History and TheoryPub Date : 2026-06-01Epub Date: 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1111/hith.70022
Christopher Holman
{"title":"ON THE IDEA OF A CRITICAL HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT: TEXTUAL INTERPRETATION AND THINKING IN CONSTELLATIONS","authors":"Christopher Holman","doi":"10.1111/hith.70022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70022","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article intervenes in recent methodological debates in the history of political thought, particularly those involving the question of whether its practice should be considered primarily as a historical endeavor or as a philosophical endeavor. Moving beyond this binary, I propose an approach that utilizes both historical and philosophical techniques for the sake of recuperating the unintentional meaning embedded within any complex text. In order to clarify the operations characterizing such an approach, I take inspiration from early critical theory to develop an interpretive frame drawn from the philosophical notion of thinking in constellations. The analyst, mining the surplus of meaning that necessarily inheres in the work, can perform an original illocutionary act meant to advance a particular political end. Such an act may proceed through critically identifying the necessary gaps and ambiguities that traverse a substance that is never adequate to the thematization of the political world and reconstructing the text via the creative reorganization of its textual elements in new configurations, configurations that work to illuminate an otherwise concealed dimension of signification.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"65 2","pages":"180-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148174439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
History and TheoryPub Date : 2026-06-01Epub Date: 2025-12-08DOI: 10.1111/hith.70018
Udi Greenberg
{"title":"EXPANDING THE BORDERS OF HUMANITY","authors":"Udi Greenberg","doi":"10.1111/hith.70018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In <i>The Question of Unworthy Life: Eugenics and Germany's Twentieth Century</i>, historian Dagmar Herzog explores one of the most remarkable transformations in European approaches to human life: the rise and fall of eugenics. In particular, she explores how Germans debated the treatment of people with intellectual disabilities: in the late nineteenth century, doctors, psychiatrists, and Christian caretakers came to equate productivity with worth. They defined people with disabilities as “unworthy” of life, which legitimized mass atrocities such as sterilization and killing under the Nazis and continued to shape their mistreatment during the postwar era. From the 1970s onward, however, a new cohort of activists challenged the eugenicist mindset and launched new campaigns to endow cognitively disabled people with respect and rights. This review essay assesses Herzog's claim that this shift was powered by the activists’ anti-fascist confrontation with the Nazi past. It argues that their success should also be understood as the product of a broader process: the decline of European efforts to mold “productive” bodies and increase birthrates. Future histories of eugenics’ decline should therefore complement Herzog's illuminative perspective with explaining how advocacy was ironically empowered by growing apathy about productivity.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"65 2","pages":"309-320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148174440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
History and TheoryPub Date : 2026-06-01Epub Date: 2026-04-10DOI: 10.1111/hith.70029
CHRISTIAN DE PEE
{"title":"THE NAITŌ HYPOSTASIS: NAITŌ KONAN (1866–1934) AND THE JAPANESE IMPERIALIST LEGACY IN THE HISTORIOGRAPHY OF MIDDLE-PERIOD CHINA (800–1400 CE)","authors":"CHRISTIAN DE PEE","doi":"10.1111/hith.70029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 1955, Hisayuki Miyakawa published an article that sought to introduce American and European scholars to the work of the Japanese Sinologist Naitō Konan (1866–1934). Miyakawa drew particular attention to what he called the “Naitō hypothesis”—that is, Naitō’s argument that China became modern during the Song dynasty (960–1279). Miyakawa neglected to explain, however, that Naitō conceived his periodization of the Chinese past in order to interpret current political developments in Japan and China and shape current political decisions rather than to interpret historical documents and that Naitō adjusted his periodization as relations between Japan and China deteriorated. Naitō supported and justified Japanese imperialist and colonialist policies by writing newspaper articles and scholarly publications as well as by working for the Foreign Ministry, as his own sons and the Black Dragon Society (or Amur River Society) acknowledged after his death. Naitō’s historical publications and political activities closely resemble those of German historians of Poland and the Baltic during the Weimar and National-Socialist periods. This article recommends that historians of Middle-Period China (800–1400) stop honoring Naitō as a founding figure of their field, both because the image of Naitō they honor derives from deliberately misleading Cold War representations of him and his work and because the political purposes of his scholarship have lastingly compromised his assumptions, analytical terms, evidence, interpretations, and conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"65 2","pages":"203-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hith.70029","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148174551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
History and TheoryPub Date : 2026-06-01Epub Date: 2025-11-29DOI: 10.1111/hith.70025
Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen
