Technology in SocietyPub Date : 2026-09-01Epub Date: 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103246
Kang Sun, Yingcheng Li
{"title":"Knowledge complexity and intercity technology transfer in China, 2001–2020","authors":"Kang Sun, Yingcheng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103246","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103246","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While regional innovation capabilities play a crucial role in technology transfer, existing studies often lack nuanced measures of innovation capabilities and instead focus primarily on the “quantity” of technology transfer. This paper leverages the concept of knowledge complexity to explore its influences on both the “quantity” and “complexity” of intercity technology transfer. Drawing upon a dataset of more than 10 million patents from the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), we calculate the knowledge complexity index (KCI) for 252 Chinese cities and the technological complexity index (TCI) for 622 four-digit technological fields from 2001 to 2020 to capture the “complexity” dimension of technology transfer. Our empirical results reveal an increasing polarization of the KCI distribution among Chinese cities and significant differences between the “quantity” and “complexity” networks of intercity technology transfer. Using fixed-effect panel regression models and an instrumental variable approach, we identify a robust, causal inverted-U relationship between intercity KCI disparities and both the “quantity” and “complexity” of technology transfer. While moderate intercity KCI disparities promote technology transfer, larger disparities hinder it due to limitations in absorptive capacity. Moreover, this inverted-U relationship is heterogeneous across technology sectors and cities, being more pronounced for the transfer of technologies with low and moderate TCI, and for technology transfers between cities with relatively stronger innovation capacities. These findings contribute to the understanding of technology transfer from a knowledge complexity perspective and provide policy insights for designing smart technological specialization strategies in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103246"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Technology in SocietyPub Date : 2026-09-01Epub Date: 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103254
Yasir Ali , Wei Long , Hayat Khan
{"title":"International digital trade in E7 countries: The role of national digital innovation capacity in international trade transformation","authors":"Yasir Ali , Wei Long , Hayat Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103254","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103254","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital trade has developed as a transformative force in the global economy, transforming traditional trade patterns through seamless exchanges of digital trade worldwide. In light of this transition, a crucial question is how national digital innovation capacity (DI) and its various developmental stages (access, usage, and skills) among the E7 emerging economies (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, and Turkey) affect digital trade. This study aims to fill this research gap by exploring the effect of national digital innovation capacity and its developmental stages on digital trade, specifically in the presence of economic freedom, population, economic growth, and institutional quality in the E7 emerging economies. The cointegration analysis shows a long-run association between the analysed variables, where the Method of Moment Quantile Regression (MMQR) analysis reveals that population, economic growth, DI, and its developmental stages significantly increase digital trade, while institutional quality significantly reduces digital trade in E7 emerging economies. Digital skills are found to be more important than digital access and usage for digital trade. However, the impact of economic freedom on digital trade is insignificant. Policymakers and regulators should prioritize strengthening national digital innovation capacity across developmental stages while improving institutional quality to promote digital trade in the E7 emerging economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103254"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Technology in SocietyPub Date : 2026-09-01Epub Date: 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103245
Jasna Poček
{"title":"Healthcare organizations in entrepreneurial ecosystems: an integrative framework and future research agenda","authors":"Jasna Poček","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103245","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103245","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Entrepreneurial ecosystems as lenses promoting innovation and entrepreneurship have attracted substantial interest in research. However attention towards the role of sector-specific actors, such as healthcare-related organizations, within entrepreneurial ecosystems remains underexplored. This paper investigates how healthcare-related organizations are conceptualized within entrepreneurial ecosystem research through an integrative review of the literature addressing EEs and healthcare. The findings show that healthcare entrepreneurs are often portrayed as actors addressing both commercial and public health purposes. Hospitals are perceived as laboratories of collaboration and learning, combining care delivery with innovation-oriented activities, while life sciences are seen as critical to regional innovation and development by attracting scientific knowledge and enabling translation into entrepreneurial opportunities. Institutional and resource dynamics are also perceived as important for healthcare and entrepreneurship ecosystems, through facilitation of resource mobilization and regulatory adaptation. Based on this review, the paper develops a framework that positions healthcare organizations within entrepreneurial ecosystems according to their degree of hybridity and ecosystem roles. This research contributes to EE literature by examining entrepreneurial ecosystems research through a sector-sensitive and relational perspective. The paper offers a framework and research agenda calling for more exploration of institutional complexity, patient-centred innovation, the evolving role of hospitals, and hybrid governance models in entrepreneurial ecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103245"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Technology in SocietyPub Date : 2026-09-01Epub Date: 2026-01-03DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103216
Joel Anderson , Jeroen Hopster , Björn Lundgren
