发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Field Methods最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Revisiting the Recommended Duration of Interviews Conducted by Mobile Phone in Low- and Middle-income Countries: A Randomized Trial in Malawi 重新审视中低收入国家建议的移动电话访谈持续时间：马拉维随机试验
IF 1.7 3区 社会学
Field Methods Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI: 10.1177/1525822x241248906
Orsola Torrisi, Jethro Banda, Georges Reniers, Stéphane Helleringer
{"title":"Revisiting the Recommended Duration of Interviews Conducted by Mobile Phone in Low- and Middle-income Countries: A Randomized Trial in Malawi","authors":"Orsola Torrisi, Jethro Banda, Georges Reniers, Stéphane Helleringer","doi":"10.1177/1525822x241248906","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x241248906","url":null,"abstract":"Guidelines for conducting surveys by mobile phone calls in low- and middle-income countries suggest keeping interviews short (<20 minutes). The evidence supporting this recommendation is scant, even though limiting interview duration might reduce the amount of data generated by such surveys. We recruited nearly 2,500 mobile phone users in Malawi and randomly allocated them to 10-, 20-, or 30-minute phone interviews, all ending with questions on parental survival. Cooperation was high in all groups, and differences in completion rates were minimal. The extent of item nonresponse, age heaping, and temporal displacement of deaths in data on parental survival generally did not vary between study groups, but reports of maternal age at death were more reliable in longer interviews. Recommendations about the duration of mobile phone interviews might be too restrictive. They should not preclude additional modules, including ones on mortality, in mobile phone surveys conducted in LMICs.","PeriodicalId":48060,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140925065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Revisiting the Recommended Duration of Interviews Conducted by Mobile Phone in Low- and Middle-income Countries: A Randomized Trial in Malawi 重新审视中低收入国家建议的移动电话访谈持续时间：马拉维随机试验
IF 1.7 3区 社会学
Field Methods Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI: 10.1177/1525822x241237042
Orsola Torrisi, Jethro Banda, G. Reniers, Stéphane Helleringer
{"title":"Revisiting the Recommended Duration of Interviews Conducted by Mobile Phone in Low- and Middle-income Countries: A Randomized Trial in Malawi","authors":"Orsola Torrisi, Jethro Banda, G. Reniers, Stéphane Helleringer","doi":"10.1177/1525822x241237042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x241237042","url":null,"abstract":"Guidelines for conducting surveys by mobile phone calls in low- and middle-income countries suggest keeping interviews short (<20 minutes). The evidence supporting this recommendation is scant, even though limiting interview duration might reduce the amount of data generated by such surveys. We recruited nearly 2,500 mobile phone users in Malawi and randomly allocated them to 10-, 20-, or 30-minute phone interviews, all ending with questions on parental survival. Cooperation was high in all groups, and differences in completion rates were minimal. The extent of item nonresponse, age heaping, and temporal displacement of deaths in data on parental survival generally did not vary between study groups, but reports of maternal age at death were more reliable in longer interviews. Recommendations about the duration of mobile phone interviews might be too restrictive. They should not preclude additional modules, including ones on mortality, in mobile phone surveys conducted in LMICs.","PeriodicalId":48060,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140078551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Case-to-Condition Ratios in Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Adding Cases Instead of Removing Conditions 定性比较分析中的病例与条件比率：添加病例而不是删除条件
IF 1.7 3区 社会学
Field Methods Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI: 10.1177/1525822x241231479
Judith Glaesser
{"title":"Case-to-Condition Ratios in Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Adding Cases Instead of Removing Conditions","authors":"Judith Glaesser","doi":"10.1177/1525822x241231479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x241231479","url":null,"abstract":"In qualitative comparative analysis, as with all methods, there is a question about how many cases are needed to make an analysis robust. In deciding on the number of cases, a key consideration is the number of conditions to be analyzed. I suggest that adding cases is preferable to dropping conditions if there are too many conditions relative to the number of cases. I first consider the relationship of low n and limited diversity, followed by an exploration of two scenarios: (1) cases in the study are the universe; (2) more cases could exist. I suggest that a simple rule or benchmark on how many cases to include in relation to the number of conditions is unlikely to be helpful since this depends at least in part on the goals and circumstances of the research. Finally, this issue is not confined to QCA but affects all types of research.","PeriodicalId":48060,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139955672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Case-to-factor Ratios and Model Specification in Qualitative Comparative Analysis. 定性比较分析中的案例因素比和模型规范
IF 1.7 3区 社会学
