ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Using QIP-MS to Guide the Timing of MRD Testing in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Budget Impact Analysis From the French Payer Perspective. 使用QIP-MS指导多发性骨髓瘤患者MRD检测的时机:从法国付款人的角度进行预算影响分析。
IF 2.1
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S498848
Christian Siegfried, Miyuru Amarapala, Xavier Leleu, Lauren Fusfeld
{"title":"Using QIP-MS to Guide the Timing of MRD Testing in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Budget Impact Analysis From the French Payer Perspective.","authors":"Christian Siegfried, Miyuru Amarapala, Xavier Leleu, Lauren Fusfeld","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S498848","DOIUrl":"10.2147/CEOR.S498848","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Serum or urine protein electrophoresis (SPEP or UPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE or UIFE) are routinely used to detect M-proteins in MM patients. However, SPEP and SIFE are not sensitive enough to measure M-protein levels that are low but still clinically significant. This study aimed to evaluate the potential cost savings associated with using the EXENT GAM Assay, a serum-based quantitative-immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry (QIP-MS) diagnostic test instead of SIFE to guide the timing of minimal residual disease (MRD) testing for patients with multiple myeloma (MM).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A simple 2-year budget impact model was created in Excel using data from MM clinical trials and fee schedules. Patients are tested with either QIP-MS or SIFE at predetermined timepoints. If patients test negative, they will receive MRD testing. The result of the MRD test will determine if the preceding serum-based test was a true negative result (MRD test is negative) or a false negative result (MRD test is positive). Patients receiving autologous stem cell transplant (henceforth referred to as transplant) and those not receiving transplant are both eligible for one MRD test per year. MRD testing for transplant-eligible patients occurs prior to transplant and one year following transplant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across a hypothetical population of 5154 mm patients receiving 1<sup>st</sup>-line treatment in France, using QIP-MS instead of SIFE prior to MRD testing leads to 1973 fewer false negative results and 744 more false positive results (due, in part, to the detection of residual IgG). Net savings per QIP-MS test would be €260 or total savings of €2,481,832.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that the use of QIP-MS prior to MRD testing may be cost-saving for testing French patients with MM.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"107-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849414/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143494241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Budget Impact and Cost-Benefit Analyses of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors for Patients With Heart Failure in Thailand. 钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂对泰国心力衰竭患者的预算影响和成本效益分析
IF 2.1
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-02-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S504819
Poukwan Arunmanakul, Tuangrat Phodha, Sakkarin Pinta-Ay, Mantiwee Nimworapan, Arintaya Phrommintikul, Noppakun Thammatacharee, Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
{"title":"Budget Impact and Cost-Benefit Analyses of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors for Patients With Heart Failure in Thailand.","authors":"Poukwan Arunmanakul, Tuangrat Phodha, Sakkarin Pinta-Ay, Mantiwee Nimworapan, Arintaya Phrommintikul, Noppakun Thammatacharee, Piyameth Dilokthornsakul","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S504819","DOIUrl":"10.2147/CEOR.S504819","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the budget impact and cost-benefit of incorporating sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) into the benefit package for patients with heart failure (HF) under the universal health coverage (UHC) in Thailand.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A budget impact analysis and cost-benefit model were developed using a five-year time horizon from the payer perspective. Dapagliflozin 10 mg daily or Empagliflozin 10 mg daily was considered as an additional treatment to standard of care (SoC) for patients with HF, under the UHC. Two analytical frameworks were applied: (1) only medicine cost and (2) medicine cost and cost of hospitalization for HF (HHF) and urinary tract infection (UTI) admission as the adverse event of SGLT-2i. The net budget impacts (NBI) were calculated along with the HHF cost reduction and benefit-cost ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NBI in the first year in only medicine cost for dapagliflozin was 12,535 million Thai baht (THB) and that for empagliflozin was 13,265 million THB. The NBIs, when considering HHF and UTI admission costs, were 7661 and 7407 million THB in the first year. The