Payvand Kamrani, Monica Boen, Raheel Zubair, Steven H Dayan, Sabrina G Fabi
{"title":"优化鼻腔外观的神经调节器和能量设备综述。","authors":"Payvand Kamrani, Monica Boen, Raheel Zubair, Steven H Dayan, Sabrina G Fabi","doi":"10.1089/fpsam.2023.0316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Importance:</b> The demand for less invasive nasal procedures has been increasing, highlighting a gap in research on alternatives beyond fillers. This review explores the potential of neuromodulators and energy-based devices for nonsurgical rhinoplasty. <b>Observations:</b> Both botulinum toxin and energy-based devices used independently or alongside fillers have been studied for nasal shape adjustments. Neuromodulator injection of the depressor septi nasi can reduce nasal tip droop, which can reduce the appearance of a plunged nose. Treatment of the dilator naris can minimize alar flaring, giving the appearance of a thinner nasal tip. These methods primarily reported patient-reported outcomes. Energy-based devices have been used to address nasal skin quality and shape contouring, including resurfacing devices for rhinophyma with improvement in both physician and patient-reported outcomes. The 1470 nm laser achieved nasal reshaping after two sessions. Radiofrequency microneedling was notable for volumetric reduction in the nose (excluding nasal tip), confirmed by 3D imaging, lasting about 12 months. <b>Conclusions and Relevance:</b> The use of neuromodulators and energy-based devices may offer promising results for nasal reshaping. However, there is a need for further comparison studies using both objective measures such as 3D photography and physician and patient-reported outcomes, prior to establishing best practices for these techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":48487,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"183-190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Neuromodulators and Energy-Based Devices for Optimizing Nasal Appearance.\",\"authors\":\"Payvand Kamrani, Monica Boen, Raheel Zubair, Steven H Dayan, Sabrina G Fabi\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/fpsam.2023.0316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Importance:</b> The demand for less invasive nasal procedures has been increasing, highlighting a gap in research on alternatives beyond fillers. This review explores the potential of neuromodulators and energy-based devices for nonsurgical rhinoplasty. <b>Observations:</b> Both botulinum toxin and energy-based devices used independently or alongside fillers have been studied for nasal shape adjustments. Neuromodulator injection of the depressor septi nasi can reduce nasal tip droop, which can reduce the appearance of a plunged nose. Treatment of the dilator naris can minimize alar flaring, giving the appearance of a thinner nasal tip. These methods primarily reported patient-reported outcomes. Energy-based devices have been used to address nasal skin quality and shape contouring, including resurfacing devices for rhinophyma with improvement in both physician and patient-reported outcomes. The 1470 nm laser achieved nasal reshaping after two sessions. Radiofrequency microneedling was notable for volumetric reduction in the nose (excluding nasal tip), confirmed by 3D imaging, lasting about 12 months. <b>Conclusions and Relevance:</b> The use of neuromodulators and energy-based devices may offer promising results for nasal reshaping. However, there is a need for further comparison studies using both objective measures such as 3D photography and physician and patient-reported outcomes, prior to establishing best practices for these techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"183-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2023.0316\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2023.0316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
重要性:人们对鼻部微创手术的需求与日俱增,这凸显了除填充物以外的替代品研究方面的空白。本综述探讨了神经调节剂和基于能量的设备在非手术鼻整形中的应用潜力。观察结果:肉毒杆菌毒素和基于能量的设备可单独使用,也可与填充物一起用于鼻形调整。对鼻中隔抑制器注射神经调节剂可以减少鼻尖下垂,从而减少鼻子下垂的外观。对鼻翼扩张器的治疗可减少鼻翼外翻,使鼻尖看起来更薄。这些方法主要报告患者报告的结果。能量设备已被用于解决鼻部皮肤质量和形状轮廓问题,包括用于鼻赘瘤的换肤设备,医生和患者报告的结果均有所改善。1470 纳米激光在两次治疗后实现了鼻部重塑。射频微针疗法显著缩小了鼻部(不包括鼻尖)的体积,三维成像证实了这一点,持续时间约为 12 个月。结论与意义:使用神经调节剂和基于能量的设备可为鼻部整形带来良好效果。然而,在确定这些技术的最佳实践之前,还需要使用 3D 摄影等客观测量方法以及医生和患者报告的结果进行进一步的比较研究。
A Review of Neuromodulators and Energy-Based Devices for Optimizing Nasal Appearance.
Importance: The demand for less invasive nasal procedures has been increasing, highlighting a gap in research on alternatives beyond fillers. This review explores the potential of neuromodulators and energy-based devices for nonsurgical rhinoplasty. Observations: Both botulinum toxin and energy-based devices used independently or alongside fillers have been studied for nasal shape adjustments. Neuromodulator injection of the depressor septi nasi can reduce nasal tip droop, which can reduce the appearance of a plunged nose. Treatment of the dilator naris can minimize alar flaring, giving the appearance of a thinner nasal tip. These methods primarily reported patient-reported outcomes. Energy-based devices have been used to address nasal skin quality and shape contouring, including resurfacing devices for rhinophyma with improvement in both physician and patient-reported outcomes. The 1470 nm laser achieved nasal reshaping after two sessions. Radiofrequency microneedling was notable for volumetric reduction in the nose (excluding nasal tip), confirmed by 3D imaging, lasting about 12 months. Conclusions and Relevance: The use of neuromodulators and energy-based devices may offer promising results for nasal reshaping. However, there is a need for further comparison studies using both objective measures such as 3D photography and physician and patient-reported outcomes, prior to establishing best practices for these techniques.