Field Methods Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-19 DOI: 10.1177/1525822X231159458
Alrik Thiem, Lusine Mkrtchyan
{"title":"Case-to-factor Ratios and Model Specification in Qualitative Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Alrik Thiem, Lusine Mkrtchyan","doi":"10.1177/1525822X231159458","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1525822X231159458","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is an empirical research method that has gained some popularity in the social sciences. At the same time, the literature has long been convinced that QCA is prone to committing causal fallacies when confronted with non-causal data. More specifically, beyond a certain case-to-factor ratio, the method is believed to fail in recognizing real data. To reduce that risk, some authors have proposed benchmark tables that put a limit on the number of exogenous factors given a certain number of cases. Many applied researchers looking for methodological guidance have since adhered to these tables. We argue that fears of inferential breakdown in QCA due to an \"unfavorable\" case-to-factor ratio are without foundation. What is more, we demonstrate that these benchmarks induce more fallacious inferences than they prevent. For valid causal inference, researchers are better off relying on the current state of knowledge in their respective fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":48060,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10727962/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42080550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fewer Procedures, More Reflection: A Rejoinder to Duşa and Marx. 少程序，多反思:对杜立和马克思的回应
IF 1.1 3区 社会学
Field Methods Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-17 DOI: 10.1177/1525822X231159461
Alrik Thiem, Lusine Mkrtchyan
{"title":"Fewer Procedures, More Reflection: A Rejoinder to Duşa and Marx.","authors":"Alrik Thiem, Lusine Mkrtchyan","doi":"10.1177/1525822X231159461","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1525822X231159461","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48060,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10727960/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45425637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do You Have Two Minutes to Talk about Your Data? Willingness to Participate and Nonparticipation Bias in Facebook Data Donation 您有两分钟时间谈论您的数据吗？Facebook 数据捐赠中的参与意愿和不参与偏差
IF 1.7 3区 社会学
Field Methods Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI: 10.1177/1525822x231225907
Florian Keusch, Paulina K. Pankowska, Alexandru Cernat, Ruben L. Bach
{"title":"Do You Have Two Minutes to Talk about Your Data? Willingness to Participate and Nonparticipation Bias in Facebook Data Donation","authors":"Florian Keusch, Paulina K. Pankowska, Alexandru Cernat, Ruben L. Bach","doi":"10.1177/1525822x231225907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x231225907","url":null,"abstract":"Data donation is a novel approach to collecting digital trace data, where users are asked to download their retrospective data from a platform and share them with the researchers. Little is known about the willingness to donate data and the potential bias that may arise from nonparticipation. We conducted a study among over 900 German Facebook users asking them to donate two data packages. While around 80% of participants were willing to donate their data, only around one-third of them successfully did so. Trust in researchers positively correlates with willingness and donation success, and trust in Facebook is negatively associated with donation success. The framing of the data donation request did not affect the outcomes. We find no difference in frequency of Facebook use between donors and non-donors.","PeriodicalId":48060,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139626648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Short Take: Designing a Multinational Smartphone App Survey during COVID-19: Rewards, Risks, and Recommendations 简评：在 COVID-19 期间设计跨国智能手机应用程序调查：收获、风险和建议
IF 1.7 3区 社会学
Field Methods Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI: 10.1177/1525822x231218192
Jennifer C. Davidson, D. Karadzhov, Graham Wilson
{"title":"Short Take: Designing a Multinational Smartphone App Survey during COVID-19: Rewards, Risks, and Recommendations","authors":"Jennifer C. Davidson, D. Karadzhov, Graham Wilson","doi":"10.1177/1525822x231218192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x231218192","url":null,"abstract":"Cost-effective and user-friendly, mobile phone-assisted methods have remained underutilized in qualitative social science research. The scarce methodological guidance, together with recruitment and ethical challenges, has arguably stifled advancements in this area. COVID-19 exposed the need to better equip researchers with the expertise and tools to conduct remote research effectively. In 2020, we designed and launched a smartphone survey application to collect real-time data from children’s sector professionals across the globe regarding best practices in, and challenges to, responding to the pandemic. In this short article, we reflect on the efficiency, quality, and acceptability afforded by the smartphone app survey, and outline recommendations for enhancing rigor and feasibility. We also present data snippets illustrating the positive impact of participation on respondents—a seldom-documented aspect of app-based research. Altogether, we advocate a flexible, pragmatic, and user-centered study and app design that aligns with respondents’ specific, situational needs, and preferences.","PeriodicalId":48060,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139445728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Usually, I Do Not Quarrel” – What Type of Ties Do We Find When We Ask About Conflicts Using a Name-Generator Approach? 通常，我不会争吵"--当我们使用 "姓名生成器 "方法询问冲突时，会发现什么类型的联系？
