Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Norm Circles and Critical Realism 规范圈与批判现实主义
IF 1.6 3区 心理学
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Pub Date : 2026-04-03 DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.70038
Dave Elder-Vass, Manuel Heckel
{"title":"Norm Circles and Critical Realism","authors":"Dave Elder-Vass,&nbsp;Manuel Heckel","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<p>An increasing number of scholars have employed the critical realist concept of <i>norm circles</i> in empirical research. Norm circles are social structures, composed of human agents, that tend to encourage people to conform with norms. As such, they provide a (partly) structural explanation for social normativity, which in turn plays an important role in many other social structures. Researchers who come across the concept, however, often ask how it relates to other elements of critical realist theory. This paper addresses the relationships between norm circle theory and the work of three influential critical realist theorists: Roy Bhaskar, Margaret Archer and Tony Lawson. With reference to Bhaskar's work, it presents norm circles as entities with emergent causal powers and as social structures that are concept and activity dependent. With reference to Archer's work, it shows how the morphogenetic approach applies to the development of norm circles but also considers the tensions between norm circle theory and Archer's understandings of reflexivity and culture. Regarding Lawson's work, it argues that norm circles add an explanation of why people go along with positional rights and obligations that are the centrepiece of Social Positioning Theory and how positions exist. Overall, the paper argues that norm circle theory complements all these contributions. It illustrates how abstract ontological work can be applied to more concrete empirical social cases and thus extends critical realist social ontology. Given the centrality of normativity to many social structures, it also provides a resource for theorising other forms of social structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147682971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Norm Circles and Critical Realism 规范圈与批判现实主义
IF 1.6 3区 心理学
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Pub Date : 2026-04-03 DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.70038
Dave Elder-Vass, Manuel Heckel
{"title":"Norm Circles and Critical Realism","authors":"Dave Elder-Vass,&nbsp;Manuel Heckel","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70038","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jtsb.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<p>An increasing number of scholars have employed the critical realist concept of <i>norm circles</i> in empirical research. Norm circles are social structures, composed of human agents, that tend to encourage people to conform with norms. As such, they provide a (partly) structural explanation for social normativity, which in turn plays an important role in many other social structures. Researchers who come across the concept, however, often ask how it relates to other elements of critical realist theory. This paper addresses the relationships between norm circle theory and the work of three influential critical realist theorists: Roy Bhaskar, Margaret Archer and Tony Lawson. With reference to Bhaskar's work, it presents norm circles as entities with emergent causal powers and as social structures that are concept and activity dependent. With reference to Archer's work, it shows how the morphogenetic approach applies to the development of norm circles but also considers the tensions between norm circle theory and Archer's understandings of reflexivity and culture. Regarding Lawson's work, it argues that norm circles add an explanation of why people go along with positional rights and obligations that are the centrepiece of Social Positioning Theory and how positions exist. Overall, the paper argues that norm circle theory complements all these contributions. It illustrates how abstract ontological work can be applied to more concrete empirical social cases and thus extends critical realist social ontology. Given the centrality of normativity to many social structures, it also provides a resource for theorising other forms of social structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147682970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Institutional Logics Versus Norm Circles: Alternative or Complementary Approaches to the Analysis of Institutions? 制度逻辑与规范圈:制度分析的替代或补充方法?