{"title":"UNWARRANTED CONFIDENCE: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE POVERTY OF ANTI-REALISM","authors":"Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen","doi":"10.1111/hith.70025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>The Poverty of Anti-Realism: Critical Perspectives on Postmodernist Philosophy of History</i>, edited by Tor Egil Førland and Branko Mitrović, celebrates the new dawn of historical realism, which it claims supersedes the erroneous and harmful anti-realism. The volume indeed contributes to reinvigorating the debate surrounding realism and anti-realism and draws attention to a relatively neglected philosophical approach in the philosophy of historiography: realism. However, both the tone and content of this New Historical Realism leave much to be desired. The book displays unwarranted confidence regarding the quality of its content and its grasp of philosophical issues. Many of the essays in this volume exhibit a lack of understanding about the basic issues of realism and anti-realism and are riddled with conceptual confusions. Philosophical notions such as anti-realism, irrealism, postmodernism, idealism, and constructivism are used casually and even interchangeably. Although there are some glimmers of light and more measured approaches in the book, its broad-brush categories are premised on an us-against-them view of the scholarly debate, presenting the rival anti-realistic position simplistically as detrimental, deficient, and wholly objectionable. I end my article with a plea for prudent scholarship and reviewing in the philosophy of historiography and philosophy more generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"65 2","pages":"271-297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hith.70025","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148166944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
History and TheoryPub Date : 2026-06-01Epub Date: 2026-04-25DOI: 10.1111/hith.70031
EDOARDO GRENDI
{"title":"“THE NORMAL EXCEPTION”: “MICROANALYSIS AND SOCIAL HISTORY” (1977)*","authors":"EDOARDO GRENDI","doi":"10.1111/hith.70031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70031","url":null,"abstract":"<p>“The normal exception” has long been a slogan of microhistory. This oxymoronic phrase is the iconic rendering of an incidental sentence that appeared in a 1977 article published by Edoardo Grendi in the Italian journal <i>Quaderni storici</i>, which functioned as the incubator of Italian microhistory. Grendi's article, titled “Micro-analisi e storia sociale” (Microanalysis and Social History), is here translated into English for the first time. Although foundational to the project of Italian microhistory, the article is not entirely self-explanatory. A companion piece by Francesca Trivellato in this issue of <i>History and Theory</i> places this contribution in the context of the historiographical debates of the time, traces its influence, examines the controversies it generated, and points to some of its continued heuristic potentials.</p>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"65 2","pages":"257-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hith.70031","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148174503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
History and TheoryPub Date : 2026-06-01Epub Date: 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1111/hith.70019
Stefan Berger
{"title":"REALISM OR IDEALISM? PERSPECTIVES ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY FROM A PRACTICING HISTORIAN","authors":"Stefan Berger","doi":"10.1111/hith.70019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70019","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This review essay argues that the realist philosophy of history, as represented by Adam Timmins in <i>Towards a Realist Philosophy of History</i>, raises interesting questions about the nature of historical writing and challenges some of the foundations of idealist philosophy of history. A basic problem with Timmins's book is the conflation of “constructivism” with “idealism” when there are, indeed, quite a few “realists” who are also “constructivists.” After summarizing the main arguments of the book and critically examining them, this essay argues that realism, if combined with constructivism, is appealing for many practicing historians, but it also warns that there can be no foundationalism regarding the institutionalization of professional historiography. Furthermore, it emphasizes skepticism regarding trust in specialization, and it cautions that idealist philosophy of history has had more of an impact on practicing historians than Timmins's book suggests. Because I am not a philosopher of history, I must leave the finer points of philosophy to other reviewers; instead, I focus on the perspective of a practicing historian with an interest in historical theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"65 2","pages":"298-308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hith.70019","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148174832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
History and TheoryPub Date : 2026-06-01Epub Date: 2026-04-25DOI: 10.1111/hith.70030
FRANCESCA TRIVELLATO
{"title":"“THE NORMAL EXCEPTION”: EDOARDO GRENDI, MICROANALYSIS, AND GENERALIZATIONS*","authors":"FRANCESCA TRIVELLATO","doi":"10.1111/hith.70030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p>“The normal exception” has long been a slogan of microhistory. This oxymoronic phrase is the iconic rendering of an incidental sentence that appeared in a 1977 article by Edoardo Grendi. His article, titled “Micro-analisi e storia sociale” (Microanalysis and Social History), is cited more often than it is read. In this issue of <i>History and Theory</i>, Grendi's seminal article appears in English for the first time. This companion piece introduces Grendi's contribution by situating it within contemporary debates between historians and anthropologists. It also sheds light on the fate of the concept of “the normal exception” among its supporters and detractors. Finally, it clarifies some of the possibilities that other Italian microhistorians have laid out for deriving generalizations from case studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"65 2","pages":"237-256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hith.70030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148174502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
