发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Legitimacy-not Justice-and the Case for Judicial Review. 合法性——而非正义——以及司法审查的案例。
IF 1.2 2区 社会学
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-05-24 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac009
Tom Hickey
{"title":"<i>Legitimacy-</i>not Justice<i>-and the Case for Judicial Review</i>.","authors":"Tom Hickey","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sceptics of judicial review-from Jeremy Waldron to those in the Judicial Power Project-have tended to attribute to their opponents an erroneous prioritisation of 'justice' over 'legitimacy'. They claim that those who make the case for judicial review do so on the grounds that 'judges know best', and that judicial review therefore helps promote the overall justness of a state's social order-rather than on the grounds that it helps enhance the overall legitimacy of a state's authority. This article interrogates that line of attack. It explores its roots in political theory, particularly the idea that those guilty of it (such as Aileen Kavanagh) follow in John Rawls's supposed prioritisation of justice over legitimacy. And it turns to republican and later-Rawlsian thinking on these two concepts to see whether it may offer a sound basis upon which the case for judicial review can be made … legitimately.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"42 3","pages":"893-917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645005/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40687288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Three Issues in the Law of Contractual Discretion. 合同自由裁量权法中的三个问题。
IF 1.2 2区 社会学
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-02-11 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac003
Jason N E Varuhas
{"title":"Three Issues in the Law of Contractual Discretion.","authors":"Jason N E Varuhas","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The new law of contractual discretion is developing apace. This article addresses three major issues in this dynamic field. First, the article propounds an analytical framework for understanding the nature and practice of reasonableness review in the contractual setting, based on doctrinal exegesis of the full run of cases on contractual discretion. Significantly, the analysis demonstrates that review of contractual discretion is characterised by a 'variable intensity' approach: the intensity with which courts scrutinise exercises of discretion is dependent on a series of contextual factors. Second, the article analyses the genus of the implied term, which imposes legal constraints on contractual decision-makers, arguing that the term is properly conceptualised as a term implied in law. Third, the article addresses the remedial consequences of non-compliance with implied fetters, identifying three different remedial models in the case law. The article challenges the common assertion that damages are the invariable remedy, arguing that an impugned exercise of discretion may be void or voidable.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"42 3","pages":"787-817"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/16/gqac003.PMC9645001.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40687287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Changing Concepts of the Constitution. 不断变化的宪法观念。
IF 1.2 2区 社会学
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-19 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac001
Alex Schwartz
{"title":"The Changing Concepts of the Constitution.","authors":"Alex Schwartz","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There have been several important formal changes to the United Kingdom's constitution over the past few decades, including devolution to Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales; the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights in domestic law; and the creation of a new Supreme Court. This article is about the informal semantic changes that may have accompanied these formal changes. It focuses on several central concepts: parliamentary sovereignty, the rule of law, the separation of powers, devolution, and human rights. Using a recently developed machine learning method to analyse a massive corpus of parliamentary debate, the article gauges the extent to which these concepts have become more (or less) related to the meaning of the UK's constitution in parliamentary discourse. Ultimately, the analysis supports some important theoretical expectations about the changing nature of the constitution, including the claim that parliamentary sovereignty is now a less significant concept for the meaning of the constitution than it once was.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"42 3","pages":"758-786"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645002/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40687285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件
IF 1.2 2区 社会学
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac006
{"title":"OUP accepted manuscript","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"61433251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Two Attitudes towards Textuality in International Law: The Battle for Dualism. 对国际法文本性的两种态度:二元论之争。
IF 1.2 2区 社会学
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac010
Jean d'Aspremont
{"title":"Two Attitudes towards Textuality in International Law: The Battle for Dualism.","authors":"Jean d'Aspremont","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article sketches out two distinct attitudes towards textuality in international law, namely international hermeneutics and international poetics. It argues that these two attitudes towards textuality espouse very different types of dualism of thought. This difference bears major implications on how the international lawyer approaches international legal texts. In exposing these two attitudes towards textuality and the distinct types of dualism they reveal, this article makes a plea for a greater embrace of international poetics by international lawyers, and thus for a complete remoulding of international lawyers' dualist patterns of thought.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"42 4","pages":"963-984"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732246/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10344412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond Fair Labelling: Offence Differentiation in Criminal Law. 超越公平标签:刑法中的犯罪区分。
