Mia Dardengo, Lynley A. Wallis, Djaykuk Djandjomerr, May Nango, Clarrie Nadjamerrek, Murray Garde, Anthony Pagels
{"title":"Karribolknahnan kunred la kundulk:北领地Mirarr国家当代文化改良树","authors":"Mia Dardengo, Lynley A. Wallis, Djaykuk Djandjomerr, May Nango, Clarrie Nadjamerrek, Murray Garde, Anthony Pagels","doi":"10.1002/arco.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Mirarr <i>Kunred</i> (Country) in the Alligator Rivers region of the Northern Territory, Australia, a particular form of scarred, culturally modified tree (CMT) is actively being created as <i>Bininj</i> (Aboriginal people) harvest bark to be used as art canvases (<i>dolobbo</i>). Cultural heritage surveys carried out over the past 5 years in and near the township of Jabiru have recorded numerous <i>dolobbo</i> trees, along with a smaller number of older CMTs containing scars from other forms of resource extraction. These newly created CMTs are a tangible demonstration of cultural continuity, produced by <i>Bininj</i> adapting traditional practices to engage with the contemporary economy. Although <i>dolobbo</i> trees are a relatively new addition to the cultural landscape of Mirarr <i>Kunred</i>, they are warmly regarded by <i>Bininj</i> when encountered and have heritage value as indicators of current cultural activities. This study highlights the significance of recording these trees as part of the contemporary cultural landscape of Mirarr <i>Kunred</i> and considers the environmental and heritage implications of this practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46465,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology in Oceania","volume":"60 2","pages":"132-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arco.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Karribolknahnan kunred la kundulk: Contemporary Culturally Modified Trees in Mirarr Country, Northern Territory\",\"authors\":\"Mia Dardengo, Lynley A. Wallis, Djaykuk Djandjomerr, May Nango, Clarrie Nadjamerrek, Murray Garde, Anthony Pagels\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/arco.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In Mirarr <i>Kunred</i> (Country) in the Alligator Rivers region of the Northern Territory, Australia, a particular form of scarred, culturally modified tree (CMT) is actively being created as <i>Bininj</i> (Aboriginal people) harvest bark to be used as art canvases (<i>dolobbo</i>). Cultural heritage surveys carried out over the past 5 years in and near the township of Jabiru have recorded numerous <i>dolobbo</i> trees, along with a smaller number of older CMTs containing scars from other forms of resource extraction. These newly created CMTs are a tangible demonstration of cultural continuity, produced by <i>Bininj</i> adapting traditional practices to engage with the contemporary economy. Although <i>dolobbo</i> trees are a relatively new addition to the cultural landscape of Mirarr <i>Kunred</i>, they are warmly regarded by <i>Bininj</i> when encountered and have heritage value as indicators of current cultural activities. This study highlights the significance of recording these trees as part of the contemporary cultural landscape of Mirarr <i>Kunred</i> and considers the environmental and heritage implications of this practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeology in Oceania\",\"volume\":\"60 2\",\"pages\":\"132-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arco.70000\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeology in Oceania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arco.70000\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeology in Oceania","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arco.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Karribolknahnan kunred la kundulk: Contemporary Culturally Modified Trees in Mirarr Country, Northern Territory
In Mirarr Kunred (Country) in the Alligator Rivers region of the Northern Territory, Australia, a particular form of scarred, culturally modified tree (CMT) is actively being created as Bininj (Aboriginal people) harvest bark to be used as art canvases (dolobbo). Cultural heritage surveys carried out over the past 5 years in and near the township of Jabiru have recorded numerous dolobbo trees, along with a smaller number of older CMTs containing scars from other forms of resource extraction. These newly created CMTs are a tangible demonstration of cultural continuity, produced by Bininj adapting traditional practices to engage with the contemporary economy. Although dolobbo trees are a relatively new addition to the cultural landscape of Mirarr Kunred, they are warmly regarded by Bininj when encountered and have heritage value as indicators of current cultural activities. This study highlights the significance of recording these trees as part of the contemporary cultural landscape of Mirarr Kunred and considers the environmental and heritage implications of this practice.
期刊介绍:
Archaeology in Oceania is published online and in print versions three times a year: April, July, October. It accepts articles and research reports in prehistoric and historical archaeology, modern material culture and human biology of ancient and modern human populations. Its primary geographic focus is Australia, the islands of the Pacific Ocean and lands of the western Pacific rim. All articles and research reports accepted as being within the remit of the journal and of appropriate standard will be reviewed by two scholars; authors will be informed of these comments though not necessarily of the reviewer’s names.