发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

METAPHILOSOPHY最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Converging ontologies: On some similarities between the Sāṃkhyakārikā and Plotinus's Enneads 聚合本体：论Sāṃkhyakārikā与普罗提诺的恩尼阿德之间的一些相似之处
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
METAPHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12728
Federico Divino
{"title":"Converging ontologies: On some similarities between the Sāṃkhyakārikā and Plotinus's Enneads","authors":"Federico Divino","doi":"10.1111/meta.12728","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12728","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article endeavors to conduct a comparative analysis between the philosophical systems of Plotinus and classical Sāṃkhya, two distinct philosophical traditions characterized by their substantial historical and cultural contexts. The primary aim of the study is to discern and evaluate the fundamental themes inherent in these philosophical systems. To facilitate this comparative exploration, the article employs Plotinus's seminal work, the <i>Enneads</i>, as the representative source for Neoplatonism, and Īśvarakṛṣṇa's <i>Sāṃkhyakārikā</i>, recognized as the earliest extant treatise within the Sāṃkhya tradition. This comparative analysis seeks to illuminate both the commonalities and divergences that exist between Neoplatonism and Sāṃkhya, thereby providing insights into their historical evolution, the influence of cultural factors, and the nuanced interplay between Eastern and Western philosophical traditions. It emphasizes the paramount importance of acknowledging the intricate philosophical potential within religious traditions and their intricate dialogues with philosophical discourse.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"56 2","pages":"264-279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/meta.12728","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How can we build a “women's” philosophy? 我们如何建立“女性”哲学？
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
METAPHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12727
Anne-Marie McCallion
{"title":"How can we build a “women's” philosophy?","authors":"Anne-Marie McCallion","doi":"10.1111/meta.12727","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12727","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nancy Holland (1990, 1) defines “women's philosophy” as philosophical work that “arises from, explicitly refers to, and attempts to account for the experience of women.” A “women's” philosophy, distinct from “feminist” philosophy, would depict the lived reality of women's experiences without an explicit or self-conscious desire to construct oppositional theories or arguments. This paper builds on Holland's discussion of a women's philosophy to propose a new perspective on the role and function of the philosophy curriculum. The paper shifts the conversation from one concerning whether a women's philosophy is “possible” to one that directly asks how we can <i>build</i> this philosophy. It argues that creating space for a women's philosophy need not require the reimagining of philosophical norms. Instead, the task should be understood as broadening perceptions of what <i>counts</i> as philosophy. The central claim is that we should witness curriculum construction as a tool for metaphilosophical intervention and as the first step towards building a women's philosophy. The paper shows how the incorporation of feminist autoethnography (a research approach and body of literature) into curriculums is particularly fruitful.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"56 2","pages":"249-263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/meta.12727","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shame and self-image in Sartre and Bernard Williams 萨特和伯纳德·威廉姆斯的羞耻感和自我形象
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
METAPHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2025-03-14 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12726
Ana Falcato
{"title":"Shame and self-image in Sartre and Bernard Williams","authors":"Ana Falcato","doi":"10.1111/meta.12726","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12726","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Analysis of the feeling of shame plays a crucial role in classical phenomenological accounts of intersubjectivity, and shame has increasingly become a core topic in Anglo-American moral philosophy since at least the publication of Bernard Williams's <i>Shame and Necessity</i> in 1993. While Williams's philosophical approach to the deep moral implications of shame was indeed groundbreaking, previous philosophical readings of the emotion were already in the offing, including Jean-Paul Sartre's prodigious representation of the moment shame reaches consciousness in <i>Being and Nothingness</i>, first published in 1943. This paper compares Sartre's and Williams's interpretive frameworks for understanding the rich (first-personal) experience of shame, explaining in detail how they not only complement but also illuminate each other, thereby offering a novel understanding of shame's relation to the moral, nonmoral, and ethical self.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"56 2","pages":"182-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Danger signals for untrustworthy thought experiments 不可信的思想实验的危险信号
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
METAPHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12724
Henri Tuohimaa
{"title":"Danger signals for untrustworthy thought experiments","authors":"Henri Tuohimaa","doi":"10.1111/meta.12724","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12724","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A key question in contemporary metaphilosophy of thought experiments is the “wheat from chaff” problem: How can we separate the good and trustworthy thought experiments from the untrustworthy ones? This article examines this problem by viewing thought experimentation as a form of mental simulation. It argues that we should approach the limitations of thought experiments in light of the general shortcomings of our capacity to run mental simulations. Furthermore, the article proposes an answer to the wheat from chaff problem by presenting three danger signals for untrustworthy thought experiments. These are (1) high counterfactuality of the imagined scenario, (2) complexity of the imagined scenario, and (3) a large psychological distance to the imagined scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"56 2","pages":"209-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kant's and Schiller's different understandings of the human person 康德和席勒对人的不同理解
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
METAPHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12725
Xiaoyun Si
{"title":"Kant's and Schiller's different understandings of the human person","authors":"Xiaoyun Si","doi":"10.1111/meta.12725","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12725","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Freedom is an eternal theme of thought in modern Europe. In philosophers, freedom is embodied in the freedom of reason, and in poets, freedom is embodied in the freedom of human nature. Unlike the philosopher Kant, who defined a person as the subject of practical reason and took the realisation of the supreme good—that is, the freedom of the moral person—as the goal of his thought, the poet Schiller understands the person as a “beautiful personality” harmonising sensibility and rationality, and the fulfilment of human nature as the ultimate goal of his thought. Here, the motive of Schiller's thought is embodied in an ideal, which is manifested in the pursuit of human nature to reach infinity—that is, sanctity. At the same time, in ideal art, what emerges from the unity of body and spirit, sensibility and reason, is the personality as an idea in itself, with its own stipulation of beauty.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"56 2","pages":"239-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Intuition-denial and methods teaching: Prediction, reform, and complication 直觉否定与方法教学：预测、改革与复杂化
