Journal of Robotic Surgery最新文献

{"title":"Robotic abdominopelvic surgery: a systematic review of cross-platform outcomes.","authors":"Atanu Pal, Rehan Gamage","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02144-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-024-02144-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the global surgical robotic ecosystem diversifies, multi-platform surgery is becoming increasingly common. The natural question is whether these robots differ in performance and cost. We address this question and report the first systematic review comparing platforms. A systematic search identified clinical studies comparing at least two platforms. Of 287 studies, 31 were included, with 5 RCTs and 26 cohort studies, including 3624 patients. All studies compared da Vinci with Hintori, Hugo, KangDuo, Micro-Hand, Revo-I, Senhance, and Versius robots. Comparisons were across specialties: urology (18 studies; upper and lower tract), general surgery (11 studies; inguinal and ventral hernia, cholecystectomy, colorectal, pancreatic, oesophagectomy, distal gastrectomy), gynaecology (3 studies; hysterectomy, sacrocolpopexy). There were no differences in conversion rate, estimated blood loss, complication rate, pathological parameters, oncological outcomes (6 months), and functional outcomes (12 months). Results were mixed on operative time and its components. Length of stay was largely similar. Surgeon task load was similar (2 studies). Operative cost was 45-60% lower on the newer platforms (3 studies). Operative, clinical, oncological, and functional outcomes were similar for da Vinci and the newer robots across a range of abdominopelvic procedures, with a signal of lower cost on newer types. Studies were heterogeneous. Data on non-technical skills, other human factors, and comparative learning curves was scant. The majority of evidence was low quality and retrospective. However, accumulating evidence on safety, efficacy, and non-inferiority of the newer platforms has implications for robotic training programmes and procurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"386"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142548306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The prognostic role of inflammation score in patients with gastric cancer following Da Vinci robot surgery.","authors":"Pengyu Zhang, Xiping Shen, Ji Wu","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02142-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02142-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142548308","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Urine leak and vascular complications following robotic partial nephrectomy: a contemporary single-center experience.","authors":"Olivia Kola, Michael Smigelski, Shavy Nagpal, Rozalba Gogaj, Samir S Taneja, James S Wysock, William C Huang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02096-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02096-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urine leak (UL) and vascular complications (VC), i.e., pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistulas are well-described complications of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Historically, UL incidence ranges from 0.3 to 17% and VC from 0.8 to 5.6%. We report the contemporary experience of UL and VC from a single, high-volume center in cases of RAPN. 447 patients were identified from an IRB-approved Renal Tumor Database of 2174 cases who underwent RAPN from 1/2017 to 5/2023. VC occurred in 9 cases (4 pseudoaneurysms, 1 AV fistula, 4 concurrent AV fistula/pseudoaneurysm), UL occurred in 9 (2.0%), and there was one concurrent case of VC and UL. Collecting-system entry occurred in five VC cases and five UL cases. For VCs, the median nephrometry score and maximal tumor diameter was 8 (IQR 3.0) and 3.8 (0.9) cm, respectively, and 8 (3.0) and 3.7 (1.1) cm for UL cases, respectively. Most complications occurred with tumors ≤ 4 mm from the collecting system (n = 7 VC, n = 6 UL). VCs presented after 18 (6.0) days, 6 with gross hematuria; 3 required clot irrigation, 1 required continuous bladder irrigation, and 8 required embolization. No patients required postoperative transfusion. Patients with UL presented after a median of 1 (12) day, with 5 cases detected by elevated creatinine in drain fluid and the remainder detected on routine ultrasound. The duration of UL was 13 (41) days with only 2 cases requiring stenting and one case requiring a drainage catheter. No patients required kidney re-operation or removal. Our rate of VC and UL following RAPN are low and consistent with other contemporary series. Complications occurred in patients with high nephrometry scores or tumors located close to the collecting system. Both complications generally present early and can be managed without kidney re-operation or removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142548309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Revolutionizing endometriosis treatment: automated surgical operation through artificial intelligence and robotic vision.","authors":"Sina Saadati, Maryam Amirmazlaghani","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02139-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02139-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical limitations due to poverty significantly impact the lives and health of many individuals globally. Nevertheless, this challenge can be addressed with modern technologies, particularly through robotics and artificial intelligence. This study aims to address these challenges using advanced technologies in robotic surgery and artificial intelligence, proposing a method to fully automate endometriosis robotic surgery with a focus on interpretability, accuracy, and reliability. A methodology for fully automatic endometriosis surgery is introduced. Given the complexity of endometriosis lesions detection, they are categorized by their anatomical location to improve system interpretability. Then, three ensemble U-Net frameworks are designed to detect and localize common types of endometriosis lesions intraoperatively. A cross-training approach is employed, exploring U-Net models with diverse neural architectures-such as ResNet50, ResNet101, VGG19, InceptionV3, MobileNet, and EfficientNetB7-to develop U-Net ensemble models for precise endometriosis lesions segmentation. A novel image augmentation technique is also introduced, enhancing the segmentation models' accuracy and reliability. Furthermore, two U-Net models are developed to localize the ovaries and uterus, mitigating unexpected noise and bolstering the method's accuracy and reliability. The image segmentation models, assessed using the Intersection over Union (IoU) metric, achieved