Archaeology in Oceania最新文献

The archaeology of eastern Lutruwita (Tasmania) 东鲁特鲁维塔（塔斯马尼亚）考古学

IF 1.1 3区历史学

Archaeology in Oceania Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1002/arco.5341

Richard Cosgrove, John Webb, Jillian Garvey, Jeff Theys, Rhys Jones

{"title":"The archaeology of eastern Lutruwita (Tasmania)","authors":"Richard Cosgrove, John Webb, Jillian Garvey, Jeff Theys, Rhys Jones","doi":"10.1002/arco.5341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/arco.5341","url":null,"abstract":"Fifty years have passed since the first systematic archaeological surveys and excavations were conducted in Lutruwita (Tasmania). Despite numerous Late Pleistocene archaeological discoveries in the southwest region, no indisputable pre-Holocene sites have been found in eastern Tasmania. This profound difference raises questions about how Aboriginal people utilised the Lutruwita landscape; first as a projecting peninsula into the Southern Ocean and then as an island cut off by rising seas c.14000 years ago.To examine the difference between east and west further, legacy data excavated by one of us (RJ) in 1964 at the Oatlands OL1 site and stored at the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery (TMAG) has been analysed. The results of pXRF chemical analysis of artefact raw material, radiocarbon dating and studies of faunal remains have produced information that highlights the Holocene interaction between people in eastern Lutruwita. Despite the current lack of Late Pleistocene evidence from eastern Lutruwita, this pattern appears to be different from land use models for Late Pleistocene southwestern Lutruwita. With new information from the OL1 rock shelter site we can now contrast the Late Pleistocene hunting economics with the exceptionally well-preserved faunal remains found in the Holocene site, OL1.","PeriodicalId":46465,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology in Oceania","volume":"59 3","pages":"495-515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arco.5341","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142555456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A new parasite discovery in Micronesia: eggs of the nematode Toxocara canis at archaeological sites on Ebon Atoll, Marshall Islands extend the known dog presence by c.600 years 密克罗尼西亚的寄生虫新发现：马绍尔群岛埃本环礁考古遗址中的犬线虫虫卵将已知狗的存在时间延长了约 600 年

IF 1.1 3区历史学

Archaeology in Oceania Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1002/arco.5342

Mark Horrocks, Marshall I. Weisler, Quan Hua, Bronwen Presswell

引用次数: 0

Kia kōrerorero tonu ai: a review of the dialogue at the interface of Indigenous oral tradition and archaeology in Aotearoa New Zealand and Oceania Kia kōrerorero tonu ai：新西兰奥特亚罗瓦和大洋洲土著口述传统与考古学对话综述

IF 1.1 3区历史学

Archaeology in Oceania Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI: 10.1002/arco.5338

Isaac McIvor, Tom Roa, Waikaremoana Waitoki

{"title":"Kia kōrerorero tonu ai: a review of the dialogue at the interface of Indigenous oral tradition and archaeology in Aotearoa New Zealand and Oceania","authors":"Isaac McIvor, Tom Roa, Waikaremoana Waitoki","doi":"10.1002/arco.5338","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/arco.5338","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the previous theoretical interfaces of Indigenous oral tradition and archaeology in Oceania, specifically in Aotearoa (New Zealand). Historical processes of writing down kōrero, or oral histories, by amateur historians and ethnologists in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, culminated in the romanticised traditions of the early Polynesian society and influenced contemporary archaeological scholarship. In response to criticisms, archaeologists attempted to validate kōrero using Western research methodologies. However, attempts often fell short and processual archaeologists of the mid-late-20th century considered oral tradition and archaeology as incapable of cross-validation. Parallel ethnological scholarship focused on the symbolism in oral histories as indicators of their function in contemporary society or as legitimate forms of recounting actual historical events after critical evaluation. More recent archaeologists use kōrero about the last few centuries like any other historical source. Māori scholars have taken inspiration from previous theoretical arcs to position kōrero in a postmodern space of relative truths or to critically analyse its historical and functional values. The review concludes with how the interface of oral history and archaeology might follow Kaupapa Māori research methodologies and current materialist critiques of dominant settlement pattern theory.","PeriodicalId":46465,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology in Oceania","volume":"59 3","pages":"422-434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arco.5338","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142555300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The age and position of the southern boundary of prehistoric Polynesian dispersal 史前波利尼西亚人扩散的南部边界的年代和位置

IF 1.1 3区历史学

Archaeology in Oceania Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1002/arco.5337

