Minerva最新文献_第10页

Participation as Post-Fordist Politics: Demos, New Labour, and Science Policy. 作为后福特主义政治的参与：德莫斯、新工党和科学政策》。

IF 3.2 2区哲学

Minerva Pub Date : 2010-12-01 Epub Date: 2010-11-20 DOI: 10.1007/s11024-010-9157-8

Charles Thorpe

{"title":"Participation as Post-Fordist Politics: Demos, New Labour, and Science Policy.","authors":"Charles Thorpe","doi":"10.1007/s11024-010-9157-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11024-010-9157-8","url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, British science policy has seen a significant shift 'from deficit to dialogue' in conceptualizing the relationship between science and the public. Academics in the interdisciplinary field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) have been influential as advocates of the new public engagement agenda. However, this participatory agenda has deeper roots in the political ideology of the Third Way. A framing of participation as a politics suited to post-Fordist conditions was put forward in the magazine Marxism Today in the late 1980s, developed in the Demos thinktank in the 1990s, and influenced policy of the New Labour government. The encouragement of public participation and deliberation in relation to science and technology has been part of a broader implementation of participatory mechanisms under New Labour. This participatory program has been explicitly oriented toward producing forms of social consciousness and activity seen as essential to a viable knowledge economy and consumer society. STS arguments for public engagement in science have gained influence insofar as they have intersected with the Third Way politics of post-Fordism.","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":"48 4","pages":"389-411"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/a8/11024_2010_Article_9157.PMC2999726.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29618914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Do Spin-Offs Make the Academics' Heads Spin?: The Impacts of Spin-Off Companies on Their Parent Research Organisation. 衍生产品会让学术界头晕吗?:分拆公司对母公司研究机构的影响。

IF 2.3 2区哲学

Minerva Pub Date : 2010-09-01 DOI: 10.1007/s11024-010-9154-y

Arend H Zomer, Ben W A Jongbloed, Jürgen Enders

{"title":"Do Spin-Offs Make the Academics' Heads Spin?: The Impacts of Spin-Off Companies on Their Parent Research Organisation.","authors":"Arend H Zomer, Ben W A Jongbloed, Jürgen Enders","doi":"10.1007/s11024-010-9154-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9154-y","url":null,"abstract":"As public research organisations are increasingly driven by their national and regional governments to engage in knowledge transfer, they have started to support the creation of companies. These research based spin-off companies (RBSOs) often keep contacts with the research institutes they originate from. In this paper we present the results of a study of four research institutes within two universities and two non-university public research organisations (PROs) in the Netherlands. We show that research organisations have distinct motivations to support the creation of spin-off companies. In terms of resources RBSOs contribute, mostly in a modest way, to research activities by providing information, equipment and monetary resources. In particular, RBSOs are helpful for researchers competing for research grants that demand participation of industry. Furthermore, RBSOs may be seen as a proactive response by Dutch public research organisations to demands of economic relevance from their institutional environment. RBSOs enhance the prestige of their parent organisations and create legitimacy for public funds invested in PROs. At the same time, most RBSOs do not have a significant impact on the direction of the research conducted at the PROs.","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":"48 3","pages":"331-353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11024-010-9154-y","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29346181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 40

Virology Experts in the Boundary Zone Between Science, Policy and the Public: A Biographical Analysis. 处于科学、政策和公众之间边界地带的病毒学专家：传记分析。

IF 2.3 2区哲学

Minerva Pub Date : 2010-06-01 Epub Date: 2010-05-28 DOI: 10.1007/s11024-010-9145-z

Erwin van Rijswoud

{"title":"Virology Experts in the Boundary Zone Between Science, Policy and the Public: A Biographical Analysis.","authors":"Erwin van Rijswoud","doi":"10.1007/s11024-010-9145-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11024-010-9145-z","url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to open up the biographical black box of three experts working in the boundary zone between science, policy and public debate. A biographical-narrative approach is used to analyse the roles played by the virologists Albert Osterhaus, Roel Coutinho and Jaap Goudsmit in policy and public debate. These figures were among the few leading virologists visibly active in the Netherlands during the revival of infectious diseases in the 1980s. Osterhaus and Coutinho in particular are still the key figures today, as demonstrated during the outbreak of novel influenza A (H1N1). This article studies the various political and communicative challenges and dilemmas encountered by these three virologists, and discusses the way in which, strategically or not, they handled those challenges and dilemmas during the various stages of the field's recent history. Important in this respect is their pursuit of a public role that is both effective and credible. We will conclude with a reflection on the H1N1 pandemic, and the historical and biographical ties between emerging governance arrangements and the experts involved in the development of such arrangements.","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":"48 2","pages":"145-167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3b/50/11024_2010_Article_9145.PMC2898100.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29159151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Is Inequality Among Universities Increasing? Gini Coefficients and the Elusive Rise of Elite Universities. 大学之间的不平等正在加剧吗?基尼系数与精英大学难以捉摸的崛起。

IF 2.3 2区哲学

Minerva Pub Date : 2010-03-01 Epub Date: 2010-03-20 DOI: 10.1007/s11024-010-9141-3

Willem Halffman, Loet Leydesdorff

{"title":"Is Inequality Among Universities Increasing? Gini Coefficients and the Elusive Rise of Elite Universities.","authors":"Willem Halffman, Loet Leydesdorff","doi":"10.1007/s11024-010-9141-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9141-3","url":null,"abstract":"One of the unintended consequences of the New Public Management (NPM) in universities is often feared to be a division between elite institutions focused on research and large institutions with teaching missions. However, institutional isomorphisms provide counter-incentives. For example, university rankings focus on certain output parameters such as publications, but not on others (e.g., patents). In this study, we apply Gini coefficients to university rankings in order to assess whether universities are becoming more unequal, at the level of both the world and individual nations. Our results do not support the thesis that universities are becoming more unequal. If anything, we predominantly find homogenisation, both at the level of the global comparisons and nationally. In a more restricted dataset (using only publications in the natural and life sciences), we find increasing inequality for those countries, which used NPM during the 1990s, but not during the 2000s. Our findings suggest that increased output steering from the policy side leads to a global conformation to performance standards.","PeriodicalId":47427,"journal":{"name":"Minerva","volume":"48 1","pages":"55-72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2010-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11024-010-9141-3","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"28929187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 106

Richard Whitley, Jochen Gläser (eds.), The Changing Governance of the Sciences. The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook: Springer, Dordrecht, 2007, 26 pp. 理查德·惠特利，约亨Gläser(编)，科学的不断变化的治理。研究评估系统的出现。科学社会学年鉴:斯普林格，多德雷赫特，2007年，26页。

IF 2.3 2区哲学

Minerva Pub Date : 2009-12-01 Epub Date: 2009-11-05 DOI: 10.1007/s11024-009-9132-4

Jürgen Enders

引用次数: 15

Bureaucratization in Public Research Institutions. 公共研究机构的官僚化。

IF 2.3 2区哲学

Minerva Pub Date : 2009-03-01 Epub Date: 2009-02-24 DOI: 10.1007/s11024-008-9113-z

Mario Coccia

引用次数: 68

Ethics of university research, biotechnology and potential military spin-off. 大学研究伦理、生物技术和潜在的军事衍生品。