European Political Science Review最新文献_第10页

Social influence and political participation around the world 世界各地的社会影响和政治参与

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-04-04 DOI: 10.1017/S175577392200008X

Bruce Bimber, Homero Gil de Zúñiga

引用次数: 3

Perceived risk crowds out trust? Trust and public compliance with coronavirus restrictions over the course of the pandemic 感知风险排挤信任?在大流行期间，信任和公众对冠状病毒限制的遵守

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000078

B. Seyd, F. Bu

引用次数: 5

Ideological extremism, perceived party system polarization, and support for democracy 意识形态极端主义、政党制度两极分化和对民主的支持

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000066

Mariano Torcal, Pedro C. Magalhães

{"title":"Ideological extremism, perceived party system polarization, and support for democracy","authors":"Mariano Torcal, Pedro C. Magalhães","doi":"10.1017/S1755773922000066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000066","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Does ideological polarization undermine or strengthen people’s principled support for democracy? In this study, we suggest that different manifestations of ideological polarization have different implications in this respect. Using data from 11 surveys conducted with representative samples of the adult populations of a group of liberal democratic countries, part of the Comparative National Elections Project, we look at how people’s level of ideological extremism and their perceptions of ideological polarization in their countries’ party systems are related with their support for democracy. We show that citizens who hold more extreme ideological positions are indeed less supportive of democracy and that such a negative relationship is strengthened as citizens’ extremism increases. However, we also show that the citizens who display higher levels of principled support for democracy are those who perceive parties to be neither too distant nor too close to each other in ideological terms. In other words, while a very polarized partisan supply seems to undermine popular commitment with democracy, very low polarization may have similar consequences.","PeriodicalId":47291,"journal":{"name":"European Political Science Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"188 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42333974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

Exploring the domestic and international drivers of professionalization of Central and Eastern European interest groups 探索中欧和东欧利益集团专业化的国内和国际驱动因素

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-03-03 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000054

Michael Dobbins, B. Horváth, R. Labanino

{"title":"Exploring the domestic and international drivers of professionalization of Central and Eastern European interest groups","authors":"Michael Dobbins, B. Horváth, R. Labanino","doi":"10.1017/S1755773922000054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000054","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While there has been a veritable boom in literature on organized interests, their lobbying strategies, relationships with decision-makers, and their impact on policymaking, only a few studies have explored internal organizational developments and, specifically, the professionalization of interest groups. The present study focuses on the national and transnational factors driving the professionalization of interest groups in Central and Eastern Europe, a region previously neglected in much of the interest group literature. Based on a sample of more than 400 surveyed organizations operating in Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Slovenia in the healthcare, higher education, and energy sectors, we explore three bundles of factors potentially enhancing the professionalization of interest groups – organizational funding sources, national and transnational intergroup cooperation and organizations’ standing in the domestic interest group system. Our statistical analyses show that state subsidies and tight policy coordination with the state are crucial drivers of internal organizational professionalization, suggesting rather patronistic and symbiotic relationships between the state and certain organizations. However, our data also support the notion that interorganizational collaboration, both at the national and international levels, may also be key to organizational professionalization, enabling groups that lack close ties with the state to compensate their disadvantage with intensive domestic and international networking. The study is also among the first to link increasing professionalization with organizational population density.","PeriodicalId":47291,"journal":{"name":"European Political Science Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"263 - 280"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45723831","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Incentives and constraints: a configurational account of European involvement in the anti-Daesh coalition 激励与约束:欧洲参与反达伊沙联盟的配置描述

