Chiropractic & Manual Therapies最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Characteristics of Australian and New Zealand osteopaths who treat patients presenting with non-musculoskeletal complaints: outcomes from two practice-based research networks. 澳大利亚和新西兰整骨医生治疗非肌肉骨骼疾病患者的特点:两个基于实践的研究网络的结果。
IF 2 4区 医学
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2025-08-23 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00598-9
Brett Vaughan, Francesco Cerritelli, Jerry Draper-Rodi, Jack Feehan, Ana Paula A Ferreira, Michael Fleischmann, Gopi McLeod, Cindy McIntyre, Chantal Morin, Lee Muddle, Oliver P Thomson, Loïc Treffel, Nicholas Tripodi, Kesava Kovanur Sampath, Niklas Sinderholm Sposato, Amie Steel, Jon Adams
{"title":"Characteristics of Australian and New Zealand osteopaths who treat patients presenting with non-musculoskeletal complaints: outcomes from two practice-based research networks.","authors":"Brett Vaughan, Francesco Cerritelli, Jerry Draper-Rodi, Jack Feehan, Ana Paula A Ferreira, Michael Fleischmann, Gopi McLeod, Cindy McIntyre, Chantal Morin, Lee Muddle, Oliver P Thomson, Loïc Treffel, Nicholas Tripodi, Kesava Kovanur Sampath, Niklas Sinderholm Sposato, Amie Steel, Jon Adams","doi":"10.1186/s12998-025-00598-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-025-00598-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Australian and New Zealand osteopaths predominantly manage musculoskeletal complaints using a variety of modalities including manual therapy, exercise and lifestyle and occupational advice. There appears to be a small percentage of patients who seek osteopathy care for non-musculoskeletal issues such as conditions affecting the gastrointestinal tract. The evidence base for osteopathic treatment as part of the management of such conditions is equivocal. The aim of this study was to describe the practice of Australian and New Zealand osteopaths who report often treating patients with non-musculoskeletal complaints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a secondary analysis of data from the Australian and New Zealand osteopathy practice-based research networks (PBRNs) collected in Australia from July to December 2016 and in New Zealand from August to December 2018. Respondents to the PBRN baseline surveys were asked to provide information about their demographic, patient and clinical management characteristics. One of these characteristics was the frequency of treating patients presenting with non-musculoskeletal complaints. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to inform regression modelling of significant predictors of often managing non-musculoskeletal complaints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1254 osteopath participants from Australia and NZ, 13.5% (n = 170) reported often treating patients presenting with non-MSK complaints. Significant predictors of often treating patients presenting with non-MSK complaints were often using visceral (ORa 3.54 95%CI 2.15-5.85) and Osteopathy in the Cranial Field (OCF) (ORa 2.05 95%CI 1.20-3.51) techniques, and often treating patients up to the age of 3 years (ORa 3.05 95%CI 1.89-4.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than one in ten Australian and New Zealand osteopaths report often treating patients presenting with non-MSK complaints, with the dominant manual therapy approaches used being visceral techniques and OCF. This study provides a unique insight into the characteristics of osteopaths who often treat patients presenting with non-MSK complaints. Further research is required to examine if patients seek out care from an osteopath specifically for non-MSK complaints or primarily seek out care from an osteopath for MSK complaints but are managed for non-MSK complaints as a secondary consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"33 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374476/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144974808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Variation in use of radiographs in chiropractic care: a cross-sectional study. 脊椎指压治疗中x线片使用的变化:一项横断面研究。
IF 2 4区 医学
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00594-z
R K Jensen, S Heilmann, J N Thomsen, J K Hansen, O Arnbjerg, C Bell, T S Jensen
{"title":"Variation in use of radiographs in chiropractic care: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"R K Jensen, S Heilmann, J N Thomsen, J K Hansen, O Arnbjerg, C Bell, T S Jensen","doi":"10.1186/s12998-025-00594-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-025-00594-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There appears to be a substantial variation in the use of radiographs in chiropractic clinics, but the reasons for this variation are not well understood. This study examined the use of radiography over a one-year period in Danish chiropractic clinics and explored its associations with clinic- and chiropractor-level characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on the number of unique patients consulting a chiropractor and those receiving radiography between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2022 were obtained from a Danish national registry. Information on clinics including the number of chiropractors, geographical region, multidisciplinary status, and types of other healthcare professionals employed, as well as chiropractor characteristics (age, gender, seniority, and country of education) was collected from clinic websites and a national register of Danish healthcare professionals. The proportion of patients undergoing radiography was calculated for each clinic. Associations with clinic and chiropractic characteristics were tested using chi-square or t-tests, as appropriate. Characteristics were also compared between clinics with and without in-house radiographic imaging facilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 237 chiropractic clinics and 657 chiropractors were included. The mean age of chiropractors was 47 years (SD 12.8), 53% were women and 61.8% were educated in Denmark. Clinics with radiographic facilities (n = 161, 68%) tended to be larger and more likely to be multidisciplinary than clinics without (n = 76, 32%). Among clinics with radiographic facilities, the proportion of patients receiving radiography was 9.5% (95% CI 8.4-10.6%), ranging from 0 to 39%. No associations were found between radiography use in clinics with in-house radiographic facilities and clinic or chiropractic characteristics. In clinics without radiographic facilities, only 1.1% of patients were referred for radiography via chiropractic service codes, although this is likely an underestimation, as referrals to public hospitals were not captured.