{"title":"Implementing Virtual Reading Communities for Caregivers of Adolescents","authors":"María P. Olivos, Montserrat Cubillos","doi":"10.1002/jaal.70080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70080","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This qualitative, formative implementation study examined the pilot version of the program <i>I Read, We Talk</i>, a WhatsApp-based reading community for caregivers of adolescents, focusing on acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability as literacy-relevant indicators of whether caregiver-mediated reading practices can be taken up and sustained at home, as a basis for a later experimental test of effects on adolescents' reading motivation and reading volume. Target behaviors included independent reading, reading with/in front of adolescents, discussing texts with them, and participating in WhatsApp discussions. Deductive–inductive analysis of 10 in-depth interviews identified barriers, facilitators, and design implications. Acceptability was high, driven by well-being motives, rebuilding a reader identity, and strengthening caregiver–adolescent relationships. Feasibility was conditioned by how many people's cooperation each behavior required, from independent reading to WhatsApp discussions that depended on a whole group's responsiveness. Sustainability required flexibility amid fluctuating family demands and supportive facilitation and norms. Although acceptability and sustainability shared similar underlying motives, sustained engagement declined over the pilot, underscoring that valuing the program did not guarantee caregivers could sustain it in practice. Findings offer actionable design principles for equitable, sustained adult participation in home-based digital reading communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"70 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jaal.70080","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149146025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Critical Reflections and Third Spaces in the Secondary English Classroom","authors":"Natalie Davis-Porada","doi":"10.1002/jaal.70079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70079","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article examines a pedagogical shift in how student writing is conceived, from a solitary, evaluative demonstration of finished argument toward a recursive, dialogic, collaborative process of knowledge construction. This shift is enacted through the Critical Reflection, a short-form, open-ended, frequently-executed writing assignment grounded in Homi Bhabha's hybrid third spaces and Mikhail Bakhtin's polyphonic chronotopes. Through a practitioner-research analysis of student submissions, peer annotations, and meta-commentaries from a single secondary classroom, the author traces how this approach fostered syntactic fluidity, theoretical integration, a shared class lexicon, and productive uncertainty, alongside the uneven outcomes and tensions that accompanied it. The Critical Reflection emerges as a pedagogical third space in which most students moved from passive reporters toward active critics, offering transferable principles for reconceiving writing as dialogic and recursive.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"70 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149146502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Taylor Rose-Dougherty, James S. Chisholm, Mike P. Cook
{"title":"Fostering Dialogic Meaning-Making With Graphic Critical Literature Circles","authors":"Taylor Rose-Dougherty, James S. Chisholm, Mike P. Cook","doi":"10.1002/jaal.70078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70078","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This qualitative study examines how undergraduate readers used graphic literature circle roles to discuss graphic narratives in three university courses in the U.S. West, South, and Midwest. Extending recent scholarship on traditional, critical, and graphic literature circles, authors customized literature circle roles to support critical readings and dialogic meaning-making of graphic narratives. Data analysis revealed how participants interpreted medium-specific rhetoric to engage in broader sociopolitical discourse. Implications call for enacting graphic critical literature circles to foster dialogic meaning-making during literary discussion of graphic narratives.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"70 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149048123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Books About Banned Books: What Does Today's Fiction Teach Adolescents About Censorship?","authors":"Leah Day, Lauren Aimonette Liang","doi":"10.1002/jaal.70077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70077","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines how censorship and book banning are represented in contemporary middle-grade and young adult literature through a qualitative content analysis of 20 novels published between 1980 and 2025. This study asks: What are the descriptive characteristics of this body of books and how do these fictional portrayals reflect or diverge from the real-world censorship trends? Then, looking at the narrative patterns, what are the recurring themes surrounding civic engagement and censorship? Implications for educators include the potential to use these texts to foster civic engagement, informed discussions about censorship, and critical literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"70 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jaal.70077","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149047870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reclaiming Critical Consciousness: Literacy for Digital Oppression","authors":"Rachel Besharat Mann","doi":"10.1002/jaal.70076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70076","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Digital information landscapes and communication platforms are controlled by algorithmic curation and polarized content that serve larger societal systems. The need for a reimagined approach to literacy education has never been more urgent. Drawing on Freire's foundational concepts of critical consciousness, dialogic pedagogy, and the rejection of the banking model, this paper defines and sustains <i>digital oppression</i> or the ways digital platforms reproduce prescriptive, extractive relationships between institutions and users and offers key instructional strategies organized around resisting it. This analysis examines how youth engagement with digital texts requires pedagogies that are experiential, dialogic, and attuned to power, identity, and meaning-making. By situating literacy as a tool for empowerment, resistance, and transformation, this paper calls for a renewed commitment to critical pedagogy as both the “word” and the “world” are increasingly mediated by digital infrastructures. It concludes with a call to educators and researchers to co-construct emancipatory practices that support young people in becoming critically literate agents capable of remaking their social realities.