{"title":"Attributional Lag: Structured Choice and the Conditions of Personal Accountability","authors":"Chong-Yu Chen","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70072","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Several influential approaches to responsibility already recognise that agency is causally, socially and institutionally conditioned. This article begins from that shared baseline and identifies a different problem: attributional lag. Institutions may acknowledge the social formation of agency when explaining how choices arise yet continue to treat a prior choice as a sufficient warrant for concentrating durable consequences on the individual. I distinguish token-action moral responsibility from institutional personal accountability and develop three diagnostic dimensions for evaluating this mismatch: epistemic access, practical accessibility and temporal revisability. Practical accessibility is not a revival of the principle of alternative possibilities; it asks whether alternatives invoked by institutions were realistically available rather than merely formal options. Temporal revisability does not imply costless reversal; it asks whether later learning can be given proportionate weight in institutional decisions. Attributional lag therefore names a mismatch between an institution's explanation of agency and its later use of choice to justify consequences.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149355990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Habitus, Reflexivity, and Micro-Hysteresis: An Experimental Dialogue Between Bourdieu's Praxeology and Pragmatist Theories of Action","authors":"Gabriel Peters","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70070","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article explores an analytical strategy through which Bourdieu's theory of practice and (neo)pragmatist theories of action, especially Dewey's, may be synthesised into an integrated model of the subjective motors of social conduct, one capable of granting due explanatory weight to both habitual dispositions and reflexive processes. On the one hand, pragmatists show that disjunctions between habitual dispositions and the social circumstances of action, which demand a greater role for reflexive deliberation in relation to habitual propensities as subjective motors of conduct, do not occur only in the scenarios of radical structural crisis that Bourdieu termed the ‘hysteresis effect.’ Situated along a continuum of greater or lesser intensities, including what we may call ‘micro-hystereses,’ such disjunctions are part of agents' everyday relationship to their collective contexts of experience. On the other hand, as a theory of the ‘regulated improvisations’ of ‘practical sense,’ Bourdieu's praxeology not only captures the creative component of habitual dispositions themselves, but may also combine the non-mechanistic notion of ‘habit’ proposed by Dewey's pragmatism with a concept of <i>habitus</i> as a system of habits or dispositions. Finally, the article explores different modes of reflexivity and the circuits of reciprocal influence they establish with habitual dispositions, including both the role of reflexivity in dispositional self-transformation and the possibility that reflexive processes may themselves have dysfunctional effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70070","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149356780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Embodied Resistance and Epistemic Sovereignty: Rethinking Knowledge Production in Disability Studies","authors":"Carolina Becerra Sepúlveda","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70071","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article develops a theoretical framework to examine how knowledge about disability is produced, legitimised and challenged within contemporary power structures. It poses the following question: How does the bodily experience of exclusion generate alternative forms of knowledge that challenge dominant epistemic structures? Drawing on critical disability studies, feminist theory and Southern epistemologies, the article introduces the concepts of ‘embodied resistance’ and ‘epistemic sovereignty’ as interconnected analytical tools. It argues that neoliberal discourses on resilience function as mechanisms of normalisation that individualise structural inequalities and shift the responsibility for inclusion onto people with disabilities. In contrast, embodied resistance is conceptualised as a set of situated, often subtle, practices through which people with disabilities maintain their autonomy within disciplinary environments. Epistemic sovereignty refers to the relational capacity to participate in shaping the concepts and interpretive criteria through which lived experience is understood and institutionally addressed. Thinking from the wound names the process through which embodied experiences of exclusion can inform critical interpretation, without treating suffering as a guarantee of knowledge. The framework is articulated through four dimensions—guiding, tactical, methodological and political—and the Chilean context is used as an analytical site to illustrate how inclusion can reproduce epistemic asymmetries despite formal advances in participation. In doing so, the article contributes to disability studies and broader social theory by repositioning embodied experience as a site of conceptual production and by clarifying the relationship between knowledge, agency and social behaviour.