Michael B. Sherry, Glenn G. Smith, Kimberly DeFusco
{"title":"设计对话:可选择的在线讨论论坛如何支持协作分歧","authors":"Michael B. Sherry, Glenn G. Smith, Kimberly DeFusco","doi":"10.1002/jaal.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Authentic dialogue, in which citizens engage with different perspectives using evidence, is integral to participation in a democratic, literate society. Yet participants in classroom conversations and in public forums often talk past each other rather than taking up what others have written or said. How might the design of alternative online discussion forums enhance dialogue among secondary students? Prior research has suggested that practice with oral debate can promote dialogic uptake of different points of view. Yet few studies have examined whether and how online discussions might offer similar benefits. Moreover, opportunities remain to study how the design of different types of online forums might enable or inhibit students' uptake of others' words and ideas. Based on data generated in a Southern US secondary school during a unit on media literacy, we reveal how two alternative forum designs (including one created by Smith) influenced student dialogue about environmental issues. We discuss implications and challenges for fostering online discussions that support student dialogue and collaborative disagreement.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"69 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dialogue by Design: How Alternative Online Discussion Forums Could Support Collaborative Disagreement\",\"authors\":\"Michael B. Sherry, Glenn G. Smith, Kimberly DeFusco\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jaal.70015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Authentic dialogue, in which citizens engage with different perspectives using evidence, is integral to participation in a democratic, literate society. Yet participants in classroom conversations and in public forums often talk past each other rather than taking up what others have written or said. How might the design of alternative online discussion forums enhance dialogue among secondary students? Prior research has suggested that practice with oral debate can promote dialogic uptake of different points of view. Yet few studies have examined whether and how online discussions might offer similar benefits. Moreover, opportunities remain to study how the design of different types of online forums might enable or inhibit students' uptake of others' words and ideas. Based on data generated in a Southern US secondary school during a unit on media literacy, we reveal how two alternative forum designs (including one created by Smith) influenced student dialogue about environmental issues. We discuss implications and challenges for fostering online discussions that support student dialogue and collaborative disagreement.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy\",\"volume\":\"69 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaal.70015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaal.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dialogue by Design: How Alternative Online Discussion Forums Could Support Collaborative Disagreement
Authentic dialogue, in which citizens engage with different perspectives using evidence, is integral to participation in a democratic, literate society. Yet participants in classroom conversations and in public forums often talk past each other rather than taking up what others have written or said. How might the design of alternative online discussion forums enhance dialogue among secondary students? Prior research has suggested that practice with oral debate can promote dialogic uptake of different points of view. Yet few studies have examined whether and how online discussions might offer similar benefits. Moreover, opportunities remain to study how the design of different types of online forums might enable or inhibit students' uptake of others' words and ideas. Based on data generated in a Southern US secondary school during a unit on media literacy, we reveal how two alternative forum designs (including one created by Smith) influenced student dialogue about environmental issues. We discuss implications and challenges for fostering online discussions that support student dialogue and collaborative disagreement.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy is the only literacy journal published exclusively for teachers of older learners. Each issue offers practical, classroom-tested ideas grounded in research and theory. Whether you work with new, struggling, or skilled readers, you’ll find something of interest in JAAL. Every issue includes •Practical ideas for instruction •Reviews of student and teacher resources, including young adult literature •Tips on how to integrate technology, media, and popular culture in your classroom •Reflections on current literacy trends, issues, and research