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"70 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148994098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Who Is the Subject, Who Is the Source?: Critical Media Literacy, Journalism, and the Ethics of Sourcing","authors":"Gillian E. Mertens, Henry “Cody” Miller","doi":"10.1002/jaal.70073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70073","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This practical manuscript presents a reading protocol for adolescents to support source analysis by exploring both how authors use sources and noticing when sourcing and subject are misaligned. We draw from critical media literacy perspectives on journalistic writing and ethical sourcing to design a classroom protocol for source analysis. We present this protocol as a vignette-in-action, including insights into patterns from class discussion. The manuscript concludes by discussing pragmatic differentiation approaches for the classroom in alignment with young adults’ evolving engagement with news media.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"70 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148994100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"AI Literacies for Adults in a GenAI Intensive Workforce: A Thematic Literature Review (2022–2026)","authors":"Edwin Creely","doi":"10.1002/jaal.70075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70075","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reconfiguring professional practice, everyday decision making, and adult learning across virtually every sector. This thematic literature review synthesizes research published between 2022 and 2026 on the skills and understandings adults need in order to work purposefully, critically, and ethically with GenAI, taking established scholarship on digital, information, media, and critical literacies as its grounding. The review adopts a sociocultural orientation in which literacy denotes situated practices of making and interrogating meaning with texts. The review argues that competence with GenAI is not a narrow technical capacity but a situated form of agency encompassing purposeful use, contextual judgment, critical evaluation, ethical awareness, adaptive learning, and the capacity to preserve human thinking alongside automated systems. It examines the prompt as a communicative competency, the scrutiny of outputs for bias, inaccuracy, hallucination, and intellectual appropriation, the critical AI literacy scholarship that questions the framing itself, the contested evidence on productivity, and the shifting skill demands of AI enabled workplaces, closing with a cross-sector set of AI learning principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"70 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jaal.70075","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148994099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kathryn Mitchell Pierce, Carol Gilles, Sarah D. Reid
{"title":"Teacher Agency: Finding Spaces to Transform ELA Classrooms","authors":"Kathryn Mitchell Pierce, Carol Gilles, Sarah D. Reid","doi":"10.1002/jaal.70074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70074","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Amid ongoing attacks on teachers and their professionalism, we studied three middle school ELA teachers who exercised their agency to transform their classrooms and curricula through social justice pedagogy (SJP). Using Pantić's (2017) model, we examined their sense of purpose, competence, autonomy, and reflexivity in confronting barriers. This multiple-case study drew on interviews, focus group transcripts, artifacts, and responses to our analysis of their reported beliefs regarding their agency about dialogic talk in literature discussions as part of SJP. We found that teachers' agency, dialogic talk, literature discussions, and SJP were deeply interwoven. Teachers valued dialogic talk in literature discussions as a means of learning, democratic discourse, and social change. Their teaching contexts shaped their transformations, and talk, especially about literature, emerged as a central thread linking student identity, agency, and social justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"70 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jaal.70074","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148943145","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daniel P. Moore, Antero Garcia, Nicole Mirra, Matthew Berland, Peter J. Woods, Max Shafer-Landau
{"title":"“That Sounds Like ChatGPT!”: Youth Civic Literacies and Unhumanizing Generative AI","authors":"Daniel P. Moore, Antero Garcia, Nicole Mirra, Matthew Berland, Peter J. Woods, Max Shafer-Landau","doi":"10.1002/jaal.70071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70071","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This design-based study explored how youth civic literacies manifested as young people demystified GenAI—tinkering and playing with the tool in an informal setting. Students “unhumanized” GenAI, using its tools for civic and humanistic purposes. Analysis of ChatGPT logs, video/audio recordings, and artifacts indicated that students: (1) dissected, mimicked, and resisted GenAI; (2) employed an agentic, “robots-in-the-loop” approach in considering their civic and personal futures; and (3) realized a techno-optimism characterized by a lack of fear, sense of possibility, and joy. Collectively, these findings suggest that young people demystified GenAI in ways that encouraged civic innovation and expression while centering their own creativity, agency, and humanity. These activities paved the way for personal, social, and political explorations using GenAI. This article offers insight into the praxes of AI and civic literacy, providing opportunities for educators and researchers to support learners as they engage with (and critique) these technologies.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"70 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148942264","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"“It's Human Nature to Search for Some Kind of Company”: Youth, Photovoice, and the Theory of Listening Literacy","authors":"Kristien Zenkov, Lin Rudder","doi":"10.1002/jaal.70068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70068","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article the authors introduce the concept of “listening literacy,” a merged research and instructional framework designed to address growing civic disengagement and political polarization in the United States. Drawing on Indigenous pedagogies, Deweyan democratic philosophy, critical pedagogy, and culturally sustaining practices, the authors theorize listening as a foundational literacy skill essential for democratic participation. To illustrate the framework in practice, the authors present findings from a photovoice project conducted with 15 high school students, exploring their perspectives on the purpose of school, factors that support and hinder their school engagement, and the role teachers play in their success. Student insights revealed that schools serve as vital sites of community and opportunity. The authors argue that “listening pedagogies” like photovoice empower students to articulate their experiences, develop self-efficacy, and engage as citizens. The authors close with a consideration of implications for educators across disciplines seeking to cultivate democratic literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"70 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jaal.70068","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148754103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}