{"title":"Correction to: International, Political, Sociology Revisited","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/ips/olag041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag041","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">This is a correction to: R B J Walker, Didier Bigo, International, Political, Sociology Revisited, <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">International Political Sociology</span>, Volume 20, Issue 2, June 2026, olag013, <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag013\">https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag013</a></span>","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Peace by Other Means? Ruptures and Neoliberal Continuities in Duque’s Colombia (2018–2022)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/ips/olag033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag033","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">Peacebuilding has come to exert a powerful pull in international relations (IR). Yet while considerable attention has been paid to what peacebuilding does to people, far less has been devoted to what it does to political analysis itself. This article explores this question through a poststructuralist analysis of the discourse of Colombia’s former president, Iván Duque (2018–2022). While dominant interpretations portray his administration as a securitarian rollback from the transformative ambitions of the 2016 Peace Accords, such readings obscure the deeper continuities linking the earlier model of “territorial peace” to the subsequent framework of “peace with legality.” After critically re-examining Duque’s discourse on peace and security, the paper turns to a theme that has remained largely overlooked: development and the transformation of territories. For all the important reconfigurations, Duque’s discourse remained structured by a long-standing neoliberal and colonial rationality, oriented towards adapting marginalized populations to the imperatives of capitalist markets. Beyond the Colombian case, the article thus invites a more critical engagement with peacebuilding as a frame for understanding political dynamics in post-conflict settings.</span>","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Infrastructural Perspectives on Global Ordering: A Research Agenda on the Infrastructure-Orders-Nexus","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/ips/olag032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag032","url":null,"abstract":"<span class=\"paragraphSection\">Infrastructural transformation can stabilize relations between states, international regimes, firms, individuals, and the environment, but it can also contribute to their reconfiguration. To explore how infrastructural change (re)produces or transforms global orders, this article clarifies and disentangles the constitutive elements of what we call the infrastructure-orders-nexus. It views infrastructures (as socio-technical networks) and “global orders” (understood as multi-scalar constellations of patterns of practices, institutionalized norms, and distributions of material assets) as fundamentally relational: Processes of global ordering are characterized by inherent forms of connectivity and interaction, and driven by specific conflicts and negotiations over the planning, production, and operation of infrastructures. The article contributes to the socio-material grounding of an emerging “relational IR.” Drawing on Latin American transport initiatives, we identify four mechanisms—a corridor logic, financial conditionalities, a commodity imperative, and socio-ecological impact and resistance feedback loops—that specify how infrastructural processes reshape practices of cooperation, governance norms, and material asymmetries across scales. The broader research agenda outlined in this article links our heuristic framework to critical domains—climate (in)justice, extractivism and (de)colonialism, gendered inequalities, and post-anthropocentrism—calling for a reflexive understanding of the complex linkages between infrastructures and global orders.</span>","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"497 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149221556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Policing Souls, Redeeming Nations: Evangelical Activism and the Far-Right Counterpolitics of Emotions in the Brazilian Police","authors":"Rodrigo D E Campos,Nicolai Gellwitzki","doi":"10.1093/ips/olag038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag038","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In liberal democracies, policing is conventionally understood as a secular and rational practice grounded in the rule of law. Yet this assumption is unsettled as religion re-emerges as a formative force in security governance. Across the contemporary global far right, religious nationalism increasingly legitimises authoritarian security agendas by fusing moral and emotional appeals with projects of exclusion and repression. This article argues that such dynamics hinge on what we term the counterpolitics of emotions, the political contestation through which actors seek to reshape the emotional norms that sustain liberal institutions. By reconfiguring how state agents feel about themselves, their work, and those they govern, these counterpolitics enable the affective normalization of authoritarian practices. The argument is developed through the case of Brazil, where Evangelical activism has become deeply entwined with policing. Drawing on documentary and interview