Clinical Psychology Review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Comparison of effects of interventions to promote the mental health of parents of children with autism: A systematic review and network meta-analysis 促进自闭症儿童家长心理健康的干预措施效果比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
IF 13.7 1区 心理学
Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102508
Shuliang Mo , Fan Bu , Shujuan Bao , Zhou Yu
{"title":"Comparison of effects of interventions to promote the mental health of parents of children with autism: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Shuliang Mo ,&nbsp;Fan Bu ,&nbsp;Shujuan Bao ,&nbsp;Zhou Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102508","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102508","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders often face persistent challenges in social interaction and engage in repetitive and stereotyped behaviors. Parenting a child with autism can profoundly affect parents both physically and psychologically, potentially leading to negative impacts on their mental health. This study employs a network meta-analysis methodology to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of mental health interventions specifically designed for parents of autistic children. A total of 69 empirical intervention studies involving 4213 parents of autistic children were included in the analysis. Employing the frequency framework model and utilizing Stata 16.0 software, we quantitatively analyzed the impact of various interventions on anxiety, depression, parenting stress, and parenting self-efficacy. Our findings indicate that mindfulness-based interventions demonstrate the highest efficacy in reducing parenting stress, while cognitive behavioral therapy is effective in alleviating anxiety and depression in parents of children with autism. Psychoeducational interventions have shown significant benefits in mitigating parental anxiety, depression, and parenting stress, and acceptance and commitment (ACT) displays promising outcomes in reducing depression. We also elaborate on the underlying mechanisms that contribute to the effectiveness of these interventions. This network meta-analysis presents valuable insights for the development of targeted interventions to provide support to parents of children with autism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102508"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142569929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Network meta-analysis examining efficacy of components of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia 对认知行为疗法治疗失眠的疗效进行网络荟萃分析
IF 13.7 1区 心理学
Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102507
Lisa Steinmetz , Laura Simon , Bernd Feige , Dieter Riemann , Anna F. Johann , Johanna Ell , David D. Ebert , Harald Baumeister , Fee Benz , Kai Spiegelhalder
{"title":"Network meta-analysis examining efficacy of components of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia","authors":"Lisa Steinmetz ,&nbsp;Laura Simon ,&nbsp;Bernd Feige ,&nbsp;Dieter Riemann ,&nbsp;Anna F. Johann ,&nbsp;Johanna Ell ,&nbsp;David D. Ebert ,&nbsp;Harald Baumeister ,&nbsp;Fee Benz ,&nbsp;Kai Spiegelhalder","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102507","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102507","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT<img>I) is recommended as first-line treatment for insomnia. CBT-I is a multi-component intervention comprising psychoeducation, sleep restriction, stimulus control, cognitive, and relaxation therapy. The relative efficacy of its components has yet to be investigated with state-of-the-art meta-analytic methods. PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and CINAHL were searched according to a pre-registered protocol using search terms indicative of insomnia and CBT<img>I. Baseline-to-post-treatment effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated in a component network meta-analysis. Eighty studies representing 15,351 participants (mean age 44.9 years, 70.1 % female) were included. For the primary outcome insomnia severity, a significant positive effect for sleep restriction therapy (d = −0.45; 95 % CI: [−0.63; −0.36]) was found. Overall, the results suggest that sleep restriction therapy improves self-reported sleep continuity and sleep quality, and stimulus control therapy improves self-reported and objective total sleep time. No significant effects of psychoeducation, relaxation therapy, and cognitive therapy, and no further significant effects of any CBT-I component on objective sleep parameters were found. The most common sources of bias were a lack of blinding, missing outcome data, and the absence of study protocols. The current results suggest that sleep restriction therapy and stimulus control therapy are the most effective components of CBT-I.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102507"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142586531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Motor actions across psychiatric disorders: A research domain criteria (RDoC) perspective 精神病患者的运动行为:研究领域标准(RDoC)视角。
IF 13.7 1区 心理学
Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102511
K. Juston Osborne , Sebastian Walther , Vijay A. Mittal
