Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine最新文献_第10页

Impact of Absorbable Nasal Polylactic Acid Implantation on Functional Septorhinoplasty Reimbursement Coding in the United States. 可吸收鼻腔聚乳酸植入对美国功能性鼻中隔成形术报销编码的影响。

IF 1.6 3区医学

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-26 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0325

Allen S Zhou, Robin W Lindsay

引用次数: 0

Invited Commentary on: "Bringing Inclusivity to 'Ethnic' Rhinoplasty: A Novel Anatomical Classification System," by Hall et al. 关于 "为'种族'鼻整形术带来包容性：新颖的解剖学分类系统 "的评论。

IF 1.6 3区医学

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0214

José Enrique Barrera, Katarina Gasic

引用次数: 0

Invited Commentary on: Santamaría-Gadea et al's "Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty After Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of the Technique, Results, and Complications". 特邀评论：Santamaría-Gadea 等人的 "鼻整形术后的非手术鼻整形术：技术、结果和并发症的系统回顾"。

IF 1.6 3区医学

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0267

Tatiana Correa, Scott R Owen

引用次数: 0

Response to: "Letter to the Editor: Buccal Fat Advancement-Transposition Flap for Reconstruction of Midface Volume Defects" with Dr. Van Damme. 回复"致编辑的信：颊脂垫-转移皮瓣重建中面部容积缺损"，与 Van Damme 医生合作。

IF 1.6 3区医学

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0341

Taha Z Shipchandler

引用次数: 0

Long-Term Outcomes of Projectometer Measurements During Rhinoplasty. 鼻整形术中投射计测量的长期效果

IF 1.6 3区医学

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0040

Harry H Ching, Lauren T Standiford, Brian J F Wong

引用次数: 0

Techniques for Creating Inconspicuous Facelift Scars: An Update. 创建不明显拉皮疤痕的技术：最新进展。

IF 1.6 3区医学

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-07 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0319

Russell W H Kridel, Megan L Swonke, Nicole Starr, Sean W Delaney

引用次数: 0

Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty After Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of the Technique, Results, and Complications. 鼻整形术后的非手术鼻整形术：技术、结果和并发症的系统回顾。

IF 1.6 3区医学

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0116

Alfonso Santamaría-Gadea, Carlota Sevil-Serrano, Javier Buendía Pérez, Franklin Mariño-Sánchez

{"title":"Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty After Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review of the Technique, Results, and Complications.","authors":"Alfonso Santamaría-Gadea, Carlota Sevil-Serrano, Javier Buendía Pérez, Franklin Mariño-Sánchez","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0116","DOIUrl":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0116","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Surgical rhinoplasty is a complex procedure with a high revision rate. Nonsurgical rhinoplasty (NSR) could avoid secondary rhinoplasty allowing the correction of postsurgical defects. A systematic review has been performed among adult patients who had previously undergone surgical rhinoplasty and now presenting for NSR with filler, demonstrated most common indications, fillers, and complications in this technique. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) system guidelines. Primary outcomes included indications for NSR in patients with prior rhinoplasty and complication rate. Secondary outcomes included filler material and degree of patient satisfaction. Results: Twenty articles met the inclusion criteria, obtaining 2,048 patients analyzed in the review. Hyaluronic acid was the most used filler, found in 67% of patients. Indications were highly variable, considering deformities of the middle third of the nose the most remarkable. A high degree of satisfaction was found in the analyzed studies and the rate of major complications was low. Discussion and Conclusions: NSR in patients with prior rhinoplasty is a useful option for correcting a range from subtle aesthetic defects to severe nasal deformities. However, this technique is not exempt from complications, since an increased risk of skin necrosis has been observed.[Box: see text].","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"68-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142127049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Complications of Pediatric Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis: A Comparison of Internal and External Devices. 小儿下颌骨牵引成骨术的并发症：内外装置的比较。

IF 1.6 3区医学

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0128

Emily R Disler, Tania Hassanzadeh, Mark A Vecchiotti, Alexander P Marston, Andrew R Scott

引用次数: 0

Are Tear Trough Fillers Really that Bad? 泪沟填充真的那么糟糕吗？

IF 1.6 3区医学

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0238

Sina J Torabi, Guy Massry, Babak Azizzadeh

引用次数: 0

Fasciocutaneous SMAS Island Flap for Large Facial Defect Reconstruction. 筋膜皮肤SMAS岛状皮瓣修复大面积面部缺损。

IF 1.6 3区医学

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2024.0194

Simon J Madorsky, Jonah S Brand, Orr A Meltzer

{"title":"Fasciocutaneous SMAS Island Flap for Large Facial Defect Reconstruction.","authors":"Simon J Madorsky, Jonah S Brand, Orr A Meltzer","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0194","DOIUrl":"10.1089/fpsam.2024.0194","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Large cutaneous defects of the face have traditionally been reconstructed with cervicofacial rotation flaps. Objective: To measure advancing distance and assess vascular reliability of superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) island flaps for reconstruction of large cutaneous facial defects. Methods: The study design was a retrospective case series of all patients who had undergone reconstruction of facial defects 3 cm or greater with fasciocutaneous SMAS island flaps from 2009 to 2023. Flap advancing distance and vascular compromise were analyzed. Results: The average patient age at the time of surgery was 69 (standard deviation [SD] 15) years with more males (n = 33, 92%) than females (n = 3, 8%). Of 36 patients, 18 had posterior defects, 16 had anterior defects, and 2 had defects straddling both regions. Fifteen cases had a full fasciocutaneous SMAS island flap, and 21 underwent the partial island modification. Flap ischemia occurred in three cases (8%). The mean flap advancing distance was 3.8 cm (SD 1.1). Of the 5 smokers, none had ischemia of the flap. The median follow-up time was 2 years (range 12-3,170 days). Conclusions: Fasciocutaneous SMAS island and partial island flaps are reliable options for the reconstruction of large cheek defects (3 cm or greater). Anterior pedicle blood supply is more reliable for defects anterior to the line from the lateral brow to the angle of the mandible, whereas the posterior pedicle is a better choice for defects posterior to that line.","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"84-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142808255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0