{"title":"Measuring Perceptions of Rural America: An Integration of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis","authors":"Cara Lawson, Peng Lu, Courtney Meyers","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70040","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the first instrument specifically designed to measure public perceptions of rural America. The researcher‐developed instrument was comprised of 22 items. An exploratory factor analysis and a confirmatory factor analysis were conducted in two different samples: a group of undergraduate students and a national sample. A four‐factor model of the scale was confirmed, including community strengths and safety, economic and educational challenges, health and addiction issues, and social discrimination and cultural tensions. The scale is appropriate for measuring perceptions of rural Americans reliably and accurately. A better understanding of the perceptions of rural America will help educators and communicators identify and promote solutions for the issues and challenges facing those communities.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147447418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Is Rural America Older Than Urban America? The Answer Depends on the Decade","authors":"Matthew M. Brooks","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70041","url":null,"abstract":"Residents of rural America being older than urban residents is often viewed as a fundamental demographic difference between these two populations, with rural population aging seen as both a cause and consequence of economic and epidemiological hardships found in rural communities. However, it is currently unknown how historically rooted this demographic divide is and if it will persist in the future. This study asks one descriptive question: how has the age structure of rural and urban populations changed—or will change—between 1920 and 2060? Historical full count microdata, county‐level population counts, and multiple population projections are used to estimate the median age of rural and urban residents. From 1920 to 1960 individuals living in counties currently classified as rural were unexpectedly younger than their urban peers. Although rural populations were older from 1970 to 2020 and are likely to remain so in the near future, population projections suggest that urban median ages will catch up by 2060. Underlying compositional shifts in key age groups suggest that Baby Boomers played a major role in these age structure transitions. These findings provide necessary insights into the changing nature of who lives in rural America and how rural communities may need to adapt to aging populations.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147447419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daniel Tobin, Lizah Makombore, Travis W. Reynolds, Leland L. Glenna
{"title":"On Repeat? The Logic of Agricultural Modernization, the Choices of Tanzanian Small‐Scale Farmers, and Implications for the Second Green Revolution","authors":"Daniel Tobin, Lizah Makombore, Travis W. Reynolds, Leland L. Glenna","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70033","url":null,"abstract":"The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) is the latest in a series of initiatives aimed at modernizing small‐scale farming to address food insecurity and poverty, yet AGRA has fallen short of its goals. This study explores whether these shortcomings might stem from flawed assumptions in AGRA's theory of change—assumptions long embedded in top‐down agricultural modernization efforts. We situate AGRA within broader debates on the agrarian question, especially the Chayanov–Lenin debate, and draw historical parallels with United States agricultural industrialization, the Green Revolution, and Soviet collectivization, as well as Tanzania's villagization program. Tanzania is an instructive case, having undergone both collectivist and market‐based modernization. Using Chayanov's theory of peasant household decision‐making, we analyze panel survey data from the Tanzania National Panel Survey (TNPS), part of the World Bank Living Standards Measurement Study—Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (LSMS‐ISA) program, to examine how household demographic factors relate to labor and land use decisions. Our findings show that household composition is significantly associated with agricultural labor allocation choices and land use. We also address Chayanov's gender blind spot, finding that men and women plot managers and men‐ and women‐headed households often pursue different labor allocation and land use strategies. These results suggest that AGRA's model may make questionable assumptions about the decision‐making of small‐scale farmers. We conclude by considering the implications of this modernization logic and argue that a pragmatic approach to agricultural development, one rooted in the actual priorities and preferences of small‐scale farmers, offers an alternative.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146261013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Landowner Perspectives on Large‐Scale Solar Leasing: Decision‐Making and Agricultural Implications in Rural New York State","authors":"Kathryn Bills Walsh, Richard Stedman, David Kay","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70038","url":null,"abstract":"As the decarbonization‐driven energy transition accelerates, land‐intensive renewable energy technologies, and large‐scale solar facilities (LSS) in particular, increasingly compete for rural land. In the Northeast United States, LSS development largely depends on private landowners' decisions to lease land for LSS development. Little research has documented the characteristics of landowners who either agree or refuse to contract with LSS developers nor how they are likely to change their future land management, especially agricultural practices. Drawing on a survey of 1499 rural landowners ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 584 responses) conducted in three counties of New York State, currently ranked 8th nationally in solar energy production, but with even more ambitious solar production goals, this study explores landowner beliefs, decision‐making, and intended land management behavior concerning LSS development. Nearly half of respondents had been approached to lease land for LSS development. Farmland owners—compared to landowners who do not own land that is agricultural (henceforth “non‐farmland owners”) were approached to lease more frequently but were less likely to lease if approached. More negative beliefs about LSS, stronger levels of opposition to LSS, and concerns about the solar development company are associated with observed lower rates of leasing among farmland owners. Farmers with LSS leases are three times more likely to indicate that they intend to use solar revenues to continue farming rather than as an agricultural exit strategy. Nearly half do not intend to change their agricultural practices. Based on these results we suggest that—at least in this context—concerns about farmland loss due to LSS may be overstated.