Chiropractic & Manual Therapies最新文献

{"title":"Manual therapies in cystic fibrosis care: a scoping review.","authors":"Niklas Sposato Sinderholm, Kristofer Bjerså","doi":"10.1186/s12998-023-00478-0","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12998-023-00478-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the use of manual therapies (MT) for pain, respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function in cystic fibrosis (CF) care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search with a systematic approach was conducted by two independent reviewers, using the databases Medline, PubMed, Scopus and Cinahl from their respective inception dates to March 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 199 publications were initially screened by title and abstract, after which 190 were excluded. Following a full-text review of the remaining articles, six studies with a total of 234 participants were included. Decreased pain levels following MT were observed in two studies and, in three studies, patient reports on improvement in ease of breathing and peak airflow were presented. No significant effects on spirometry measures were observed and none of the included studies investigated respiratory muscle strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current research on MT in CF care indicates positive trends based on subjective measures. However, research in this context is sparse and disparate in terms of both interventions and methodology. Further investigations including MT as part of multimodal interventions are therefore suggested before any specific recommendations for clinical implementation of MT in CF can be provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"31 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9903555/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9321016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A qualitative study exploring perceived barriers and enablers to fidelity of training and delivery for an intervention to reduce non-indicated imaging for low back pain.","authors":"Daphne To,&nbsp;Diana De Carvalho,&nbsp;Andrea Pike,&nbsp;Rebecca Lawrence,&nbsp;Holly Etchegary,&nbsp;Andrea M Patey,&nbsp;Elaine Toomey,&nbsp;Amanda Hall","doi":"10.1186/s12998-023-00480-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00480-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-specific low back pain (LBP) commonly presents to primary care, where inappropriate use of imaging remains common despite guideline recommendations against its routine use. Little is known about strategies to enhance intervention fidelity (i.e., whether interventions were implemented as intended) for interventions developed to reduce non-indicated imaging for LBP.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to inform the development of an intervention to reduce non-indicated imaging among general practitioners (GPs) and chiropractors in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), Canada. The study objectives are: [1] To explore perceived barriers and enablers to enhancing fidelity of training of GPs and chiropractors to deliver a proposed intervention to reduce non-indicated imaging for LBP and [2] To explore perceived barriers and enablers to enhancing fidelity of delivery of the proposed intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploratory, qualitative study was conducted with GPs and chiropractors in NL. The interview guide was informed by the National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium fidelity checklist; data analysis was guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Participant quotes were coded into TDF domains, belief statements were generated at each domain, and domains relevant to enhancing fidelity of provider training or intervention delivery were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included five GPs and five chiropractors from urban and rural settings. Barriers and enablers to enhancing fidelity to provider training related to seven TDF domains: [1] Beliefs about capabilities, [2] Optimism, [3] Reinforcement, [4] Memory, attention, and decision processes, [5] Environmental context and resources, [6] Emotion, and [7] Behavioural regulation. Barriers and enablers to enhancing fidelity to intervention delivery related to seven TDF domains: [1] Beliefs about capabilities, [2] Optimism, [3] Goals, [4] Memory, attention, and decision processes, [5] Environmental context and resources, [6] Social influences, and [7] Behavioural regulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The largest perceived barrier to attending training was time; perceived enablers were incentives and flexible training. Patient pressure, time, and established habits were perceived barriers to delivering the intervention as intended. Participants suggested enhancement strategies to improve their ability to deliver the intervention as intended, including reminders and check-ins with researchers. Most participants perceived intervention fidelity as important. These results may aid in the development of a more feasible and pragmatic intervention to reduce non-indicated imaging for GPs and chiropractors in NL.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"31 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9890790/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10761815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Description of recurrent headaches in 7-14-year-old children: Baseline data from a randomized clinical trial on effectiveness of chiropractic spinal manipulation in children with recurrent headaches.","authors":"Kristina Boe Dissing,&nbsp;Werner Vach,&nbsp;Susanne Lynge,&nbsp;Henrik Wulff Christensen,&nbsp;Lise Hestbaek","doi":"10.1186/s12998-023-00479-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00479-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Headaches in children are poorly described and diagnosing can be challenging. Objectives are: (1) to describe headache characteristics and child characteristics, (2) to explore whether data can suggest a more diverse way to categorize headaches than traditionally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline data for a clinical trial included