IF 1.7 3区 社会学
Field Methods Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI: 10.1177/1525822x231220596
Philip Adebahr, Sylvia Keim-Klärner, André Knabe, A. Klärner
{"title":"“Usually, I Do Not Quarrel” – What Type of Ties Do We Find When We Ask About Conflicts Using a Name-Generator Approach?","authors":"Philip Adebahr, Sylvia Keim-Klärner, André Knabe, A. Klärner","doi":"10.1177/1525822x231220596","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x231220596","url":null,"abstract":"In a mixed-methods study on poverty in Germany, we conducted qualitative interviews and collected quantitative data on ego-centered networks using a name-generator approach and a single set of respondents. Based on the qualitative data, we first developed a typology of negative ties and then evaluated which of these ties the name generator (on conflicts) had measured. To some extent, the conflict name-generator (CNG) captured the complexity of the negative ties in the typology, but it captured only a small fraction of the negative ties mentioned in the narrative interviews and it missed some specific ones. Discussing the limitations of the CNG in the light of our typology of negative ties allows us to learn more about being nuanced in formulating appropriate questions for eliciting negative ties.","PeriodicalId":48060,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138995896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recruitment and Attrition for Panel Surveys of Hard-to-reach Populations: Some Lessons from a Longitudinal Study on Undocumented Migrants 难以接触人口的小组调查的招募和流失:来自无证移民纵向研究的一些教训
3区 社会学
Field Methods Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI: 10.1177/1525822x231210415
Aline Duvoisin, Jan-Erik Refle, Claudine Burton-Jeangros, Liala Consoli, Julien Fakhoury, Yves Jackson
{"title":"Recruitment and Attrition for Panel Surveys of Hard-to-reach Populations: Some Lessons from a Longitudinal Study on Undocumented Migrants","authors":"Aline Duvoisin, Jan-Erik Refle, Claudine Burton-Jeangros, Liala Consoli, Julien Fakhoury, Yves Jackson","doi":"10.1177/1525822x231210415","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x231210415","url":null,"abstract":"Conducting research among hard-to-reach populations is a difficult endeavor because some of their characteristics are known to be associated with survey nonresponse and panel attrition. In the case of the Parchemins study, which followed undocumented migrants over their process of regularization and during the first years of regularized life in Geneva, we underscore the difficulties in recruiting and keeping respondents who come from such a hard-to-reach population. Factors hindering their participation include the fear of being denounced as undocumented, missing time due to high workload, health issues, or language problems. Using unique data from the recruitment and the follow-up processes, we demonstrate that investing high resources and time is particularly beneficial to reach such a population and to reduce attrition over successive data collection waves. In addition, we present the strategies adopted to draw a convenient sample from our targeted population, which mainly relies on generating trust.","PeriodicalId":48060,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135286277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Did You Like the Interview? Interviewer Effects on Respondents’ Interview Pleasantness Ratings 你喜欢面试吗?访谈者对受访者访谈愉快程度的影响
3区 社会学
Field Methods Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI: 10.1177/1525822x231209251
Claudia Schmiedeberg, Jette Schröder
{"title":"Did You Like the Interview? Interviewer Effects on Respondents’ Interview Pleasantness Ratings","authors":"Claudia Schmiedeberg, Jette Schröder","doi":"10.1177/1525822x231209251","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x231209251","url":null,"abstract":"Although it has long been acknowledged that interviewers play a crucial role in the survey data collection process, there is little research concerning interviewer effects on how respondents perceive the interview. We investigate whether interviewer effects exist regarding how much respondents report having enjoyed the interview and whether these effects can be explained by interviewer characteristics. We use data from wave 9 of the German Family Panel pairfam, combined with data from an interviewer survey conducted prior to this wave. Applying multilevel models, we find large interviewer effects that can be explained only partly by interviewers’ sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes, and behavior. Interviewers’ gender, intrinsic work motivation, and their attitude toward respondents significantly affect how much respondents enjoy the interview.","PeriodicalId":48060,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135341484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信