R.L. Dean , K.J. Lester , E. Grant , A.P. Field , F. Orchard , V. Pile
{"title":"The impact of interventions for depression on self-perceptions in young people: A systematic review & meta-analysis","authors":"R.L. Dean , K.J. Lester , E. Grant , A.P. Field , F. Orchard , V. Pile","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Negative self-perceptions are implicated in the development and maintenance of depression in young people, but little is known about their receptiveness to change in response to treatment. This paper reports on a pre-registered meta-analysis examining the extent to which treatments for depression in young people aged 11–24 result in changes to self-perceptions. Controlled treatment trials examining outcomes related to self-perceptions were synthesised (<em>k</em> = 20, <em>N</em> = 2041), finding small reductions in both symptoms of depression (<em>g</em> = −0.30; 95 % CI: −0.52, −0.08) and self-perception outcomes (<em>g</em> = 0.33; 95 % CI: 0.16, 0.49) for interventions compared with control groups. Meta-regression analyses found no significant association between reductions in depressive symptoms and improvements in self-perception following treatment, suggesting that despite interventions generally improving both outcomes these changes may be unrelated to each other. Our results indicate that young people's self-perceptions are sensitive to change following treatment for depression, however effect sizes are small and treatments could be more effective in targeting and changing negative self-perceptions. Given the importance that young people place on integrating work on their sense of self into treatments for depression, future interventions could aim to support young people with depression to develop a positive sense of self.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 102521"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001429","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Negative self-perceptions are implicated in the development and maintenance of depression in young people, but little is known about their receptiveness to change in response to treatment. This paper reports on a pre-registered meta-analysis examining the extent to which treatments for depression in young people aged 11–24 result in changes to self-perceptions. Controlled treatment trials examining outcomes related to self-perceptions were synthesised (k = 20, N = 2041), finding small reductions in both symptoms of depression (g = −0.30; 95 % CI: −0.52, −0.08) and self-perception outcomes (g = 0.33; 95 % CI: 0.16, 0.49) for interventions compared with control groups. Meta-regression analyses found no significant association between reductions in depressive symptoms and improvements in self-perception following treatment, suggesting that despite interventions generally improving both outcomes these changes may be unrelated to each other. Our results indicate that young people's self-perceptions are sensitive to change following treatment for depression, however effect sizes are small and treatments could be more effective in targeting and changing negative self-perceptions. Given the importance that young people place on integrating work on their sense of self into treatments for depression, future interventions could aim to support young people with depression to develop a positive sense of self.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology.
While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.