{"title":"Rethinking or delinking? Said and Mignolo on humanism and the question of the human","authors":"K. Smiet","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2030595","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2030595","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the commonalities and divergences between postcolonial and decolonial approaches to humanism and the question of the human, by way of an examination of the work of postcolonial scholar Edward W. Said and decolonial scholar Walter D. Mignolo. While at first glance, their stances may seem diametrically opposed, as the former is a staunch defender of humanism while the latter is a vocal critic, a closer examination reveals a more complex picture. The problem of universalism is key to understanding the difference: while the exclusionary and parochial universalism of Eurocentric colonial humanism is critiqued by both, the question that divides them is whether a universalizing gesture inherent in ‘speaking for the human’ can and should be avoided altogether. While Said explicitly embraces a concrete universalist humanism against the violent colonial history of Eurocentric, parochial humanism, Mignolo turns to the notion of pluriversality as an alternative to universality. However, I argue that this move disavows rather than avoids a universalizing gesture altogether. By getting out of the stalemate of picking a side for or against humanism, a path can be cleared for a critical reconfiguring of humanism and a productive reengagement with the question of the human.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"73 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83127345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Crossfire: postcolonial theory between Marxist and decolonial critiques","authors":"G. Colpani","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2030587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2030587","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article stages a confrontation between postcolonial theory and the decolonial option on the terrain of their respective engagements with Marxism. While prominent decolonial critics accuse postcolonial theory of relying too much on ‘Eurocentric’ theories, including Western Marxism, the article argues that this critique ignores what has been in fact a long-standing debate between postcolonial theory and its Marxist critics. Thus, the article questions this decolonial characterization and locates postcolonial theory itself in the crossfire of Marxist and decolonial critiques. First, it outlines the main objections that Marxist critics have formulated against postcolonial theory. Next, it discusses the decolonial critiques of postcolonial theory with an emphasis on the role played by Marxism in this confrontation. Finally, it proposes a ‘relinking’ between postcolonial theory and Marxism, understood not as a closure of the debate between these two theoretical formations but rather as an effort to hold that debate open. The article identifies the space of this open debate between postcolonial theory and its Marxist critics as a vantage point from which to articulate a critical response to the decolonial intervention.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"54 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86936160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Writing rights: suturing Spivak’s postcolonial and de Sousa Santos’ decolonial thought","authors":"S. de Jong","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2030596","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2030596","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Exchange between postcolonial and decolonial thought has been hampered by intellectual and political divisions despite a shared concern with decentring colonial hegemonies. Against the grain, this article brings the work of Boaventura de Sousa Santos into conversation with Gayatri C. Spivak’s, centring on one key converging issue of concern – human rights. I argue that both thinkers share what I call a ‘reluctant commitment’ to a human rights framework, while recognizing its tainted history and current instrumentalization for hegemonic imperial ends. I identify and weave together the strands that form the basis for their reluctant commitment, their critique of human rights, and their proposals for a reconfigured framework of human rights. The article maps how Spivak and de Sousa Santos aim to reconfigure a liberal human rights frame by suturing it to alternative ethical systems, including responsibility-based systems and other conceptions of dignity. It shows common patterns in their work, including their concern that binary global divisions undermine the supposed universality of the human rights framework and the risks of equating law with ethics. Tracing the deconstructive and reconstructive strategies at work in Spivak’s and de Sousa Santos’ writing helps to break down the walls between decolonial and postcolonial scholarship.