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although considerable variation in radiography use was observed across Danish chiropractic clinics with radiographic facilities, this was not explained by measured clinic or chiropractic characteristics. The true extent of radiography use in clinics without in-house facilities remains uncertain. Further research into clinical decision-making is needed to support evidence-based, transparent and consistent practice, potentially using qualitative methods to better understand the reasons behind the observed variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"33 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369156/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144974503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Continuing education for the chiropractic profession: a cross-sectional study analyzing potential barriers to future chiropractic academic and research development. 脊骨按摩专业的继续教育:一项分析未来脊骨按摩学术和研究发展潜在障碍的横断面研究。
IF 2 4区 医学
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00596-x
Shannon Schueren, Dean L Smith, Christopher A Malaya, Jeffrey A King, Nathan D Schilaty
{"title":"Continuing education for the chiropractic profession: a cross-sectional study analyzing potential barriers to future chiropractic academic and research development.","authors":"Shannon Schueren, Dean L Smith, Christopher A Malaya, Jeffrey A King, Nathan D Schilaty","doi":"10.1186/s12998-025-00596-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12998-025-00596-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuing education (CE) for chiropractors is mandated by state licensing boards to ensure ongoing learning and to maintain professional excellence. While incorporating research into CE programs is crucial for practitioners to remain dynamic and evidence-based, conducting research and academic pursuits is necessary for further development of the profession. We hypothesized that fewer U.S. states would provide CE credit for the completion of research or higher-education teaching activities within the chiropractic profession compared to other health professions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Internet searches of publicly available state board websites for each profession was undertaken with a cross-sectional study design between 12/19/2024 and 03/01/2025. Data extraction focused on whether CE was granted for research (publication and/or peer review) as well as academic pursuits (higher education and/or CE instruction). Descriptive statistics determined the frequency of states allowing CE while Fisher's Exact test and one-way ANOVA was performed to compare states granting CE credits for research and teaching as well as comparisons among the professions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 16 US states allow DCs to claim research activities for CE credit while 50% allow teaching for CE credit. This is significantly lower (p < 0.001) than ATs, DOs, and MDs where teaching and research activities are accepted for CE credit in all states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Precluding research and higher-education teaching opportunities for CE presents a potential barrier to chiropractic academic and research development at present and in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"33 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372364/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144974783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spinal manipulation/mobilization: past, present, future. 脊柱操作/活动:过去,现在,未来。
IF 2 4区 医学
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2025-08-12 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00597-w
Martin Descarreaux, Jan Hartvigsen, Sidney M Rubinstein, Stephen M Perle
{"title":"Spinal manipulation/mobilization: past, present, future.","authors":"Martin Descarreaux, Jan Hartvigsen, Sidney M Rubinstein, Stephen M Perle","doi":"10.1186/s12998-025-00597-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12998-025-00597-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This commentary brings the 2021-2023thematic series Spinal Manipulation/Mobilization: Past, Present, Future to a close. The 23 papers published in the series contribute to our understanding of spinal manipulation/mobilization(SMT) in a few important domains. They provide evidence on the biomechanics, clinical science, research methods, and policy implications of SMT. They present suggested training, research and policy changes that can be made to improve health care delivery and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"33 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12345012/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144838284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in demographics and clinical outcomes in older, middle-aged, and younger adults with low back pain receiving chiropractic care. 老年、中年和年轻腰痛患者接受捏脊治疗的人口统计学差异和临床结果。
IF 2 4区 医学
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00589-w
L A Hansen, J Hartvigsen, R K Jensen