IF 1.6 3区 心理学
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Pub Date : 2026-03-26 DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.70037
Sven Modell
{"title":"Institutional Logics Versus Norm Circles: Alternative or Complementary Approaches to the Analysis of Institutions?","authors":"Sven Modell","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70037","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jtsb.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The institutional logics and norm circle perspectives have emerged as two approaches to the analysis of institutions in organisations and society. This paper compares the two perspectives and asks whether they should be seen as alternative or complementary approaches. Although the two approaches rest on a shared ontological conception of institutions as objectified, or taken-for-granted, phenomena that are imbued with a strong sense of normativity, their diverging epistemological commitments and analytical emphases speak in favour of treating them as relatively distinct alternatives. This is especially the case insofar as the ‘mainstream’ approach, that has dominated research on institutional logics, is concerned. However, I also draw attention to how insights from the institutional logics and norm circle perspectives can be selectively combined and complement each other within a research approach that builds on a shared, critical realist understanding of institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70037","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147579743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reflecting on Prejudice Research: Considering Participants' Feedback 偏见研究反思:考虑参与者的反馈
IF 1.6 3区 心理学
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Pub Date : 2026-03-19 DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.70036
Maykel Verkuyten
{"title":"Reflecting on Prejudice Research: Considering Participants' Feedback","authors":"Maykel Verkuyten","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prejudice is a major worldwide problem fuelling discrimination and conflict in everyday life. In mainstream psychological and social science research, many prejudice researchers test theoretical propositions using standard (survey) questions. This article argues that this important type of work will benefit from reflecting on some of the feedback that people give when participating in research that uses self-report for measuring prejudice. Four issues relating to different aspects of this research are identified and discussed: misinterpretation, invalidation, dehumanisation and double standards. It is argued that seriously considering these four issues can have various implications for prejudice research quality and design and is important for theoretical and applied reasons.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70036","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147567123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Multisituationality and Social Sensibility. Insights From Neophenomenological Sociology 多情境性与社会敏感性。新现象社会学的见解
IF 1.6 3区 心理学
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Pub Date : 2026-03-04 DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.70035
Michele Granzotto
{"title":"Multisituationality and Social Sensibility. Insights From Neophenomenological Sociology","authors":"Michele Granzotto","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sometimes, we do not act in accordance with what we know. For example, we may purchase products that we know are the result of production chains with questionable ethics. This contribution investigates the paradox between social action and rational knowledge, starting from the ambivalence between emotion and reason. The analysis integrates Schmitz's Neue Phänomenologie and Neophenomenological Sociology (NPS) and is divided into three parts: (1) clarifying affective involvement as a social a priori and the <i>patheur</i>'s felt-bodily communication, (2) focusing on the concepts of the semi-thing, the situation, and the atmosphere as pre-reflective motivators of action and multisituationality, and (3) interpreting Hochschild's concept of <i>feeling rules</i> as programme components of the situation, thereby highlighting the emotional friction that can arise when one is emotionally involved in two or more conflicting situations. Building on this, the concept of social sensibility is introduced as a trans-subjective dynamic, shaped atmospherically in a sensitisation process, which guides social action. This concept offers a tool for understanding action and inaction in contemporary crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70035","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147563256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differentiating Regulative and Constitutive Normativity: Talcott Parsons, Harold Garfinkel and the Sticky Problem of Meaning 区分规则规范与构成规范:塔尔科特·帕森斯、哈罗德·加芬克尔与意义的粘性问题
IF 1.6 3区 心理学
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Pub Date : 2026-02-23 DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.70033
Andrew Chalfoun
{"title":"Differentiating Regulative and Constitutive Normativity: Talcott Parsons, Harold Garfinkel and the Sticky Problem of Meaning","authors":"Andrew Chalfoun","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In everyday life, individuals regularly confront novel situations which demand their attention and response. In such situations, they routinely deploy portable norms to select between appropriate and inappropriate next actions. Yet, these norms do not seem to determine the conditions of their own application. How then are we able to act in an orderly and mutually intelligible manner? This paper examines two attempts to answer this question, neither of which is entirely satisfactory. Talcott Parsons solves this ‘problem of meaning’ by postulating the existence of a cultural system that governs the applicability of shared norms. By contrast, Harold Garfinkel's ethnomethodology prioritises actors' own methods of in situ sense-making, drawing attention to contextually specific practices for securing intersubjectivity. Although Garfinkel's approach resolves some problems with the Parsonian account, I argue that his break with Parsons introduces a conceptual slippage between <i>regulative</i> and <i>constitutive</i> normativity. In view of this, the final section argues that contemporary social theory would benefit from renewed attention to the mutual autonomy of these two phenomena.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147568012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Composition Theory: A Pragmatist Specification of the Mesosocial 构成理论:中社会的实用主义规范
IF 1.6 3区 心理学
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Pub Date : 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.70031
David D. Brown