a questionnaire and a physical screening. Children's characteristics and detailed description of headache symptoms were provided. Children were classified for migraine or tension-type-headache based on questionnaire data reported by children and parents. This required to apply slightly modified classification criteria and a \"non-classifiable\" group was added. Severity and symptoms, related to the migraine versus tension type distinction, were investigated to define a migraine-tension-type-index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>253 children were included. Mean pain intensity was 5.9/10. Over 2/3 of the children had headache for > 1 year, and > 50% for several days/week. Half of the children were non-classifiable, 22% were classified as migraine and 23% as tension-type headache. A migraine-tension-type-index was constructed and describes a continuous spectrum rather than two distinct groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children with recurrent headaches are often severely affected. A questionnaire-based classification appeared feasible to distinguish between migraine and tension-type headaches in children but leaving many children unclassified. A migraine-tension-type-index can be generated allowing to regard the traditional distinction as a continuum (including mixed headache), and potentially serving as an instrument to improve headache management. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02684916.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"31 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9887886/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10761813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A two-year follow-up: Twitter activity regarding misinformation about spinal manipulation, chiropractic care and boosting immunity during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Gregory Neil Kawchuk, Steen Harsted, Jan Hartvigsen, Luana Nyirö, Casper Glissmann Nim","doi":"10.1186/s12998-022-00469-7","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12998-022-00469-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is offered by many health professions, most often by chiropractors. While SMT can be effective for some musculoskeletal disorders, there is no evidence that SMT improves human immunity in a clinically meaningful way. Despite this, we showed previously that Twitter misinformation about chiropractic/SMT  improving immunity increased sharply at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we perform a two-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We previously employed specialized software (i.e. Talkwalker) to search the entirety of Twitter activity in the  months before and after the COVID-19 pandemic was declared (March 11, 2020). In this paper, we conducted follow-up searches over two successive 12 month periods using terms related to SMT, immunity and chiropractic. The resulting tweets were then coded into those promoting/refuting a relation between SMT and immunity (tone) and messaging about chiropractic/interventions (content). Further analyses were performed to subcategorize tweet content, tally likes, retweets and followers, and evaluate refuting tweets and the country of origin. Finally, we created a chronology of Twitter activity superimposed with dates of promoting or refuting activities undertaken by chiropractic organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 27 month study period, Twitter activity peaked on March 31, 2020 then declined continuously. As in our first paper, our follow-up data showed that (1) the ratio of refuting/promoting tweets remained constant and (2) tweets that refuted a relationship between SMT and immunity were substantially more liked, retweeted and followed than those promoting. We also observed that promoting tweets suggesting that SMT improves immunity decreased more rapidly. Overwhelmingly, promoting tweets originated in the USA while refuting tweets originated in Canada, Europe and Australia. The timing of the decline in peak Twitter activity, together with a parallel decline in tweets claiming that SMT improves immunity, was coincident with initiatives by chiropractic organizations and regulators targeting misinformation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overwhelmingly, Twitter activity during the COVID-19 pandemic focussed on refuting a relation between chiropractic/SMT and immunity. A decline in Twitter activity promoting a relation between SMT and immunity was observed to coincide with initiatives from chiropractic organizations and regulators to refute these claims. The majority of misinformation about this topic is generated in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"31 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870654/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10619425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Attitudes, skills and implementation of evidence-based practice: a national cross-sectional survey of licensed naprapaths in Sweden.","authors":"Tobias Sundberg,&nbsp;Matthew J Leach,&nbsp;Stina Lilje,&nbsp;Oliver P Thomson,&nbsp;Gary Fryer,&nbsp;Per J Palmgren,&nbsp;Jon Adams,&nbsp;Eva Skillgate","doi":"10.1186/s12998-023-00473-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00473-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based practice (EBP) is fundamental to the delivery of high-quality, safe and effective health care. Naprapaths, manual therapy providers that specialize in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain and dysfunction, became a Swedish licensed health profession in 1994. This study investigated the attitudes, skills and implementation of EBP among licensed naprapaths in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Licensed naprapaths (n = 950) of Svenska Naprapatförbundet (the Swedish Naprapathy Association) were invited by email to take part in this cross-sectional anonymous online study using the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude and Utilisation Survey in February 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen percent (137/950) of invited naprapaths completed the survey. There was an approximately equal gender divide among responders; most