发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The contradictions of American capital punishment 美国死刑的矛盾之处
IF 1.8 2区 社会学
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI: 10.5860/choice.41-5614
T. Geraghty
{"title":"The contradictions of American capital punishment","authors":"T. Geraghty","doi":"10.5860/choice.41-5614","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-5614","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":"94 1","pages":"209-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71101223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 146
The Real-World Shift in Criminal Procedure 刑事诉讼中的现实世界转变
IF 1.8 2区 社会学
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2002-12-03 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.345320
Stephanos Bibas
{"title":"The Real-World Shift in Criminal Procedure","authors":"Stephanos Bibas","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.345320","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.345320","url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, criminal procedure scholars have focused on the U.S. Supreme Court's constitutional doctrine. This doctrinal approach has dominated not only scholarship, but also teaching, and it continues to rule the leading casebooks. Younger scholars have begun to broaden criminal procedure scholarship to include non-judicial actors, state law, neglected topics such as plea bargaining and sentencing, and factors such as politics, race, and drugs. These changes have, however, been slow to hit the classroom, as until recently all the major casebooks focused on federal constitutional doctrine. Now, however, two more real-world casebooks are available: Marc Miller & Ronald Wright's Criminal Procedures, and Ronald Allen, William Stuntz, Joseph Hoffman, and Debra Livingston's Comprehensive Criminal Procedure. These two books enrich the mix of teaching materials, adding a welcome diversity of approaches to the existing mix. The doctrinal, constitutional approach is not bad, but these new books supplement this approach in rewarding ways. This review essay compares these two real-word casebooks with five leading doctrinal casebooks. It discusses how the newer approach promises to enrich teaching and scholarship as well. Part I considers the significance of looking beyond judges and case law to other actors and sources of law. Part II discusses Miller & Wright's shift of focus from federal law to state law and practice. Part III examines how factors beyond doctrine come into play: politics, race, and drugs. Part IV then looks at the broadening of focus beyond strictly criminal enforcement to civil and quasi-criminal procedures, such as forfeitures, commitment of sex offenders, and gang-loitering ordinances. Part V addresses the real-world shift away from jury trials toward the hugely important issues of charging, plea bargaining, and sentencing. This review concludes with thoughts about the significance of these changes for criminal procedure teaching and scholarship generally.","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":"93 1","pages":"789"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2002-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.345320","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68594866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative: Whatever Happened to Federalism 美国诉奥克兰大麻买家合作社:联邦制到底发生了什么
IF 1.8 2区 社会学
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2002-09-22 DOI: 10.2307/1144310
Caroline Herman
{"title":"United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative: Whatever Happened to Federalism","authors":"Caroline Herman","doi":"10.2307/1144310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1144310","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":"93 1","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2002-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1144310","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68413932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
What Were They Smoking?: The Supreme Court's Latest Step in a Long, Strange Trip through the Fourth Amendment 他们在抽什么?:最高法院在漫长而奇怪的第四修正案之旅中迈出的最新一步
IF 1.8 2区 社会学
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2002-09-22 DOI: 10.2307/1144311
D. McKenzie
{"title":"What Were They Smoking?: The Supreme Court's Latest Step in a Long, Strange Trip through the Fourth Amendment","authors":"D. McKenzie","doi":"10.2307/1144311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1144311","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":"93 1","pages":"153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2002-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1144311","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68413986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Federal Habeas Review: The Supreme Court's Failure to Apply Williams Consistently 联邦人身保护审查:最高法院未能始终如一地适用威廉姆斯
IF 1.8 2区 社会学
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2002-09-22 DOI: 10.2307/1144309
Marry Connell Grubb
{"title":"Federal Habeas Review: The Supreme Court's Failure to Apply Williams Consistently","authors":"Marry Connell Grubb","doi":"10.2307/1144309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1144309","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":"93 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2002-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1144309","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68413914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shafer v. South Carolina: Another missed opportunity to remove juror ignorance as a factor in capital sentencing 谢弗诉南卡罗莱纳:又一次错失了消除陪审员无知作为死刑判决因素的机会
IF 1.8 2区 社会学
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2002-09-22 DOI: 10.2307/1144308
William H. Baarsma
{"title":"Shafer v. South Carolina: Another missed opportunity to remove juror ignorance as a factor in capital sentencing","authors":"William H. Baarsma","doi":"10.2307/1144308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1144308","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":"93 1","pages":"23-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2002-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1144308","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68413866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Blurring the Line: Impact of Offense-Specific Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel 模糊界限:第六修正案对特定犯罪的律师权利的影响
IF 1.8 2区 社会学
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2002-09-22 DOI: 10.2307/1144312
Melis Y. Minas
{"title":"Blurring the Line: Impact of Offense-Specific Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel","authors":"Melis Y. Minas","doi":"10.2307/1144312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1144312","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":"93 1","pages":"195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2002-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1144312","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68414002","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Questions Unanswered: The Fifth Amendment and Innocent Witnesses 未解之谜:第五修正案和无辜证人
IF 1.8 2区 社会学
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2002-09-22 DOI: 10.2307/1144314
A. Roxas
{"title":"Questions Unanswered: The Fifth Amendment and Innocent Witnesses","authors":"A. Roxas","doi":"10.2307/1144314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1144314","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":"93 1","pages":"259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2002-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1144314","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68414056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
City of Indianapolis v. Edmond: The Constitutionality of Drug Interdiction Checkpoints 印第安纳波利斯市诉埃德蒙:毒品拦截检查站的合宪性
IF 1.8 2区 社会学
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2002-09-22 DOI: 10.2307/1144313
A. Mulligan
{"title":"City of Indianapolis v. Edmond: The Constitutionality of Drug Interdiction Checkpoints","authors":"A. Mulligan","doi":"10.2307/1144313","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1144313","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":"93 1","pages":"227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2002-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1144313","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68414012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Foreword: Terrorism and Utilitarianism: Lessons from, and for, Criminal Law 前言:恐怖主义与功利主义:刑法的教训与启示
IF 1.8 2区 社会学
Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology Pub Date : 2002-09-05 DOI: 10.2307/1144307
P. Butler
{"title":"Foreword: Terrorism and Utilitarianism: Lessons from, and for, Criminal Law","authors":"P. Butler","doi":"10.2307/1144307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1144307","url":null,"abstract":"Punishment is violent, but it is violence with a purpose. The same observation might be made of terrorism. This Article compares instrumentalist justifications of utilitarian punishment and terrorism. Both terrorism and the harsh punishment for crimes favored by American criminal justice are premised on a construct of cost-benefit analysis that, while (arguably) efficient, is immoral. The Article argues that both terrorism and excessive punishment can be justified by instrumentalism, but neither should be. The comparison of terrorism and American criminal justice does not mean that they are equally bad. Terrorism is worse. There are, however, many people in the United States who are punished for social, not individual (\"just desert\"), objectives. When we remember that punishment is the \"deliberate infliction of pain\" we understand that the state is intentionally hurting people to achieve some goal. This is not as bad as what terrorists do, but the difference is one of degree, not kind.","PeriodicalId":47821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2002-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1144307","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68413854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信