叛国罪与政治共同体:排斥、归属与忠诚

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Benjamin de Carvalho
{"title":"叛国罪与政治共同体:排斥、归属与忠诚","authors":"Benjamin de Carvalho","doi":"10.1093/ips/olaf025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have witnessed a surprising resurgence of treason accusations in public discourse, despite their rarity in legal prosecutions, particularly within democratic states. This article examines the effects of treason accusations, shifting focus from their causes to their role in shaping political communities and the meaning of allegiance. Deploying the term treason has important effects, as it contributes to delegitimizing groups of people, branding them as disloyal outsiders. Based on a historical analysis of the discourse on treason and political community in England after the Reformation, I show how treason played a central role in securing the English state through prosecuting dissent and continues to shape collective identities. Drawing attention to changing notions of treason, I show how these contributed to understandings of loyalty, belonging, and exclusion. Through stigmatizing dissenters as disloyal outsiders, treason accusations not only reveal alternative imaginaries of political community and authority but also uncover the violent dynamics sustaining group identity. This historical lens offers insights into contemporary debates about treason’s role in redefining sovereignty and belonging, underscoring its enduring power as a fundamental discursive and performative political act.","PeriodicalId":47361,"journal":{"name":"International Political Sociology","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treason and Political Community:Exclusion, Belonging, and Loyalty\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin de Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ips/olaf025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent years have witnessed a surprising resurgence of treason accusations in public discourse, despite their rarity in legal prosecutions, particularly within democratic states. This article examines the effects of treason accusations, shifting focus from their causes to their role in shaping political communities and the meaning of allegiance. Deploying the term treason has important effects, as it contributes to delegitimizing groups of people, branding them as disloyal outsiders. Based on a historical analysis of the discourse on treason and political community in England after the Reformation, I show how treason played a central role in securing the English state through prosecuting dissent and continues to shape collective identities. Drawing attention to changing notions of treason, I show how these contributed to understandings of loyalty, belonging, and exclusion. Through stigmatizing dissenters as disloyal outsiders, treason accusations not only reveal alternative imaginaries of political community and authority but also uncover the violent dynamics sustaining group identity. This historical lens offers insights into contemporary debates about treason’s role in redefining sovereignty and belonging, underscoring its enduring power as a fundamental discursive and performative political act.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Political Sociology\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Political Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olaf025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olaf025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,公众话语中出现了叛国罪指控的惊人复苏,尽管它们在法律起诉中很少出现,尤其是在民主国家。本文考察了叛国罪指控的影响,将焦点从其原因转移到其在塑造政治社区中的作用和效忠的意义上。使用叛国罪这个词有重要的影响,因为它有助于使一些人失去合法性,把他们打上不忠诚的局外人的标签。基于对宗教改革后英格兰叛国罪和政治团体话语的历史分析,我展示了叛国罪如何通过起诉异见者在确保英国国家安全方面发挥核心作用,并继续塑造集体身份。为了引起人们对叛国罪概念变化的关注,我展示了这些概念如何促进了对忠诚、归属感和排斥的理解。通过将持不同政见者污名化为不忠诚的局外人,叛国罪指控不仅揭示了政治社区和权威的另类想象,而且揭示了维持群体认同的暴力动态。这一历史镜头提供了对当代关于叛国罪在重新定义主权和归属中的作用的辩论的见解,强调了其作为一种基本的话语和表演政治行为的持久力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treason and Political Community:Exclusion, Belonging, and Loyalty
Recent years have witnessed a surprising resurgence of treason accusations in public discourse, despite their rarity in legal prosecutions, particularly within democratic states. This article examines the effects of treason accusations, shifting focus from their causes to their role in shaping political communities and the meaning of allegiance. Deploying the term treason has important effects, as it contributes to delegitimizing groups of people, branding them as disloyal outsiders. Based on a historical analysis of the discourse on treason and political community in England after the Reformation, I show how treason played a central role in securing the English state through prosecuting dissent and continues to shape collective identities. Drawing attention to changing notions of treason, I show how these contributed to understandings of loyalty, belonging, and exclusion. Through stigmatizing dissenters as disloyal outsiders, treason accusations not only reveal alternative imaginaries of political community and authority but also uncover the violent dynamics sustaining group identity. This historical lens offers insights into contemporary debates about treason’s role in redefining sovereignty and belonging, underscoring its enduring power as a fundamental discursive and performative political act.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: International Political Sociology (IPS), responds to the need for more productive collaboration among political sociologists, international relations specialists and sociopolitical theorists. It is especially concerned with challenges arising from contemporary transformations of social, political, and global orders given the statist forms of traditional sociologies and the marginalization of social processes in many approaches to international relations. IPS is committed to theoretical innovation, new modes of empirical research and the geographical and cultural diversification of research beyond the usual circuits of European and North-American scholarship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信