共同的欧盟堕胎政策?欧洲议会将堕胎作为人权问题的决议

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Lourdes Peroni, Marta Bucholc
{"title":"共同的欧盟堕胎政策?欧洲议会将堕胎作为人权问题的决议","authors":"Lourdes Peroni,&nbsp;Marta Bucholc","doi":"10.1111/eulj.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While abortion regulation may formally escape European Union competence, EU self-restraint may be under growing pressure. An EU common abortion policy may not be far-fetched, as impulses that trigger interest in abortion increase in Europe and beyond. In examining a recent series of European Parliamentary resolutions on abortion, this article shows how abortion has moved from the margins to the centre owing to increasing triggers coming from inside and outside the EU. In pushing abortion higher up the agenda, the European Parliament has framed abortion in human rights language and, most recently, called for abortion to be included as a right in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The article argues that in adopting these resolutions, the Parliament may be exercising internal cultural diplomacy in human rights and, at the same time, projecting an image of EU unity while marking a binary division of the world: one moving towards more liberal abortion rules and the other towards greater restrictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"31 1-2","pages":"63-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a common EU-abortion policy? The European Parliament's resolutions on abortion as a human rights issue\",\"authors\":\"Lourdes Peroni,&nbsp;Marta Bucholc\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eulj.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While abortion regulation may formally escape European Union competence, EU self-restraint may be under growing pressure. An EU common abortion policy may not be far-fetched, as impulses that trigger interest in abortion increase in Europe and beyond. In examining a recent series of European Parliamentary resolutions on abortion, this article shows how abortion has moved from the margins to the centre owing to increasing triggers coming from inside and outside the EU. In pushing abortion higher up the agenda, the European Parliament has framed abortion in human rights language and, most recently, called for abortion to be included as a right in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The article argues that in adopting these resolutions, the Parliament may be exercising internal cultural diplomacy in human rights and, at the same time, projecting an image of EU unity while marking a binary division of the world: one moving towards more liberal abortion rules and the other towards greater restrictions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1-2\",\"pages\":\"63-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.70005\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.70005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.70005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然堕胎法规可能正式脱离欧盟的管辖范围,但欧盟的自我约束可能面临越来越大的压力。欧盟共同的堕胎政策可能并不牵强,因为在欧洲和其他地区,引发对堕胎兴趣的冲动正在增加。通过对最近一系列欧洲议会关于堕胎的决议的研究,本文展示了由于来自欧盟内外的触发因素越来越多,堕胎是如何从边缘走向中心的。为了把堕胎推上议程的更高位置,欧洲议会用人权的语言对堕胎进行了框定,最近还呼吁将堕胎作为一项权利列入《欧盟基本权利宪章》。文章认为,在通过这些决议时,议会可能是在行使人权方面的内部文化外交,与此同时,投射出欧盟团结的形象,同时标志着世界的二元分裂:一个走向更自由的堕胎规则,另一个走向更大的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a common EU-abortion policy? The European Parliament's resolutions on abortion as a human rights issue

While abortion regulation may formally escape European Union competence, EU self-restraint may be under growing pressure. An EU common abortion policy may not be far-fetched, as impulses that trigger interest in abortion increase in Europe and beyond. In examining a recent series of European Parliamentary resolutions on abortion, this article shows how abortion has moved from the margins to the centre owing to increasing triggers coming from inside and outside the EU. In pushing abortion higher up the agenda, the European Parliament has framed abortion in human rights language and, most recently, called for abortion to be included as a right in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. The article argues that in adopting these resolutions, the Parliament may be exercising internal cultural diplomacy in human rights and, at the same time, projecting an image of EU unity while marking a binary division of the world: one moving towards more liberal abortion rules and the other towards greater restrictions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The European Law Journal represents an authoritative new approach to the study of European Law, developed specifically to express and develop the study and understanding of European law in its social, cultural, political and economic context. It has a highly reputed board of editors. The journal fills a major gap in the current literature on all issues of European law, and is essential reading for anyone studying or practising EU law and its diverse impact on the environment, national legal systems, local government, economic organizations, and European citizens. As well as focusing on the European Union, the journal also examines the national legal systems of countries in Western, Central and Eastern Europe and relations between Europe and other parts of the world, particularly the United States, Japan, China, India, Mercosur and developing countries. The journal is published in English but is dedicated to publishing native language articles and has a dedicated translation fund available for this purpose. It is a refereed journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信