prices of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin should be reduced by 57.13% and 52.07% to reach a budget impact of 500 million THB. The benefit-cost ratio was 0.396 for dapagliflozin and 0.456 for empagliflozin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating SGLT-2i into the UHC would significantly impact the healthcare budget. Policymakers should consider this valuable evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"95-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11844265/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143484368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real World Evaluation of Next-Day Molecular Respiratory Infectious Disease Testing on Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs. 呼吸道传染病次日分子检测对医疗资源利用和成本的现实评价。
IF 2.1
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S497838
Andrea J French, Maren S Fragala, Azia S Evans, Pallavi Upadhyay, Steven E Goldberg, Jairus Reddy
{"title":"Real World Evaluation of Next-Day Molecular Respiratory Infectious Disease Testing on Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs.","authors":"Andrea J French, Maren S Fragala, Azia S Evans, Pallavi Upadhyay, Steven E Goldberg, Jairus Reddy","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S497838","DOIUrl":"10.2147/CEOR.S497838","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Advancements in pathogen identification by diagnostic testing may improve patient outcomes. This study evaluated healthcare utilization and costs following diagnostic testing for acute oropharyngeal and respiratory tract infections (RTIs).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Healthcare utilization and costs were evaluated in patients with acute oropharyngeal infections (n=1,172,693), and RTIs (n=4,005,228) who received a syndromic panel-based PCR test with next-day results (HealthTrackRx, Denton, TX), or no test in the IQVIA PharMetrics<sup>®</sup> Plus adjudicated claims database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences were observed between patients who received the PCR test compared to those who received no test. The PCR test cohort had lower total healthcare costs (mean = $5,601±$29,170, median = $807) versus the no test cohort (mean = $7,460±$40,817, median = $1,163) (p = 0.0014) over 6 months, and fewer outpatient visits, other medical service visits, emergency room visits, and inpatient stays (p<0.0001). Similarly, those who received the PCR test for oropharyngeal infection trended towards lower total healthcare costs (mean = $4,393±$13,524, median=$844) than those who received no test (mean = $5,503±$34,141, median = $956) (p=0.0525) and had fewer outpatient and other medical services (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Next-day molecular testing for respiratory and oropharyngeal infection lowers healthcare utilization and costs, suggesting improved patient care through reduced need for healthcare resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"79-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829601/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143433927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Atopic Dermatitis Treatments Before and After Initiation of Ruxolitinib Cream: 6-Month Follow-Up Analysis of a US Payer Claims Database. 开始使用 Ruxolitinib 霜前后的特应性皮炎治疗:对美国支付方索赔数据库的 6 个月随访分析。
IF 2.1
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-02-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S506043
Jinan Liu, Karishma Desai, Chia-Chen Teng, Daniel Sturm, Grace Stockbower, Hiten Patadia, Vincent Willey
{"title":"Atopic Dermatitis Treatments Before and After Initiation of Ruxolitinib Cream: 6-Month Follow-Up Analysis of a US Payer Claims Database.","authors":"Jinan Liu, Karishma Desai, Chia-Chen Teng, Daniel Sturm, Grace Stockbower, Hiten Patadia, Vincent Willey","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S506043","DOIUrl":"10.2147/CEOR.S506043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), a highly pruritic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease, experience inadequate disease control. Ruxolitinib cream was approved in the US in September 2021 for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD. This analysis describes treatment patterns before and after initiation of ruxolitinib cream among patients with AD.