European Law Journal最新文献

{"title":"Does the European Union's rule of law require the criminalisation of EU public officials? A first appraisal","authors":"Alberto di Martino","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12507","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eulj.12507","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article emphasises the role of criminal law as a strategic form of accountability aimed at safeguarding the EU rule of law, especially when public officials are entrusted with powers that may violate fundamental rights. Abuses committed in the context of border management serve as a case study and a test bench for the more general argument developed in the contribution. It is argued that criminal law—through sanctioning serious abuse of power irrespective of any lucrative intent—contributes to the legitimacy of policies and actions carried out in the name of the union. As impunity gaps may result from the difficult application of domestic law, the article maintains that it is necessary to stigmatise at the union's level such misdeeds that go beyond cases of mere bad policy or ‘maladministration’. It therefore advocates for a directive requiring Member States to criminalise abuse of powers, which are in breach of the rule of law as one of the foundational values enshrined in Article 2 TEU.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"30 1-2","pages":"181-196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141273006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The European Union Agency for Asylum: Legal remedies and national articulations in composite procedures","authors":"Agostina Pirrello","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12508","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eulj.12508","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, the European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) has been variously involved in the decision-making processes of national authorities deciding on individual asylum applications. In spite of its capability of affecting national asylum procedures and the circumstances in which they are carried out, holding EUAA accountable for its action is prevented by the lack of clear allocations of tasks and the consequent inadequacy of the judicial remedies available. By analysing and comparing the main role played by the Agency in Italy and Malta, this article sheds some light on the different problems of effective judicial protection, which vary and arise differently depending on the tasks performed by EUAA in each national legal system.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"30 1-2","pages":"165-180"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12508","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141269084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Frontex at the epicentre of a rule of law crisis at the external borders of the EU","authors":"Luisa Marin","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12505","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eulj.12505","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Next to the rule of law ‘crises’ within Member States, a new facet of this rule of law crisis is emerging at the external borders of the EU, and sees the EU border agency Frontex as its epicentre. This article illustrates the multiple facets of this crisis which concerns Frontex's functioning and activities, discussing a form of ‘agency capture’ that occurred under the mandate of the former Executive Director and a legal framework ensuring limited monitoring and transparency on operations. Subsequently, the article delves into the constitutional meaning of the rule of law for an agency such as Frontex, both for its significance on relations between authorities and individuals and for the interplay between the rule of law and accountability. The article concludes by calling for a rethinking of the accountability instruments in place, to constrain more effectively the exercise of discretion by agencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"30 1-2","pages":"11-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12505","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141197817","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Shadow","authors":"Pap Khouma","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12498","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eulj.12498","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"30 1-2","pages":"253-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141105811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Frontex's expanding mandate: Has democratic control caught up?","authors":"Tineke Strik","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12499","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eulj.12499","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article analyses to what extend the rapid growth of Frontex has been accompanied by adequate democratic accountability, whereby the author draws on her experiences as a Member of Parliament. She elaborates on the safeguards in legislation but also on their application in practice, with a focus on the lessons the Parliament learned from its own inquiry on the role of Frontex in pushbacks. The contribution subsequently puts democratic control to a test on two relatively recent tasks of Frontex: return and external cooperation. Regarding the latter, the Parliament's role is highlighted in the negotiations on the Frontex status agreements between the EU and Mauritania/Senegal. The article answers the question of what obstacles must be overcome, through legislative amendments or changes in practice and culture, for the Parliament to exercise its role effectively. Two of these factors are dealt with more prominently: transparency and cooperation with national parliaments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"30 1-2","pages":"217-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12499","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141118143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Watching the guards: Ensuring compliance with fundamental rights at the external borders","authors":"Jorrit J. Rijpma","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12500","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eulj.12500","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The essay deals with the enhancement of the legal framework for informal readmissions at internal borders enshrined in the proposal on an amended Schengen Border Code, which in turn requires enhancement of bilateral police cooperation. It focuses on the impact of the new rules on the prohibition on police controls equivalent to border checks to highlight that the case-law of the Court of Justice on the matter creates a huge grey area which is critical for the ideal of a border-check-free Union. Increased use of video surveillance and other technologies also faces the legal bottleneck of prohibition on police controls having equivalent effects to border checks, as well as raising serious concerns on fundamental rights. It is argued that the situation resulting from these amendments to the Schengen Border Code should be considered in terms of an impending rule of law crisis at internal borders. [Correction added on 19 July 2024 after first online publication: The Abstract section was previously omitted and has been included in this version.]