{"title":"Differences in demographics and clinical outcomes in older, middle-aged, and younger adults with low back pain receiving chiropractic care.","authors":"L A Hansen, J Hartvigsen, R K Jensen","doi":"10.1186/s12998-025-00589-w","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12998-025-00589-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evidence on age-related differences in outcomes in patients seeking chiropractic care for low back pain is limited. The aims of this study were to (i) to explore differences in patient characteristics and symptoms between older, middle-aged and younger patients with LBP seeking chiropractic care, (ii) to investigate whether age was associated with changes in physical function at 2, 13 and 52 weeks follow-up and (iii) to evaluate if other specific demographic variables were associated with changes in physical function over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cohort study (November 2016 to December 2018) used data from the Danish Chiropractic Low Back Pain Cohort (ChiCo). Participants ≥ 18 years seeking chiropractic care for new onset low back pain were categorised into three age groups: young adults (< 40 years), middle-aged adults (40-59 years), and older adults (≥ 60 years). Disability was assessed at baseline and at 2, 13 and 52 weeks follow-up using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Associations between age groups and disability outcomes were analysed using linear regression, while associations with demographics, and social and psychological factors were examined using backward stepwise linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2777 participants were included. At baseline, there were no significant differences in disability scores between age groups. Older patients reported more non-musculoskeletal comorbidities and prescription pain medication use, compared to younger and middle-aged patients. Younger patients showed higher depression and anxiety levels compared to middle-aged and older patients. Younger and middle-aged patients more frequently reported multiple musculoskeletal comorbidities than older patients. At all follow-ups, older patients had slightly higher disability scores and showed less improvement over time compared to younger and middle-aged patients, indicating a modest association between age and poorer outcomes. Higher baseline disability, more musculoskeletal comorbidities, worse self-reported health, and higher depression scores were more consistently associated with less improvement in disability over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older chiropractic patients with low back pain had slightly higher disability scores compared to younger and middle-aged patients, but age was not the strongest factor associated with disability outcomes. Baseline disability, depression, self-perceived general health, and MSK comorbidities were more consistently linked to higher disability scores across all follow-up time points.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"33 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315371/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144761865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic ability of the sTarT back screening tool for disability and pain intensity outcomes in older adults with low back pain seeking chiropractic care: a multi-national external validation study. sTarT背部筛查工具对寻求脊椎指压治疗的老年腰痛患者的残疾和疼痛强度结果的预后能力:一项多国外部验证研究。
IF 2 4区 医学
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2025-07-30 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00592-1
Yanyan Fu, Alan D Jenks, Sidney M Rubinstein, Katie de Luca, Iben Axen, Bart W Koes, Alessandro Chiarotto
{"title":"Prognostic ability of the sTarT back screening tool for disability and pain intensity outcomes in older adults with low back pain seeking chiropractic care: a multi-national external validation study.","authors":"Yanyan Fu, Alan D Jenks, Sidney M Rubinstein, Katie de Luca, Iben Axen, Bart W Koes, Alessandro Chiarotto","doi":"10.1186/s12998-025-00592-1","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12998-025-00592-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is common among older adults, and it is a frequent reason for seeking chiropractic care. The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) was developed to stratify patients with LBP into low, medium, and high-risk treatment pathways, so that the treatment can be matched to each participant's risk profile. But its prognostic performance varies across settings and populations. No studies have focused on the SBT's utility as a stratified-care tool in older adults with LBP in a chiropractic setting. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the ability of the SBT to predict three-, six-, and 12-month disability and pain outcomes in older adults (≥55 years) with a new episode of LBP consulting chiropractors in the Netherlands, Sweden, and Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of the Back Complaints in Older Adults - Chiropractic (BACE-C) cohort. Participants visiting chiropractors with LBP completed baseline questionnaires for demographic and clinical characteristics, including the SBT. Follow-up questionnaires assessed disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)) and pain intensity (11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)). \"No improvement\" on disability and pain intensity was defined as less than 30% reduction in baseline scores. We used logistic regression models to estimate discrimination metrics including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Subgroup analyses were conducted by country, sex, and LBP duration; sensitivity analyses employed alternative \"no improvement\" definitions and linear regression on continuous outcome scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 738 participants were included. The mean age of the study sample was 66.2 ± 7.5 years and 50.9% of the participants were female. The SBT showed poor discrimination for predicting no improvement in disability and pain intensity. All AUC values were below 0.60 regardless of whether SBT risk subgroups (i.e. low/medium/high) or the SBT sum score were used. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not meaningfully improve discrimination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SBT presented limited prognostic ability to predict outcomes of disability and pain intensity in older adults with LBP in a chiropractic setting. These findings suggest insufficient evidence for the prognostic ability of the SBT risk stratification tool. Future research should explore reasons behind the limited prognostic accuracy and consider potential modifications or alternative tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"33 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312513/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144754926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ultrasound measurements of lumbar spinous process movement during flexion distraction manipulation: a preliminary descriptive cross-sectional study with healthy participants. 屈曲牵张操作期间腰椎棘突运动的超声测量:一项健康参与者的初步描述性横断面研究。