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational study used medical and pharmacy claims data from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD<sup>®</sup>) and included adults and adolescents (aged ≥12 years) with an AD diagnosis, a first claim for ruxolitinib cream (index date) between October 2021 and July 2022, and continuous enrollment in a commercial or managed Medicare plan for 6 months before and after the index date. Analyses were also conducted in a subset of patients with a history of more advanced AD therapy (ie, systemic therapies, phototherapy, or ultrahigh-potent topical corticosteroids). Data from 6 months before ruxolitinib cream initiation (baseline period) and after initiation (follow-up period) were summarized using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,581 patients in the overall AD cohort, 749 had a history of more advanced AD therapy. During the follow-up period, 43.8% of patients did not receive any other AD treatment. Compared with baseline, fewer patients received topical corticosteroids (52.3% vs 30.4%), topical calcineurin inhibitors (13.9% vs 6.6%), and topical phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (4.4% vs 2.3%) during the follow-up period; slightly greater reductions were observed among the subset with a history of more advanced AD therapies. Oral corticosteroid use decreased from 20.9% to 15.5% overall and from 44.1% to 20.7% in the subset with more advanced baseline therapy. Among patients receiving biologics at baseline, 17.4% did not receive these treatments during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These 6-month follow-up data suggest that initiating ruxolitinib cream for AD may reduce the overall need for other topical treatments, oral corticosteroids, and biologics.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"69-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809233/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143391950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Therapy with an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor or Docetaxel in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. 估计使用免疫检查点抑制剂或多西他赛治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌的肿瘤治疗场(TTFields)的成本-效果
IF 2.1
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S501532
Wesley Furnback, Elizabeth Wu, Cloe Ying Chee Koh, Jorge Fernando Nino de Rivera Guzman, Christian Kruhl, Rupesh Kotecha, Bruce C M Wang
{"title":"Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Therapy with an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor or Docetaxel in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Wesley Furnback, Elizabeth Wu, Cloe Ying Chee Koh, Jorge Fernando Nino de Rivera Guzman, Christian Kruhl, Rupesh Kotecha, Bruce C M Wang","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S501532","DOIUrl":"10.2147/CEOR.S501532","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy extended survival in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on or after platinum-based therapy. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of TTFields therapy concomitant with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or docetaxel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model-based health economic evaluation estimated lifetime costs, clinical benefits, and humanistic outcomes of TTFields therapy plus ICI or docetaxel versus ICI or docetaxel alone in metastatic NSCLC. The model used clinical data from the LUNAR study, US healthcare cost data, and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The addition of TTFields therapy to an ICI or docetaxel resulted in a mean life-year gain of 0.92 and a QALY gain of 0.66, with an incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER) of $89,808 per QALY gained. TTFields therapy plus an ICI had 1.67 additional life years and 1.21 additional QALYs compared to an ICI alone, with an ICER of $58,764 per QALY gained. For TTFields therapy plus docetaxel, the life-year gain was 0.23 and the QALY gain was 0.17, with an ICER of $306,029 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of TTFields therapy to an ICI or docetaxel in metastatic NSCLC demonstrates comparable cost-effectiveness to other approved treatments. ICERs fall within the accepted range for US cost-effectiveness thresholds, supporting their use in clinical practice. TTFields therapy extended mean lifetime survival, offering a clinically meaningful and economically justifiable option for patients progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"55-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807771/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143391984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Genetic Testing as a Prenatal Diagnostic Tool for Thalassemia: A Single-Center Study From Central Thailand. 基因检测作为地中海贫血产前诊断工具的成本效益分析:一项来自泰国中部的单中心研究。
IF 2.1
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S500802
Kwandao Malasai, Jiraphun Jittikoon, Wanvisa Udomsinprasert, Pattarawalai Talungchit, Sitaporn Youngkong, Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri, Surakameth Mahasirimongkol, Usa Chaikledkaew