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"89 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78249099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Decolonial anxieties in a postcolonial world: an interview with Achille Mbembe","authors":"Joseph Confavreux","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2050587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2050587","url":null,"abstract":"In his latest book, philosopher Achille Mbembe recasts the notion of ‘brutalism’ drawn from architecture in order to describe a contemporary situation in which humanity’s essence is transformed at the same time as its very existence is threatened. ‘Brutalism’s ultimate project is the transformation of humanity into matter and energy’, writes Mbembe in his latest book, entitled Brutalisme. His writing starts out ‘from racialized bodies’ – for which neoliberalism constitutes a ‘gigantic pumping and carbonization mechanism’. But it also seeks to bring both Western and non-Western epistemologies into play in order to release the energies and ideas that can help confront the contemporary feeling of vertigo. Indeed, under the effect of unprecedented technologies, separatist political projects and economic pressures straining bodies and deforming minds, humanity’s essence is being transformed at the same time as its very existence is threatened. In this interview, Mbembe also responds to the anxieties expressed in many a newspaper column over postcolonial and decolonial discourses, as well as the recent reconfigurations of identity politics.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"128 - 135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78552512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Academic colonialism and marginalization: on the contentious postcolonial–decolonial debate in Latin American Studies","authors":"O. Rosenthal","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2030576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2030576","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article offers an overview of key debates that conditioned the reception of postcolonial and subaltern studies among Latin Americanist scholars. It begins by analysing the initial Latin American postcolonial debate, and it assesses the claims of academic colonialism and marginalization that were voiced in the course of the polemic. In particular, it considers how these arguments worked to distance Latin America from the wider, emerging field of postcolonial studies by highlighting the supposed incommensurability of the region’s colonial experience, and it foregrounds important misapprehensions about subaltern studies that conditioned the development of the Latin American Subaltern Studies group. It further traces how these claims paved the way for the emergence of Latin American decolonial scholarship, and it foregrounds key unresolved tensions that have shaped its development. By providing a detailed account of this contentious intellectual history, this article seeks to interrogate the foundations of Latin American decoloniality, and to contribute to a critical reassessment of that project.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"75 1","pages":"17 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77374476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Postcolonial responses to decolonial interventions","authors":"G. Colpani, Jamila M. H. Mascat, K. Smiet","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2041695","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2041695","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the last decade, the terms ‘decolonial’ and ‘decoloniality’ have been deployed in an expansive manner and have gained increasing traction across many theoretical and political domains. Therefore, a critical assessment of the specific decolonial vocabulary is both timely and necessary. The relationship between the decolonial and the postcolonial especially requires more critical scrutiny than it has received so far. This special issue takes a step in this direction by staging critical dialogues between postcolonial and decolonial approaches on different terrains. While decolonial theory tends to operate as an expansive and centripetal force, pulling within its orbit a variety of other theoretical and political formation, our focus is on the original formulation of ‘decoloniality’ – or the ‘decolonial option’ – within the Modernity/Coloniality/Decoloniality (MCD) group. In this introduction, we outline some of the main objections that decolonial critics have formulated against postcolonial theory, and we argue that these critiques have been instrumental in defining the decolonial option itself. While advocates of decoloniality have been very vocal in their critiques of postcolonial theory, we note among postcolonial critics – with some exceptions – a predominant tendency either not to respond to these charges or to downplay them in favour of reconciliatory moves. As an alternative to this tendency, we stress the value of a postcolonial critical response to the decolonial intervention. We argue that postcolonial theories still have something to offer to a critique of the present and the past. In the face of the decolonial claim to have radicalized or surpassed postcolonial theory, we suggest that the postcolonial must speak back and reclaim the value of its critical apparatus in the context of the unfinished struggle for decolonizing knowledge and the social unconscious of postcoloniality.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"1 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85626044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Epistemic daring: an interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak","authors":"G. Spivak, G. Colpani, Jamila M. H. Mascat","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2030600","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2030600","url":null,"abstract":"Gianmaria Colpani (G.C.) and Jamila M.H. Mascat (J.M.): Let us start this conversa-tion from a rather conventional place: the matter of pre fi xes, which relates to substantial problematics of periodization and historiography. As we know, the ‘ post ’ in ‘ postcolonial ’ has long been debated, especially through the 1990s. 1 From those debates two key under-standings of the ‘ post ’ emerged. On the one hand, it has been argued that the postcolonial is also