“Usually, I Do Not Quarrel” – What Type of Ties Do We Find When We Ask About Conflicts Using a Name-Generator Approach?

IF 1.1 3区社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY

Field Methods Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.1177/1525822x231220596

Philip Adebahr, Sylvia Keim-Klärner, André Knabe, A. Klärner

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a mixed-methods study on poverty in Germany, we conducted qualitative interviews and collected quantitative data on ego-centered networks using a name-generator approach and a single set of respondents. Based on the qualitative data, we first developed a typology of negative ties and then evaluated which of these ties the name generator (on conflicts) had measured. To some extent, the conflict name-generator (CNG) captured the complexity of the negative ties in the typology, but it captured only a small fraction of the negative ties mentioned in the narrative interviews and it missed some specific ones. Discussing the limitations of the CNG in the light of our typology of negative ties allows us to learn more about being nuanced in formulating appropriate questions for eliciting negative ties.

查看原文本刊更多论文

通常，我不会争吵"--当我们使用 "姓名生成器 "方法询问冲突时，会发现什么类型的联系？

在一项关于德国贫困问题的混合方法研究中，我们使用名称生成器方法和一组受访者对以自我为中心的网络进行了定性访谈并收集了定量数据。在定性数据的基础上，我们首先对负面联系进行了分类，然后评估了名称生成器（冲突）对其中哪些联系进行了测量。在某种程度上，冲突名称生成器（CNG）捕捉到了类型学中负面联系的复杂性，但它只捕捉到了叙述性访谈中提到的一小部分负面联系，而且还遗漏了一些特定的负面联系。根据我们的负面联系类型学来讨论冲突名称生成器的局限性，可以让我们进一步了解在制定适当的问题以激发负面联系时如何做到细致入微。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Field Methods Multiple-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

5.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： Field Methods (formerly Cultural Anthropology Methods) is devoted to articles about the methods used by field wzorkers in the social and behavioral sciences and humanities for the collection, management, and analysis data about human thought and/or human behavior in the natural world. Articles should focus on innovations and issues in the methods used, rather than on the reporting of research or theoretical/epistemological questions about research. High-quality articles using qualitative and quantitative methods-- from scientific or interpretative traditions-- dealing with data collection and analysis in applied and scholarly research from writers in the social sciences, humanities, and related professions are all welcome in the pages of the journal.