were in the mid-career age range, practiced in city areas, and had a university or college certificate/diploma as their highest qualification. The majority of naprapaths agreed or strongly agreed that EBP was necessary in the practice of naprapathy, assisted them in making care decisions, and improved the quality of patient care. Naprapaths' self-reported skills in EBP were mostly in the moderate to moderate-high range. The majority of participating naprapaths reported infrequent implementation of EBP. Perceived minor or moderate barriers to EBP uptake included a lack of colleague support for EBP and a lack of relevant resources. Access to the internet and free online databases were reported as very useful enablers to improving EBP uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The licensed naprapaths participating in this survey reported positive attitudes toward EBP, moderate levels of EBP skills, and infrequent implementation of EBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"31 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9863153/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9472568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction: Why is the prevailing model of joint manipulation (still) incorrect?","authors":"David W Evans","doi":"10.1186/s12998-023-00476-2","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s12998-023-00476-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"31 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9854020/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10565141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessing cultural competency among Canadian chiropractors: a cross-sectional survey of Canadian Chiropractic Association members.","authors":"Nora Bakaa,&nbsp;Danielle Southerst,&nbsp;Pierre Côté,&nbsp;Luciana Macedo,&nbsp;Lisa C Carlesso,&nbsp;Joy MacDermid,&nbsp;Silvano Mior","doi":"10.1186/s12998-023-00474-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00474-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a paucity of research assessing cultural competency among Canadian chiropractors. Therefore, the aims of this study were to (1) measure cultural competency among Canadian chiropractors, (2) understand chiropractors' perspectives of challenges and attitudes regarding the delivery of chiropractic services to equity-seeking communities, and (3) assess contextual factors associated with cultural competency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of members of the Canadian Chiropractic Association (CCA) (May-July 2021). The survey instrument consisted of 57 questions related to demographics, cultural competency, perceptions about health disparities, and challenges in delivery of rehabilitation. Cultural competency was measured using the Cultural Awareness and Sensitivity and Cultural Competence Behaviours subscales of the Cultural Competence Assessment Instrument. We conducted a multivariate linear regression to assess factors that may be associated with cultural competency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3143 CCA members responded (response rate of 41%). Mean scores for the Cultural Awareness and Sensitivity subscale were 5.8/7 (95% CI 5.7; 5.8) and 4.2/7 (95% CI 4.1; 4.2) for the Cultural Competence Behaviour subscale. Most chiropractors (72-78%) reported observing important cultural health disparities across various care-related outcomes. Cost of services and language were identified as barriers to providing care to equity-seeking communities. Cultural Awareness and Sensitivity scores were weakly associated with gender (men), years of clinical practice, cultural health disparities, the statement \"I think some people have an agenda to look for discrimination even where it does not exist (DEI attitudes),\" race (Caucasian), and prior DEI training, (R² = 0.15, p < 0.0001). Cultural Competence Behaviour scores were weakly associated with race (Caucasian), cultural health disparities, prior DEI training, increased years of clinical experience, and higher Cultural Awareness and Sensitivity scores (R² = 0.19, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides the first description of cultural competency within the chiropractic profession in Canada. Findings suggest a gap between knowledge and behaviour and uncover several barriers and challenges that may inform the development of profession-specific training in cultural competence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"31 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9835226/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9335785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The effect of lumbar spinal manipulation on biomechanical factors and perceived transient pain during prolonged sitting: a laboratory-controlled cross-sectional study.","authors":"D E De Carvalho,&nbsp;J P Callaghan","doi":"10.1186/s12998-022-00472-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00472-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal manipulation has been shown to affect muscle activity, posture, and pain. To date, no studies have examined the effect of manipulation on biomechanical factors during sitting. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effect of lumbar spinal manipulation on trunk muscle activation, spine posture and movements, and perceived ratings of transient pain in asymptomatic adults during prolonged office sitting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty healthy adults were recruited for a single laboratory session that included a standardized office sitting/data entry protocol (120 min total, 3 blocks of 40 min). Data were collected between July and August 2012. The first block (baseline) was immediately followed by two experimental blocks. Prior to the start of each experimental block, participants were transferred to a therapy plinth and placed side lying (right side down), and a random presentation of either a control or high velocity low amplitude thrust directed at L4/L5 was delivered. Continuous measures of muscle activity, spine posture, and spine movements were recorded throughout the sitting trials. Perceived transient pain was measured by visual analogue scale at 10-min intervals (including immediately before and after the randomized maneuvers).