JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY最新文献_第6页

AI in Search of Unfairness in Consumer Contracts: The Terms of Service Landscape 人工智能在消费者合同中寻找不公平:服务条款景观

IF 2.3

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY Pub Date : 2022-07-18 DOI: 10.1007/s10603-022-09520-9

F. Lagioia, A. Jablonowska, R. Liepiņa, K. Drazewski

引用次数: 5

Regulating Borrower Hardship in Australia, Singapore, and Hong Kong: Payment Holidays During COVID-19 and Beyond 监管澳大利亚、新加坡和香港的借款人困境：新冠肺炎及其后的付款假期

IF 2.3

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY Pub Date : 2022-05-13 DOI: 10.1007/s10603-022-09515-6

Emma Leong

引用次数: 0

Amending China’s Notion of a “Consumer”: Lessons from Comparative Analysis of the PRC Consumer Protection Law 中国“消费者”概念的修正:《中华人民共和国消费者保护法》的比较分析

IF 2.3

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI: 10.1007/s10603-022-09518-3

K. Thomas

引用次数: 1

Long-term Energy Cost Labelling for Appliances: Evidence from a Randomised Controlled Trial in Ireland 电器的长期能源成本标签:来自爱尔兰随机对照试验的证据

IF 2.3

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY Pub Date : 2022-05-10 DOI: 10.1007/s10603-022-09516-5

E. Denny

引用次数: 1

Book Notes “Law” 1/2022 “法律”1/2022

IF 2.3

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY Pub Date : 2022-04-13 DOI: 10.1007/s10603-022-09517-4

H.-W. Micklitz

引用次数: 0

The Unreliability of Online Review Mechanisms 在线审查机制的不可靠性

IF 2.3

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY Pub Date : 2022-04-12 DOI: 10.1007/s10603-022-09514-7

M. Narciso

引用次数: 1

Economics of Consumer Protection: Contributions and Challenges in Estimating Consumer Injury and Evaluating Consumer Protection Policy 消费者保护经济学:评估消费者伤害与评估消费者保护政策的贡献与挑战

IF 2.3

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY Pub Date : 2022-04-06 DOI: 10.1007/s10603-021-09482-4

J. Pappalardo

引用次数: 3

Financial Vulnerability, Financial Literacy, and the Use of Digital Payment Technologies 金融脆弱性、金融素养和数字支付技术的使用

IF 2.3

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY Pub Date : 2022-03-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10603-022-09512-9

Seldal M. M. Naeser, E. Nyhus

引用次数: 14

Consumer Protection Law in Cuba 古巴的消费者保护法

IF 2.3

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10603-022-09510-x

N. D. L. C. Ojeda Rodríguez, T. P. Lorenzo

引用次数: 0

Reading a Duty to Provide Accessible Pre-Contractual Information for Consumers with Disabilities into EU Consumer Protection Law 解读欧盟消费者保护法中为残疾消费者提供可访问的合同前信息的责任

IF 2.3

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY Pub Date : 2022-02-28 DOI: 10.1007/s10603-022-09513-8

L. Waddington

{"title":"Reading a Duty to Provide Accessible Pre-Contractual Information for Consumers with Disabilities into EU Consumer Protection Law","authors":"L. Waddington","doi":"10.1007/s10603-022-09513-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-022-09513-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper considers whether a duty to provide consumers with disabilities with pre-contractual information in an accessible format, or in an otherwise personalised format, can be read into EU consumer protection law. Such a duty could be regarded as a particular form of reasonable accommodation. The paper explores this issue in the context of three key consumer protection instruments: the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, the Consumer Credit Directive, and the Consumer Rights Directive. The paper argues that the Directives should be interpreted in light of the EU’s obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) which addresses, <i>inter alia</i>, the accessibility of information. Whilst consumer protection is an area of shared competence between the EU and its Member States, the three Directives examined in the paper largely provide for “full harmonisation,” thereby limiting the scope Member States have for taking action in these fields. In light of this, the paper argues that the EU has, to a large degree, taken on responsibility for complying with the CRPD in these fields, and that the Directives should be interpreted in light of those obligations. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights can further bolster a human rights compatible interpretation of EU consumer protection directives. The paper also considers the extent to which the Directives allow Member States some residual competences to set requirements concerning pre-contractual information for persons with disabilities. To the extent that such competences exist, the paper argues that CRPD-compatible minimum requirements for pre-contractual information provided to consumers with disabilities should be read into the Directives by the European Court of Justice. Establishing CRPD-compatible minimum requirements in this field would reduce the need for individual Member States to take action to comply with the CRPD, and therefore reduce the risk of divergent national standards which could undermine the internal market goals of the relevant Directives. The paper concludes that a duty to provide a de facto reasonable accommodation, in terms of accessible and additional information, can be read into the Consumer Credit Directive and the Consumer Rights Directive. A more limited duty, concerning only the provision of additional information for persons with disabilities, can be read into the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. It is unclear whether case law of the Court of Justice can be interpreted as requiring the provision of accessible information under this last Directive.</p>","PeriodicalId":47436,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138520638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1