{"title":"Defining socially disruptive technologies and reframing the ethical challenges they pose","authors":"Joel Anderson , Jeroen Hopster , Björn Lundgren","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103216","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103216","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Socially Disruptive Technologies (SDTs) loom large in public debate, yet scholarly discourse on the ethical implications of social disruption is still in its infancy. This article makes two contributions to advance this discourse. First, we propose and defend a new definition of SDTs that allows for classification of those technologies that warrant further ethical analysis, specifically in virtue of their socially disruptive nature (among the examples we discuss are deepfakes, cultured meat, birth control technologies). This is the applied value of the framework we offer: to offer guidance in identifying which technologies require specific scrutiny as SDT, and guidance in identifying an initial set of ethical tools to accompany such analysis. Second, we reframe the ethics of social disruption by highlighting how SDTs pose challenges to capacities for normative orientation and joint action-coordination and by foregrounding the potentially stratified availability of the resources needed to overcome or mitigate these challenges. We argue that although the burdensome disruptiveness means that SDTs characteristically have, at least in a “narrow” sense, a <em>pro tanto</em> negative valence, they may nonetheless turn out to contribute to significant social and moral progress. The ethical concerns raised by SDTs require an approach that is sensitive both to the challenges inherent in the disruption and to its eventual outcome.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103216"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Technology in SocietyPub Date : 2026-09-01Epub Date: 2026-01-31DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103252
Jungwoo Nam , Nahyun Park , Haeyoon Lee , Jungwoo Shin , Daeho Lee , Jieun Shin
{"title":"User perceptions of credibility signals: A conjoint analysis of technological features in news platform","authors":"Jungwoo Nam , Nahyun Park , Haeyoon Lee , Jungwoo Shin , Daeho Lee , Jieun Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103252","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103252","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the era of information overload, the absence of centralized gatekeeping makes it increasingly difficult for users to evaluate the credibility of online news. Drawing on signaling theory, this study examines how technological characteristics embedded in platform interfaces serve as credibility signals that shape user preferences and willingness to pay. We focus on three attributes of online news platforms—interactivity, hypertextuality, and multimediality—and investigate their influence through a conjoint survey and mixed logit analysis. Our findings indicate that users consistently prefer credibility signals. Specifically, content modality, which represents multimediality, is the most influential factor in shaping user preferences, whereas human review verification is valued most highly in monetary terms. These results suggest that costly technological features operate as signals of online news quality, guiding credibility assessments and subscription decisions. The study extends signaling theory by applying it to online news platforms and linking it with research on information systems and human–computer interaction. In practice, the results provide guidance for platform managers and designers, emphasizing that verification and multimedia features can strengthen user preferences, enhance perceptions of credibility, and support revenue models. Thus, the study bridges theoretical insight with managerial relevance for the future development of online news platforms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103252"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Navigating frictions and drivers in international research collaboration – the case of BRICS nations","authors":"Angelica Pigola , Bruno Fischer , Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes , Dirk Meissner , Zhou Yuan , Zhongzhen Miao","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103241","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103241","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>International research collaboration plays an increasingly important role in shaping global scientific agendas. Yet limited empirical attention has been given to how these dynamics unfold in emerging economies. This paper investigates the effects of collaboration frictions, execution challenges, strategic incentives, and trust asymmetries on scientific outcomes in international research collaborations among BRICS academics. Drawing on transaction cost economics, organizational behavior, and process-based trust theory, we develop and test a structural model using survey data from 396 respondents engaged in international collaborative research. Scientific outcomes are defined as tangible and strategic outputs such as technological innovations, R&D infrastructure, and institutional agreements. Contrary to expectations, execution challenges are positively associated with scientific outcomes, suggesting that operational complexity may reflect innovation ambition rather than dysfunction. Strategic incentives emerge as the strongest positive predictor of scientific outcomes. Trust asymmetries, though not directly associated with outcomes, significantly moderate collaboration mechanisms—attenuating the positive influence of strategic incentives and weakening the positive association between execution challenges and scientific outcomes under relational imbalance, while indicating that the relationship between collaboration frictions and scientific outcomes varies across trust conditions. These results challenge conventional assumptions that prioritize friction-free coordination, instead highlighting how relational imbalances can distort collaboration dynamics. The study contributes to a more context-sensitive understanding of research governance in the Global South and offers practical insights into designing resilient, equitable partnerships in complex environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103241"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146081663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Technology in SocietyPub Date : 2026-09-01Epub Date: 2026-01-28DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103247
Muhammad Umair Rafiq , Yixiang Zhang , Shaham Saleem
{"title":"Navigating sustainable growth: Decoding the influence of digital economy on economic sustainability","authors":"Muhammad Umair Rafiq , Yixiang Zhang , Shaham Saleem","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103247","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103247","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The digital economy can offer transformative pathways to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation, heralding a sustainable future. In this context, can digital economy promote economic sustainability? This study investigates this relationship across European countries from 2003 to 2019 based on the awareness-motivation-capability framework. A new economic sustainability index is developed. By applying system generalized method of moments technique, the findings unveil a significant positive effect of the digital economy on economic sustainability. In terms of moderating impacts, natural resource depletion and research and development positively moderate and strengthen the digital economy’s impact on economic sustainability. Regarding mediating effects, this research identifies circular economy and energy efficiency, categorized as carrying capacity, along with financial development and institutional quality, classified as absorptive capacity, which positively mediate the association between the digital economy and economic sustainability. These findings highlight how the digital economy promotes economic sustainability, guiding policymakers in integrating digital initiatives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103247"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Technology in SocietyPub Date : 2026-09-01Epub Date: 2026-02-08DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103261
