Did You Like the Interview? Interviewer Effects on Respondents’ Interview Pleasantness Ratings

IF 1.1 3区社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY

Field Methods Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1177/1525822x231209251

Claudia Schmiedeberg, Jette Schröder

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although it has long been acknowledged that interviewers play a crucial role in the survey data collection process, there is little research concerning interviewer effects on how respondents perceive the interview. We investigate whether interviewer effects exist regarding how much respondents report having enjoyed the interview and whether these effects can be explained by interviewer characteristics. We use data from wave 9 of the German Family Panel pairfam, combined with data from an interviewer survey conducted prior to this wave. Applying multilevel models, we find large interviewer effects that can be explained only partly by interviewers’ sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes, and behavior. Interviewers’ gender, intrinsic work motivation, and their attitude toward respondents significantly affect how much respondents enjoy the interview.

查看原文本刊更多论文

你喜欢面试吗?访谈者对受访者访谈愉快程度的影响

虽然人们早就认识到访谈者在调查数据收集过程中起着至关重要的作用，但很少有关于访谈者对受访者如何感知访谈的影响的研究。我们调查是否存在面试官效应关于多少受访者报告喜欢面试，以及这些影响是否可以用面试官的特征来解释。我们使用了来自德国家庭调查小组第9次调查的数据，并结合了在此之前进行的访谈者调查的数据。运用多层次模型，我们发现，面试官的社会人口特征、态度和行为只能部分解释面试官的巨大影响。访谈者的性别、内在工作动机和对受访者的态度显著影响受访者对访谈的享受程度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Field Methods Multiple-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

5.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： Field Methods (formerly Cultural Anthropology Methods) is devoted to articles about the methods used by field wzorkers in the social and behavioral sciences and humanities for the collection, management, and analysis data about human thought and/or human behavior in the natural world. Articles should focus on innovations and issues in the methods used, rather than on the reporting of research or theoretical/epistemological questions about research. High-quality articles using qualitative and quantitative methods-- from scientific or interpretative traditions-- dealing with data collection and analysis in applied and scholarly research from writers in the social sciences, humanities, and related professions are all welcome in the pages of the journal.