Rachel Rupnow , Rosaura Uscanga , Anna Marie Bergman , Cassandra Mohr
{"title":"Snapshots of sameness: Characterizations of mathematical sameness across student groups","authors":"Rachel Rupnow , Rosaura Uscanga , Anna Marie Bergman , Cassandra Mohr","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101193","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101193","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sameness is foundational to mathematics but has only recently become an area of focus in mathematics education research. In this paper, we describe characterizations of sameness generated by four student groups: discrete mathematics students, linear algebra students, abstract algebra students, and graduate students. Based on qualitative analysis of open response surveys, we compare these groups’ characterizations of sameness; note the subcomponents discussed and variation within each dimension; and highlight experiences influential to students’ perceptions of sameness. Findings include interpretability of sameness as a big idea, nascent development of thematic connections across courses, emphases on current course material rather than connections to prior courses for students solicited from a particular course, greater reflectiveness from the graduate student group, and abstract algebra as an impactful course. Implications include a need for thoughtful examinations of how “big ideas” develop among students and what experiences might support such development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142428275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What are explanatory proofs in mathematics and how can they contribute to teaching and learning?","authors":"Marc Lange","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101191","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101191","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper will examine several simple examples (drawn from the mathematics literature) where there are multiple proofs of the same theorem, but only some of these proofs are widely regarded by mathematicians as explanatory. These examples will motivate an account of explanatory proofs in mathematics. Along the way, the paper will discuss why <em>deus ex machina</em> proofs are not explanatory, what a mathematical coincidence is, and how a theorem's proper setting reflects the naturalness of various mathematical kinds. The paper will also investigate how context influences which features of a theorem are salient and consequently which proofs are explanatory. The paper will discuss several ways in which explanatory proofs can contribute to teaching and learning, including how shifts in context (and hence in a proof’s explanatory power) can be exploited in a classroom setting, leading students to dig more deeply into why some theorem holds. More generally, the paper will examine how “Why?” questions operate in mathematical thinking, teaching, and learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101191"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142324193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Encouraging students to explain their ideas when learning mathematics: A psychological perspective","authors":"Bethany Rittle-Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101192","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101192","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Children’s <em>self-explanations</em> are answers to voiced why and how questions that attempt to make sense of new information for oneself. They often are not sophisticated or generalizable. Despite this, prompting children to generate explanations often improves their learning. After providing examples of children’s explanations, this article summarizes empirical evidence for the learning benefits of prompting people to generate explanations when learning mathematics. There is strong evidence that prompting learners to explain leads to greater conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge and procedural transfer when knowledge is assessed immediately after the learning session; there is limited evidence for greater procedural transfer after a delay. Scaffolding high-quality explanations via training or structured responses, designing prompts to carefully balance attention to important content, prompting learners to explain correct information, and prompting learners to explain why incorrect information is incorrect when appropriate, increases the benefits of prompts to generate explanations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732312324000695/pdfft?md5=da899ecf252efeddeeea91ce27ec15c7&pid=1-s2.0-S0732312324000695-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142314687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
George Kinnear , Gemma Hood , Eloise Lardet , Colette Sheard , Colin Foster
{"title":"Lecturers' use of questions in undergraduate mathematics lectures","authors":"George Kinnear , Gemma Hood , Eloise Lardet , Colette Sheard , Colin Foster","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101190","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101190","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mathematics lecturers frequently ask questions in their lectures, and these questions presumably play an important role in students’ thinking about and learning of the lecture content. We replicated and developed a coding scheme used in previous research in the US to categorise lecturers’ questions in a sample of 136 lectures given by 24 lecturers at a research-intensive UK university. We found that the coding scheme could be applied reliably, and that factual questions were predominant (as in previous research). We explore differences in the lecturers’ use of questions – both between our UK sample and the previous US work, and between individual lecturers in our sample. We note the presence of strings of related successive questions from the lecturer, which we term ‘question chains’. We explore the nature of these, examine their prevalence, and seek to account for them in terms of the lecturers’ possible intentions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732312324000671/pdfft?md5=eed3542583cd33645c2f09865c9e4dd8&pid=1-s2.0-S0732312324000671-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142238787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hortensia Soto , Jessi Lajos , Vladislav Kokushkin
{"title":"Creating and sharing linear algebra metaphors as an assessment for engaging students beyond the cognitive domain","authors":"Hortensia Soto , Jessi Lajos , Vladislav Kokushkin","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101189","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101189","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this research, we investigated how a summative assessment of creating and sharing metaphors for linear algebra concepts supported undergraduate students’ affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement. All seven research participants were enrolled in an introductory linear algebra course designed to develop students’ geometric understanding of linear algebra concepts in <em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> and <em>R</em><sup><em>3</em></sup>. Using embodied cognition and an engagement framework, we analyzed students’ written responses and video-taped their focus group discussion. Our findings suggest that this summative assessment (a) privileged mathematical aesthetics and the affective domain of learning, (b) engaged students in binding formal aspects of linear algebra concepts with metaphors that they enacted via embodiment, and (c) was an opportunity to demonstrate learning and higher-order cognition. Thus, illustrating that assessments can focus on aesthetic and affective domains of mathematics while simultaneously integrating serious