AI & Society最新文献_第4页

As you sow, so shall you reap: rethinking humanity in the age of artificial intelligence 种瓜得瓜，种豆得豆：重新思考人工智能时代的人性

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01983-3

Monalisa Bhattacherjee, Sweta Sinha

引用次数: 0

Attitudes toward artificial intelligence: combining three theoretical perspectives on technology acceptance 对人工智能的态度：结合关于技术接受度的三种理论视角

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01987-z

Pascal D. Koenig

引用次数: 0

Reconfiguring the alterity relation: the role of communication in interactions with social robots and chatbots 重构改变性关系：交流在与社交机器人和聊天机器人互动中的作用

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01953-9

Dakota Root

{"title":"Reconfiguring the alterity relation: the role of communication in interactions with social robots and chatbots","authors":"Dakota Root","doi":"10.1007/s00146-024-01953-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00146-024-01953-9","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Don Ihde’s <i>alterity relation</i> focuses on the quasi-otherness of dynamic technologies that interact with humans. The alterity relation is one means to study relations between humans and artificial intelligence (AI) systems . However, research on alterity relations has not defined the difference between playing with a toy, using a computer, and interacting with a social robot or chatbot. We suggest that Ihde’s quasi-other concept fails to account for the interactivity, autonomy, and adaptability of social robots and chatbots, which more closely approach human alterity. In this article, we will examine experiences with a chatbot, Replika, and a humanoid robot, a RealDoll, to show how some users experience AI systems as companions<i>.</i> First, we show that the perception of social robots and chatbots as intimate companions is grounded in communication. Advances in natural language processing (NLP) and natural language generation (NLG) allow a relationship to form between some users and social robots and chatbots. In this relationship, some users experience social robots and chatbots as more than quasi-others. We will use Kanemitsu’s another-other concept to analyze cases where social robots and chatbots should be distinguished from quasi-others.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47165,"journal":{"name":"AI & Society","volume":"40 3","pages":"1321 - 1332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00146-024-01953-9.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141378055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

AI in situated action: a scoping review of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic studies 情境行动中的人工智能：人种方法学和会话分析研究范围综述

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01919-x

Jakub Mlynář, Lynn de Rijk, Andreas Liesenfeld, Wyke Stommel, Saul Albert

{"title":"AI in situated action: a scoping review of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic studies","authors":"Jakub Mlynář, Lynn de Rijk, Andreas Liesenfeld, Wyke Stommel, Saul Albert","doi":"10.1007/s00146-024-01919-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00146-024-01919-x","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite its elusiveness as a concept, ‘artificial intelligence’ (AI) is becoming part of everyday life, and a range of empirical and methodological approaches to social studies of AI now span many disciplines. This article reviews the scope of ethnomethodological and conversation analytic (EM/CA) approaches that treat AI as a phenomenon emerging in and through the situated organization of social interaction. Although this approach has been very influential in the field of computational technology since the 1980s, AI has only recently emerged as such a pervasive part of daily life to warrant a sustained empirical focus in EM/CA. Reviewing over 50 peer-reviewed publications, we find that the studies focus on various social and group activities such as task-oriented situations, semi-experimental setups, play, and everyday interactions. They also involve a range of participant categories including children, older participants, and people with disabilities. Most of the reviewed studies apply CA’s conceptual apparatus, its approach to data analysis, and core topics such as turn-taking and repair. We find that across this corpus, studies center on three key themes: openings and closing the interaction, miscommunication, and non-verbal aspects of interaction. In the discussion, we reflect on EM studies that differ from those in our corpus by focusing on praxeological respecifications of AI-related phenomena. Concurrently, we offer a critical reflection on the work of literature reviewing, and explore the tortuous relationship between EM and CA in the area of research on AI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47165,"journal":{"name":"AI & Society","volume":"40 3","pages":"1497 - 1527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00146-024-01919-x.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141267170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Hunters not beggars 猎人不是乞丐

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01978-0

Mark Ressler

引用次数: 0

We’re only human after all: a critique of human-centred AI 我们终究只是人类：对以人为本的人工智能的批判

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01976-2

Mark Ryan

{"title":"We’re only human after all: a critique of human-centred AI","authors":"Mark Ryan","doi":"10.1007/s00146-024-01976-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00146-024-01976-2","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of a ‘human-centred’ artificial intelligence approach (HCAI) has substantially increased over the past few years in academic texts (1600 +); institutions (27 Universities have HCAI labs, such as Stanford, Sydney, Berkeley, and Chicago); in tech companies (e.g., Microsoft, IBM, and Google); in politics (e.g., G7, G20, UN, EU, and EC); and major institutional bodies (e.g., World Bank, World Economic Forum, UNESCO, and OECD). Intuitively, it sounds very appealing: placing human concerns at the centre of AI development and use. However, this paper will use insights from the works of Michel Foucault (mostly <i>The Order of Things</i>) to argue that the HCAI approach is deeply problematic in its assumptions. In particular, this paper will criticise four main assumptions commonly found within HCAI: human–AI hybridisation is desirable and unproblematic; humans are not currently at the centre of the AI universe; we should use humans as a way to guide AI development; AI is the next step in a continuous path of human progress; and increasing human control over AI will reduce harmful bias. This paper will contribute to the field of philosophy of technology by using Foucault's analysis to examine assumptions found in HCAI [it provides a Foucauldian conceptual analysis of a current approach (human-centredness) that aims to influence the design and development of a transformative technology (AI)], it will contribute to AI ethics debates by offering a critique of human-centredness in AI (by choosing Foucault, it provides a bridge between older ideas with contemporary issues), and it will also contribute to Foucault studies (by using his work to engage in contemporary debates, such as AI).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47165,"journal":{"name":"AI & Society","volume":"40 3","pages":"1303 - 1319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00146-024-01976-2.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141266672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

If AI is our co-pilot, who is the captain?

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01965-5

K. Woods

引用次数: 0

Ethics and administration of the ‘Res publica’: dynamics of democracy 公共资源 "的伦理与管理：民主的动力

IF 2.9

AI & Society Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01963-7

Satinder P. Gill

引用次数: 0

Morality first?