European Political Science Review最新文献_第9页

Pax populi? An analysis of the conflict resolution potential of referendums on self-determination 罗马帝国populi吗?关于自决的公民投票解决冲突潜力的分析

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-05-16 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000169

M. Germann

引用次数: 0

Dealing with the populist radical right in parliament: mainstream party responses toward the Alternative for Germany 应对议会中的民粹主义极右翼:主流政党对德国新选择党(Alternative for Germany)的回应

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-05-13 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000108

Anne Heinze

{"title":"Dealing with the populist radical right in parliament: mainstream party responses toward the Alternative for Germany","authors":"Anne Heinze","doi":"10.1017/S1755773922000108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000108","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In recent years, populist radical right parties (PRRPs) have continued to establish themselves in parliaments across Europe. However, there is little research on party responses in parliaments. This article explores how mainstream parties have dealt with the Alternative for Germany (AfD) in state parliaments. Its contribution is twofold: theoretically, it links the existing literature on party responses to the parliamentary arena and proposes a comprehensive framework for analyzing party responses in parliament, distinguishing between the formal and the policy level. Moreover, it tries to understand the variation of responses by emphasizing three important factors: party ideology, the government–opposition divide, and the federal structure of parties. Empirically, the article explores the crucial variation of response patterns toward the AfD at the subnational level, which is often neglected in the study of PRRPs. The results show that party responses reflect an ongoing learning process with no ‘magic formula’ in sight. Overall, the article underlines the importance of party responses in the initial phase for the PRRPs’ impact and offers substantial theoretical and empirical impetus for future research.","PeriodicalId":47291,"journal":{"name":"European Political Science Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"333 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44483966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

EPR volume 14 issue 2 Cover and Back matter EPR第14卷第2期封面和封底

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI: 10.1017/s1755773922000182

引用次数: 0

EPR volume 14 issue 2 Cover and Front matter EPR第14卷第2期封面和封面

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI: 10.1017/s1755773922000170

引用次数: 0

Delving into the divide: how ideological differences fuel out-party hostility in a multi-party context 深入探讨分歧:意识形态差异如何在多党制背景下加剧党外敌意

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000121

Patrick F. A. van Erkel, Emma Turkenburg

引用次数: 3

Participatory processes and their outcomes: comparing assembly and popular vote decisions 参与性过程及其结果:比较大会和民众投票决定

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000157

A. el-Wakil, M. Strebel

引用次数: 2

The bottom-up spillover effect for radical right parties 极右翼政党的自下而上溢出效应

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-04-25 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000133

K. Chan

引用次数: 0

Incentives and constraints: a configurational account of European involvement in the anti-Daesh coalition – Corrigendum 激励与约束:欧洲参与反达伊沙联盟的配置说明——勘误表

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-04-25 DOI: 10.1017/s1755773922000091

Patrick A. Mello

引用次数: 1

(Don’t) bite the hand that feeds you: do critical interest organizations gain less funding in the EU? (不要)恩将仇报:关键利益组织在欧盟获得的资金会减少吗?

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-04-25 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000145

Michele Crepaz, Marcel Hanegraaff

{"title":"(Don’t) bite the hand that feeds you: do critical interest organizations gain less funding in the EU?","authors":"Michele Crepaz, Marcel Hanegraaff","doi":"10.1017/S1755773922000145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000145","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this study we test whether interest organizations that are confrontational towards EU institutions are less successful than their more cooperative counterparts in obtaining funding from the European Commission (EC). The transfer of public funds to interest organizations is a key dynamic in state-civil society relationships. Research shows that organizations, especially public groups, often heavily rely on public funds to the point that, without funds, many would cease to exist. ‘Don’t bite the hand that feeds you’ is thus a popular expression among leaders of organizations who apply for funds. Scholars document a widespread perception among group leaders that a confrontational attitude towards the state can lead to curtail of public funds. This perception is based on the assumption that state institutions use public funding to discipline confrontational interest organizations. We test this assumption using quantitative and qualitative data collected from a survey of 270 interest organizations who applied for EC funding between 2015 and 2018. Our findings suggest that, while almost half of our survey respondents feel that critical attitudes towards the EU would have negative consequences for their funding applications, empirically, confrontational and cooperative organizations have the same chances of obtaining EC grants. This finding is robust across different interest organization categories, including when non-applicants and mortality anxiety are considered in the analysis. The results add a new layer to resource dependency theory pointing at the incongruence between an organization’s perception of its relationship with public institutions and the observation of that relationship.","PeriodicalId":47291,"journal":{"name":"European Political Science Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"315 - 332"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43479458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The varying logics for supporting populist right-wing welfare politics in West European welfare regimes 西欧福利制度中支持民粹主义右翼福利政治的不同逻辑

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI: 10.1017/S175577392200011X

Karl Loxbo

{"title":"The varying logics for supporting populist right-wing welfare politics in West European welfare regimes","authors":"Karl Loxbo","doi":"10.1017/S175577392200011X","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577392200011X","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Little is known about whether and under which conditions populist radical right parties’ (PRRPs’) nativist welfare politics matters to the voters. I address this gap in the research and test the argument that the electoral appeal of this electoral discourse varies among welfare regimes. The study compares the conservative and social-democratic welfare regimes and focuses on the vote choices of the two core constituencies of PRRPs – economically exposed and immigration-sceptic voters. The results show that these electorates support PRRPs’ nativist welfare positions for very different reasons in the two welfare regimes. First, in the conservative regime, economically exposed citizens vote for PRRPs, the more they stress nativism and welfare expansion. By contrast, in the social-democratic regime this group of voters is more likely to support positions combining nativism and dismantled welfare benefits. Second, immigrant-sceptic voters in the social-democratic regime support PRRPs who pledge to preserve the welfare state, and increased migration considerably boosts the probability that they do so. By contrast, this group of voters in the conservative regime is more likely to support PRRPs who seek to partly dismantle the welfare state, and the inflow of immigrants is unrelated to these choices. These results have important implications and suggest that welfare regimes moderate public opinion differently in the current age of populism compared to previous eras.","PeriodicalId":47291,"journal":{"name":"European Political Science Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"171 - 187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48369803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2