注意差距:欧洲性别不平等社会规范的力量——当法律不够时

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Carolina Fernández Blanco, M. Victoria Kristan
{"title":"注意差距:欧洲性别不平等社会规范的力量——当法律不够时","authors":"Carolina Fernández Blanco,&nbsp;M. Victoria Kristan","doi":"10.1111/eulj.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gender disparities persist across all EU Member States, despite legal frameworks that formally guarantee equality between women and men. This article explores how deeply entrenched social norms can undermine the efficacy of legal norms, focusing in particular on the domain of gender equality. Grounded in legal theory, the analysis argues that legal noncompliance is often not the result of institutional failure alone, but of conflicting social expectations that remain deeply internalised and largely unchallenged. The first section clarifies the conceptual distinction between the efficacy and effectiveness of legal norms, with attention to their design and conditions of enforcement. The second develops a typology of ways in which social norms obstruct the implementation of gender-equality law, illustrated with examples from EU Member States. The third section provides an analytical overview of how conflicting social norms undermine the efficacy of gender-equality law. Finally, the article adopts a static theoretical lens to examine how law might respond to such conflicts—not by prescribing specific reforms, but by identifying the conceptual conditions under which legal intervention can become both normatively justified and practically feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"31 1-2","pages":"6-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mind the gap: The power of social norms in gender inequality in Europe—When law is not enough\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Fernández Blanco,&nbsp;M. Victoria Kristan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eulj.70004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Gender disparities persist across all EU Member States, despite legal frameworks that formally guarantee equality between women and men. This article explores how deeply entrenched social norms can undermine the efficacy of legal norms, focusing in particular on the domain of gender equality. Grounded in legal theory, the analysis argues that legal noncompliance is often not the result of institutional failure alone, but of conflicting social expectations that remain deeply internalised and largely unchallenged. The first section clarifies the conceptual distinction between the efficacy and effectiveness of legal norms, with attention to their design and conditions of enforcement. The second develops a typology of ways in which social norms obstruct the implementation of gender-equality law, illustrated with examples from EU Member States. The third section provides an analytical overview of how conflicting social norms undermine the efficacy of gender-equality law. Finally, the article adopts a static theoretical lens to examine how law might respond to such conflicts—not by prescribing specific reforms, but by identifying the conceptual conditions under which legal intervention can become both normatively justified and practically feasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1-2\",\"pages\":\"6-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.70004\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.70004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.70004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管法律框架正式保障男女平等,但性别差异在所有欧盟成员国仍然存在。本文探讨了根深蒂固的社会规范如何破坏法律规范的效力,特别关注性别平等领域。基于法律理论,该分析认为,法律不合规往往不仅仅是制度失败的结果,而是社会期望冲突的结果,这种期望仍然根深蒂固,基本上没有受到挑战。第一部分澄清了法律规范的效力和效力的概念区别,并注意了它们的设计和执行条件。第二部分发展了社会规范阻碍性别平等法实施的方式的类型学,并以欧盟成员国的例子加以说明。第三部分分析了相互冲突的社会规范如何破坏性别平等法律的效力。最后,本文采用了一个静态的理论视角来考察法律如何应对这些冲突——不是通过规定具体的改革,而是通过确定法律干预可以在规范上合理化和实际可行的概念条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mind the gap: The power of social norms in gender inequality in Europe—When law is not enough

Gender disparities persist across all EU Member States, despite legal frameworks that formally guarantee equality between women and men. This article explores how deeply entrenched social norms can undermine the efficacy of legal norms, focusing in particular on the domain of gender equality. Grounded in legal theory, the analysis argues that legal noncompliance is often not the result of institutional failure alone, but of conflicting social expectations that remain deeply internalised and largely unchallenged. The first section clarifies the conceptual distinction between the efficacy and effectiveness of legal norms, with attention to their design and conditions of enforcement. The second develops a typology of ways in which social norms obstruct the implementation of gender-equality law, illustrated with examples from EU Member States. The third section provides an analytical overview of how conflicting social norms undermine the efficacy of gender-equality law. Finally, the article adopts a static theoretical lens to examine how law might respond to such conflicts—not by prescribing specific reforms, but by identifying the conceptual conditions under which legal intervention can become both normatively justified and practically feasible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The European Law Journal represents an authoritative new approach to the study of European Law, developed specifically to express and develop the study and understanding of European law in its social, cultural, political and economic context. It has a highly reputed board of editors. The journal fills a major gap in the current literature on all issues of European law, and is essential reading for anyone studying or practising EU law and its diverse impact on the environment, national legal systems, local government, economic organizations, and European citizens. As well as focusing on the European Union, the journal also examines the national legal systems of countries in Western, Central and Eastern Europe and relations between Europe and other parts of the world, particularly the United States, Japan, China, India, Mercosur and developing countries. The journal is published in English but is dedicated to publishing native language articles and has a dedicated translation fund available for this purpose. It is a refereed journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信