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
METAPHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12722
James Andow
{"title":"Intuition-denial and methods teaching: Prediction, reform, and complication","authors":"James Andow","doi":"10.1111/meta.12722","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12722","url":null,"abstract":"<p>According to a popular theory in philosophical methodology, there is a widespread misconception among philosophers as to their own methods. This misconception is that philosophers use intuitions as evidence. This is a fascinating theory, for various reasons. Some of those reasons pertain to what the theory predicts about what philosophers are teaching their students, and whether the theory puts us on the pathway to pedagogical reform. The current paper does not answer those questions but uses them to demonstrate hitherto unrecognized fascinating aspects of the idea that there is a widespread misconception among philosophers as to their methods. Advocates of the theory end up needing to make surprising further claims about the nature of the profession, and to revisit debates they have dismissed as a big mistake.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"56 2","pages":"225-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/meta.12722","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond “moral progress”: A dual-character conception of moral change 超越“道德进步”：道德变迁的双重性概念
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
METAPHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12723
Heng Ying
{"title":"Beyond “moral progress”: A dual-character conception of moral change","authors":"Heng Ying","doi":"10.1111/meta.12723","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12723","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Philosophers who study moral progress often hold a largely unacknowledged conception of moral history, which one may call the <i>problem-solving conception of moral progress</i>. This conception pictures humans as problem solvers, who make progress by advancing morally significant values in society. This conception, however, overlooks the conflict of values. In response, this paper proposes the <i>dual-character conception of moral change</i> to guide the study of the historical change of morality. This conception tracks a self-limiting structure of moral change—since not all values are compatible and combinable, our efforts to actualize certain values entail our neglect and sacrifice of alternative values. In consequence, the “progress” we make actually limits us from experimenting with other ideal forms of life and society. As calling a change process progress keeps us in a state of neglecting alternative values, we should discard the moral-progress thinking and stay aware of the limitations of our moral efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"56 2","pages":"194-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/meta.12723","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Naturalism and the Cartesian ghost 自然主义和笛卡尔的幽灵
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
METAPHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12720
Lawrence Cahoone
{"title":"Naturalism and the Cartesian ghost","authors":"Lawrence Cahoone","doi":"10.1111/meta.12720","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12720","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many philosophers equate naturalism with physicalism. Non-reductive naturalists object that physicalism is inadequate to human agency. Despite their disagreement, both labor under a vestigial Cartesianism that regards the human mind as the sole exception in an otherwise monolithic physical nature. But nonhuman nature is complex, exhibits emergence, and requires multiple sciences. This paper argues that nonhuman nature cannot be adequately understood by physicalism with its doctrine of the causal closure of the physical. At the same time, non-reductive naturalism cannot deny the dependence of human processes on nonhuman nature. A pluralistic naturalism can acknowledge this dependency without accepting physicalism. The Cartesian ghost can only be exorcized by thinking through the complexity of the nonhuman nature that is our home. This permits us to accept the realist, albeit fallibilist, truth of human cognition of the nature that evolved it.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"56 2","pages":"141-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Naturalism, from a transcendental point of view 自然主义，从先验的角度来看
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
METAPHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12718
Sami Pihlström
{"title":"Naturalism, from a transcendental point of view","authors":"Sami Pihlström","doi":"10.1111/meta.12718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12718","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay develops a version of non-reductive (“soft,” liberal, non-scientistic) naturalism based on an integration of pragmatism and transcendental philosophy. In critical dialogue with philosophers such as Quine, Strawson, and McDowell, this version of naturalism, understood as an open research program, is argued to be more compelling than other (non-transcendental) variants of non-reductive naturalism. It is suggested that any naturalist must examine how we are able to view ourselves as elements of the natural world; accordingly, the question concerning the contingency of the transcendental “us” is raised. The related issue of realism underlying debates on naturalism is also discussed. This paper thus contributes to the current naturalism debates by distinguishing between transcendental and non-transcendental non-reductive naturalisms and by emphasizing the entanglement of the issues of naturalism and realism.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"56 2","pages":"155-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on Lawrence Cahoone, “Naturalism and the Cartesian ghost” 评劳伦斯·卡胡恩《自然主义与笛卡尔的幽灵》
IF 0.4 3区 哲学
METAPHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI: 10.1111/meta.12719
Sami Pihlström
{"title":"Comment on Lawrence Cahoone, “Naturalism and the Cartesian ghost”","authors":"Sami Pihlström","doi":"10.1111/meta.12719","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12719","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper comments on Lawrence Cahoone's essay “Naturalism and the Cartesian ghost,” published in this issue of <i>Metaphilosophy</i>. Agreeing with Cahoone's criticism of reductive naturalism while identifying differences in our versions of non-reductive naturalism, the paper focuses on questions concerning ontological dependence and the relation between naturalism and humanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"56 2","pages":"168-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143840968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信