IF 2 4区 医学
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2025-07-25 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00593-0
Ralph Kruse, Maruti Gudavalli, Bret White, Stacey Rider, Dean Greenwood, Casey Rogers
{"title":"Ultrasound measurements of lumbar spinous process movement during flexion distraction manipulation: a preliminary descriptive cross-sectional study with healthy participants.","authors":"Ralph Kruse, Maruti Gudavalli, Bret White, Stacey Rider, Dean Greenwood, Casey Rogers","doi":"10.1186/s12998-025-00593-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12998-025-00593-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low back pain is a prevalent condition that impairs productivity and quality of life. While spinal manipulative therapy reduces pain and disability, the biomechanical mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear. This study utilized diagnostic ultrasound to measure lumbo-sacral spinous process movement (L3-S1) during Cox<sup>®</sup> Flexion Distraction manipulation, Protocol I, providing insight into spinal intersegmental motion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed a convenience sample of generally healthy participants, aged 21 years and older, from both sexes and various ethnicities who reported no back pain. Participants were recruited through announcements and flyers posted around the Keiser university campus. Data was collected from June-August 2022. The participants were positioned prone on a specialized flexion distraction chiropractic table. Ultrasound imaging was performed to measure the spinous process distance from L3-S1 before the procedure, during flexion distraction utilizing standard Protocol I, and post-procedure. Ultrasound measurements were recorded by identifying the tips of the spinous processes and distances between L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1, before, during, and after flexion distraction. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests to evaluate spinous process distances pre- and during Cox<sup>®</sup> Flexion distraction, independent t-tests for gender differences, and linear regression for body mass index (BMI) and age correlations with changes in separation distance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty participants (16 male, 14 female) with a mean age of 32.5 years (Standard deviation [SD] 10.4), mean weight of 69.2 Kg (SD 11.8), mean height of 169.0 cm (SD 8.9), and BMI of 23.9 underwent Cox<sup>®</sup> Flexion Distraction Protocol I. Spinous process separation increased during treatment: L3-L4 (0.13 mm), L4-L5 (0.13 mm), and L5-S1 (0.16 mm). Paired ttests showed significant pre- and during-treatment changes (p < 0.001), with moderate correlations to BMI (R²=0.61) and age (R²=0.58). Gender differences did not reveal statistical differences in separation distances at all lumbar levels measured (p > 0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound imaging revealed significant separation of spinous processes at L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 during Cox<sup>®</sup> Flexion Distraction Protocol I. Statistical analyses showed separation correlated moderately with age and BMI that was unaffected by gender. Future studies should assess this technique's relevance in patients with low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"33 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12291367/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144718918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cross-sectional analysis of online information on low back pain across South African chiropractic websites. 横跨南非脊椎按摩网站的腰痛在线信息的横断面分析。
IF 2 4区 医学
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00591-2
J Redelinghuys, F Ismail
{"title":"Cross-sectional analysis of online information on low back pain across South African chiropractic websites.","authors":"J Redelinghuys, F Ismail","doi":"10.1186/s12998-025-00591-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12998-025-00591-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rising low back pain (LBP) prevalence and increased patient reliance on online health resources necessitate critically evaluating how chiropractic websites represent common musculoskeletal conditions. This study analyzed LBP-related content shared by South African chiropractic websites to assess the credibility of available information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional content evaluation was conducted between 2 June 2024 and 21 July 2024 on 333 South African chiropractic websites, identified using a Google search cross-referenced with the Allied Health Professions Council of South Africa registry. Four key areas were evaluated, including (1) contributors to, (2) diagnostic approaches for, (3) possible treatment approaches for and 4) indicators for seeking professional treatment for LBP. Sociodemographic factors such as educational background, sex, and practice ownership structure were considered. A pilot ensured data collection standardization. Content and statistical analysis explored information, citation frequency and identified trends in chiropractic online health communication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed significant variability of LBP-related content across chiropractic websites. Of the 333 websites analyzed, most chiropractors were trained at UJ (58.1%) and DUT (29.2%). Sex distribution showed 55.3% were female-owned. The highest concentration of chiropractic websites was in Gauteng, the Western