</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"30 1-2","pages":"74-86"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12500","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141123349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Frontex and access to justice: The need for effective monitoring mechanisms","authors":"Elspeth Guild","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12501","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eulj.12501","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Access to justice depends on the ability of the person who is alleging a breach of human rights to establish to a credible extent the facts of the case. Where the individual is unable to provide supporting documentation about the facts, the claims are likely to be found inadmissible, or at least the defendant's lawyers are likely to seek to have the case dismissed on the basis of no case to answer. The transnational nature of state authorities' violence in external border controls (border violence) complicates the ability of victims to establish what has actually happened. Indeed, victims are often on one side of the border and those seeking to assist them on the other, while border police themselves are most reluctant to assist in establishing facts which may result in liability for themselves. This article examines how the EU can establish effective monitoring mechanisms with the competence to investigate allegations of state agencies' border violence building on existing structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"30 1-2","pages":"136-148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12501","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140976752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"‘Foot in the Door’ or ‘Door in the Face’? The development of legal strategies in European climate litigation between structure and agency","authors":"Carlotta Garofalo","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12494","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eulj.12494","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Following the landmark <i>Urgenda</i> case, European social movements and legal networks have increasingly turned to courts to compel governments to more ambitious mitigation policies. The rapid proliferation of <i>Urgenda</i>-like cases in the most diverse European jurisdictions, makes a compelling case to investigate the motivations and goals animating European climate litigators, especially when facing high legal barriers. While timely legal analyses of high-profile climate litigation abound in the literature, an emerging body of research has focused on the genesis of climate cases , their strategies, and societal impacts. To contribute to this latter thread, the article investigates how legal barriers and considerations, and social movements' motivations and goals, have shaped a diverse range of legal strategies in high-profile climate lawsuits inspired by <i>Urgenda</i> in Europe. The article shows that courts might turn into very different arenas to pursue social change, in which actors elect cautious or daring strategies, depending on the legal system and tradition they refer to, but also their vision and objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"29 3-6","pages":"340-361"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12494","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140804782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Guest editorial: Courts as an arena for societal change: An appraisal in the age of “environmental democracy”; In this issue","authors":"Asmaa Khadim,&nbsp;Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh,&nbsp;Jannemieke Ouwerkerk,&nbsp;Miranda Boone","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12495","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eulj.12495","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The impacts of environmental challenges, including climate change, are increasingly felt by individuals across the globe. Amidst the critical and, some argue, urgent nature of these challenges, and the perceived sluggishness of the executive and legislative branches of government in addressing them, citizens and civil society movements are increasingly seeking redress through judicial avenues. This trend shines a new light on fundamental questions about the role of law in society and the interplay between the political and the legal. It particularly challenges traditional notions of the judiciary's role, begging important questions: What motivates citizens to bring socially charged issues before the courts, and how do institutional frameworks influence the adjudication of such issues? What roles do governments, parliaments, courts and civil society play in these processes? What leads courts to render substantive decisions on these issues, or why do they refrain from doing so? What complexities arise when judges make decisions in such politically charged contexts? How can concerns about judicial independence and impartiality be balanced with evolving public expectations around the role of the courts? And what consequences does this shifting role have for the judiciary's self-image and its perceived legitimacy?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Environmental and climate change law presents a particularly fertile terrain to explore these questions. The concept of “environmental democracy”, as discussed by &lt;i&gt;Angelika Krężel&lt;/i&gt; in this issue in relation to strategic climate litigation in the European Union,\u00001 brings to the fore interesting questions pertaining to the justification for the role of courts and their legitimacy in addressing pressing societal issues. A countermajoritarian logic has traditionally supported the role of courts from a balance of power perspective, where court action is deemed necessary to amplify the voices of minorities or the vulnerable. This perspective also views judicial intervention as a way to enforce the rule of law by preventing asymmetries of power in society - be they economic or political - from having a detrimental impact on the way legal rules are interpreted and applied, as &lt;i&gt;Giorgio Cataldo&lt;/i&gt;'s essay examining key Italian constitutional court decisions in light of the European Court of Justice's case law illustrates. Courts in that sense constitute a democratic forum where the voice of the (silenced) majority is heard.\u00002 But courts can also have a direct impact on the definition of democracy itself as a space for contestation. This is exemplified by &lt;i&gt;Paolo Mazzotti&lt;/i&gt;'s call for a liberal interpretation of the climate defence of necessity in criminal courts, amidst a growing transnational movement of climate activists embracing civil disobedience.\u00003&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Through the open texture of law, courts have played a key role in its interpretation and adaptation to evolving societal needs. &lt;i&gt;Henri de Waele&lt;/i&gt; has painted a picture of","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"29 3-6","pages":"258-264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12495","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140806666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The necessity defence in (the Swiss) climate protest cases: Democratic contestation in the age of climate activism","authors":"Paolo Mazzotti","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12497","DOIUrl":"10.1111/eulj.12497","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The transnational movement of climate activists is resorting increasingly often to acts of civil disobedience. Upon being prosecuted for those acts, climate activists across various jurisdictions are starting to plead the general criminal law defence of necessity. The present article takes the cases in which that defence was pleaded before Swiss courts as a case study to analyse the legal questions raised by the ‘climate necessity defence’, conceptualised as an instance of climate litigation. The article hence situates the Swiss cases within a broader framework, trying to draw interpretive insights from international environmental law and climate science, as well as the transnational case-law on the climate necessity defence. The article's overarching submission is that a broad interpretation of the defence, tending towards accepting its applicability, is more in line with the current legal thinking on environmental matters than a restrictive interpretation rejecting <i>a priori</i> climate necessity claims.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"29 3-6","pages":"393-421"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12497","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140804751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}