IF 1.2 2区 社会学
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac007
Andrew Cornford
{"title":"Beyond Fair Labelling: Offence Differentiation in Criminal Law.","authors":"Andrew Cornford","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How should criminal conduct be divided among different offences? To date, this question has received only one serious answer: the fair labelling principle, which states that distinctions among offences should reflect distinctions in the nature and seriousness of the wrongdoing that they criminalise. This article argues that the fair labelling principle should not be the sole or main principle governing offence differentiation decisions. Its argument consists in three main claims. First, the only plausible foundation for the principle is a duty to ensure that the blame expressed through criminal conviction is allocated justly. Second, this duty cannot be absolute: if it were, the result would be an absurdly highly differentiated criminal law. Third, several other factors are relevant to how we should differentiate offences, and these will often count against the demands of just blaming. A complete normative account of offence differentiation must thus extend beyond fair labelling-or indeed, any single principle.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"42 4","pages":"985-1011"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732221/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10344409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Constitutional Reform by Legal Transplantation: The United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020. 法律移植的宪政改革:《2020年英国内部市场法案》。
IF 1.2 2区 社会学
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac018
Thomas Horsley
{"title":"Constitutional Reform by Legal Transplantation: The United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020.","authors":"Thomas Horsley","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article develops the comparative law framework on legal transplantation to theorise the impact of the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 (UKIMA) on the UK constitution across three registers of analysis-the territorial, the material and the conceptual. It arrives at three conclusions. First, in relation to the territorial constitution, this article argues that the UKIMA introduces something transformative: the concept of an internal market as a shared regulatory space that cuts across the respective competences of the UK and devolved legislatures. Secondly, the legal transplant framework points to the introduction of a powerful commitment to the principles of a liberal market economy as the basis of the UK's material constitution. Finally, regarding the conceptual constitution, this article concludes that the UKIMA effects a qualitative change to established patterns of judicial review through its co-opting of courts as agents to secure the foundations of the newly recast material constitution.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"42 4","pages":"1143-1169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732217/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10344410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件
IF 1.2 2区 社会学
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac004
{"title":"OUP accepted manuscript","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"61433667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sentencing Policy, Social Values and Discretionary Justice. 量刑政策、社会价值观与酌情司法。
IF 1.2 2区 社会学
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac011
Ralph Henham
{"title":"Sentencing Policy, Social Values and Discretionary Justice.","authors":"Ralph Henham","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the recent consolidation of sentencing law and procedure, the fundamental values which underpin the policy and practice of sentencing in England and Wales have remained largely unchanged since the deserts-based model introduced by the Criminal Justice Act of 1991. It is argued that this paradigm is no longer appropriate and presents a significant impediment to reducing imprisonment and mainstreaming restorative forms of intervention within the criminal process. An alternative value-based approach is proposed to counter this trend, one that provides greater structural flexibility and empowers sentencers to engage more effectively with the social impact of penal intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"42 4","pages":"1093-1117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732222/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10344411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Comparative Lessons in Sectional Title Laws: Mitigating Urban Inequality in South Africa. 分部所有权法的比较教训:减轻南非的城市不平等。
IF 1.2 2区 社会学
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac013
Edward S W Ti
{"title":"Comparative Lessons in Sectional Title Laws: Mitigating Urban Inequality in South Africa.","authors":"Edward S W Ti","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urban inequality in South Africa is a formidable problem that is linked to the injustices of its historical apartheid past. This paper identifies sectional titles, a form of property ownership where proprietors wholly own their apartment unit while co-owning the land and common property, as critical to providing more affordable housing. Sectional title schemes mitigate urban inequality by giving a greater proportion of the country the opportunity to own legally secure, well-located dwellings while serving as a platform where communal living could take place. Two suggestions how sectional title legislation can further alleviate aspects of urban inequality are made (1) Permitting a supermajority of sectional owners to terminate a sectional scheme prevents holdout and allows urban land to be redeveloped, providing an increase in housing. (2) Municipalities could consider mandating ethnic integration in sectional schemes to counter the organic formation of mono-racial residential enclaves which remain in present-day South Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"42 4","pages":"1012-1039"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/84/6a/gqac013.PMC9732223.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10344876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信