Cape, and KwaZulu-Natal. Regarding the 4 key areas, mechanical contributors to LBP were predominant (65.2%), diagnostic approaches (56.7%), treatment approaches (79.6%) and explicit guidance on when to seek care (47.4%) was mentioned in the websites. Only 13.5% of websites cite sources of the information shared. Chiropractors trained at UJ and DUT emphasized evidence-based treatments, while those trained internationally referenced alternative methods. Sex differences showed males focusing on diagnostic tools and treatment protocols, while females emphasized holistic care and lifestyle modifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the need for improved LBP information quality and consistency on South African chiropractic websites. The structured subjective content evaluation revealed notable gaps in content depth, specificity, and evidence-based citations. Sociodemographic factors, including educational background and sex, influenced the presentation of information. Future research should prioritize developing standardized and evidence-based guidelines for chiropractic websites to improve access to online health information and patient education and ensure accurate, reliable health information delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"33 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278598/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144683424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
No drugs, more sex? And Rock'n Roll: effective non-operative treatments and practical management strategies for older adults with lumbar spinal stenosis. 不吸毒,多做爱?摇滚乐:有效的非手术治疗和老年人腰椎管狭窄的实用管理策略。
IF 2 4区 医学
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00590-3
Carlo Ammendolia
{"title":"No drugs, more sex? And Rock'n Roll: effective non-operative treatments and practical management strategies for older adults with lumbar spinal stenosis.","authors":"Carlo Ammendolia","doi":"10.1186/s12998-025-00590-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12998-025-00590-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lumbar spinal stenosis is a growing problem among older adults, associated with significant disability and socio-economic burden. Neurogenic claudication is the most common clinical syndrome caused by LSS with pain being the predominant symptom and limited walking the main impairment. Lumbar spinal stenosis can also impact sexual function in older adults, necessitating greater awareness of this association. Pain and impaired function can lead to psychosocial distress, including hopelessness, anxiety, and isolation, further compounding disability. Recent clinical practice guidelines recommend non-operative treatment as the first-line approach, including manual therapy, exercise, and education. However, these guidelines lack details on the practical application of these interventions in clinical practice. This narrative review explores the epidemiology of lumbar spinal stenosis, the evidence supporting non-operative care, and practical management strategies. It also highlights the relationship between sexual dysfunction and lumbar spinal stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"33 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12278609/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144683425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dry cupping therapy combined with conventional therapy does not provide additional benefits over conventional therapy alone in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized trial. 一项随机试验表明,在非特异性慢性腰痛患者中,干拔罐联合常规疗法并没有比单独常规疗法提供更多的益处。
IF 2 4区 医学
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Pub Date : 2025-06-16 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00588-x
Renjie Xu, Yun Yang, Chengjie Yan, Zhou Li, Chaochen Zhao, Jingming Ma, Guangxu Xu
{"title":"Dry cupping therapy combined with conventional therapy does not provide additional benefits over conventional therapy alone in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized trial.","authors":"Renjie Xu, Yun Yang, Chengjie Yan, Zhou Li, Chaochen Zhao, Jingming Ma, Guangxu Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12998-025-00588-x","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12998-025-00588-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) is a complex and heterogeneous condition, and it is necessary to explore new treatment approaches. We evaluated whether the addition of dry cupping therapy to guideline‑based conventional therapy would further improve clinical outcomes in CNLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six patients with CNLBP were recruitedand randomly divided into two groups: the control group and the intervention group. The intervention group received cupping therapy in addition to the control group (core stabilization exercises, spinal manipulation and education) for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity. Secondary outcomes were the Roland Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), and pressure pain thresholds (PPT) at bilateral Shenshu (BL23), Qihaishu (BL24), and Dachangshu (BL25) acupuncture points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At week 4 the between‑group difference in resting pain was trivial (median difference 0.0 cm, 95% CI - 1.0 to 1.0). Neither clinically important nor statistically significant differences were detected in disability or PPTs. Both groups improved substantially from baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this randomized trial, adding dry cupping to conventional therapy offered no additional benefit over conventional therapy alone for pain, disability or PPT in CNLBP. Larger, multicentre trials with longer follow‑up and standardized negative pressures are warranted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR2300069398, http://www.chictr.org.cn , Registration Date: March 15, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"33 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12168300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144310556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信