data, the article shows how Evangelical chaplaincy organizations cultivate emotional repertoires that valorize pride and vulnerability while suppressing guilt and shame. In doing so, they recast police officers as divine subjects and policing as a Christian vocation. This emotional reorientation fuses Evangelical and far-right politics, transforming security institutions from within. The article thus demonstrates how counterpolitics of emotion underpin the rise of authoritarianism and contribute to its transnational diffusion.","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149123301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pragmatist Resilience: Fallibilism, Experimentation, and Diversity","authors":"Peter Finkenbusch","doi":"10.1093/ips/olag040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag040","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Resilience has become a dominant paradigm in economic development, international security, and climate change mitigation. For many public commentators and policy practitioners, resilience promises better coping in a complex world of recurring crises. However, the academic disciplines of international relations and politics have so far been critical of the new governing ethos. Whether they see it as biopolitical, neoliberal, or post-liberal, critics agree on the passive and socially regressive nature of resilience. The article takes issue with this negative, one-sided view by articulating a pragmatist iteration of resilience. Drawing on the philosophy of John Dewey, the article argues that resilience and pragmatism share an affinity in three respects. First, both reject a will to truth, emphasizing the limited and provisional character of knowledge. Second, they embrace a deeply experimental ethos, putting the focus on practice over theory. Thirdly, they strive to include a diverse set of actors in the policy-making process. My argument is that these three commonalities help avoid the responsibilizing and depoliticizing nature of resilience identified by biopolitical and governmentality accounts of resilience. Through fallibilism, experimentation, and diversity, pragmatist resilience offers more than mere adaptation. It promises scientific progress, increasing human control and collective growth.","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149123303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Geopolitics of Children’s Sexuality: Reframing Rights and Contesting Moral Sovereignty in Europe","authors":"Víctor Hugo Ramírez García","doi":"10.1093/ips/olag042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag042","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article develops the concept of the geopolitics of children’s sexuality to examine how childhood becomes a central arena of contestation in the global governance of gender and sexuality. Drawing on Polish and Hungarian legislative initiatives on the “protection” of children, it argues that childhood is strategically mobilized as a form of symbolic capital in transnational struggles. The framework foregrounds children’s sexual agency as a key object of dissensus linking the micro-politics of subject formation with the macro-politics of geopolitical boundary-making. Children’s rights, rather than constituting a stable legal framework, are reinterpreted by both liberal and illiberal actors, thereby revealing the constitutive ambiguity and normative elasticity of human rights. Illiberal actors deploy securitization strategies that construct childhood as a national good to be defended, framing gender and sexual diversity as threats to moral sovereignty. The article contributes to debates on norm contestation and the role of childhood as a technology of governance, showing how struggles over intimate life are constitutive of broader geopolitical conflicts.","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149092609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Organic Cosmos: Cybernetics and Politics of Relations Between Arendt and Latour","authors":"Toni Čerkez","doi":"10.1093/ips/olag031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag031","url":null,"abstract":"Relational thinking in International Relations Theory (IRT) and International Political Sociology (IPS) critiques Cartesian binaries by advancing relational ontologies of politics. Central to this critique is Bruno Latour’s theory of modernity, which challenges Cartesianism and calls for an emancipatory break from it. I engage Latour through a dialogue with Hannah Arendt’s account of the shift from Being to Process, which she links to cybernetics and the dominance of labor in the vita activa. I reinterpret this shift as a move from Cartesian mechanism (Arendt’s Being) to what I call organic cosmology (Arendt’s Process), reflecting digitalised reality. I argue that IRT and IPS have under-theorized this cosmological shift, with consequences for the politics of relations. Cybernetics inaugurated organic cosmology by positing that information constitutes relations. Yet information is treated as separate from matter, producing a post-Cartesian dualism left largely unaddressed by Latour and contemporary IRT and IPS. This binary underpins computational capitalism by enabling data extractivism as an ordering logic. Drawing on debates on earth-system governance and algorithmic ontology, I argue that neglecting cybernetics as a cosmological formation leaves relational IRT and IPS ill-equipped to grasp how cybernetic imaginaries structure politics of relations and reproduce new dualisms, weakening their critical purchase.","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148409018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jessica Auchter,Kyle Grayson,Victor Coutinho Lage,Nora El Qadim,Aida Hozić