{"title":"Motor actions across psychiatric disorders: A research domain criteria (RDoC) perspective","authors":"K. Juston Osborne ,&nbsp;Sebastian Walther ,&nbsp;Vijay A. Mittal","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102511","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102511","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The motor system is critical for understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of mental illness. Abnormalities in the processes that allow us to plan and execute movement in a goal-directed, context-appropriate manner (i.e., motor actions) are especially central to clinical motor research. Within this context, the NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework now includes a Motor Actions construct within the recently incorporated Sensorimotor Systems Domain, providing a useful framework for conducting research on motor action processes. However, there is limited available resources for understanding or implementing this framework. We address this gap by providing a comprehensive critical review and conceptual integration of the current clinical literature on the subconstructs comprising the Motor Actions construct. This includes a detailed discussion of each Motor Action subconstruct (e.g., action planning/execution) and its measurement across different units of analysis (e.g., molecules to behavior), the temporal and conceptual relationships among the Motor Action subconstructs (and other relevant RDoC domain constructs), and how abnormalities in these Motor Action subconstructs manifest in mental illness. Together, the review illustrates how motor system dysfunction is implicated in the pathophysiology of many psychiatric conditions and demonstrates shared and distinct mechanisms that may account for similar manifestations of motor abnormalities across disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102511"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142605080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The current evidence of solution-focused brief therapy: A meta-analysis of psychosocial outcomes and moderating factors 以解决方案为重点的简短疗法的现有证据:社会心理成果和调节因素的荟萃分析。
IF 13.7 1区 心理学
Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102512
E. Vermeulen-Oskam , C. Franklin , L.P.M. van’t Hof , G.J.J.M. Stams , E.S. van Vugt , M. Assink , E.J. Veltman , A.S. Froerer , J.P.C. Staaks , A. Zhang
{"title":"The current evidence of solution-focused brief therapy: A meta-analysis of psychosocial outcomes and moderating factors","authors":"E. Vermeulen-Oskam ,&nbsp;C. Franklin ,&nbsp;L.P.M. van’t Hof ,&nbsp;G.J.J.M. Stams ,&nbsp;E.S. van Vugt ,&nbsp;M. Assink ,&nbsp;E.J. Veltman ,&nbsp;A.S. Froerer ,&nbsp;J.P.C. Staaks ,&nbsp;A. Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102512","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102512","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Solution Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) focuses on the strengths and resources of clients, and is assumed to achieve positive results on various psychosocial outcomes. This meta-analysis is an extension of previous meta-analyses on SFBT, and examines if the effectiveness of SFBT is influenced by participant, intervention, study and publication characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Experimental and quasi-experimental studies were included. A three-level meta-analysis was performed on 72 studies and 489 effect sizes, accounting for within and between study differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The overall effect of SFBT on psychosocial problems was large (<em>g</em> = 1.17). Moderator analyses revealed larger effects of SFBT in non-clinical samples (<em>g</em> = 1.50) than in clinical samples (<em>g</em> = 0.78). Studies with treatment-as-usual (TAU) as control condition reported smaller effects (<em>g</em> = 0.58) than studies with a no-treatment control condition (<em>g</em> = 1.59). Relatively large effects were found for couples (<em>g</em> = 3.02) compared to other client groups (0.41 &lt; <em>g</em> &lt; 1.70), and marital functioning (<em>g</em> = 3.02) compared to other outcomes (0.23 &lt; <em>g</em> &lt; 1.31). Group therapy (<em>g</em> = 1.64) yielded a larger effect than individual therapy (<em>g</em> = 0.48).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings indicate that SFBT is applicable for a variety of clients and psychosocial problems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102512"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142569950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bridging perspectives - A review and synthesis of 53 theoretical models of delusions 视角的桥梁--53 种妄想症理论模型的回顾与综述。
IF 13.7 1区 心理学
Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102510
S. Denecke, S.N. Schönig , A. Bott , J.L. Faße , T.M. Lincoln
{"title":"Bridging perspectives - A review and synthesis of 53 theoretical models of delusions","authors":"S. Denecke,&nbsp;S.N. Schönig ,&nbsp;A. Bott ,&nbsp;J.L. Faße ,&nbsp;T.M. Lincoln","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102510","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102510","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The degree to which numerous existing models of delusion formation disagree or propose common mechanisms remains unclear. To achieve a comprehensive understanding of delusion aetiology, we summarised 53 theoretical models of delusions extracted from a systematic literature search. We identified central aspects and unique or overarching features of five core perspectives: cognitive (<em>n</em> = 22), associative learning (<em>n</em> = 4), social (<em>n</em> = 6), neurobiological (<em>n</em> = 6), and Bayesian inference (<em>n</em> = 15). These perspectives differ in foci and mechanistic explanations. Whereas some postulate delusions to result from associative and operant learning, others assume a disbalance in the integration of prior beliefs and sensory input or emphasise the relevance of information processing biases. Postulated moderators range from maladaptive generalised beliefs over neurocognitive impairment to dopamine, stress, and affective dysregulation. The models also differ in whether they attempt to explain delusion formation in general or the delusional content (i.e., persecutory). Finally, some models postulate functional aspects of delusions, such as insight relief. Despite their differences, the perspectives converge on the idea that delusions form as an explanation for an experienced ambiguity. Building on this common ground, we propose an integrative framework incorporating essential mechanistic explanations from each perspective and discuss its implications for research and clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102510"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142604622","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors related to help-seeking and service utilization for professional mental healthcare among young people: An umbrella review 青少年寻求帮助和利用专业精神保健服务的相关因素:综述
IF 13.7 1区 心理学
Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102504