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773921000333

Patrick A. Mello

{"title":"Incentives and constraints: a configurational account of European involvement in the anti-Daesh coalition","authors":"Patrick A. Mello","doi":"10.1017/S1755773921000333","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773921000333","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 2014, the USA initiated the formation of a multilateral military operation against Daesh in Syria and Iraq. Eventually, more than 70 states joined the anti-Daesh coalition. However, contributions to the military effort have been characterized by great variance, especially among EU member states. While some states took leading roles in the airstrikes, others provided training for Iraqi and Kurdish forces, and still others did not get involved beyond voicing their support for the policy. Against this backdrop, this article makes a two-fold contribution to the literature on military coalitions and security policy. Empirically, the article provides a mapping of the then 28 EU member states’ military engagement in the fight against Daesh in Syria and Iraq. Analytically, fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) is applied to account for the observed pattern of military involvement, using an integrative framework that combines international and domestic factors. The results demonstrate that multiple paths led towards EU military involvement in the anti-Daesh coalition. At the same time, international-level incentives, such as external threat and/or alliance value feature prominently in all three identified paths. The analysis further underscores the value of a configurational perspective, because neither an external threat nor alliance value are sufficient on their own to bring about the outcome. Across the set-theoretic configurations, these conditions either combine with other ‘push’ factors or with the absence of constraints against military involvement. In line with the latter, the article highlights the policy relevance of institutional constraints, especially legislative veto rights, since most of those countries that were involved in the airstrikes of the anti-Daesh coalition did not have formal parliamentary involvement on matters of military deployment policy.","PeriodicalId":47291,"journal":{"name":"European Political Science Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"226 - 244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47883785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Non-citizen voting rights and political participation of citizens: evidence from Switzerland 非公民投票权与公民政治参与:来自瑞士的证据

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-02-11 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000029

E. Kayran, Anne Nadler

引用次数: 0

Setting the terms of state intervention: employers, unions and the politics of inclusiveness in Austrian and Danish vocational education institutions 制定国家干预的条件：奥地利和丹麦职业教育机构的雇主、工会和包容性政治

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-02-11 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000017

Martin B. Carstensen, P. Emmenegger, Daniel Unterweger

{"title":"Setting the terms of state intervention: employers, unions and the politics of inclusiveness in Austrian and Danish vocational education institutions","authors":"Martin B. Carstensen, P. Emmenegger, Daniel Unterweger","doi":"10.1017/S1755773922000017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000017","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract How do coalitional dynamics matter for the capacity of states to maintain social inclusion in coordinated models of capitalism? Taking its departure in scholarship emphasizing the influence of employers on the extent of state intervention in post-industrial economies, this paper argues that employer influence depends on which actors they team up with – unions or parties. If unions depend on employers for their organizational influence in a policy field, unions become a strong coalitional partner for employers in weakening demands for inclusiveness from the parliamentary arena. Conversely, if unions have influence independent of any coalition with employers, both unions and employers are likely to team up with political parties aligned with their preferences. This makes the level of inclusion resulting from increased state intervention more fluctuating, depending on who holds government power. A comparative study of reforms of Danish and Austrian vocational education institutions corroborates the empirical purchase of the argument.","PeriodicalId":47291,"journal":{"name":"European Political Science Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"245 - 262"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49412179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

EPR volume 14 issue 1 Cover and Front matter EPR第14卷第1期封面和封面

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI: 10.1017/s1755773922000030

引用次数: 0

EPR volume 14 issue 1 Cover and Back matter EPR第14卷第1期封面和封底

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI: 10.1017/s1755773922000042

引用次数: 0

Unequal inequalities? How participatory inequalities affect democratic legitimacy 不平等的不平等？参与性不平等如何影响民主合法性

IF 3.2 1区社会学

European Political Science Review Pub Date : 2021-12-22 DOI: 10.1017/S1755773922000479

Henrik Serup Christensen, Janette Huttunen, F. Malmberg, Nanuli Silagadze

{"title":"Unequal inequalities? How participatory inequalities affect democratic legitimacy","authors":"Henrik Serup Christensen, Janette Huttunen, F. Malmberg, Nanuli Silagadze","doi":"10.1017/S1755773922000479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000479","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Democratic theorists have long emphasized the importance of participatory equality, that is, that all citizens should have an equal right to participate. It is still unclear, however, whether ordinary citizens view this principle as central to democracy and how different violations of this principle affect subjective democratic legitimacy. The attitudes of citizens are imperative when it comes to the subjective legitimacy of democratic systems, and it is therefore important to examine how participatory inequalities affect these attitudes. We here contribute to this research agenda with survey experiments embedded in two surveys (n = 324, n = 840). We here examine (1) whether citizens consider participatory inequality to be an important democratic principle, and (2) how gender and educational inequalities affect subjective legitimacy and the perceived usefulness of the participatory input. The results show that citizens generally consider participatory inequalities to be important, but only gender inequalities affect subjective legitimacy and usefulness. Hence it is important to consider the type of inequality to understand the implications.","PeriodicalId":47291,"journal":{"name":"European Political Science Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"19 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44048620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0