{"title":"Introducing IPS@20: Reflections, Critiques, and the Futures of International Political Sociology","authors":"Jessica Auchter,Kyle Grayson,Victor Coutinho Lage,Nora El Qadim,Aida Hozić","doi":"10.1093/ips/olag034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag034","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As the journal International Political Sociology marks its twentieth anniversary, we explore what it now means to do international political sociology as a way of introducing the IPS@20 Special Issue. Drawing on our experience as an editorial team, we highlight how we have engaged with debates about what constitutes international political sociology in our editorial practice. In doing so, we offer a set of reflections on IPS and international political sociology, as conceptual terrains but also as intellectual functionaries. Second, we explore the potential futures of international political sociology. Third, we reflect on the role of critique and transformation in the field. We note the decline of immanent critique and what that might mean for work in international political sociology. Finally, in the concluding (or commencing) section, we return to the question of the international, its futures, and its functions in a time of poly-crisis. By engaging with these questions, we offer a significant contribution to the ongoing conversations about international political sociology that have productively shaped the field.","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148898970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"When Can We Know Practices? Rules, Logics, and Epistemologies of Practice in IR","authors":"August Danielson","doi":"10.1093/ips/olag036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag036","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines who can know practices and under what conditions. While scholarship on the practice turn in International Relations (PTIR) emphasizes the tacit, embodied and pre-reflective qualities of practice, it often relies on interviews and textual accounts that presuppose practitioner reflexivity. This tension has been obscured by conflating two dimensions of practice: the rules that constitute and regulate a practice, and the logic of practice, understood as the historically sedimented dispositions that make certain actions appear sensible. The article develops a typology of five epistemological positions in PTIR to show how these dimensions have been treated as differently accessible to researchers and practitioners. Its central claim is that epistemic access to the logic of practice is context-dependent: usually tacit, the logic may become articulable when routines are disrupted or actors occupy liminal positions. This matters for international political sociology because explanations based on fields, dispositions and background knowledge depend on whether the conditions that render the logic of practice articulable are present. Practitioner accounts should therefore be treated as situated, partial evidence whose value depends on when, where and from whom they are elicited. Consequently, researchers should match their methods to the dimension of practice under study.","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"375 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148922991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Preserving or Extending the “Local’s Point of View”? Situated Knowledge, Social Inquiry, and the “Problem of Agency”","authors":"Timo Walter","doi":"10.1093/ips/olag039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olag039","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Experience-near and reflexive research practice has become the new gold standard for constructionist scholarship in IR and IPS. A key promise of this dual ‘local’ and ‘reflexive turn’ is that privileging subaltern perspectives, everyday experience, and situated knowledges will help fracture traditional and foreground alternative ontologies of the International, thereby helping subaltern actors build effective forms of political agency. Although this strategy has produced a surge of methodological innovation and greatly increased the plurality of voices and standpoints represented within IR and IPS discourse, a growing number of scholars have raised doubts about the narrative that scientific inquiry can function as a performative catalyst of political agency for the situated knowledges it foregrounds. This article challenges the presumption that foregrounding reflexive and experience-near knowledges is sufficient to empowering marginalized and subaltern actors. I argue that this logic fundamentally mis-construes the “problem of (constructing) agency” these actors face because of the dominance of a “constitutive idiom” that (mis-)understands the production of scientific knowledge and social order as mutually reflective or co-constitutive. Building on feminist, post-colonial, and pragmatist insights, I show that experience-near, situated knowledges and techniques and instruments of theorizing are neither opposed nor mutually exclusive but complementary to the construction of reflexive and transformative forms of social agency.","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2026-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149123298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}