{"title":"Cost-Benefit Analysis of Genetic Testing as a Prenatal Diagnostic Tool for Thalassemia: A Single-Center Study From Central Thailand.","authors":"Kwandao Malasai, Jiraphun Jittikoon, Wanvisa Udomsinprasert, Pattarawalai Talungchit, Sitaporn Youngkong, Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri, Surakameth Mahasirimongkol, Usa Chaikledkaew","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S500802","DOIUrl":"10.2147/CEOR.S500802","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the costs and benefits of genetic testing, specifically mutation analysis and prenatal diagnostic testing, for the confirmation of thalassemia in at-risk pregnancies in Thailand, providing crucial insights to inform public health policy decision-making.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We analyzed the costs and benefits of following standard screening guidelines, which included a sequence of tests such as mean corpuscular volume (MCV)/mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) with dichlorophenol indophenol precipitation (DCIP), hemoglobin (Hb) typing, genetic testing, and amniocentesis. A decision-tree model was employed for this analysis. The study compared the scenarios with and without genetic testing, adopting a societal perspective that accounted for costs during pregnancy and the lifetime of a child born with thalassemia. Both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to account for uncertainties in the parameters used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that adhering to the standard screening program with genetic testing resulted in a cost-savings of approximately 490 USD per prevented thalassemia case. Among the diagnostic methods, the specificity of the MCV/MCH with DCIP showed a higher degree of sensitivity relative to other testing methods, significantly influencing the outcomes. From a governmental perspective, with a full uptake of genetic testing, the incremental budget required was estimated to be 3.7 million USD (131 million THB) for one year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings are particularly valuable for policymakers, as they provide robust evidence supporting potential revisions to the reimbursement structure within Thailand's Universal Health Coverage benefit package, facilitating better management of thalassemia and improving prenatal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"33-43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808050/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143392062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Financial Cost of Treating Polytrauma in a Public Tertiary Hospital in the South-Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: A Case Series Study. 刚果民主共和国东南部一家公立三级医院治疗多发性创伤的财务成本:案例系列研究。
IF 2.1
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S496402
Chadrack Kabeya Diyoka, Laetitia Ngongo Mwanvua, Marcellin Shauri Kalemera, Pascal Pambi Mukanga, Criss Koba Mjumbe
{"title":"Financial Cost of Treating Polytrauma in a Public Tertiary Hospital in the South-Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: A Case Series Study.","authors":"Chadrack Kabeya Diyoka, Laetitia Ngongo Mwanvua, Marcellin Shauri Kalemera, Pascal Pambi Mukanga, Criss Koba Mjumbe","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S496402","DOIUrl":"10.2147/CEOR.S496402","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Polytrauma constitutes a major public health issue that is steadily increasing. In developing countries, including the Democratic Republic of Congo, this phenomenon is exacerbated by a combination of factors, such as inadequate funding mechanisms, the high cost of healthcare services and the low socio-economic level of the populations at risk. This study aims to assess the financial cost of treating polytrauma in a tertiary hospital in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A case series study was conducted at the Jason SENDWE provincial referral general hospital in Lubumbashi, with data collected from 1 January to 31 December 2023. The study was based on the operational definitions of Heinrich and the economic burden of care at the individual level was calculated by dividing the average direct costs by the GDP per capita, PPP of the country.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present study comprised forty patients with polytrauma, with a mean age of 29.73 ± 9.9 years, ranging from 9 to 45 years.Approximately 65% of cases were attributed to road accidents, with a male predominance of 82.5%.The most frequently observed form of vital distress was neurological, accounting for 60% of cases, and le parage chirurgical comme acte chirurgical (28.11%). The overall survival rate was 7.50%, with a mean direct cost per patient of USD 608.77 ± 370.85 (range: USD 139.78 to USD 1826.34). This equates to a financial burden of 93.79 ± 57.13% of GDP per capita, ranging from 21.54 to 281.36% of GDP per capita.The proportion of out-of-pocket payments was 97.5%. The highest proportion of expenditure (42.2%) was attributed to medications, followed by the cost of surgical procedures (23.21%), and then imaging examinations (19.8%). Conversely, the lowest expenditure was observed to be related to resuscitation (1.21%) and laboratory tests (1.83%). It was observed that only polytrauma patients admitted to intensive care and hospitalised for 43 days or more exhibited a higher mean direct cost, with statistically significant differences (at a risk of 5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with polytrauma are at significant risk of incurring catastrophic health expenditures. The results provide insight into the financial implications of polytrauma, which may inform the organisation of trauma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806672/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143383594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness Between Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Provocative Discography in the Identification of Chronic Low Back Pain Surgery Candidates. 磁共振波谱与激发性椎间盘造影鉴别慢性腰痛手术候选人的成本-效果比较。
