Qualitative Research最新文献_第2页

A day without Global North researchers: Making space for equitable collaboration after COVID-19 没有全球北方研究人员的日子：在 COVID-19 之后为公平合作创造空间

IF 3.6 1区社会学

Qualitative Research Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.1177/14687941241264669

Annalisa Bolin, Tatiana Carayannis, Gino Vlavonou, David Nkusi

{"title":"A day without Global North researchers: Making space for equitable collaboration after COVID-19","authors":"Annalisa Bolin, Tatiana Carayannis, Gino Vlavonou, David Nkusi","doi":"10.1177/14687941241264669","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241264669","url":null,"abstract":"What happens when researchers based in the Global North are suddenly unable to access research sites, especially those in the Global South? In 2020, COVID-related public health measures and travel restrictions made clear how dependent certain categories of researchers in the North are on easy access to research sites in the South. The space opened up by their pandemic-imposed retreat and the solutions devised in response have provoked both challenges and opportunities. In this article, we reflect on this space, focusing on how forms of more just collaboration become possible when the inertia of Global North-controlled research is interrupted. Many scholars have argued for change in how Global North-South scholarly collaborations proceed, seeking to root out colonial practices and attend to power imbalances that disadvantage South-based scholars. COVID's disruptions offer a chance to reorient these collaborations toward more ethical forms of research. We examine the ethical and practical questions inherent in such collaborations and explore two case studies of attempts to reorient collaborative work, drawing primarily on examples of collaboration between African, European, and North American scholars. Cognizant that these efforts are only initial attempts toward reworking collaborative practice, we also trace the challenges they bring, from the duty of care and paternalistic approaches to funding and practical problems. We suggest that a careful consideration of these issues can help to establish more just ways to fully reengage North-South research and collaboration in the wake of the global pandemic.","PeriodicalId":48265,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142185305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Giving up the ‘Good Research Child’ 放弃 "研究好孩子

IF 3.6 1区社会学

Qualitative Research Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI: 10.1177/14687941241264490

Abi Hackett, Mel Hall, Kate Pahl, Peter Kraftl

引用次数: 0

North-South research collaboration during complex global emergencies: Qualitative knowledge production and sharing during COVID-19 全球复杂紧急情况下的南北研究合作：COVID-19 期间的定性知识生产与共享

IF 3.6 1区社会学

Qualitative Research Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1177/14687941241264677

Adriana Rudling, Mohamed Sesay, Eric Wiebelhaus-Brahm, Angelika Rettberg

{"title":"North-South research collaboration during complex global emergencies: Qualitative knowledge production and sharing during COVID-19","authors":"Adriana Rudling, Mohamed Sesay, Eric Wiebelhaus-Brahm, Angelika Rettberg","doi":"10.1177/14687941241264677","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241264677","url":null,"abstract":"Large multinational teams of academics and activist-practitioners that span the Global North-South divide have become common in qualitative research because of the reliance of field of peace and conflict studies on “local” knowledge and expertise. Complex global emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, present the opportunity to (re)shape and (re)consider these endeavors in key some ways. This article focuses on the involvement of South-based activist-practitioners in three large North-South collaborations, one pre-pandemic (Beyond Words: Implementing Latin American Truth Commission Recommendations), one ongoing when the pandemic began (Gender, Justice, and Security Hub), and one launched during the pandemic (Truth Commissions and Sexual Violence: African and Latin American Experiences). Drawing on center-periphery framework, we adopt an autoethnographic approach, to reflect on how the pandemic has not only reinforced existing structural and institutional asymmetries through reduced funding, professional uncertainty, and personal loss and insecurity but also added some new ethical concerns. This reality has tested both our capacity and commitment to work toward the decolonization of knowledge in the field. In making this argument, we seek to contribute to the discussion on research ethics and the politics of knowledge production and sharing in qualitative peace and conflict research.","PeriodicalId":48265,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141941426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

But where's the body? Bodies, time, money, and the political economy of post-pandemic field research 但尸体在哪里？身体、时间、金钱和流行病后实地研究的政治经济学

IF 3.6 1区社会学

Qualitative Research Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1177/14687941241264473

Donna Baines, Susan Braedley, Tamara Daly, Gudmund Ågotnes, Albert Banerjee, Elias Chaccour, Karine Côté-Boucher, Stinne Glasdam, Sean Hillier, Martha MacDonald, Frode Fadnes Jacobsen, Christie Stilwell

引用次数: 0

Anti-oppression as praxis in the research field: Implementing emancipatory approaches for researchers and community partners. 反压迫作为研究领域的实践:为研究人员和社区伙伴实施解放方法

IF 3.2 1区社会学

Qualitative Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-03 DOI: 10.1177/14687941231196382

Ruth Rodney, Marsha Hinds, Jessica Bonilla-Damptey, Danielle Boissoneau, Aaliya Khan, Anika Forde