Xinping Huang , Tianqi Kou , Qianwen Zhou
{"title":"Embedding AI ethics in the data lifecycle: A framework for enterprise AI governance","authors":"Xinping Huang , Tianqi Kou , Qianwen Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103261","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103261","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enterprises adopting AI often face a persistent gap between ethical principles and concrete operational practices. To address this challenge, this study proposes a data-centered governance framework that embeds ethical considerations throughout the AI data lifecycle. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyze internationally representative AI ethics and data governance policy documents through grounded theory, informed by Value Sensitive Design and socio-technical systems theory. The resulting framework comprises four governance dimensions—macro values, technical foundations, actor practices, and organizational arrangements—operationalized through twenty indicators. Indicator weights are further derived using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process based on assessments from enterprise practitioners. The findings reveal a strong emphasis on institutional accountability and technical compliance, while commitments to value-level ethical ideals and internal governance capacity receive comparatively less attention. Building on these results, we propose a practical governance framework that integrates accountability mechanisms, technical safeguards, and normative principles across the data lifecycle. Supplementary qualitative insights from cross-sector interviews further illuminate sectoral differences in implementation. Overall, the framework supports enterprises in operationalizing AI ethics and offers policymakers an empirical basis for bridging the ethics–practice gap.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103261"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146190403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Technology in SocietyPub Date : 2026-06-01Epub Date: 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103239
Ming Zhu , Prashant Sharma , Salwa Saleh Almasabi , Varun Chotia , Gian Luca Gregori , Manlio Del Giudice
{"title":"Reinforcing financial and accounting resilience in digital circular platforms: The strategic role of digital governance and organizational culture","authors":"Ming Zhu , Prashant Sharma , Salwa Saleh Almasabi , Varun Chotia , Gian Luca Gregori , Manlio Del Giudice","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103239","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103239","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital circular platforms are a new form of socio-technical ecosystems integrating digital technologies, financial innovation and organizational sustainability practices designed to build resilience and regenerative value. This research studied the effect of digital platform functionality, digital governance maturity and platform-based financial mechanism on financial and accounting resilience through the mediating impact of organisational culture for sustainability and circular business model innovation. Using dynamic capabilities view and socio-technical systems theory as a theoretical foundation, the current research develops and tests a serial mediation model using data from 297 professionals. Digital governance maturity and platform-based financial mechanism improve financial and accounting resilience significantly to a considerable degree. Organisational culture for sustainability and circular business model innovation exhibit serial mediating effects. Thus, it confirms that a mechanism exists between digital and financial enablers leading to resilience outcomes. The considerable variance in financial and accounting resilience can be explained by the model. Therefore, it can be inferred that adaptive governance and innovation-driven culture are critical to sustaining circular digital ecosystems. This study enhances the understanding of how digital governance and circular innovation are linked through organizational culture-based mediating pathways. Practically, it provides actionable guidance for platform managers and policymakers to facilitate their establishment of integrative digital financial and accounting systems that generate resilience, adaptability, and long-term sustainability for circular business systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103239"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146037443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Technology in SocietyPub Date : 2026-06-01Epub Date: 2025-11-15DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103171
Myne Uddin , Ayub Ali , Abu Bakkar Siddik
{"title":"Employment in the digital economy: Role of artificial intelligence and technological innovation","authors":"Myne Uddin , Ayub Ali , Abu Bakkar Siddik","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103171","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103171","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the age of the digital economy, technological advancements are reshaping labor markets, creating both new opportunities and challenges. However, the impact of digitalization, particularly the roles of artificial intelligence (AI) and technological innovation (TI), on employment remains insufficiently examined. This study examines the effect of the digital economy on employment in 36 OECD countries from 2005 to 2022, focusing on the moderating roles of AI and TI, using the Driscoll-Kraay Standard Errors (DKSE) model and various robustness tests. The findings show that: (1) the digital economy enhances employment, with a stronger effect at lower employment quantiles; (2) AI and TI strengthen the digital economy's impact, although AI's direct effect is negative, while innovation's effect is positive; (3) the digital economy increases employment through political, economic, and social globalization; (4) sectoral analysis reveals that the digital economy reduces jobs in agriculture while boosting those in the service sector, and has a positively insignificant effect on the industrial sector; and (5) heterogeneity analysis indicates that the digital economy's benefits are more pronounced in highly developed, industrialized, and less urbanized countries. The study emphasizes the need for tailored policies to maximize the benefits of digitalization, address the challenges posed by AI, and ensure sustainable and equitable labor market growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103171"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145579369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}