Qualitative Research in Psychology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Interpreting hidden meaning in qualitative research interview data: opportunities and challenges 定性研究访谈数据的隐含意义解读:机遇与挑战
IF 19 3区 心理学
Qualitative Research in Psychology Pub Date : 2022-04-24 DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2022.2067509
G. Ivey
{"title":"Interpreting hidden meaning in qualitative research interview data: opportunities and challenges","authors":"G. Ivey","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2022.2067509","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2022.2067509","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Hidden meaning, understood as relationally constituted unformulated or defended experience, presents both opportunities and challenges not adequately theorised and explored in the qualitative research literature. This paper outlines weaker and stronger forms of hiddenness and discusses the epistemological and methodological difficulties that hidden meaning presents. Many qualitative approaches claiming to accommodate hidden meaning are significantly flawed because of their attenuated conceptions of intersubjectivity and consequent reliance on interview transcripts, rather than the rich intersubjective data co-created in the interview process. If the researcher’s subjectivity is the primary research instrument, we need to work with both verbal content and affect-laden embodied experience, reflexively observing its manifestations and intersubjective impacts. The disciplined use of reflexive subjectivity involves paying close attention to our affective resonances, reveries, and/or researcher countertransference, which signal implicit research manifestations of the relational unconscious. I propose an interpretive process model, underpinned by a critical realist ontology and epistemology, and illustrate this with reference to some interview material. I conclude with an overview of the ethical challenges of interpreting hidden meaning and the crucial role that rigorous and holistically conceived reflexivity plays as an interpretive and ethical resource.","PeriodicalId":48420,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","volume":"20 1","pages":"21 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46927507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Facilitation strategies for conducting focus groups attending to issues of power 引导焦点小组关注权力问题的促进策略
IF 19 3区 心理学
Qualitative Research in Psychology Pub Date : 2022-04-19 DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2022.2066036
Mariah Kornbluh
{"title":"Facilitation strategies for conducting focus groups attending to issues of power","authors":"Mariah Kornbluh","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2022.2066036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2022.2066036","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Focus groups are a common and popular qualitative research method within the field of psychology. While ample literature exists regarding designing, recruiting, and conducting focus groups, there is less research surrounding the facilitation techniques needed to solicit a data-rich, participatory, and authentic group dialogue while attending to power. Contributing to literature addressing this gap, this manuscript provides tangible steps surrounding facilitating focus groups guided by social constructivist and transformative epistemological orientations. These practices encompass: a) fostering a climate seeking equitable participation, b) engaging in critical self-reflexivity, and c) capturing moments of convergence and divergence in perspectives. Each strategy will be illustrated from a qualitative research project with sixth and seventh graders, yet, these practices are translatable and can be employed with diverse populations.","PeriodicalId":48420,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","volume":"20 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41360651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Carrying stories: digital storytelling and the complexities of intimacy, relationality, and home spaces 承载故事:数字叙事和亲密关系、关系和家庭空间的复杂性
IF 19 3区 心理学
Qualitative Research in Psychology Pub Date : 2022-03-11 DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2022.2047246
A. LaMarre, Carla M. Rice, May Friedman, Hannah Fowlie
{"title":"Carrying stories: digital storytelling and the complexities of intimacy, relationality, and home spaces","authors":"A. LaMarre, Carla M. Rice, May Friedman, Hannah Fowlie","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2022.2047246","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2022.2047246","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Over the past decade, we have worked alongside storytellers to bring their stories into the world. These encounters have been challenging, exciting, and intimate. In this paper, we reflect on a digital/multimedia storytelling project in which we engaged with people who have experienced weight stigma in fertility, pregnancy, and motherhood care. We use the metaphors of story midwifery and surrogacy to describe the methodological-substantive interplay between what we do, how we do it, and what emerges in this (un)doing. In this reflexive and methodological paper, we engage with the affect and relationality of doing storywork. We reflect on and theorize around embeddedness, othering, belonging, power, shame, and joy in research encounters. Pragmatically, we consider how relational ethics combine with exhaustion and logistical challenges. Finally, we explore the tensions inherent to (co)producing stories at the boundaries of neoliberal academic temporalities and structures.","PeriodicalId":48420,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","volume":"19 1","pages":"1143 - 1168"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41640596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘Trust me, we can sort this out’: a theory-testing case study of the role of epistemic trust in fostering relationships “相信我,我们可以解决这个问题”:一项关于认知信任在培养关系中作用的理论测试案例研究
IF 19 3区 心理学
Qualitative Research in Psychology Pub Date : 2022-02-12 DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2022.2033898
Eva A. Sprecher, Elizabeth Li, M. Sleed, N. Midgley
