{"title":"A systems-theoretical look at stakeholder theory: Lessons from Bogdanov's Tektology","authors":"Vladislav Valentinov","doi":"10.1111/basr.70018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We explore how the conversation between stakeholder theory and systems theory can illustrate the unique role of stakeholder management within the system of capitalistic institutions. Toward that end, we call the attention of stakeholder scholars to Alexander Bogdanov's <i>Tektology</i>, an early version of systems theory that raised critical concerns about capitalism. According to <i>Tektology,</i> capitalism fosters individualistic and conflict-driven mindsets, which stymie society's ability to achieve its full collaborative potential. If stakeholder theory takes this critique on board, it may conceptualize social collaboration as “organized complexity” that can materialize if human actors overcome their reductionist mindsets. This conceptual move highlights novel systems-theoretical foundations for stakeholder theory's insights into the role of stakeholder mindsets in unlocking collaborative potential within capitalist societies. The resulting added value for stakeholder theory lies in recognizing the collaborative nature of capitalism as an institutional accomplishment facilitated by stakeholder management practices, which operate along non-linear pathways and generate emergent and counter-intuitive outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"130 3","pages":"414-439"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/basr.70018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145196680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Green leadership, green action: How environmentally specific transformational leadership drives employee green behavior","authors":"Zhibin Tao","doi":"10.1111/basr.70017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the realm of environmental sustainability, exploring environmentally specific transformational leadership holds great importance. Nonetheless, there is a lack of comprehensive research on how environmentally specific transformational leadership affects green behavior among employees. Hence, this study employs affective events theory, self-determination theory, and the cultural self-representation perspective to explore. The validity of the research hypotheses is confirmed through survey data collected from 460 employees in the Chinese manufacturing industry and the structural equation model method. The results demonstrated a substantial positive influence of environmentally specific transformational leadership on employee green behavior. Furthermore, mediation analysis revealed that harmonious environmental passion, green self-identity, and autonomous motivation each played a mediating role in the relationship between environmentally specific transformational leadership and employee green behavior. In addition, the mediating effect of harmonious environmental passion accounted for 11.8% of the total effect, green self-identity accounted for 11.6%, autonomous motivation accounted for 9.3%, the total mediation effects of these three variables mediated 32.7% of the total effect. Comparison tests revealed no statistically significant differences between the three mediating variables. These research findings provide reference and guidance for scholars, managers, practitioners, and policymakers, particularly those involved in sustainable business development and reducing organizational carbon footprint, offering practical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"130 3","pages":"368-413"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145197225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Evelina Van Mensel, Nikolay A. Dentchev, Zornitsa Yordanova, Abel Diaz Gonzalez
{"title":"Effectuation at work in universities: Using what is at hand to support social entrepreneurs","authors":"Evelina Van Mensel, Nikolay A. Dentchev, Zornitsa Yordanova, Abel Diaz Gonzalez","doi":"10.1111/basr.70012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Universities play an important role in creating social impact through supporting social entrepreneurs. While existing literature primarily focuses on the educational aspect of nurturing social entrepreneurs, there is a gap in understanding the diverse and heterogeneous initiatives undertaken by universities. Recognizing the call for a nuanced exploration of universities' distinct approaches, we adopt an effectuation theory as an interpretive framework to investigate how universities, with varying scale and scope, support social entrepreneurs. Through 37 in-depth interviews and 5 focus group discussions at four universities, we offer an empirically grounded typology of four distinct support logics: embedded, auxiliary, opportunity-driven, and boundary-spanning. These categories reflect divergent institutional responses to uncertainty, internal capability, and stakeholder engagement. Our findings challenge the conventional narrative of homogeneity in university initiatives, emphasizing that support systems are shaped by a dynamic interaction of structural elements and individual decision-making processes. This research expands the theoretical discourse on university support for social entrepreneurs by bridging structure and agency and demonstrating how universities act as both integrators of resources and ecosystem enablers. By leveraging internal strengths and cultivating external partnerships, universities create multifaceted, adaptable support mechanisms that reflect the uniqueness of their institutional context and their contributions to the social entrepreneurship ecosystem. The study contributes to evolving debates on the university's roles in entrepreneurial ecosystems and provides a conceptual foundation for future theorization and comparative analysis. It offers actionable insights for university management, social entrepreneurs, and policymakers, advocating for a more nuanced understanding of the role universities play in creating social impact through entrepreneurial ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"130 3","pages":"264-297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145196862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Greenwashing with green: Product packaging color and perception of environmental sustainability","authors":"Ho Keat Leng","doi":"10.1111/basr.70014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Greenwashing refers to any communication that misleads people into adopting overly positive beliefs about an organization's environmental performance. The aim of this study is to examine whether the use of green color in product packaging affects consumers' perception of a brand's environmental sustainability. A convenience sample of 34 respondents was recruited from a university in Singapore. The mean age of the respondents was 22.9 years with 25 (74%) of the respondents of female gender. The respondents were provided with three brands each from four different household products. The brands were identical except that the color of the packaging was manipulated with one of the three brands packaged in green color. The results show that respondents were more likely to select the product with green packaging as environmentally sustainable. Fisher's Exact Test indicated that the proportion of respondents who selected the images with green packaging as more environmentally sustainable did not differ among those who were more eco-literate, familiar with the product category and involved in purchasing sustainable products. This suggests that by changing the color of the packaging, even informed consumers can be influenced into perceiving that the brands are environmentally sustainable.