Nathan R. Huff, Laura Dunderdale, Alexander J. Kellogg, Linda M. Isbell
{"title":"Factors related to help-seeking and service utilization for professional mental healthcare among young people: An umbrella review","authors":"Nathan R. Huff,&nbsp;Laura Dunderdale,&nbsp;Alexander J. Kellogg,&nbsp;Linda M. Isbell","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102504","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102504","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The aim of this umbrella review is to summarize evidence on factors that influence help-seeking and service utilization for professional mental healthcare among young people ages 0–30. The CINAHL, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched in December 2023 for systematic reviews in English. The search yielded 26 eligible reviews, all of which are medium or high quality. Primary study overlap was rare. Using an established framework, we organize intrapersonal (<em>n</em> = 37), interpersonal (<em>n</em> = 14), institutional (<em>n</em> = 9), community (<em>n</em> = 7), and public policy (<em>n</em> = 6) factors. The most frequently reviewed factor at each level is trust of professionals (intrapersonal), close others' support for treatment (interpersonal), cost (institutional), availability (community), and insurance (public policy). Stigma is widely referenced (18 reviews) and classified as multi-dimensional. Narrative synthesis reveals population-specific variability (e.g., rural, racial/ethnic minority, refugees, immigrants) in the importance of many factors. To develop interventions and healthcare systems sensitive to young people's needs, we recommend promoting stigma-reduction campaigns, and targeting trustworthiness, affordability, anonymity, accessibility, and mental health literacy. Identifying commonalities and differences across populations and contexts assists in the design of nuanced and efficient treatment delivery systems for young people, who are at a critical time for their mental health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102504"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142417619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Positive health outcomes of mindfulness-based interventions for cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis 以正念为基础的干预对癌症患者和幸存者的健康产生积极影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 13.7 1区 心理学
Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102505
Nasim Badaghi , Cecilie Buskbjerg , Linda Kwakkenbos , Sabien Bosman , Robert Zachariae , Anne Speckens
{"title":"Positive health outcomes of mindfulness-based interventions for cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Nasim Badaghi ,&nbsp;Cecilie Buskbjerg ,&nbsp;Linda Kwakkenbos ,&nbsp;Sabien Bosman ,&nbsp;Robert Zachariae ,&nbsp;Anne Speckens","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102505","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102505","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are commonly used for cancer patients and survivors to reduce symptoms, but little is known about effects on positive health outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effects of MBIs on positive health outcomes (mindfulness skills, self-compassion, positive affect, coping, social support, well-being, personal growth, and spirituality) in cancer patients and survivors. Four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAH) were searched (grey literature was not included), abstracts and full texts were screened, and MBI quality and risk of bias were assessed. Effect sizes were calculated and data was analyzed using a frequentist analytical strategy. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of MBIs compared to any type of control on positive health outcomes in cancer patients or survivors. Based on 46 RCTs eligible for meta-analysis, statistical significant effects were observed for all positive health outcomes at post-treatment. Effect sizes ranged from small (positive affect; Hedges's g = 0.26) to large (spirituality, g = 0.91). At follow-up, mindfulness skills, self-compassion, personal growth, and spirituality reached statistical significance, with effect sizes ranging from small (positive affect; g = 0.07) to medium (spirituality; g = 0.61) and large (post-traumatic growth; g = 1.40). Taken together, significant effects of MBIs were found for several positive outcomes in cancer patients and survivors, with the strongest evidence found for mindfulness skills. MBIs may play a key role in improving well-being in this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102505"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001260/pdfft?md5=422f9ed0b09a7389d88318cc6d740c61&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824001260-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142306435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sleep and paranoia: A systematic review and meta-analysis 睡眠与妄想症:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
IF 13.7 1区 心理学
Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102503
Poppy Brown , Sarah Reeve , Matthew Hotton , Natalie Steer , Craig Steel
{"title":"Sleep and paranoia: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Poppy Brown ,&nbsp;Sarah Reeve ,&nbsp;Matthew Hotton ,&nbsp;Natalie Steer ,&nbsp;Craig Steel","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102503","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102503","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sleep dysfunction commonly co-occurs with paranoia and is hypothesised to be a contributory causal mechanism in its development and maintenance.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To systematically review and quantitatively evaluate the evidence for the relationship between sleep dysfunction and paranoia across the spectrum of severity.