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in spine or pelvic posture or perceived back pain following either the manipulation or control maneuvers. Significantly reduced muscle activity and increased shifts of the lumbar spine angle were identified in the block following manipulation compared to both baseline and post control blocks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spinal manipulation does not appear to have an immediate impact on spine or pelvic posture in healthy adults but does appear to reduce muscle activity and increase spine movement during sitting. Future work should replicate this study with a larger population in a field setting. It may be worthwhile to explore the implication of reduced muscle activation and increased spine movements during prolonged sitting for office workers that receive manipulations or mobilizations during their workday.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"30 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9805135/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9320993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An exploratory study to understand how people use Twitter to share experiences or information about spinal stenosis.","authors":"Lillian L C Li,&nbsp;Arnold Y L Wong,&nbsp;Gregory N Kawchuk","doi":"10.1186/s12998-022-00465-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00465-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal stenosis is a narrowing of the spinal canal that may compress neurological tissues resulting in pain and disability. Although previous qualitative studies have solicited data regarding the life experience of patients with spinal stenosis or their opinions on relevant non-surgical treatments, their data was collected from participants in a controlled setting. Therefore, it remains unclear whether patients' or caregivers' concerns/opinions about spinal stenosis would be different in a non-experimental environment. Since Twitter is a popular online platform for people to share information and interact, it may reveal people's thoughts and attitudes about spinal stenosis. This study aimed to identify tweets that are related to spinal stenosis on Twitter, and to categorize them into common themes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A social media monitoring and analysis software program (TalkWalker) was used to search relevant tweets using the keywords 'spinal stenosis' and 'stenosis' between 29 May 2019 and 24 June 2020. Two independent reviewers screened and conducted content analysis of the tweets and classified the tweets into different themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 510 identified tweets, 362 tweets met the selection criteria. Five themes were identified: (1) compromised physical, psychological, and social wellbeing (n = 173); (2) diverse treatment options (n = 69); (3) coping strategies (n = 30); (4) dissemination of scientific information (n = 86); and (5) health policy (n = 4). Most of the tweets revealed negative impacts of spinal stenosis on patients' physical and psychosocial wellbeing. People with spinal stenosis shared their experiences and sought helps from others, while some people used Twitter to disseminate relevant information and research findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study exploring Twitter using an online analytical tool to identify themes related to spinal stenosis. The approach not only helps understand people's concerns about spinal stenosis in an uncontrolled environment, but also can be adopted to monitor influences of diseases or public health education on Twitter users.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"30 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797109/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10773524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sports-related concussion: assessing the comprehension, collaboration, and contribution of chiropractors.","authors":"Nicholas Shannon,&nbsp;Jon Patricios","doi":"10.1186/s12998-022-00471-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-022-00471-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last 2 decades, sports-related concussion (SRC) awareness and management have evolved from an emphasis on complete cognitive and physical rest to evidence-based protocols and interventions. Chiropractors are primary care providers with exposure to athletes and teams in collision sports and, in addition, manage patients with concussion-like symptoms including neck pain, dizziness, and headache. With SRC frequently occurring in the absence of a medical practitioner, the role of allied health practitioners like chiropractors should be emphasised when it comes to the recognition, assessment, and management of SRC. This commentary discusses the potential contribution of chiropractors in SRC and the specific role their expertise in the cervical spine may play in symptom evaluation and management. A PubMed and Google scholar review of the chiropractic SRC literature suggests that the chiropractic profession appears under-represented in concussion research in athletic populations compared to other medical and allied health fields. This includes an absence of chiropractic clinicians with a focus on SRC participating in the Concussion in Sport Group (CISG) and the International Consensus Conferences on Concussion. Furthermore, with evolving evidence suggesting the importance of cervicogenic manifestations in SRC, there is an opportunity for chiropractors to participate in SRC diagnosis and management more fully and contribute scientifically to an area of specialised knowledge and training. With a dearth of chiropractic orientated SRC science, clinical SRC expertise, and clinical chiropractic representation in the CISG; it is incumbent on chiropractic clinicians and scientists to take up this opportunity through meaningful contribution and involvement in the SRC field.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"30 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793635/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10773522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}