mathematical cognition. We conclude by offering adaptations of this assessment for other mathematics courses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142167340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Secondary teachers’ guided reinvention of the definitions of reducible and irreducible elements","authors":"Kaitlyn Stephens Serbin , Younggon Bae , Sthefanía Espinosa","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101188","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101188","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Informed by Realistic Mathematics Education, we designed a hypothetical learning trajectory on graduate students’ guided reinvention of reducible and irreducible elements in rings. We created experientially real context problems for use in a teaching experiment, in which secondary in-service and pre-service teachers used algebra tiles as an emergent model of factoring integers and quadratics in <span><math><mrow><mi>Z</mi><mrow><mfenced><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow></mfenced></mrow></mrow></math></span>. In their mathematical activity, this became the teachers’ model for abstracting the shared structure of (ir)reducible elements in <span><math><mi>Z</mi></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>Z</mi><mo>[</mo><mi>x</mi><mo>]</mo></mrow></math></span>, which they used to formally define (ir)reducible elements. In this paper, we discuss the progression of the teachers’ reasoning and defining activities that were evident as they reinvented the definitions of reducible and irreducible elements of integral domains.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142167339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jessica Gehrtz , Jess Ellis Hagman , Victoria Barron
{"title":"Engagement with student written work as an instantiation of and proxy for how college calculus instructors engage with student thinking","authors":"Jessica Gehrtz , Jess Ellis Hagman , Victoria Barron","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101187","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101187","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Teachers who use student thinking to make instructional decisions tend to create more positive learning experiences for students and support conceptual understanding. Looking at student work is one way college instructors learn about student thinking. We interviewed eight calculus instructors to investigate what they noticed when examining student work. Reflexive thematic analysis allowed us to classify instructors by the stance they adopted when looking at student work. Instructors who adopted an evaluative stance responded by providing examples or explaining how to solve the problem, often taking on the intellectual work of solving the problem. Instructors who adopted an interpretive stance responded by providing examples or asking guiding questions informed by the student’s thinking. We then extended our analyses to illustrate two instructional archetypes (Interpreter and Evaluator), to highlight how the stance taken when examining student work can serve as a proxy for how instructors engage with student thinking more broadly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732312324000646/pdfft?md5=79808339f06402b0a6a1c331e5c9fa74&pid=1-s2.0-S0732312324000646-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142147683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Developing (Pedagogical) content knowledge of constant rate of change: The case of Samantha","authors":"Michael A. Tallman , John Weaver , Taylor Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101179","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101179","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present the results of a teaching experiment designed to foster a pre-service secondary teacher’s construction of a quantitative scheme for constant rate of change. Although the research participant developed a productive conception of constant rate of change as an interiorized ratio, images of chunky continuous covariation constrained her ability to reason efficiently across a variety of applied contexts. The participant constructed a scheme for constant rate of change at the reflected level of thought, which enabled her to become cognizant of its essential aspects and to appreciate its general applicability. Our results suggest that engaging in reflected abstraction is critical for supporting pre-service teachers’ construction of coherent and refined mathematical schemes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142097020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Use of mathematical problems rooted in primary historical sources to reveal preservice teachers’ mathematical content knowledge","authors":"Ioannis Papadopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101177","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101177","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, the use of mathematical problems rooted in primary historical sources as a diagnostic tool for identifying learners’ understanding about area and volume is examined. The study follows preservice teachers in the context of a compulsory course in mathematics education while dealing with such problems embedding errors and challenging mistaken beliefs about the area of quadrilaterals and the volume of the cube. Although the initial aim was to involve the participants in inquiry-based activities, in the end, the history of mathematics served as a means to reveal the complete or partial understanding of the concepts making evident at the same time the participants’ misconceptions such as the overgeneralization of the rule ‘length times breadth’ and the confusion between area and perimeter concerning the area of the quadrilaterals task, and the illusion of linearity and the confusion between volume and surface area concerning the volume of the cube task.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142058328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Arthur J. Baroody , Douglas H. Clements , Julie Sarama
{"title":"Does use of a hypothetical learning progression promote learning of the cardinal-count concept and give-n performance?","authors":"Arthur J. Baroody , Douglas H. Clements , Julie Sarama","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101178","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101178","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The general aim of the research was to conduct a rare test of the efficacy of hypothetical learning progressions (HLPs) and a basic assumption of basing instruction on HLPs, namely teaching each successive level is more efficacious than skipping lower levels and teaching the target level directly. The specific aim was evaluating whether counting-based cardinality concepts unfold in a stepwise manner. The research involved a pretest—delayed-posttest design with random assignment of 14 preschoolers to two conditions. The experimental intervention was based on an HLP for cardinality development (first promoting levels that presumably support and are necessary for the target level and then the target knowledge). The active-control treatment entailed a Teach-to-Target approach (first promoting irrelevant cardinality knowledge about recognizing written numbers and then directly teaching the same target-level goals with the same explicit instruction and similar games). A mix of quantitative and qualitative analyses indicated HLP participants performed significantly and substantially better than Teach-to-Target participants on target-level concept and skill measures. Moreover, the former tended to make sensible errors, whereas the latter generally responded cluelessly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142058329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}