JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION最新文献_第2页

Philosophical Silences: Race, Gender, Disability, and Philosophical Practice 哲学的沉默:种族、性别、残疾和哲学实践

4区教育学

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad076

Robert A Wilson

引用次数: 1

Education, epistemic justice, and truthfulness: Miranda Fricker interviewed by A. C. Nikolaidis and Winston C. Thompson 教育、认知正义和真实性:米兰达·弗里克，a·c·尼古莱迪斯和温斯顿·c·汤普森访谈

4区教育学

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad075

A C Nikolaidis, Winston C Thompson, Miranda Fricker

{"title":"Education, epistemic justice, and truthfulness: Miranda Fricker interviewed by A. C. Nikolaidis and Winston C. Thompson","authors":"A C Nikolaidis, Winston C Thompson, Miranda Fricker","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad075","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In her groundbreaking book, Epistemic Injustice, renowned moral philosopher and social epistemologist Miranda Fricker coined the term epistemic injustice to draw attention to the pervasive impact of epistemic oppression on marginalized social groups. Fricker’s account spurred a flurry of scholarship regarding the discriminatory impact of epistemic injustice and gave birth to a domain of philosophical inquiry that has extended far beyond the disciplinary boundaries of philosophy. In this interview, Fricker responds to questions posed by A. C. Nikolaidis and Winston C. Thompson that address the ways in which epistemic injustice intersects with education as a human endeavor and social institution. In doing so, Fricker reflects on her motivations in writing her book more than 15 years ago and explicitly addresses some of the most significant contributions of the concept of epistemic injustice as a tool for analyzing issues in education. She also offers insights on the purpose of education, outlines educational manifestations of epistemic injustice, and discusses the virtues that educators must exhibit and inculcate in their students in order for epistemic justice to obtain.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134957202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

An Error of Punishment Defences in the Context of Schooling 学校教育背景下的惩罚抗辩错误

4区教育学

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad077

DaN McKee

{"title":"An Error of Punishment Defences in the Context of Schooling","authors":"DaN McKee","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad077","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Whenever justification of classroom punishment has been attempted it has usually been on grounds that punishment acts either appropriately pedagogically, teaching students how to behave morally, or is a necessary evil that enables the practical running of the school so that it may carry out its educational business. By itself the first justification leaves punishment in schools as only an extension of wider social attitudes about the virtue of punishing perceived moral wrongdoing, rather than providing any distinct argument for punishment specific to the special circumstances of the school. By highlighting an entanglement between the moral and the conventional, and between discipline and punishment, within the context of the school, I shall argue that the essentially contested nature of education and its purpose, and the related question of the school’s suitability as a venue for it, means that the school’s most promising defence of its use of punishment—that punishment of students might somehow be necessary for enabling the important educative business of the school—becomes undone. Schooling and education are not necessarily synonymous, and as schools provide only one vision of education—and this vision is contestable—then upholding the business of any one school in order for it to achieve its particular unsettled and disputed purpose is not a morally sufficient reason to coerce a student’s compliance through regimes of ‘harm intended as harm.’","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":"33 23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136281954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Epistemic Injustice? Banning ‘critical race theory’, ‘divisive topics’, and ‘embedded racism’ in the classroom 认知不公正吗?在课堂上禁止“批判种族理论”、“分裂话题”和“根深蒂固的种族主义”

4区教育学

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad069

Henry Lara-Steidel, Winston C Thompson

{"title":"Epistemic Injustice? Banning ‘critical race theory’, ‘divisive topics’, and ‘embedded racism’ in the classroom","authors":"Henry Lara-Steidel, Winston C Thompson","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad069","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In more than half of its states, the USA has recently passed or proposed legislation to limit or ban public educational curricular reference to race, gender, sexuality, or other identity topics. The stated justifications for these legislative moves are myriad, but they share a foundational claim; namely, these topics are asserted to be politically and socially divisive such that they ought not to be included within state-controlled schools. In this paper, we consider the claims of divisiveness regarding these topics and explore whether, even if taken in good faith, the popular versions of these arguments and actions are epistemically defensible. We conclude that these bans are an epistemic injustice and therefore argue for their end. The article proceeds to consider the foundational claims of epistemic injustice, followed by the invocation of epistemic standards by which the arguments for these bans can be evaluated. The article then transitions to a close application of these standards, weighing the possible epistemic gains and losses. Before concluding, we consider objections and explore the social and epistemic significance of these issues.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135976132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Inclusion, democracy and philosophy of education Democratic education as inclusion, Nuraan Davids and Yusef Waghid (2022). Lanham Maryland: Lexington Books 民主教育即包容，Nuraan davis和Yusef Waghid(2022)。马里兰州兰厄姆:列克星敦图书公司

4区教育学

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad071

Penny Enslin

引用次数: 0

Epistemic Injustice in Education: Exploring Structural Approaches, Envisioning Structural Remedies 教育中的认知不公正:探索结构性途径，设想结构性补救

4区教育学

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad074

A C Nikolaidis

{"title":"Epistemic Injustice in Education: Exploring Structural Approaches, Envisioning Structural Remedies","authors":"A C Nikolaidis","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad074","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since the publication of Miranda Fricker’s seminal book Epistemic Injustice, philosophy of education scholarship has been mostly limited to analyses of culprit-based epistemic injustice in education. This has left structural manifestations relatively underexplored with great detriment to those who are most vulnerable to experience such injustice. This paper aims to address this oversight and open up avenues for further research by exploring approaches to theorizing structural epistemic injustice in education and envisioning efficacious remedies. The author identifies three approaches: one that focuses on educational institutions, one that focuses on institutional processes that impact educational outcomes, and one that focuses on epistemological processes that are internal to education. While the approaches differ as to their explanatory power and ease of implementation, it is argued that all three demonstrate that epistemic injustice in education is often the result of structural factors which cannot be attributed to individual epistemic agents. The author concludes by suggesting that educational philosophers must examine each of these approaches in greater depth to make significant progress in disrupting the impact of epistemic injustice in education.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":"65 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135976454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Political Anger, Affective Injustice and Civic Education 政治愤怒、情感不公正与公民教育

4区教育学

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad073

Michalinos Zembylas

引用次数: 0

Epistemic injustice in educational policy: An account of structural contributory injustice 教育政策中的认知不公平:结构性贡献不公平的解释

4区教育学

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad070

Megan L Bogia

引用次数: 0

Of Mice, Men, and Ethics: Literary Study and Moral Concern for Nonhuman Animals 《老鼠、人与伦理:非人类动物的文学研究与道德关怀》

4区教育学

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad072

Ross Collin

引用次数: 0

From Gender Segregation to Epistemic Segregation: A Case Study of the School System in Iran 从性别隔离到认知隔离:伊朗学校制度的个案研究

4区教育学

JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-10-21 DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhad068

Shadi Heidarifar

引用次数: 0