IF 2.1
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-01-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S501058
Leslie Wilson, Douglas P Beall, Robert Kenneth Eastlack, Sigurd Berven, Jeffrey C Lotz
{"title":"The Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness Between Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Provocative Discography in the Identification of Chronic Low Back Pain Surgery Candidates.","authors":"Leslie Wilson, Douglas P Beall, Robert Kenneth Eastlack, Sigurd Berven, Jeffrey C Lotz","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S501058","DOIUrl":"10.2147/CEOR.S501058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/context: </strong>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a significant US healthcare burden with millions of lumbar spine procedures annually. Diagnostic tests are essential to guide treatment but provocative discography (PD), the most common diagnostic procedure, is without robust evidence of its value. A non-invasive alternative using Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) offers a potential solution.</p><p><strong>Context/purpose: </strong>We assess cost-effectiveness of MRS with NOCISCAN diagnostic algorithm compared to PD for identifying lumbar discs requiring surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>We conducted cost-effectiveness analysis using modelling.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>We used data from a clinical study of 139 CLBP patients who met criteria for and received PD of lumbar spine and presented with an ODI score ≥40; comparing PD and MRS-based diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>We considered diagnostic costs, adverse events, surgical costs and outcomes based on a 15-point improvement on the Oswestry Disability Index.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERS) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were determined. Some authors have consulted for Aclarion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean total cost per PD patient was $59,711, and $57,998 for MRS, demonstrating $1712 cost savings per MRS diagnosed patient. Diagnostic costs ($1950 for PD; $1450 for MRS), saved $500 per MRS patient. PD incurred adverse event costs ($57,323) for 1% of patients, which MRS eliminated. MRS-based diagnosis showed 78% surgical success, whereas PD achieved 68%. MRS was the dominant diagnostic strategy, with better clinical outcomes and cost savings. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed MRS dominance and was cost-effective across a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds and across 2 different scenarios which vary base-case outcomes and surgical rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates cost-effectiveness dominance of MRS with the Nociscan diagnostic algorithm over PD for identifying CLBP surgical candidates. MRS provides significant cost savings and leads to better surgical outcomes, making it a preferred choice for insurers and health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"19-31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771157/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143053860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Novel Model Using ML Techniques for Clinical Trial Design and Expedited Patient Onboarding Process. 一种使用ML技术进行临床试验设计和加快患者入职过程的新模型。
IF 2.1
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S479603
Abhirvey Iyer, Sundaravalli Narayanaswami
{"title":"A Novel Model Using ML Techniques for Clinical Trial Design and Expedited Patient Onboarding Process.","authors":"Abhirvey Iyer, Sundaravalli Narayanaswami","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S479603","DOIUrl":"10.2147/CEOR.S479603","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical trials are critical for drug development and patient care; however, they often need more efficient trial design and patient enrolment processes. This research explores integrating machine learning (ML) techniques to address these challenges. Specifically, the study investigates ML models for two critical aspects: (1) streamlining clinical trial design parameters (like the site of drug action, type of Interventional/Observational model, etc) and (2) optimizing patient/volunteer enrolment for trials through efficient classification techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized two datasets: the first, with 55,000 samples (from ClinicalTrials.gov), was divided into five subsets (10,000-15,000 rows each) for model evaluation, focusing on trial parameter optimization. The second dataset targeted patient eligibility classification (from the UCI ML Repository). Five ML models-XGBoost, Random