post-anticolonial, that is, postcolonial theory inherits a world radically trans-formed not only by the processes of decolonization but also by their limits and failures. On the other hand, the ‘ post ’ in ‘ postcolonial ’ is paradoxical as it registers both ruptures and continuities between the colonial past and the postcolonial present. There has not been an equivalent debate about the ‘ de ’ in ‘ decolonial ’ , so less e ff ort has been put into clarifying the periodizing and historiographical work performed by this di ff erent pre fi x. Could you situate yourself in this discussion and speak about the frictions you see between the two approaches?","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"136 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84383797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Postcolonial and decolonial subaltern feminisms","authors":"L. Ballestrin","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2030906","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2030906","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The encounter between postcolonialism and feminism, since the 1980s, has brought about important theoretical and political contributions to both fields, reverberating in the debate on gender to the present day. This article examines how the geopolitical division between North and South has influenced the global feminist debate, engendering a conflictual feminist discourse. This article intends to highlight the political dimension of conflict in those feminist representations brought forward by postcolonial and decolonial interventions, which denounce colonial dynamics inside the movement and question the scope of its representational capacity. I propose the term ‘subaltern feminisms’ to understand these internal dynamics, as put forward by Third World feminisms, in their postcolonial and decolonial diversity. I first explore the theoretical and political transformations that facilitated the encounter between postcolonialism and feminism. I go on to develop the concept of ‘subaltern feminisms’, proposing it as an analytical category that highlights the conflictual dimension within the global feminist agenda. I then argue that decolonial feminism assembles different Latin American subaltern feminisms by articulating and reinstating decolonization as a political project. Finally, I critically examines the concept of ‘coloniality of gender’ as a feminist contribution to the ‘decolonial turn’.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"61 1","pages":"108 - 127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87399076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Do African postcolonial theories need an epistemic decolonial turn?","authors":"Josias Tembo","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2030582","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2030582","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The growing influence of Latin American decolonial thought has animated several African scholars in Africa, especially South Africa. As a result of this influence, numerous articles have been published calling for the decolonization, through the decolonial turn, not only of university curricula but also of the processes of knowledge production. But there has been silence on the impact of decolonial theory on African postcolonial theory. With the decolonial call for the decolonization of postcolonial theory and its influence on African scholarship, what is the position of African postcolonial theory in these decolonial interventions? With a focus on African postcolonial theory, this article interrogates Ramón Grosfoguel’s call to decolonize postcolonial theory, thereby establishing a critical epistemological dialogue between decolonial theory and African postcolonial theory.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"35 - 53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87562857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reimagining the Plantation (ocene): Mulk Raj Anand’s Two Leaves and a Bud","authors":"Jill Didur","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2021.1996916","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2021.1996916","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article turns to Mulk Raj Anand’s Two Leaves and a Bud (1937) to better map the dynamics of the Plantation (ocene) within the history of the colonial tea industry in India. Drawing on the work of Sylvia Wynter, Katherine McKittrick, Kathryn Yusoff and Ian Baucom, I argue that Anand’s novel provides an ‘alterglobal’ inroad into the world of the tea plantation as a site where the ‘biocentric subject’ and the racialized Other are co-implicated in an ‘energy intensive’ context characteristic of the Anthropocene. The global demand for tea as a commodity is linked by the narrative to the local mesh of human and botanical transplantation, and the resulting transformation of environmental, political and cultural practices in the region. Through a polyvocal narrative approach, Anand's novel works to dismantle the discourse of social and environmental improvement that framed colonial management of the tea plantation and makes visible the ‘plot and plantation’ dynamic of the imperial tea industry and its correlative in the Indian novel in English. The turn to the plantation archive in postcolonial studies provides an opportunity to imagine more just ‘plantation futures’ in an era of environmental crisis shaped by the plantation’s political, economic, environmental and cultural aftermath.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"340 - 360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83125630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}