{"title":"Anti-oppression as praxis in the research field: Implementing emancipatory approaches for researchers and community partners.","authors":"Ruth Rodney, Marsha Hinds, Jessica Bonilla-Damptey, Danielle Boissoneau, Aaliya Khan, Anika Forde","doi":"10.1177/14687941231196382","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14687941231196382","url":null,"abstract":"Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) and anti-oppression (AO) policies are implemented in research to address intersecting systemic barriers for marginalized populations. Grant applications now include questions about EDI to ensure researchers have considered how research designs perpetuate discriminatory practices. However, complying with these measures may not mean that researchers have engaged with AO as praxis. Three central points emerged from our work as a women's research collective committed to embedding AO practices within the research methodology of our community-based study. First, research ideas must be connected to larger pursuits of AO in and across marginalized communities. Secondly, AO as praxis in the research design is an exercise in centering cultural knowledge and pragmatic research preparation and response that honours the collective. Lastly, AO approaches are not prescriptive. They must shift, adapt, and change based on the research project and team, creating space for transformative resistance and emancipation of racialized researchers and community workers.","PeriodicalId":48265,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11303120/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42100487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A social researcher researching social researchers – Lessons from feminist epistemologies 社会研究人员研究社会研究人员--从女权主义认识论中汲取的经验教训

IF 3.6 1区社会学

Qualitative Research Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI: 10.1177/14687941241259980

Lili Schwoerer

引用次数: 0

Off track or on point? Side comments in focus groups with teens. 偏离轨道还是正题?青少年焦点小组的旁注

IF 3.6 1区社会学

Qualitative Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-29 DOI: 10.1177/14687941231176931

Lindsay C Sheppard, Rebecca Raby

{"title":"Off track or on point? Side comments in focus groups with teens.","authors":"Lindsay C Sheppard, Rebecca Raby","doi":"10.1177/14687941231176931","DOIUrl":"10.1177/14687941231176931","url":null,"abstract":"Side comments and conversations in focus groups can pose challenges for facilitators. Rather than seeing side comments as problematic behavior or \"failed\" data, we argue that they can add to and deepen analyses. Drawing on focus group data with grade nine students from a study on early work, in this methodological paper we discuss three patterns. First, side comments have highlighted where participants required clarification, and illustrated their views and questions about the research process. Second, side comments added new data to our analysis, including personal reflections, connections to others' comments, and information about participants' uncertainties about the research topics. Third, these comments offered insight into peer relations and dynamics, including participants' reflections on age, and how they deployed gender relations in their discussions. Provided that their use fits within established ethical protocols, we argue that there is a place for attention to side comments, especially in focus group research with young people where adult-teen hierarchies and peer dynamics might lead young people to engage more with peers than directly respond to researchers' questions.","PeriodicalId":48265,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11161323/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47782508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Driving together: Shared car journeys as research space 共同驾驶：作为研究空间的共享汽车旅行

IF 3.6 1区社会学

Qualitative Research Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI: 10.1177/14687941241255251

Gabrielle Lynch

引用次数: 0

Remote interviewing, accessibility, and scams: Notes on a case of fraudulent responses to a recruitment flyer 远程面试、无障碍环境和骗局：关于招聘传单欺诈回复案例的说明

IF 3.6 1区社会学

Qualitative Research Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI: 10.1177/14687941241255234

M. Ariel Cascio

{"title":"Remote interviewing, accessibility, and scams: Notes on a case of fraudulent responses to a recruitment flyer","authors":"M. Ariel Cascio","doi":"10.1177/14687941241255234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241255234","url":null,"abstract":"Remote interviewing has become even more common since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and allows greater accessibility for many interview participants regardless of pandemic circumstances. This accessibility is especially important in the context of my research with autistic individuals. However, it may also expose interview studies to the same concerns about fraudulent responses that survey studies face. While advice for survey research often suggests requiring interviews as a way to discourage fraudulent responses, I had participants I later concluded were misrepresenting their eligibility actually complete audio interviews. In this note, I describe my experience with this potential scam, the solutions I rejected, and the solutions I ultimately implemented to add additional screening questions related to where the participant lived and how they heard about the study. In line with my interpretivist and constructivist approach to autism studies, I focus on strategies for identifying who is “really eligible” without gatekeeping who is “really autistic.” I argue that many of the suggestions for identifying fraudulent participants may inappropriately exclude autistic or neurodivergent individuals, and describe a framework for identifying locally relevant and culturally appropriate screening questions that do not overly burden or scrutinize participants.","PeriodicalId":48265,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141191968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Writing against the chain transmission of fear: Reflections on institutionalised ethics 反对恐惧连锁传播的写作：对制度化伦理的思考

IF 3.6 1区社会学

Qualitative Research Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1177/14687941241255237

Mieke Struwig

引用次数: 0