{"title":"古巴、西班牙、意大利和德国的医疗保健系统概况和大流行结果的多维缩放","authors":"Giuseppe Orlando","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.101120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives:</h3><div>This study examines how baseline health risks in Cuba, Spain, Italy, and Germany relate to COVID-19 mortality trajectories and to identify system features associated with better outcomes. While previous comparative studies have emphasized GDP levels or hospital capacity, few have systematically linked baseline health risks and health-system models to pandemic trajectories; this study addresses that gap.</div></div><div><h3>Study design:</h3><div>Cross-country observational study of four contrasting health system models using publicly available secondary data (Cuba: state-socialist; Spain/Italy: Mediterranean welfare states; Germany: corporatist Bismarckian).</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>We applied Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) in two complementary stages: (i) a cross-sectional map of <em>Baseline Health Indicators</em> (BHI; eight pre-pandemic variables), and (ii) a trajectory-based map of <em>Pandemic Trajectory Metrics</em> (PTM; monthly reported indicators, 2020–2023) using correlation distance.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The BHI stage revealed distinct pre-pandemic configurations: Cuba separated on higher cardiovascular mortality and male smoking; Spain on elevated female smoking; Italy on older age structure and higher population density; and Germany on demographic pressures with higher diabetes prevalence. In the PTM stage, Cuba recorded the lowest cumulative COVID-19 mortality among the four (776 deaths per million), whereas European countries reached 2070–3261 deaths per million.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>The two-stage design clarifies how baseline risk profiles relate to pandemic trajectories. The Cuba–Europe separation is stable under the perturbations examined, while within-Europe distances are more variable; accordingly, we refrain from ranking Italy, Spain, and Germany. Reduced separability among the European cases is consistent with increasing financialization/marketisation and policy convergence in their health systems, which may compress structural differences in delivery and epidemic response and thus limits discrimination in the PTM space at our sample size and resolution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"15 1","pages":"Article 101120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-dimensional scaling of healthcare system profiles and pandemic outcomes in Cuba, Spain, Italy, and Germany\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Orlando\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.101120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives:</h3><div>This study examines how baseline health risks in Cuba, Spain, Italy, and Germany relate to COVID-19 mortality trajectories and to identify system features associated with better outcomes. While previous comparative studies have emphasized GDP levels or hospital capacity, few have systematically linked baseline health risks and health-system models to pandemic trajectories; this study addresses that gap.</div></div><div><h3>Study design:</h3><div>Cross-country observational study of four contrasting health system models using publicly available secondary data (Cuba: state-socialist; Spain/Italy: Mediterranean welfare states; Germany: corporatist Bismarckian).</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>We applied Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) in two complementary stages: (i) a cross-sectional map of <em>Baseline Health Indicators</em> (BHI; eight pre-pandemic variables), and (ii) a trajectory-based map of <em>Pandemic Trajectory Metrics</em> (PTM; monthly reported indicators, 2020–2023) using correlation distance.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The BHI stage revealed distinct pre-pandemic configurations: Cuba separated on higher cardiovascular mortality and male smoking; Spain on elevated female smoking; Italy on older age structure and higher population density; and Germany on demographic pressures with higher diabetes prevalence. In the PTM stage, Cuba recorded the lowest cumulative COVID-19 mortality among the four (776 deaths per million), whereas European countries reached 2070–3261 deaths per million.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>The two-stage design clarifies how baseline risk profiles relate to pandemic trajectories. The Cuba–Europe separation is stable under the perturbations examined, while within-Europe distances are more variable; accordingly, we refrain from ranking Italy, Spain, and Germany. Reduced separability among the European cases is consistent with increasing financialization/marketisation and policy convergence in their health systems, which may compress structural differences in delivery and epidemic response and thus limits discrimination in the PTM space at our sample size and resolution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883725001480\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883725001480","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-dimensional scaling of healthcare system profiles and pandemic outcomes in Cuba, Spain, Italy, and Germany
Objectives:
This study examines how baseline health risks in Cuba, Spain, Italy, and Germany relate to COVID-19 mortality trajectories and to identify system features associated with better outcomes. While previous comparative studies have emphasized GDP levels or hospital capacity, few have systematically linked baseline health risks and health-system models to pandemic trajectories; this study addresses that gap.
Study design:
Cross-country observational study of four contrasting health system models using publicly available secondary data (Cuba: state-socialist; Spain/Italy: Mediterranean welfare states; Germany: corporatist Bismarckian).
Methods:
We applied Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) in two complementary stages: (i) a cross-sectional map of Baseline Health Indicators (BHI; eight pre-pandemic variables), and (ii) a trajectory-based map of Pandemic Trajectory Metrics (PTM; monthly reported indicators, 2020–2023) using correlation distance.
Results:
The BHI stage revealed distinct pre-pandemic configurations: Cuba separated on higher cardiovascular mortality and male smoking; Spain on elevated female smoking; Italy on older age structure and higher population density; and Germany on demographic pressures with higher diabetes prevalence. In the PTM stage, Cuba recorded the lowest cumulative COVID-19 mortality among the four (776 deaths per million), whereas European countries reached 2070–3261 deaths per million.
Conclusions:
The two-stage design clarifies how baseline risk profiles relate to pandemic trajectories. The Cuba–Europe separation is stable under the perturbations examined, while within-Europe distances are more variable; accordingly, we refrain from ranking Italy, Spain, and Germany. Reduced separability among the European cases is consistent with increasing financialization/marketisation and policy convergence in their health systems, which may compress structural differences in delivery and epidemic response and thus limits discrimination in the PTM space at our sample size and resolution.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments.
HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology.
Topics covered by HPT will include:
- Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems
- Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches
- National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives
- Cross-border eHealth including health tourism
- The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare
- Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies
- Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies
- Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making
- Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in)
- Regulation and health economics