Forest, Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Logistic Regression, and Decision Tree-were applied to both datasets, alongside Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) for the second dataset. Model performance was evaluated using precision, recall, balanced accuracy, ROC-AUC, and weighted F1-score, with results averaged across k-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first phase, XGBoost and Random Forest emerged as the best-performing models across all five subsets, achieving an average balanced accuracy of 0.71 and an average ROC-AUC of 0.7. The second dataset analysis revealed that while SVC and ANN performed well, ANN was preferred for its scalability to larger datasets. ANN achieved a test accuracy of 0.73714, demonstrating its potential for real-world implementation in patient streamlining.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study highlights the effectiveness of ML models in improving clinical trial workflows. XGBoost and Random Forest demonstrated robust performance for large clinical datasets in optimizing trial parameters, while ANN proved advantageous for patient eligibility classification due to its scalability. These findings underscore the potential of ML to enhance decision-making, reduce delays, and improve the accuracy of clinical trial outcomes. As ML technology continues to evolve, its integration into clinical research could drive innovation and improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745069/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Actions to Improve the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Social Return on Investment (SROI) Study. 改善绝经后骨质疏松妇女脆性骨折二级预防的措施:一项社会投资回报(SROI)研究
IF 2.1
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S480674
Francisco Jesús Olmo-Montes, José Ramón Caeiro-Rey, Pilar Peris, Verónica Pérez Del Río, Íñigo Etxebarria-Foronda, José Manuel Cancio-Trujillo, Teresa Pareja, Esteban Jódar, Antonio Naranjo, María Jesús Moro-Álvarez, Manuel García-Goñi, Josep Vergés, Stefano Maratia, Ignasi Campos Tapias, Miriam Prades, Susana Aceituno
{"title":"Actions to Improve the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Social Return on Investment (SROI) Study.","authors":"Francisco Jesús Olmo-Montes, José Ramón Caeiro-Rey, Pilar Peris, Verónica Pérez Del Río, Íñigo Etxebarria-Foronda, José Manuel Cancio-Trujillo, Teresa Pareja, Esteban Jódar, Antonio Naranjo, María Jesús Moro-Álvarez, Manuel García-Goñi, Josep Vergés, Stefano Maratia, Ignasi Campos Tapias, Miriam Prades, Susana Aceituno","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S480674","DOIUrl":"10.2147/CEOR.S480674","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the Social Return on Investment (SROI) of implementing measures to prevent fragility fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (OP) in Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of 13 stakeholders identified necessary actions for improving refracture prevention and assessed the investment required from the Spanish National Health System (SNHS), considering direct, indirect, and intangible costs over a one-year period. Unitary costs were sourced from scientific literature and official data, and intangible costs were estimated through surveys on women's willingness to pay for better health-related quality of life. The SROI ratio was calculated from both a social perspective (including all returns) and the SNHS perspective (including only direct and intangible costs). A sensitivity analysis evaluated the returns in worst- and best-case scenarios over three years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stakeholders agreed on four main actions: 1) establishing fracture liaison services; 2) harmonizing clinical practice guidelines and provide training for healthcare professionals (HCPs); 3) promoting HCPs' adherence to fracture registries and 4) raising awareness of OP and fragility fractures. From the social perspective, implementing these actions would cost the SNHS €4,375,663 but yield a social return of €96,939,931 in the first year, resulting in a SROI ratio of €22.15 per euro invested (€28.69, 23.14, 24.29, and 10.70 for the four actions, respectively). From the SNHS perspective, the return would be €36,453,509 (€21,523,444 tangible), with a SROI of €8.33 (€4.92 tangible) and for the four actions: €9.99, 9.39, 8.45, and 3.79, respectively (€5.89, 5.54, 4.96 and 2.27 tangible). The investment would be lower than the return for all actions (3.49%, 4.32%, 4.12% and 9.34% of social perspective return, respectively) and scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to our SROI method, implementing different actions to improve secondary fracture prevention would achieve a considerable social benefit, which, in terms of direct, indirect, and intangible costs, would far outweigh the investment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"889-901"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681784/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142903431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信