M. M. Biskjaer, A. Kamari, S. R. Jensen, P. H. Kirkegaard
{"title":"Exploring blind spots in collaborative value creation in building design: a creativity perspective","authors":"M. M. Biskjaer, A. Kamari, S. R. Jensen, P. H. Kirkegaard","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2019.1654521","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1654521","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Defining, developing, and delivering value is critical in integrated design processes (IDP) in building design and its two core design disciplines, architectural design and engineering design. Even so, how values emerge—the creation part itself—is underexposed. Using the seminal four p model from creativity research (person, process, product, and press) as an analytical lens, the paper explores blind spots in two building design cases that we as architects and researchers in creativity and engineering design have been involved in. On this basis, the paper contributes a four-leaf clover model of potential blind spots in collaborative value creation in building design. The model is comprised of value exploration, value negotiation, value formulation, and value manifestation. Design researchers can use the model as a scaffold for new design value theory, and design practitioners can employ it as an instrument to better navigate collaborative building design processes with multiple stakeholders, whose individual value sets may not always be clearly articulated and hence may sometimes collide.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"4 1","pages":"374 - 391"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81927841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The situated function-behavior-structure co-design model","authors":"J. Gero, J. Milovanovic","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2019.1654524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1654524","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper presents the situated Function-Behavior-Structure (sFBS) model of co-design, developed within the FBS ontology. In co-design, designers interact with their co-designers and with their own cognitive experiences. In this model, we describe a representation of the overall co-design activity, while preserving a fine-grained representation of each designer’s interactions with their co-designers and with their internal cognitive processes. The relevance and potential of our model are illustrated through multiple examples.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"27 1","pages":"211 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2019-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81542263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Youth co-design of responsive digital badge systems: disrupting hierarchy and empowering youth","authors":"Gavin Tierney, Theresa Horstman, C. Tzou","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2019.1654522","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1654522","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While digital badges were initially seen as valuable to educational programmes, critiques of digital badges focus on, among other things, the ways badges commodify learning. This paper proposes an alternative to overly simplified and commodified badges systems, which we refer to as responsive badge systems. We examine the history of digital badges in educational programmes and their relationship with commodification of learning. Analysis focuses on data from youth co-design of a responsive digital badge system in an informal learning environment. Results identify the design principles of a responsive badge system and examine variations in agency that youth experience during co-design.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"23 1","pages":"313 - 329"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73962899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Negotiating collaboration and commodification: the social media logic of co-design on Pinterest","authors":"Leah M. Scolere","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2019.1632902","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1632902","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study presents an empirical case focused on the co-design activities of professional designers and client-stakeholders in the context of the social media platform Pinterest. Overall, this study finds that as Pinterest moves from a tool being used behind the scenes by designers as part of the creative process to a tool for co-designing with stakeholders, tensions emerge around the publicness and informal nature of communication through social media, the types of participation by stakeholders in the design process, and the complexities of quantified collaboration. In-depth interviews with professional designers and a multi-stakeholder team reveal a continuum of designer-stakeholder participation. These co-design practices are marked by social media logic, reconfigured roles of participation; and perceptions of platform design affordances. As such, these platform-specific co-design practices suggest new materialities and temporalities for collaborative design processes within a platform economy. Rather than focusing on a participatory design event, this study draws attention to the routine, everyday ways co-designing is occurring on Pinterest as part of design projects and the role this practice has in re-positioning co-design in the digital age.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"15 1","pages":"355 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2019-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84669835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Citizen involvement in co-producing decentralised stormwater systems in Brussels","authors":"C. Dobre, M. Ranzato, Luisa Moretto","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2019.1631356","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1631356","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Co-production initiatives rely on citizens’ contributions to create better public services. Although the existing literature has frequently focused on citizens’ motivations to join co-production activities, few studies have investigated how and why citizen involvement might change during the co-production process. The article offers new insights about engagement in co-production by analysing a design initiative in Brussels, Ilot d’eau. Throughout the initiative, the four citizen collectives elaborated a specific decentralised stormwater system project that would be shared among the respective households. Even though each collective followed the same methodology, only two of the four projects reached the co-construction phase. The paper reveals how changes in citizen involvement in the process are impacted by the methodologies of interaction used and the citizens’ previous experiences in co-production. Furthermore, by examining the premature withdrawal of two of the four collectives from the initiative, the study shows why some of the changes occurred. In particular, the ambivalent role played by the local municipality during the development of the initiative together with the mediation of the organising team emerge as key determinants influencing citizen involvement.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"1 1","pages":"278 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2019-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79831166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rachel Clarke, J. Briggs, A. Armstrong, Alistair MacDonald, John Vines, Emma Flynn, K. Salt