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149356789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Paradoxes of a Pre-reflective Will to Interpret: A Critical Comment on Junghun Oh's Idea of ‘Embodied Moral Reflexivity’","authors":"Christoforos Bouzanis","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70069","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In her recent publication in this journal, Junghun Oh offers an alternative reading of Pierre Bourdieu's notion of the habitus by invoking the ideas of ‘the will to interpret’ and ‘embodied moral reflexivity’. Oh premises her analysis on the idea that there are inner interpretive processes or re-evaluations that the habitus is assumed to allow. My main line of critique in this comment is, first, that this approach is similar to past inconsistent efforts by other authors to reconcile the irreconcilable ideas of Bourdieu's habitus and self-reflection; and, second, that, in the absence of an ontological stratum that can enable the emergence of the reflective interpreter that Oh assumes, the idea that Bourdieu's habitus allows for subtle reinterpretations of personal values and dominant norms is theoretically unintelligible and leads to paradoxical imageries.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70069","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149356590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Meaning-in-Action: A Theory of Symbolic Causality","authors":"Matthew Coetzee","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70064","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Theories of social behaviour often acknowledge that action is meaningfully organised, but they remain less precise about how meanings become causally efficacious in practice. This article develops a critical realist account of meaning-in-action. I argue that meanings are emergent symbolic formations with conditional causal powers: they are socially produced and interpretively mediated, but once sedimented in institutions, material infrastructures, technologies, embodied dispositions, classifications and relations of power, they can shape perception, evaluation, communication and action before, beyond or without conscious recognition. I specify this process through a five-part mechanism: availability or imposition, activation, orientation, articulation and outcome. The argument extends interpretive sociology by linking the reconstruction of meaning to an account of causal operation in open social systems, building from work on cultural repertoires, dual-process cognition, pragmatist mechanisms and context-specific causal narratives. I illustrate the framework through Robben Island Museum, a highly curated South African UNESCO World Heritage Site whose official reconciliation narrative fragments as visitors transform embodied encounters into digital cultural objects. The article contributes a portable account of symbolic causality in social behaviour, explaining how symbolic formations become effective without reducing action either to subjective interpretation, cognitive processing or deterministic structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70064","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149258726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Comparative Regime: How Pseudo-Objective Standards Constitute Desire","authors":"Mohsen Askari","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70068","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Social comparison theory holds that people compare themselves with others when objective standards of self-evaluation are unavailable. Contemporary societies supply measurement on an unprecedented scale, yet comparison has not receded. This article argues that many metrics in digital life function as pseudo-objective standards: socially relative assessments presented as independent requirements of achievement or adequacy. It develops two contributions. First, the comparative regime names a configuration linking commensuration, algorithmic selection and commercial demand generation through personalised, recurrent feedback. Comparison participates in constituting desire by arranging what appears worth wanting before deliberation begins. Its distinctiveness lies in this configuration. Second, the criterion of comparative capture identifies when such feedback undermines reflective authority: it supplies a want, keeps its standard of adequacy moving, and obstructs examination or refusal of either. These conditions must operate together; an upstream origin alone does not establish pathology. The article locates the regime historically and institutionally, explains its economic persistence and the agency that remains within it, and derives testable implications. Non-comparative selfhood names the reflective authority needed to examine desires, protect non-positional goods and bring comparison to an end.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149258727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Norm Circles and the Limitations of European Union Normative Projection in Afghanistan","authors":"Oz Hassan","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70067","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Norm diffusion research explains the international travel of norms in semantic terms, through resonance, framing, grafting and localisation. Such accounts presuppose norms to be portable objects whose identity persists through transit. Yet, ontologically, norms exert causal force only where a real social group endorses and enforces them. This article develops Dave Elder-Vass's critical realist norm-circle theory into an account of normative projection, recasting ideational travel as a problem of carrier ecology. Explanation turns on which circles operate in the receiving setting, which of them a sponsor can recruit and