Atholl Anderson, Lorena Becerra-Valdivia, Haidee Cadd, Christopher E. Marjo, Jonathan Palmer, Chris Turney, Janet M. Wilmshurst

{"title":"The age and position of the southern boundary of prehistoric Polynesian dispersal","authors":"Atholl Anderson, Lorena Becerra-Valdivia, Haidee Cadd, Christopher E. Marjo, Jonathan Palmer, Chris Turney, Janet M. Wilmshurst","doi":"10.1002/arco.5337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/arco.5337","url":null,"abstract":"Prehistoric Polynesian voyaging into high latitudes with landfall in Antarctica remains a widely credited proposition. We examine it through archaeological and environmental evidence from the Subantarctic region of the southwest Pacific, focussing upon an extensive archaeological site at Sandy Bay on Enderby Island. Combining a new set of radiocarbon ages with former, older, ages we show that the site is now within the same rapid expansion phase in which South Polynesia was first colonised. Radiocarbon ages across the site indicate a single continuous settlement, probably of some decades. Consideration of limiting factors in Subantarctic settlement, including of seafaring capability and critical resources, suggests that the site was about as far south as prehistoric habitation could be sustained and was probably vacated at the onset of the Little Ice age (LIA) in the late 14th century. An absence of prehistoric remains on islands further south also suggests that Polynesian exploration reached a boundary 2000 km short of Antarctica. The southern case is discussed briefly in the wider context of Polynesian expansion.","PeriodicalId":46465,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology in Oceania","volume":"59 3","pages":"479-494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arco.5337","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142555306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Forty Years in the South Seas: Archaeological Perspectives on the Human History of Papua New Guinea and the Western Pacific Region edited by Anne Ford, Ben Shaw, and Dylan Gaffney, pp. 435. ANU Press, Terra Australis 57, Canberra, 2024. ISBN: 9781760466442. Open Access Digital. 南洋四十年：巴布亚新几内亚和西太平洋地区人类历史的考古学视角》，安妮-福特、本-肖、迪伦-加夫尼编辑，第 435 页。澳大利亚国立大学出版社，Terra Australis 57，堪培拉，2024 年。ISBN：9781760466442。数字开放存取。

IF 1.1 3区历史学

Archaeology in Oceania Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI: 10.1002/arco.5340

Peter Sheppard

引用次数: 0

Sustainability in Ancient Island societies: An archaeology of human resilience Edited by Scott M. Fitzpatrick, Jon M. Erlandson, and Kristina M. Gill. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2024. ISBN: 9780813069975. pp. 344. US $100. 古代岛屿社会的可持续性：斯科特-M-菲茨帕特里克（Scott M. Fitzpatrick）、乔恩-M-厄兰森（Jon M. Erlandson）和克里斯蒂娜-M-吉尔（Kristina M. Gill）编著。盖恩斯维尔：佛罗里达大学出版社，2024 年。ISBN: 9780813069975. 344.100 美元。

IF 1.1 3区历史学

Archaeology in Oceania Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1002/arco.5339

Frank Thomas

引用次数: 0

Wilyakali and archaeologists collaborating to map the journey of the Bronzewing Pigeon, Broken Hill, western New South Wales, Australia 澳大利亚新南威尔士州西部布罗肯希尔，Wilyakali 和考古学家合作绘制布朗泽温鸽子的旅程图

IF 1.1 3区历史学

Archaeology in Oceania Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI: 10.1002/arco.5335

Sarah Martin, Dan Witter, Dulcie O'Donnell, Raymond O'Donnell, Sandra Clark, Raymond O'Donnell Jnr, Badger Bates

{"title":"Wilyakali and archaeologists collaborating to map the journey of the Bronzewing Pigeon, Broken Hill, western New South Wales, Australia","authors":"Sarah Martin, Dan Witter, Dulcie O'Donnell, Raymond O'Donnell, Sandra Clark, Raymond O'Donnell Jnr, Badger Bates","doi":"10.1002/arco.5335","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/arco.5335","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 This paper describes a collaboration between Wilyakali Indigenous Custodians and a group of archaeologists. This collaboration has generated a shared and integrated understanding of the cultural landscape, Ancestral Creation Histories, and archaeology of the Broken Hill region of western New South Wales. The Broken Hill landscape is ancient beyond imagination, and complex geological processes/Creation Histories have resulted in distinctive landscape features and resources including quartz suitable for stone artefact manufacture. Wilyakali stone knappers employed specialised and varied technological processes to overcome the diverse and sometimes intractable nature of the quartz material, resulting in efficient use of this local stone resource. Wilyakali interpret the Country through their knowledge of the travelling sacred Bronzewing Pigeon and its creation of landscape features and resources such as quartz and water. Empirical archaeological data complement traditional knowledge, with the two ways of knowing coming together to reconstruct a nuanced interpretation of the cultural landscape. This shared narrative has had ongoing and inter-generational benefits to the Wilyakali people, with knowledge communicated to younger generations by Elders, enabling them to interpret both the archaeology and Ancestral Creation Histories with confidence. This paper also highlights the inconsistent recognition of Indigenous ways of knowing and connection in Aboriginal cultural heritage assessments in the region.\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":46465,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology in Oceania","volume":"59 3","pages":"405-421"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142555408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Heritage and identity: returning to ancestral pathways of the Siraya indigenous archaeology 遗产与身份：回归西拉雅土著考古学的祖先之路