{"title":"‘Trust me, we can sort this out’: a theory-testing case study of the role of epistemic trust in fostering relationships","authors":"Eva A. Sprecher, Elizabeth Li, M. Sleed, N. Midgley","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2022.2033898","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2022.2033898","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Novel psychological theories are often conceived in a general or heuristic form that can benefit from development and granulation through context-specific theory testing. Here, a theory-testing single case study methodology, adapted from an approach developed in the field of psychoanalysis, is presented. The study exemplifies this methodology though an interrogation of the explanatory value of a relatively new child development theory, the theory of epistemic trust, in the context of the relationship between a foster carer (“John”) and a young person in their care (“Buster”). Using in-depth interview material, the ways and extent to which the theory of epistemic trust could aid understanding of this fostering relationship are examined. We discuss the implications for the development of the theory of epistemic trust and the applications of these findings to social work contexts. The strengths and limitations of this theory-testing case study approach are explored.","PeriodicalId":48420,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","volume":"19 1","pages":"1117 - 1142"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45382277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
”Screaming isolation” when is a chair more than a chair? Photographic encounters, IPA and capturing out of awareness experiencing: A novel approach to working with temporal, spatial and embodied dimensions “尖叫隔离”什么时候椅子比椅子更重要?摄影遭遇,IPA和捕捉意识之外的体验:一种与时间,空间和具体维度合作的新方法
IF 19 3区 心理学
Qualitative Research in Psychology Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2021.2001704
Tara Morrey, M. Larkin, Alison Rolfe
{"title":"”Screaming isolation” when is a chair more than a chair? Photographic encounters, IPA and capturing out of awareness experiencing: A novel approach to working with temporal, spatial and embodied dimensions","authors":"Tara Morrey, M. Larkin, Alison Rolfe","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2021.2001704","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.2001704","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper focuses on the concept and analysis of photographic encounters which we utilised in an interview study to explore experiences of psychotherapy environments. Our study involves a dual perspective design (a sample of therapists, and a sample of clients). Interviews incorporating photographic encounters were transcribed, and then analysed with Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Nine therapists and five clients were recruited from a voluntary counselling service in the West Midlands. Two of the therapists first took photographs of the setting. These photographs were used in the study. Interviews involved participants viewing the photographs and then choosing images to discuss. A theoretical framework for analysing the photographic encounters was incorporated alongside IPA analysis. We show how photographic encounters facilitated insights about how participants were experiencing new, layered and embodied engagement with the therapy environment. We argue that photographic encounters in qualitative interviews can foster awareness of tacit experiencing, and that IPA is an effective and complementary approach for working with such data. Our use of photographic encounters contributes to the existing literature on generating multi-modal accounts of experience using visual methods. This paper also offers a distinctive, conceptually-based framework for use alongside IPA to analyse photographic encounters.","PeriodicalId":48420,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","volume":"19 1","pages":"1064 - 1093"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46465431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The ethics of drug use research and ‘wild self-care’: a dialogue between a postgraduate student and their supervisor 药物使用研究的伦理与“疯狂的自我照顾”:一名研究生与导师之间的对话
IF 19 3区 心理学
Qualitative Research in Psychology Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2021.2003493
S. Clay, G. Treharne
{"title":"The ethics of drug use research and ‘wild self-care’: a dialogue between a postgraduate student and their supervisor","authors":"S. Clay, G. Treharne","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2021.2003493","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.2003493","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article outlines the experiences of a postgraduate student conducting research on drug use and ‘wild self-care’ in the format of a dialogue with their supervisor. There is a wealth of literature on the ethics of drug use research, the unique issues postgraduate students contend with during their tenure, researcher emotions in the field, and how self-care can be included in the research process, but there is surprisingly little literature discussing the intersection of these issues. Furthermore, it is established good practice for qualitative researchers to engage in reflexive thinking and writing as part of their data analysis process, yet this does not appear to be commonly applied in qualitative drug research. The structure of a dialogue between the postgraduate (Simon Clay) and their supervisor (Gareth Treharne) is used to critically analyse issues of participant and researcher vulnerability when conducting field work, intoxication, and the potential benefits of researchers being more reflexive and open about their personal relationship to substance use. The role of ‘wildness’ and ‘wild self-care’ are used to explore the study of drug use and the research process in general through a series of questions for researchers to consider in practice.","PeriodicalId":48420,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","volume":"19 1","pages":"1094 - 1116"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46049232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experienced qualitative researchers’ views on teaching students qualitative research design 资深质性研究者对教授学生质性研究设计的看法
IF 19 3区 心理学
Qualitative Research in Psychology Pub Date : 2021-11-25 DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2021.1992061
Emily Castell, S. Muir, L. Roberts, P. Allen, Mortaza Rezae, A. Krishna
