamel ,&nbsp;Ayman Bahr ,&nbsp;Ahmed Khalil ,&nbsp;Mohamed Elsokary","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100939","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100939","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The shift from volume-driven healthcare to value-driven healthcare, or value-based healthcare (VBHC), emerged in the 1990s, prioritizing healthcare quality over quantity. VBHC enjoys support from various healthcare stakeholders, emphasizing patient-centric outcomes that resonate with individual health experiences. Cancer is a major global cause of death, with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bearing a significant burden, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, which is expected to witness a surge in cancer cases due to conflicts, changing demographics, and environmental factors. The MENA oncology market is poised for growth, fueled by biomarkers and targeted therapies. However, the MENA region's diversity leads to disparities in cancer care access and outcomes. Countries throughout the MENA region are presently in the midst of a substantial transformation of their healthcare systems. A number of MENA nations have taken steps to transition towards value-based care, recognizing its potential to reduce healthcare costs, enhance the quality of healthcare services, and promote healthier lifestyles among the populace. This review aims to highlight the ongoing initiatives within the MENA region toward implementing value-based cancer care. It also underscores the challenges associated with this transition while presenting a pragmatic and viable plan for the widespread adoption of value-based cancer care in the MENA region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100939"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142703686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}