Explorations in Economic History最新文献_第5页

Land reform and agrarian socialism in interwar Europe: Evidence from 1930s Spain before civil war 战时欧洲的土地改革和农业社会主义：内战前 1930 年代西班牙的证据

IF 2.6 1区历史学

Explorations in Economic History Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101618

Jordi Domènech , Ilona Lahdelma , Pablo Martinelli

引用次数: 0

Bank failures and economic activity: Evidence from the progressive era 银行倒闭与经济活动：进步时代的证据

IF 2.6 1区历史学

Explorations in Economic History Pub Date : 2024-07-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101616

Marco del Angel , Gary Richardson , Michael Gou

引用次数: 0

Institutional discrimination and assimilation: Evidence from the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 制度性歧视与同化：来自 1882 年《排华法案》的证据

IF 2.6 1区历史学

Explorations in Economic History Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101615

Shuo Chen , Bin Xie

引用次数: 0

Print culture and economic constraints: A quantitative analysis of book prices in eighteenth-century Britain 印刷文化与经济制约：十八世纪英国图书价格的定量分析

IF 2.6 1区历史学

Explorations in Economic History Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101614

Iiro Tiihonen , Leo Lahti , Mikko Tolonen

引用次数: 0

Did the 1917–21 economic depression accelerate the epidemiological transition? Milk prices, summer peak of mortality, and food-and-water causes of death in Madrid, Spain 1917-21 年的经济萧条是否加速了流行病学的转型？西班牙马德里的牛奶价格、夏季死亡高峰以及食物和水的死亡原因

IF 2.6 1区历史学

Explorations in Economic History Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101613

Michel Oris, Stanislao Mazzoni, Diego Ramiro-Fariñas

引用次数: 0

European business cycles and economic growth, 1300–2000 欧洲商业周期和经济增长，1300-2000 年

IF 2.6 1区历史学

Explorations in Economic History Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101602

Stephen Broadberry , Jason Lennard

引用次数: 0

Income inequality in Eastern Europe: Bulgaria and Czechoslovakia in the twentieth century 东欧的收入不平等：二十世纪的保加利亚和捷克斯洛伐克

IF 2.3 1区历史学

Explorations in Economic History Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101594

Stefan Nikolić , Filip Novokmet , Piotr Paweł Larysz

{"title":"Income inequality in Eastern Europe: Bulgaria and Czechoslovakia in the twentieth century","authors":"Stefan Nikolić , Filip Novokmet , Piotr Paweł Larysz","doi":"10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101594","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101594","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article provides novel estimates of long-term income inequality in Bulgaria and Czech Lands/Czechoslovakia in the twentieth century. Relying on newly-constructed datasets and the social tables approach, we measure inequality between salient social strata. We find that Czechoslovakia was significantly more unequal than Bulgaria before 1945. Inequality converged to similarly low levels under socialism. Decomposition analysis by social classes reveals that different levels of inequality in the first half of the century were principally driven by higher within social-class inequality in Czechoslovakia, owing to a more stratified industrial society; whereas a low dispersion within the dominant agricultural sector held down the within social-class component in Bulgaria. A dramatic fall in total inequality after 1945 was a result of the social revolution that encompassed the virtual disappearance of between social-class inequality and a marked reduction in within social-class inequality. Our findings point to the critical role of institutional and political factors in driving inequality in Eastern Europe throughout the twentieth century.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47413,"journal":{"name":"Explorations in Economic History","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101594"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014498324000305/pdfft?md5=ce6e411fb53561380835efa04d3681c7&pid=1-s2.0-S0014498324000305-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141308176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Banking on innovation: Listed and non-listed equity investing, evidence from société générale de Belgique, 1850–1934 银行创新：上市和非上市股票投资，1850-1934 年比利时总公司的证据

IF 2.3 1区历史学

Explorations in Economic History Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101593

Gertjan Verdickt , Marc Deloof

引用次数: 0

How rich were the rich? An empirically-based taxonomy of pre-industrial bases of wealth 富人有多富？基于经验的工业化前财富基础分类法

IF 2.3 1区历史学

Explorations in Economic History Pub Date : 2024-05-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101592

Branko Milanovic

引用次数: 0

Courts, legislatures, and evolving property rules: Lessons from eminent domain 法院、立法机构和不断演变的财产规则：征用权的经验教训

IF 2.3 1区历史学

Explorations in Economic History Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101581

Robert K. Fleck, F. Andrew Hanssen

{"title":"Courts, legislatures, and evolving property rules: Lessons from eminent domain","authors":"Robert K. Fleck, F. Andrew Hanssen","doi":"10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101581","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eeh.2024.101581","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines judicial and legislative modifications to a specific property rule, the benefit offset, which was widely employed by railroad companies during the 19th century as a way to reduce required compensation for land taken through eminent domain. At the beginning of the railroad boom, all states allowed the benefit offset; by the end of the boom, most states had banned it, some via court decisions, others via legislation. Consistent with a simple model in which a court and a legislature act as (imperfect) agents of the public: 1) challenges to the benefit offset generally began with litigation; 2) all states that litigated the offset eventually restricted it, but not always through litigation; 3) where courts chose to allow the offset, legislation restricted it, often with substantial lags; 4) those lags tended to be longer (i.e., more time passed between litigation and subsequent legislation) when the litigation efforts took place early in the track building process (at which time the offset was more likely to be socially valuable); 5) states that never banned the benefit offset were those where landowners were unlikely to have ever been harmed by the practice (principally western states with vast expanses of public and private land). The model and historical evidence illustrate how a system that grants both the court and the legislature the power to alter property rules can establish a beneficial redundancy that increases the value of modifiable property rules.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47413,"journal":{"name":"Explorations in Economic History","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140182459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0