{"title":"Experienced qualitative researchers’ views on teaching students qualitative research design","authors":"Emily Castell, S. Muir, L. Roberts, P. Allen, Mortaza Rezae, A. Krishna","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2021.1992061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.1992061","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The increasing prominence of qualitative inquiry in psychological research has been accompanied by reflection on teaching and learning practices within undergraduate and postgraduate psychology courses. To date, there is limited empirical understanding of how experienced qualitative researchers approach teaching students about qualitative research design. The present study draws on interviews with qualitative researchers (N = 12) from multiple disciplines, occupying various positions within academia. Using thematic analysis, seven themes were developed, under the superordinate theme present qualitative research as a legitimate approach to enquiry. The themes illuminate practical pedagogical implications for teaching qualitative research, including introducing qualitative research in bite-sized chunks and initiating students to qualitative inquiry through foundational methods. The findings contextualise the teaching of qualitative methods as a site of multiple tensions, for example, balancing pragmatism and idealism, and providing structure to students while enabling flexibility. Educators and supervisors of qualitative research navigate these tensions in their teaching practice to provide students with what they see as the best possible learning experiences. We call for further research to build a profile of evidence-based pedagogical practice for teaching qualitative research, while also acknowledging the fluidity needed to embrace changing epistemologies, methodologies, methods, and data sources.","PeriodicalId":48420,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","volume":"19 1","pages":"978 - 1003"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41767651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Intra-participant and inter-analyst cacophony: working the hyphen between modalities using provocative reflexivity 参与者内部和分析师之间的不和谐:使用挑衅性的自反性处理模式之间的连字符
IF 19 3区 心理学
Qualitative Research in Psychology Pub Date : 2021-11-25 DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2021.1996664
David A. Caicedo, Andrea Nikté Juarez Mendoza, M. Pinedo
{"title":"Intra-participant and inter-analyst cacophony: working the hyphen between modalities using provocative reflexivity","authors":"David A. Caicedo, Andrea Nikté Juarez Mendoza, M. Pinedo","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2021.1996664","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.1996664","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Multimodal psychological research highlights the benefit of using complementary approaches to the phenomenological study of lived experience. Rather than focus on any individual method, this study attempts to concentrate on the transition, or hyphen, between them, as a place for reflexivity, ethics, and theory. Participants were 14 adults, recruited from ‘New York Community College’ and ‘New Jersey Community College’ in the U.S., who engaged in focus groups where they completed two activities: drawing a map of their personal journey to the college or of their self-identity, and their definitions for the immigration-related terms illegal and undocumented. Results demonstrated that journey and identity maps contained obstructive and supportive elements, and that the definitions reflected differential cognitive and emotional elements. However, focusing on the transition between these two activities revealed that whereas most participants viewed illegal and undocumented as different, participants who noted many more obstacles reported that the terms had both different but also similar qualities. Implications are discussed with a pivot towards the psychological link between methods as a generative space for future theoretical and conceptual work.","PeriodicalId":48420,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","volume":"19 1","pages":"1035 - 1063"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42477859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Navigating the messy swamp of qualitative research: Are generic reporting standards the answer? 在定性研究的混乱沼泽中航行:通用报告标准是答案吗?
IF 19 3区 心理学
Qualitative Research in Psychology Pub Date : 2021-11-18 DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2021.1995555
Victoria Clarke
{"title":"Navigating the messy swamp of qualitative research: Are generic reporting standards the answer?","authors":"Victoria Clarke","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2021.1995555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.1995555","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48420,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","volume":"19 1","pages":"1004 - 1012"},"PeriodicalIF":19.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42169163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
On narrativity, knowledge production, and social change: a diffractive encounter between the Narrative Productions methodology and Participatory Action-Research 论叙事性、知识生产与社会变革:叙事生产方法论与参与行动研究的衍射相遇
IF 19 3区 心理学
Qualitative Research in Psychology Pub Date : 2021-11-07 DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2021.1994678
Álvaro Ramírez-March, M. Montenegro
{"title":"On narrativity, knowledge production, and social change: a diffractive encounter between the Narrative Productions methodology and Participatory Action-Research","authors":"Álvaro Ramírez-March, M. Montenegro","doi":"10.1080/14780887.2021.1994678","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2021.1994678","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, we argue for an understanding of engaged social research as an inherently narrative activity that conceptualises both how domination is perpetuated, and the possible ways to transform it. In order to do so, we stage a diffractive encounter between two methodologies that have shaped our past practice: on the one hand, the Narrative Productions methodology (NPM), the focus of this Special Issue, on the other, Participatory Action-Research (PAR). We begin by introducing the Latin American PAR tradition and its relation to narrativity as well as NPM’s roots in the feminist epistemology of Donna Haraway. Later on, we review some of the ways these two methods can benefit from reading their insights from one another. Finally, we synthesise the relation of narrativity and social change. We draw on Karen Barad’s notion of ‘Onto-ethico-epistemology’and the concept of political ontologyto argue that, by engaging in creating the world distinctively, these two methods materialise diverging projects of social justice.","PeriodicalId":48420,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44407517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信