whether their endorsement and sanction outlast the sponsor's withdrawal. European liberal state-building in Afghanistan supplies the proof of concept. Retrodicting European engagement from the 1980s to 2021 shows the European Union constituting a distal and imagined circle among governing elites and international audiences while recruiting no proximal circles through which sanction is delivered. Centralising reform had outrun its carriers long before Bonn, from Amanullah in the 1920s to the Soviet-sponsored reforms of the 1970s. Bonn then conferred status functions without securing enforcers. Gender provisions display the asymmetry most sharply, and the collapse of 2021 exposed rather than produced it. Two amendments to the theory follow. Circles can be spatially disarticulated and differentiated by content, with authority held in international institutions and sanction delivered in the district. Carrier withdrawal operates as a mechanism of normative collapse distinct from contestation or rejection. Normative foreign policy succeeds or fails on the social organisation of enforcement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70067","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149068480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Moralisation of Stigma: Moral Foundations, Moral Exclusion and Prejudice Towards Marginalised Groups","authors":"Cristian Catena-Fernández","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70066","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stigma begins with an attribute, condition or identity that is socially marked and devalued; stereotypes, prejudice, status loss, discrimination and other social responses may follow. Yet many stigmatising responses are experienced and defended as moral judgements: targets are positioned as vulnerable and deserving of protection, or as threatening, impure, norm-violating, irresponsible or undeserving. This conceptual review integrates stigma theory, moral experience, moralisation and Moral Foundations Theory to explain how stigma becomes morally meaningful and subjectively justified. I argue that moral foundations are understood as a vocabulary and set of motivational sensitivities through which stigmatised groups and conditions are morally construed. I propose a situated moralisation framework of stigma organised around three routes: moral inclusion, in which care and fairness bring targets into the circle of moral concern; moral exclusion, in which loyalty, authority and purity frame targets as threats to group boundaries, order, or sacred values; and moral responsibility, in which attributions concerning agency, effort and controllability become moralised through concerns about self-control, reciprocity and proportionality, giving rise to judgements of blame and deservingness. I also identify boundary conditions concerning target framing, political communication, cultural context, ingroup–outgroup application, measurement and causal direction. The framework clarifies the added value of moral foundations for social–behavioural theory: they help explain not merely who is stigmatised, but how exclusion becomes morally defensible.</p>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jtsb.70066","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149048155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Towards a Materialist Ontology of Consciousness: An Autopoietic Alternative to Wendt's Quantum Consciousness Theory","authors":"Yiyan Jiang","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70065","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study re-examines Alexander Wendt's quantum consciousness theory, arguing that the explanatory aims attributed to quantum consciousness—particularly with respect to agency, teleology, intentionality and emergence—can be addressed more coherently within established nonquantum frameworks of self-organisation theory. Drawing on thermodynamics, complexity theory and autopoietic theory, the paper suggests that far-from-equilibrium self-organising systems provide a materially grounded account of purposive, self-maintaining organisation that is directly relevant to social ontology. Integrated with embodied, enactive and practice-theoretical approaches in cognitive and social theory, this framework supports a conception of consciousness as an emergent material-informational process arising from organism–environment interaction rather than from quantum-level mentality. The analysis does not claim metaphysical neutrality; rather, it defends a fallibilist and naturalised materialism in which matter, energy, fields, motion, organisation and information are treated as analytically distinguishable but materially instantiated dimensions of reality. On this basis, consciousness can be understood as an emergent material-informational process, whereas social structures can be understood as relatively enduring relational organisations with emergent causal powers; both remain empirically investigable within self-organising processes. The paper therefore proposes the self-organisation paradigm, represented by autopoietic theory, as a more productive foundation for addressing the Consciousness Anomaly and for advancing the unification of physical and social ontology.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149048250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Editorial Note","authors":"Alex Gillespie","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.70062","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47646,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","volume":"56 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148993938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}