History and TheoryPub Date : 2026-06-01Epub Date: 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1111/hith.70024
Andréa Delestrade
{"title":"UNIVERSALITY IN THE CLIMATE CATASTROPHE: RETHINKING CHAKRABARTY'S ANTHROPOCENE PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY WITH MERLEAU-PONTY'S PHILOSOPHY OF NATURE","authors":"Andréa Delestrade","doi":"10.1111/hith.70024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article critically examines Dipesh Chakrabarty's concept of Anthropocene history, a philosophy of history that is designed to respond to the universal challenge of the Anthropocene. It uses the work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty to mitigate the pitfalls of Chakrabarty's concept and to propose an alternative relation between nature and history. I argue that the problem of Chakrabarty's Anthropocene history resides not in its use of the category of the universal per se but in its insufficient articulation of the particular. Even if he is correct in asserting that it is impossible to conceptualize the ecological crisis within the modern logic of history and that it is necessary to conceptualize the ecological crisis from a non-Eurocentric perspective, Anthropocene history still leaves the modern structure of history untouched, resulting in a structure that is unable to meaningfully articulate particularity and universality because of its reliance on teleology and phenomenological emptiness. With this in mind, I show how Merleau-Ponty's conceptual redefinition of nature as a foundational universality, when combined with the chiasmic intertwining of history and nature and a reflection on the concept of the institution as a point of passage between nature and history, enables us to rearticulate universality and particularity in the face of the ecological crisis. This in turn enables a freer conceptual navigation between the existential and political dimensions of the ecological crisis with which environmental philosophy is concerned.</p>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"65 2","pages":"159-179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hith.70024","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148174833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
History and TheoryPub Date : 2026-02-23Epub Date: 2025-12-12DOI: 10.1111/hith.70021
Alf Lüdtke, Alexandra Oeser
{"title":"EIGENSINN AND DOMINATION IN LIBERAL AND ILLIBERAL SOCIETIES","authors":"Alf Lüdtke, Alexandra Oeser","doi":"10.1111/hith.70021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.70021","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is a posthumously published text that was written by Alf Lüdtke and Alexandra Oeser but was left unfinished when Lüdtke died in February 2019. It examines two central notions—and their articulations—that Lüdtke and Oeser use differently in their work: domination and <i>Eigensinn</i>. On domination, it focuses on perspectives of Max Weber's work and different translations in English and French that have led to distinct receptions of the notion of domination in these languages. While locating the notion of <i>Eigensinn</i> back in its 1980s academic context, this article reconceptualizes <i>Eigensinn</i> as a blind spot of Weber's definition of domination that addresses the question of <i>how</i> people produce a “will to obey,” which Weber's work does not tackle. The article also debates the possibilities of using the notion of <i>Eigensinn</i> for liberal and illiberal societies. Oeser has written an introduction to guide the reader through the text and to recall the conditions surrounding its production.</p>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"65 1","pages":"32-57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hith.70021","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147565231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
History and TheoryPub Date : 2026-02-23Epub Date: 2025-03-17DOI: 10.1111/hith.12386
Martin Jay
{"title":"ORIGAMI PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY","authors":"Martin Jay","doi":"10.1111/hith.12386","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12386","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Drawing on Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's monadological metaphysics, with its nominalist emphasis on the integrity of the individual, the eminent Dutch philosopher of history Franklin Rudolf Ankersmit proposes a radically new interpretation of the way historical representations create “historical reality” based on the “death” of the no longer actual past. <i>Representation: The Birth of Historical Reality from the Death of the Past</i> is an unapologetically baroque exercise that seeks to fashion a unified argument by drawing on the most diverse of elements. Gilles Deleuze's emphasis on the importance of the “fold” in his study of Leibniz and the baroque gives us an insight into the origami figure that results, a figure that is circular, closed on itself, and impermeable. After attempting to reconstruct the logic of Ankersmit's convoluted argument, this review article raises questions about his claim that the past can ever be unequivocally “dead,” his reliance on Leibniz's “principle of sufficient reason” to justify “historical rationality,” and his hope that historicism can be revived on the basis of a monadological metaphysics.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"65 1","pages":"115-132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147566266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}