</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"130 3","pages":"321-335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145196486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How supplier diversity and enabled minority businesses create stakeholder value in underserved communities","authors":"Ashok Vairavan, G. Peter Zhang","doi":"10.1111/basr.70015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70015","url":null,"abstract":"<p>While large purchasing organizations (LPOs) implement supplier diversity (SD) programs to support minority business enterprises (MBEs) and create value-added diverse supply chains, many SD initiatives fall short of enabling MBEs and generating the desired impact. This paper explores how supplier diversity can be transformative in helping grow and enable MBEs to create stakeholder value in underserved communities. This multi-case study takes an MBE-focused approach to examine the efficacy of SD programs, the relationship facets that underpin mutually beneficial relationships between LPOs and MBEs, and the enabled MBEs' impact on their stakeholders' economic and social well-being. We find that enabled MBEs can be change agents to revitalize underserved communities, generating ripple effects by creating jobs, improving employee well-being, and growing local businesses, helping underserved communities move closer toward economic equality and inclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"130 3","pages":"336-367"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145196483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to “Business and Society Review, volume 130, issue S1”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/basr.70016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 <span>Guimarães-Costa, N.</span>, <span>Schmidt, G.</span>, <span>Schulz, K.-P.</span>, <span>Waddock, S.</span> (<span>2025</span>). <span>Moving the logic of sustainability towards flourishing for all</span>, <i>Business and Society Review</i>, <span>130</span>(<span>S1</span>). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14678594/2025/130/S1</p><p>In the above issue published on 10 April 2025, the article pagination has been corrected as follows:\u0000\u0000 </p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"130 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/basr.70016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144615380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Power distance belief and power affect individuals' support of corporate philanthropy","authors":"Edythe Moulton-Tetlock, Poonam Arora","doi":"10.1111/basr.70013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70013","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past decade, researchers have investigated the relationship between individuals' power distance belief (PDB), their psychological power, and their support of individual charity (e.g., Han et al., 2017; Winterich & Zhang, 2014; Yan et al., 2021). We extend this line of inquiry into individuals' support of corporate philanthropy. We develop and test hypotheses predicting that, in high PDB contexts, individuals will support corporate philanthropy more, because they endorse corporations aiding individuals, whom they perceive as having less power than corporations. High PDB individuals will also exhibit distinct corporate philanthropy preferences based on their psychological power. Specifically, individuals high in both PDB and psychological power prefer social, rather than environmental, corporate philanthropy. We find support for our hypotheses through three complementary experiments that activate PDB and feelings of psychological power, shedding new light on the conditions under which these factors influence support for different types of corporate philanthropy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"130 3","pages":"298-320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145197076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Corporate social responsibility at the intersection of state and market: CSR interpretation in China","authors":"Xu Kang","doi":"10.1111/basr.70011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the interpretation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in an authoritarian context, with a specific focus on China. Despite surged CSR disclosures by Chinese firms, their understanding and application of CSR often align more with the party-state's policy directives than with international self-regulation standards. By analyzing CSR narratives from various actors, including government agencies, corporations, and third parties, through the lens of institutional logics, this article provides a comprehensive exploration of the influence of authoritarian capitalist institutions on CSR interpretation in China, offering theoretical insights into business and human rights issues within authoritarian state contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"130 2","pages":"233-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/basr.70011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144615379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Stakeholder ethics: Defining the ethical responsibilities of stakeholders to and for companies1","authors":"Muel Kaptein","doi":"10.1111/basr.70010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Because business ethics focuses on the ethical responsibilities of companies to and for their stakeholders, the impression that companies have only duties and that stakeholders have only rights can arise. To prevent stakeholders from becoming passive as a result, this article explores the ethical responsibilities of stakeholders to and for the companies of which they are stakeholders. Using corporate social contract theory, which holds that all contracting parties have ethical responsibilities, five principles are identified as the ethical responsibilities of stakeholders <i>to</i> their companies: empathy, fairness, solidarity, reliability, and openness. Corporate social contract theory also allows the identification of five grounds comprising the extent to which stakeholders are responsible <i>for</i> their companies: endorsement, enablement, influence, profit, and ownership. The more these grounds are present, the more stakeholders have coresponsibility for the company of which they are stakeholders. Therefore, this article opens the door more widely to study and practice stakeholder ethics.</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"130 2","pages":"209-232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/basr.70010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144615003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Gender diversity in the boardroom: Progress and organizational determinants in China and India, 2015–2020","authors":"Wenjing Li, Jennifer Castañeda-Navarrete","doi":"10.1111/basr.70009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70009","url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is growing evidence that gender diversity on corporate boards positively impacts company performance. However, this relationship remains relatively underexplored in developing and emerging economies, particularly in the context of recent legislative initiatives such as the introduction of gender quotas and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study addresses this gap by investigating board gender diversity trends and organizational determinants in China and India between 2015 and 2020. Using data from the OSIRIS, ORBIS, and CSMAR databases, we examine trends in gender diversity across companies listed on the S&P BSE 200 index in India and the CSI 300 index in China. Our findings reveal higher levels of gender diversity and more rapid improvements among Indian firms, where listed companies are required to appoint at least one woman to their boards since 2013. Using a Tobit regression model, our analysis reveals that family-owned and larger firms in both countries are more likely to appoint women directors, while state-owned enterprises, particularly in China, exhibit lower gender diversity. Industry-specific variations are also significant, with Indian firms in non-traditional sectors demonstrating greater diversity. These findings offer insights for policymakers and industry leaders seeking to improve gender representation on corporate boards in emerging economies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"130 2","pages":"189-208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/basr.70009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144615540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}