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146261014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Beyond “Deaths of Despair”: Narratives of Distress and Risk‐Taking Behaviors Among Rural Working‐Class Men","authors":"Maleah Fekete","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70037","url":null,"abstract":"White working‐class men living in rural areas are affected by increased rates of distress thought to lead to risk‐taking behaviors. This study advances understanding of risk‐taking‐related distress by examining how men interpret their experiences and how these meaning‐making processes connect to shifting social‐structural conditions in rural working‐class life. Drawing on 14 interviews with men affected by risk‐taking‐related distress, I find that men's descriptions largely focus on interpersonal relationships and often center on the end of romantic relationships with women, which they describe as unfair or undeserved. When respondents describe internal states, they report feeling depressed and having nothing and display feelings of resentment. Findings suggest that this group's declining social position has led to a mismatch between expectations and resources necessary for achieving those expectations. A sense of failing to meet directives of their working‐class masculine identities—especially maintaining control in heterosexual romantic relationships—may lead men to manage distress by engaging in risk‐taking behavior. Findings extend understanding of how macro‐social conditions in areas with high rates of risk‐taking‐related mortality translate into distress through men's cultural expectations and identity.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146261166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Will Work for Food: Labor Across the Food Chain, By Laura‐AnneMinkoff‐Zern and Teresa M.Mares, Oakland, California: University of California Press, 2025. 320 pp. $29.95 (paper). ISBN: 978‐0‐52‐039161‐1","authors":"Jordan Davey, Daniel Jaffee","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70039","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146205143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Conditions of Possibility for Deep Social Change—Imaginaries Concerning Normality in a Finnish Online Discussion on Self‐Sufficiency","authors":"Olli Herranen, Tere Vadén","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70036","url":null,"abstract":"As part of the literature that emphasizes alternative narratives as a prominent means of promoting change in the face of the climate crisis and other ecological catastrophes, we concentrate on local self‐sufficiency, which has been identified as one of the promising paths to sustainability. Inductive content analysis of public discussion of radical self‐sufficiency on a Finnish newspaper website, using two sets of data 10 years apart, uncovered shared features in people's evaluation and reasoning on self‐sufficiency. From the discussion, a social imaginary of a desirable “normal” state, characterized in terms of the monetary economy and technological progress, is readily identifiable. In contrast, change toward a self‐sufficient lifestyle is seen as contingent on several factors: it being universalizable, contributing to common goals, and discouraging living off other people. These findings suggest that efforts to articulate narratives of low natural resource use must pay heed to broadening the social imagination, while simultaneously highlighting opportunities to participate meaningfully in society.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146169534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Farm Workforce Modernization Act: Finding Common Ground at the Crossroads of Immigration and Labor Policy","authors":"Margaret Gray, Julie C. Keller, Molly Graver","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70035","url":null,"abstract":"This case study of the 2019 Farm Workforce Modernization Act explains how immigration policy is framed and how compromise is generated among legislators and interest groups with conflicting goals. This research relies on a content analysis of publicly available primary documents dating from 2019 to 2020, and a qualitative survey of 20 farmworker advocates. We argue that three overarching frames defined the policy problem and thus shaped policy proposals: (1) exploitative working conditions, (2) access to cheap labor, and (3) the rule of law. Further, we identified emotional appeals that buttressed each frame, consisting of ethics, agricultural exceptionalism, and the undeserving/deserving binary. Our analysis also reveals the Faustian bargains of members of the policy network and opposition from groups in the wider policy community. Though the FWMA did not reach the Senate floor, an analysis of how the policy problem was defined and how debate was framed offers insights into the process of policymaking around the polarizing issues of immigration and labor, while building on the scholarship on immigration frames, agricultural exceptionalism, and the role of emotions in framing.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146129388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ryan P. Thombs, Benjamin K. Sovacool, Andrew K. Jorgenson, Jonathan J. Buonocore, Mary D. Willis
{"title":"A Not‐So‐Just Transition? Examining the Effects of Coal Sector Decline on Life Expectancy in U.S. Counties","authors":"Ryan P. Thombs, Benjamin K. Sovacool, Andrew K. Jorgenson, Jonathan J. Buonocore, Mary D. Willis","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70034","url":null,"abstract":"Driven by climate and energy policy priorities in national and global contexts, coal phase‐out is expected to improve public health outcomes by reducing human exposure to air, water, and soil pollution and decreasing the number of workers in dangerous mining conditions. However, the transition may also increase economic distress in mining communities leading to poorer health outcomes—possibly offsetting the benefits of phasing out coal. We examine this hypothesis by assessing the relation between coal production, working hours per miner, coal mining employment, and life expectancy in 3076 U.S. counties (97.9% of all U.S. counties) from 2012 to 2019. We develop and apply a novel spatial modeling approach that combines the high‐dimensional half‐panel jackknife fixed effects estimator with the spatial lag of X model and examine whether increases and decreases in each predictor are associated with life expectancy. We find that an increase in coal mining employment in adjacent counties increases life expectancy in the focal county in the short and long run and vice versa for a decrease in employment, and that decreases in miner labor hours in adjacent counties increase life expectancy in the short and long run in the focal county. We also find that effects differ in Appalachia compared to the rest of the country—where increases in coal production are associated with decreases in life expectancy and is also where the effects of coal mining employment are concentrated. These findings suggest that both increasing and decreasing reliance on coal can negatively impact population health, and that these competing exposures underscore the importance of a Just Transition away from fossil fuels.","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146042637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Rural Lawyer: How to Incentivize Rural Law Practice and Help Small Communities ThriveBy HannahHaksgaard, Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2025. 204 pp. $30.99. ISBN: 978‐1‐00‐954284‐5","authors":"K. Aleks Schaefer, Brian R. Farrell","doi":"10.1111/ruso.70031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.70031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47924,"journal":{"name":"RURAL SOCIOLOGY","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145664446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}