Actions to Improve the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Social Return on Investment (SROI) Study.
Francisco Jesús Olmo-Montes, José Ramón Caeiro-Rey, Pilar Peris, Verónica Pérez Del Río, Íñigo Etxebarria-Foronda, José Manuel Cancio-Trujillo, Teresa Pareja, Esteban Jódar, Antonio Naranjo, María Jesús Moro-Álvarez, Manuel García-Goñi, Josep Vergés, Stefano Maratia, Ignasi Campos Tapias, Miriam Prades, Susana Aceituno
{"title":"Actions to Improve the Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Social Return on Investment (SROI) Study.","authors":"Francisco Jesús Olmo-Montes, José Ramón Caeiro-Rey, Pilar Peris, Verónica Pérez Del Río, Íñigo Etxebarria-Foronda, José Manuel Cancio-Trujillo, Teresa Pareja, Esteban Jódar, Antonio Naranjo, María Jesús Moro-Álvarez, Manuel García-Goñi, Josep Vergés, Stefano Maratia, Ignasi Campos Tapias, Miriam Prades, Susana Aceituno","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S480674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the Social Return on Investment (SROI) of implementing measures to prevent fragility fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (OP) in Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of 13 stakeholders identified necessary actions for improving refracture prevention and assessed the investment required from the Spanish National Health System (SNHS), considering direct, indirect, and intangible costs over a one-year period. Unitary costs were sourced from scientific literature and official data, and intangible costs were estimated through surveys on women's willingness to pay for better health-related quality of life. The SROI ratio was calculated from both a social perspective (including all returns) and the SNHS perspective (including only direct and intangible costs). A sensitivity analysis evaluated the returns in worst- and best-case scenarios over three years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stakeholders agreed on four main actions: 1) establishing fracture liaison services; 2) harmonizing clinical practice guidelines and provide training for healthcare professionals (HCPs); 3) promoting HCPs' adherence to fracture registries and 4) raising awareness of OP and fragility fractures. From the social perspective, implementing these actions would cost the SNHS €4,375,663 but yield a social return of €96,939,931 in the first year, resulting in a SROI ratio of €22.15 per euro invested (€28.69, 23.14, 24.29, and 10.70 for the four actions, respectively). From the SNHS perspective, the return would be €36,453,509 (€21,523,444 tangible), with a SROI of €8.33 (€4.92 tangible) and for the four actions: €9.99, 9.39, 8.45, and 3.79, respectively (€5.89, 5.54, 4.96 and 2.27 tangible). The investment would be lower than the return for all actions (3.49%, 4.32%, 4.12% and 9.34% of social perspective return, respectively) and scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to our SROI method, implementing different actions to improve secondary fracture prevention would achieve a considerable social benefit, which, in terms of direct, indirect, and intangible costs, would far outweigh the investment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"889-901"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S480674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates the Social Return on Investment (SROI) of implementing measures to prevent fragility fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (OP) in Spain.
Methods: A group of 13 stakeholders identified necessary actions for improving refracture prevention and assessed the investment required from the Spanish National Health System (SNHS), considering direct, indirect, and intangible costs over a one-year period. Unitary costs were sourced from scientific literature and official data, and intangible costs were estimated through surveys on women's willingness to pay for better health-related quality of life. The SROI ratio was calculated from both a social perspective (including all returns) and the SNHS perspective (including only direct and intangible costs). A sensitivity analysis evaluated the returns in worst- and best-case scenarios over three years.
Results: Stakeholders agreed on four main actions: 1) establishing fracture liaison services; 2) harmonizing clinical practice guidelines and provide training for healthcare professionals (HCPs); 3) promoting HCPs' adherence to fracture registries and 4) raising awareness of OP and fragility fractures. From the social perspective, implementing these actions would cost the SNHS €4,375,663 but yield a social return of €96,939,931 in the first year, resulting in a SROI ratio of €22.15 per euro invested (€28.69, 23.14, 24.29, and 10.70 for the four actions, respectively). From the SNHS perspective, the return would be €36,453,509 (€21,523,444 tangible), with a SROI of €8.33 (€4.92 tangible) and for the four actions: €9.99, 9.39, 8.45, and 3.79, respectively (€5.89, 5.54, 4.96 and 2.27 tangible). The investment would be lower than the return for all actions (3.49%, 4.32%, 4.12% and 9.34% of social perspective return, respectively) and scenarios.
Conclusion: According to our SROI method, implementing different actions to improve secondary fracture prevention would achieve a considerable social benefit, which, in terms of direct, indirect, and intangible costs, would far outweigh the investment.