IF 1.1 3区历史学

Archaeology in Oceania Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI: 10.1002/arco.5332

Chung Kuo-Feng, Alak Akatuang

{"title":"Heritage and identity: returning to ancestral pathways of the Siraya indigenous archaeology","authors":"Chung Kuo-Feng, Alak Akatuang","doi":"10.1002/arco.5332","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/arco.5332","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 In recent years, Taiwan's Indigenous community has been actively demanding the repatriation and reburial of ancestral remains, seeking historical justice for colonial wrongs, asserting the community's rights to traditional territories, and pushing for recognition of their long-standing existence and legal status as Indigenous peoples. In 2022, archeologists consulted and cooperated with the Siraya people, proposing “The Siraya Indigenous Archaeological Action Plan.” The aim is to re-balance the power relations between archeologists and Indigenous peoples, seek a diversity of voices and methods, and put the social practice of archaeology at the trowel's edge into practice. The action plan was carried out within the Siraya Soulangh abandoned settlement, with the Siraya people joining the investigation and excavation work, physically touching important parts of their ancestral cultural heritage. Other efforts include reviving the traditional Siraya systems of the male age-set organization and the national assembly, consolidating the ethnic identity of the contemporary Siraya people, and sustaining their societal and cultural systems. These endeavors have helped fill the huge historical gap left by colonizers, empowering the Siraya people to claim ownership over the abandoned settlement cultural heritage that has a direct cultural connection with their community, push for recognition of their long-standing and continuous existence in Taiwan, and acquire legal status as Indigenous peoples.\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":46465,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology in Oceania","volume":"59 3","pages":"387-404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142555357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Building culturally meaningful chronologies: negotiating Indigenous and Western temporalities in Oceania 建立具有文化意义的年表：大洋洲土著与西方时间的谈判

IF 1.1 3区历史学

Archaeology in Oceania Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI: 10.1002/arco.5333

Chris Urwin, Lynette Russell, Robert Skelly

引用次数: 0

Archaeology through tok stori: negotiating the meanings, values and challenges of archaeological research in Solomon Islands 所罗门群岛考古研究的意义、价值和挑战的谈判

IF 1.1 3区历史学

Archaeology in Oceania Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI: 10.1002/arco.5334

Charles J. T. Radclyffe, Grinta Ale'eke-Bemama

{"title":"Archaeology through tok stori: negotiating the meanings, values and challenges of archaeological research in Solomon Islands","authors":"Charles J. T. Radclyffe, Grinta Ale'eke-Bemama","doi":"10.1002/arco.5334","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/arco.5334","url":null,"abstract":"Tok stori, a Melanesian pidgin term meaning “conversate or share stories”, has emerged over the last decade as a Melanesian research methodology in the fields of education, pedagogy and leadership. This paper contributes to this scholarship by exploring the value of its application to the conceptualisation and practice of archaeological research in Solomon Islands. From our perspectives as Solomon Islander archaeologists, we reflect on our experiences engaging in tok stori with two communities from Santa Isabel and Lauru (Choiseul) while undertaking field work. We use these examples to demonstrate the highly dynamic nature of tok stori in research, serving as a mechanism to build trust and reciprocal relationships centred upon shared social values, but also to facilitate more transactional partnerships fixated on negotiating financial “benefits”. Drawing from our experiences, we also discuss key challenges facing archaeological practice in Solomon Islands. These are a lack of awareness of the purpose and values of archaeological research, and a legacy of monetary enticement we refer to as a “handout mentality” generated by extractive industries. Tok stori, we contend, can aid in navigating these challenges and serves as a valuable research tool for archaeologists due to its adaptability and the cultural bearing it holds for Melanesian peoples.","PeriodicalId":46465,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology in Oceania","volume":"59 3","pages":"450-464"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arco.5334","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142555382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0