{"title":"Composition Theory: A Pragmatist Specification of the Mesosocial","authors":"David D. Brown","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70031","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article develops composition theory as a pragmatist specification of the mesosocial. Existing theories describe situated social life without adequately explaining the mechanisms that produce it. Recent pragmatist scholarship has established important foundations: Gross on mechanisms, Lizardo on habit, and Hallett on inhabited institutionalism. Yet the mechanisms themselves remain underspecified. Composition theory fills this gap through four sets of mechanisms: composition, engagement, sedimentation, and circulation. Together, these explain how problem responsive actors assemble formations, how formations become consequential as affordances meet capacities, how residues accumulate over time and how patterns extend across settings through movement and echoing. The article reinterprets Dewey's concept of situation as the flow of actors' transactions with and within their present place (relational, symbolic and material environment) while remaining cognizant of their direct and indirect experiences with other places. Place is the somewhere somewhen locatable environment that necessarily grounds each situation and social reality as such. The framework reconceptualizes microsocial, mesosocial, and macrosocial as a continuum of compositional complexity anchored in the mesosocial. It expands the range of theory-driven research questions by directing attention to processes within and across places of action rather than to the forces of abstract structural properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70031","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146162476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Symbolic Interaction as a Sociology of Concern: Revisiting the Theory of Reflexivity Methodologically 作为关注社会学的符号互动:反身性理论的方法论回顾
IF 1.6 3区 心理学
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.70032
Liudmila Zaichenko
{"title":"Symbolic Interaction as a Sociology of Concern: Revisiting the Theory of Reflexivity Methodologically","authors":"Liudmila Zaichenko","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70032","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper attempts to revisit the critical realist theory of reflexivity, derived from the pragmatist tradition of symbolic interactionism (SI). It discusses how interactionist sociology, with its emphasis on investigating microstructures through meaning-making, has formed a critical realist theory of reflexivity that serves as a theoretical bridge between the micro and macro levels—specifically, between ‘subjective concerns’ and cultural and structural stability and change. The paper focuses on Margaret Archer's theory of reflexivity and internal conversation as a critical realist response to social constructionism, connecting it to SI, particularly through Herbert Blumer's framework. It proposes a holistic approach to studying reflexivity through human concerns. By underscoring the interconnection between SI methodology and the critical realist theory of reflexivity, the paper offers a triangulation of several qualitative methodological strategies to study reflexivity in a more rigorous manner while also providing a connection between the purely interpretive and the positivistic traditions.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146154634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Functionaries: A Distributional Approach to Institutional Analysis 公务员:制度分析的分配方法
IF 1.6 3区 心理学
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Pub Date : 2026-01-31 DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.70030
Dustin S. Stoltz, Marshall A. Taylor, Omar Lizardo
{"title":"Functionaries: A Distributional Approach to Institutional Analysis","authors":"Dustin S. Stoltz,&nbsp;Marshall A. Taylor,&nbsp;Omar Lizardo","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper outlines a distributional approach to institutional analysis, reconceptualising institutions as distributions of knowledge and activity across people. We argue that institutionalisation and institutional change are best understood by focussing on actors with the requisite knowledge and motivation to keep institutional patterns going, fix them when they go awry, or transform them when required, here called functionaries. The distributional approach allows us to distinguish between two main types of institutional change often conflated in the literature: Content-based and formal change. Content-based change, the one most often discussed, involves the importation, recombination, or expansion of specific patterns of activity. In contrast, formal change, often neglected in the literature, refers to shifts in the distribution of knowledge and activity, leading to dynamics of centralisation and decentralisation of institutional patterns. In this way, the distributional approach highlights the role of functionaries in both institutional stability and change, providing a micro-level perspective on institutional dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146155292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Practice Theory, Leadership-as-Practice, and Social Action 实践理论,领导力作为实践和社会行动
IF 1.6 3区 心理学
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.70029
Joseph A. Raelin
{"title":"Practice Theory, Leadership-as-Practice, and Social Action","authors":"Joseph A. Raelin","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although practice theory has significantly contributed to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying social change, it does not take a position or advocate for particular meso-macro changes, such as responsible management, because it is a theory wedded to ontological understanding. How people choose to ‘get along’ in life and manage their goods is all part of the practices, which fall under the theorist's microscope. On other hand, the applied field of leadership-as-practice is tied to change as its definitive property; in fact, leadership is defined by turning points occurring in the spaces between people, which, in turn, can lead to changes in the trajectory of the flow of practice. After narrowing the definition of social change in this paper as social action and—institutionally—as responsible management, the paper turns to a comparison between how practice theory contributes to our understanding of the evolution of social action and how leadership-as-practice, relying on the former's erstwhile elucidation, attempts to initiate and facilitate such action. The latter discussion of leadership-as-practice includes an accounting of the impetus for change initiation, its diffusion and prefigured processes, and the post-institutional applications afforded through its link with practice theory. The essay concludes by pointing out the principal contribution of the paper that social change need not rely on exclusive individual direction but on the collective capacity of the agents affiliated with the practice deriving the means to produce more just and sustainable lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70029","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146057994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书