outstanding results: 97.57% for ovarian, 96.35% for uterine, and 92.58% for peritoneal endometriosis. This study proposes a fully automatic method for some common types of endometriosis surgery, including ovarian endometriomas and superficial endometriosis. This method is centered around three ensemble U-Net frameworks and a noise reduction technique using two additional U-Nets for localizing the ovaries and uterus. This approach has the potential to significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of robotic surgeries, potentially reducing healthcare costs and improving outcomes for patients worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142510398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Triple-console robotic telesurgery: first impressions and future impact.","authors":"Travis Rogers, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Shady Saikali, Sumeet Reddy, Ahmed Gamal, Xuesong Li, Liang Cui, Vipul Patel","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02141-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02141-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Telesurgery has been recently gaining momentum as a natural evolution of robotic surgery. Besides providing expert surgical care to patients who cannot geographically access it, telesurgery can also facilitate surgical collaboration between surgeons who might need urgent assistance or coaching experts. The idea of having two consoles, with one remote and one local, has been the ideal setup for such ecosystems. However collaborations can take on many forms and might require more than one remote surgeon, depending on procedure complexity and surgeon availability. The objective of the study was to describe our perspectives and experience performing telesurgery on one patient, using three surgeon consoles for three surgeons, operating from three separate cities. In November 2023, a triple-console, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) was performed in a collaborative effort among three surgeons in three separate locations employing telesurgery using the Kangduo Endosopic Surgical Robot (KD-SR-01, Sagebot Medical). The furthest distance between participants was approximately 2600 km between Beijing and Hainan. We described and illustrated the applications and outcomes of this procedure to treat a single patient with prostate cancer. The local surgeon, along with the operating room team, and the patient were in Hainan, while the other two surgeons were in Beijing and Hunan Telesurgery command centers. The procedure lasted approximately 120 min and there were no intra- or postoperative complications. Estimated blood loss was 100 ml. The patient was ambulating 4 h after surgery and remained in the hospital for 2 days secondary to the postoperative care protocol followed by the local team taking care of the patient. The Foley catheter was removed on postoperative day 7 without complication. The final pathology was ISUP Grade Group 4 (Gleason score 4 + 4 = 8) T2cN0 with negative surgical margins. Our experience shows that telesurgery involving multiple surgeons at multiple remote locations is possible and can be completed safely with low-latency connections via available telecommunication networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"381"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142510401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Scientific production on robotic metabolic and bariatric surgery: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis on its current world status.","authors":"Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Maria Paula Corzo, Aman Goyal, Juan Camilo Roa-Maldonado, Sophia Echevarria, Steven Elzein, Enrique Elli, Rana Pullatt, Sjaak Pouwels, Beniamino Pascotto, Juan Santiago Azagra, Marco Raffaelli, Luigi Angrisani, Wah Yang, Adel Abou-Mrad, Rodolfo J Oviedo","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02135-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02135-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Robotic metabolic and bariatric surgery (RMBS) has emerged as an innovative approach in the treatment of severe obesity by combining the ergonomic precision of robotic technology and instrumentation with the established benefits of weight loss surgery. This study employs a bibliometric approach to identify local research trends and worldwide patterns in RMBS.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong> The research methodology used \"robotic\" and \"metabolic\" or \"bariatric surgery\" to search Web of Science. Articles that were published prior to December 31st, 2023, were included. The analyses were developed using the Rayyan and Bibliometric, in R Studio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> 265 articles from 51 different journals were included. Scientific production of RMBS experienced a significant annual growth rate of 21.96% from 2003 to 2023, resulting in an average of 12.6 papers published per year. A high correlation (R2 = 0.94) was found between the year and number of articles. The mean number of citations per document was 13.25. Approximately 90% of the journals were classified as zone 3, according to the Bradford categorization. International collaboration was identified in 10.57% of cases, with the University of California and the University of Illinois being the most common organizations. The countries with the highest number of corresponding authors, in descending order, were the United States of America, China, and Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Scientific production in RMBS has experienced sustained growth since the first original publications in 2003. While it has not yet reached the volume, impact, and international collaboration seen in studies related to non-robotic metabolic and bariatric surgery, RBMS holds potential that remains to be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142510400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Effectiveness of robotic metabolic and bariatric surgery in patients with BMI ≥ 50-59.9 and BMI ≥ 60 for the treatment of severe obesity in a national medical center in Mexico.","authors":"Omar Felipe Gaytán-Fuentes, Edith Barajas-Galicia, Geovany Chávez García, Jesus Murillo Rodríguez, Javier González Chavira, Israel Abraham Gaytán Fuentes, Antonio Torres Trejo, Aman Goyal, Rodolfo J Oviedo","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02138-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02138-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obesity is a global health issue that significantly increases morbidity and mortality when the Body Mass Index (BMI) reaches values ≥ 50. While metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective treatment for severe