{"title":"Socio-materiality of trust: co-design with a resource limited community organisation","authors":"Rachel Clarke, J. Briggs, A. Armstrong, Alistair MacDonald, John Vines, Emma Flynn, K. Salt","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2019.1631349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1631349","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Trust is an essential if often implicit aspect of co-design particularly when working in community-based, political and sensitive settings. Current co-design literature, however, remains fairly limited focusing on interactions between people as primary agents of trust. Drawing on research conducted with a poverty alleviation charity based in the UK, we illustrate how trust and distrust can also be mediated through material resources used in the co-design process. The paper highlights the significance of materials in negotiating the interdependencies of trust, in how distrust can be leveraged and trust can be supported through sensitive socio-material exchange conducted with resource limited community organisations.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"136 1","pages":"258 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2019-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77462946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Co-creation for empathy and mutual learning: a framework for design in health and social care","authors":"C. Akoglu, Kathrina Dankl","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2019.1633358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1633358","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Co-creation is seen as imperative in healthcare however existing frameworks are in need for adapting to specific settings from a person-centred care perspective such as shared decision-making, characterised by asymmetrical power relations and restricted time resources. This article takes a workshop in shared decision-making with doctors, nurses, patients and relatives as a point of departure for process reflection. The aim of the workshop was to develop implementation strategies for a decision tool for future cancer care. By analysing its concept and methods, we propose a general framework for design in health and social care, based on meeting fellow stakeholders, switching over roles, voicing and developing ideas and finally evaluating proposals (MOVE). By evidence of our research, we propose that empathy can be created and strengthened through co-creation in health and social care.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"74 1","pages":"296 - 312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79668790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Care towards posttraumatic growth in the era of digital economy","authors":"Alice V. Brown, J. Choi, J. Shakespeare‐Finch","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2019.1631350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1631350","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article offers a reflection on how we might co-design with and for care amid the era of digital economy through a critique of current approaches to supporting mental well-being outside of therapy. Lenses of care theory and posttraumatic growth guide this critique, examining six themes of creative approaches that have been identified through a thematic review of 83 existing interventions: online communities, digitisation and re-design of psychology intervention, biometrics and data-driven, creative sharing of stories, symbolic engagements, and creative offerings of comfort and encouragements of self-care. In particular, approaches that lie within the sharing economy are scrutinised, presenting neoliberal drives that oppose its values of fairness and equity. Involvement of trusted others in the co-design of care entanglements is proposed, suggesting that these involvements would allow for reciprocal care encounters to be personalised towards those who have experienced trauma and their trusted others.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"395 1","pages":"212 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79958293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
C. Bassetti, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Peter Lyle, Maurizio Teli, Stefano De Paoli, A. De Angeli
{"title":"Co-designing for common values: creating hybrid spaces to nurture autonomous cooperation","authors":"C. Bassetti, Mariacristina Sciannamblo, Peter Lyle, Maurizio Teli, Stefano De Paoli, A. De Angeli","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2019.1637897","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1637897","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The paper concerns the development of digitally-mediated technologies that value social cooperation as a common good rather than as a source of revenue and accumulation. The paper discusses the activities that shaped a European participatory design project which aims to develop a digital space that promotes and facilitates the ‘Commonfare’, a complementary approach to social welfare. The paper provides and discusses concrete examples of design artifacts to address a key question about the role of co- and participatory design in developing hybrid spaces that nurture sharing and autonomous cooperation: how can co-design practices promote alternatives to the commodification of digitally-mediated cooperation? The paper argues for a need to focus on relational, social, political and ethical values, and highlights the potential power of co- and participatory design processes to achieve this. In summary, the paper proposes that only by re-asserting the centrality of shared values and capacities, rather than individual needs or problems, co-design can reposition itself thereby encouraging autonomous cooperation.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"39 1","pages":"256 - 271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76974591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The breakdown of the municipality as caring platform: lessons for co-design and co-learning in the age of platform capitalism","authors":"A. Light, Anna Seravalli","doi":"10.1080/15710882.2019.1631354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1631354","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT If municipalities were the caring platforms of the 19-20th century sharing economy, how does care manifest in civic structures of the current period? We consider how platforms – from the local initiatives of communities transforming neighbourhoods, to the city, in the form of the local authority – are involved, trusted and/or relied on the design of shared services and amenities for the public good. We use contrasting cases of interaction between local government and civil society organisations in Sweden and the UK to explore trends in public service provision. We look at how care can manifest between state and citizens and at the roles that co-design and co-learning play in developing contextually sensitive opportunities for caring platforms. In this way, we seek to learn from platforms in transition about the importance of co-learning in political and structural contexts and make recommendations for the co-design of (digital) platforms to care with and for civil society.","PeriodicalId":46990,"journal":{"name":"CoDesign-International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts","volume":"48 1","pages":"192 - 211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81616540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}