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted to identify studies investigating the relationship between aspects of sleep and paranoia across clinical and non-clinical groups. A random effects model using a Fisher r-to-z transformed correlation coefficient was used for meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>45 studies were included in the review and 14 in the meta-analysis. The literature supports a small-to-moderate association (<em>r</em> = 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.16–0.40 for the seven studies using the most robust measures) with significant heterogeneity among studies but no evidence of publication bias. There is evidence that the relationship is to some extent causal, with sleep disruption leading to increased paranoia, though there is also some evidence of a bi-directional relationship. Negative affect is frequently seen as a mediator of this relationship.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review for the first time examines the significant relationship between sleep and paranoia individually. Studies are needed that further assess the potential for early intervention of sleep dysfunction in those experiencing paranoia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102503"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001247/pdfft?md5=fd161cf1bc44ccfe86fd82094c6c1636&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824001247-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating the impact of study quality on prevalence rates 避免性/限制性食物摄入障碍:系统回顾和荟萃分析表明研究质量对患病率的影响
IF 13.7 1区 心理学
Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102502
Rebecca Nicholls-Clow , Melanie Simmonds-Buckley , Glenn Waller
{"title":"Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating the impact of study quality on prevalence rates","authors":"Rebecca Nicholls-Clow ,&nbsp;Melanie Simmonds-Buckley ,&nbsp;Glenn Waller","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102502","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102502","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The prevalence of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) is unclear. This paper is the first to present meta-analysis based estimates of the prevalence of ARFID, and to assess the impact of the quality of the research on these estimates.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A pre-registered (Prospero: CRD42023487621) systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, PsychInfo, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched (final date of retrieval 30th July 2024) for peer reviewed papers published between 2013 and 2024<strong>.</strong> Random-effects and quality effects meta-analyses were used to compute and compare prevalence estimates and to evaluate the impact of study quality on prevalence rates. Subgroups were also considered (gender, age group, clinical status). Loney et al.'s (1998) <em>Critical Appraisal of the Health Research Literature: Prevalence or Incidence of a Health Problem</em> scale was used to assign each study a quality score across three categories - methodological validity (six points); interpretation of results (one point); and applicability of the results (one point).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-six studies were identified (<em>n</em> = 122,861). Meta-analysis using random-effects indicated a prevalence of 11.14 % (95 % CI 8.16–14.5 %), whereas quality effects prevalence was 4.51 % (95 % CI 0.7–10.68 %). Similar contrasts were evident among subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Even taking the more conservative estimate of 4.51 %, this review demonstrates that ARFID is a common disorder, meriting further research and clinical and service developments. Future research needs to be more methodologically robust (larger samples; standardised diagnostic measures; clearer data presentation).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102502"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001235/pdfft?md5=f393be890e09593e9fa087cf4062ee33&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824001235-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142243780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The association between digital addiction and interpersonal relationships: A systematic review and meta-analysis 数字成瘾与人际关系之间的关联:系统回顾与荟萃分析
IF 13.7 1区 心理学
Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102501
Xun Yang , Tingting Liao , Yan Wang , Lifeng Ren , Jianguang Zeng
{"title":"The association between digital addiction and interpersonal relationships: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Xun Yang ,&nbsp;Tingting Liao ,&nbsp;Yan Wang ,&nbsp;Lifeng Ren ,&nbsp;Jianguang Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102501","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102501","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Digital addiction (DA) has been identified as an emerging public health problem worldwide. However, the extent and direction of the association between DA and interpersonal relationships (IRs) are unknown. Does DA have adverse effects on IRs, and how credible is the evidence for this association in published analyses of real-world data? Using the PRISMA method, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively synthesize the results of the relevant studies and obtain reliable effect size estimates and performed an analysis of moderating factors. A systematic literature search identified 98 studies involving 134,593 participants and 99 effect sizes. A significant negative association was observed between DA and IRs. Importantly, our meta-analysis revealed that the DA subtype has no significant moderating effect on IRs, suggesting that combining numerous categories of DA rather than focusing on specific forms of DA may be appropriate for understanding the relationship between DA and IRs. Relative to the IR subtype, the association between DA and offline relationships is significant and negative, whereas the association between DA and online relationships is significant and positive. The strength of the relationship is also influenced by the participants' sex ratio, educational level, and measurement tools. These results may help resolve the disagreement over the magnitude and direction of the association between DA and IRs and have potential implications for the treatment of DA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102501"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142167710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信