obesity, it carries risks. Robotic surgery is promising but not extensively studied in Mexico, which presents an opportunity for research at a National Hospital with an academic program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed 44 patients who underwent robotic MBS using the da Vinci surgical system from January 2018 to August 2023 at Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre, ISSSTE. Data collected included surgery type, duration, complications, and weight loss metrics over 54 months post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 44 patients with severe obesity including BMI ≥ 50-59.9 kg/m² for group 1 and BMI ≥ 60 kg/m² for group 2. The average initial BMI was 54.7 kg/m² for group 1 and 68 kg/m² for group 2. The average operative times for group 1 were 10.09 min for docking, 86.23 min for robotic console time, and 95.73 min for total intraoperative time. Group 2 had average times of 9.80 min for docking, 82.4 min for robotic console time, and 92.2 min for total intraoperative time. Follow-up showed significant weight loss initially, with weight recurrence after 24 months due to different factors. No serious complications or mortality were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic MBS at a national academic medical center in Mexico shows promising outcomes for patients with BMI ≥ 50-59.9 and BMI ≥ 60, with significant weight and BMI improvements at 54 month follow-up. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to strengthen these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142510394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comment on: \"Open versus robot‑assisted partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses: a meta‑analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes\".","authors":"Xinpeng Fan, Kunpeng Li, Li Yang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02137-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02137-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142510393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Experiences in robotic colorectal surgery: comprehensive insights from a multi-center analysis using the Senhance Robotic System.","authors":"Narimantas E Samalavicius, Rita Karpiciute, Vaida Nausediene, Frank Willeke, Olaf Martin Hansen, Vivianda Menke","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02136-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02136-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic-assisted surgery has revolutionised minimally invasive approaches, particularly in colorectal surgery. While many single-center studies on colorectal surgeries exist in present literature, including experiences with Senhance® Robotic Systems, comprehensive multi-center studies are lacking. This study, conducted through the TransEnterix European Patient Registry (\"TRUST\"), aims to assess the safety and feasibility in this context. The present study explored procedural times, complications, robotic malfunction and limitations, adverse events and pain management outcomes for colorectal procedures, including sigmoid resection, right hemicolectomy and rectal surgery collected in two European centers. Data from 355 colorectal surgeries showed that the median duration of surgery was 147.2 min (IQR: 124.3-183.0), the docking time was reported with a median of 3.4 min (IQR: 2.0-5.4) and the console time was found at a mean of 84.4 min (SD: 33.6). Despite minimal blood loss, pain scores, and robotic malfunction, 2.9% of the cases (10 instances) required conversions to either an open or laparoscopic approach. Further, most robotic limitations were attributed to limited motion (18.9%, 67 cases) and collisions (11.5%, 41 cases). Adverse events (24 cases, 6.8%) were effectively managed, with 23 instances judged completely unrelated to the robotic system. This study underscores the positive outcomes and safety profile of Senhance® Robotic Systems in colorectal surgery, contributing valuable insights for future research and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142510395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Meta-analysis and systematic review of factors predicting conversion to radical nephrectomy following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy in renal cancer patients.","authors":"Chong-Jian Wang, Jiao Qin, Cheng-Cheng Pang, Cai-Xia Chen, Hong-Yuan Li, Hao-Tian Huang, Song Cao, Xue-Song Yang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02147-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11701-024-02147-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluating the risk factors for the conversion from robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) to radical nephrectomy (RN). Through a comprehensive database search encompassing PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, we identified pertinent English-language research published by June 2024. We utilized the NOS scale for quality assessment. The aggregate effect was quantified via the odds ratio (OR), alongside a 95% confidence interval (CI). Sensitivity analyses were conducted using both fixed-effects and random-effects models to evaluate reliability. The meta-analytical process was facilitated by the Stata 18 software suite. Our meta-analysis encompassed a total of 8 retrospective studies and 3 prospective studies, totaling 4056 patients. We found that increasing patient age (OR: 1.04; 95% CI 1.00-1.08; P = 0.005), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores (3 or above) (OR: 2.74; 95% CI 1.52-4.93; P = 0.001), elevated R.E.N.A.L. scores (7 or above) (OR: 2.49; 95% CI 1.57-3.95; P < 0.001), and the use of off-clamp RAPN (OR: 7.21; 95% CI 2.60-19.93; P < 0.001) significantly raised the odds of surgical conversion. On the other hand, male sex (OR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.67-1.62; P = 0.858), the side of the tumor (OR: 0.97; 95% CI 0.48-1.95; P = 0.936), tumor size (OR: 3.43; 95% CI 0.57-20.55; P = 0.177), body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.96-1.11; P = 0.426), clinical stage (OR: 3.78; 95% CI 0.46-30.70; P = 0.214), and the use of single-port RAPN (OR: 0.54; 95% CI 0.16-1.78; P = 0.31) did not show a statistically significant link to an increased conversion risk. This meta-analysis elucidates the critical risk factors for the conversion from robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy to radical nephrectomy, providing significant guidance for preoperative risk assessment and clinical decision-making. However, our findings necessitate validation through studies with larger sample sizes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"377"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142510396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}