Postcolonial Studies最新文献_第6页

‘Re-Living the Early Days’: memory, childhood and self-indigenization, North Melbourne, 1934–1935 “重新生活的早期”:记忆，童年和自我本土化，北墨尔本，1934-1935

IF 1.3 3区社会学

Postcolonial Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-17 DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2022.2049466

Fiona Gatt, Catherine Gay

{"title":"‘Re-Living the Early Days’: memory, childhood and self-indigenization, North Melbourne, 1934–1935","authors":"Fiona Gatt, Catherine Gay","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2049466","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2049466","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 1934, during the centenary celebrations commemorating Melbourne’s European settlement, the Age newspaper published a short history of the inner suburb of North Melbourne. By this time only people who had been children in the early years of the suburb were left to reminisce and they did so with great enthusiasm, writing a string of over 80 letters to the editor in response to the article. The analysis of the letters in this co-authored paper, pairing the insights of local history and childhood studies, appreciably illuminates the urban settler-colonial identity that developed in Hotham/North Melbourne. This paper uses the lens of memory to show how childhood recollections were mobilized by the letter writers to naturalize and normalize settler presence. Several themes in the letters evidence this narrative: conquering the space through play; local personalities positioned in the settler space; pride in key colonial moments; positioning First Nations people as wandering fringe-dwellers; and claims of colonial childhood as ‘original’ or ‘native’ to the area. We identify a gendered nature to these reminiscences. Significantly, we argue that the adult employment of childhood memories is a particularly powerful mode of erasure and self-indigenization.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"202 - 220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87111556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Beyond belief: secularism, religion and our muddled modernity 超越信仰:世俗主义、宗教和我们混乱的现代性

IF 1.3 3区社会学

Postcolonial Studies Pub Date : 2022-02-10 DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2022.2035924

S. Seth

引用次数: 0

Rethinking or delinking? Said and Mignolo on humanism and the question of the human 反思还是断绝联系?赛义德和米尼奥洛关于人文主义和人的问题

IF 1.3 3区社会学

Postcolonial Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2022.2030595

K. Smiet

{"title":"Rethinking or delinking? Said and Mignolo on humanism and the question of the human","authors":"K. Smiet","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2030595","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2030595","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the commonalities and divergences between postcolonial and decolonial approaches to humanism and the question of the human, by way of an examination of the work of postcolonial scholar Edward W. Said and decolonial scholar Walter D. Mignolo. While at first glance, their stances may seem diametrically opposed, as the former is a staunch defender of humanism while the latter is a vocal critic, a closer examination reveals a more complex picture. The problem of universalism is key to understanding the difference: while the exclusionary and parochial universalism of Eurocentric colonial humanism is critiqued by both, the question that divides them is whether a universalizing gesture inherent in ‘speaking for the human’ can and should be avoided altogether. While Said explicitly embraces a concrete universalist humanism against the violent colonial history of Eurocentric, parochial humanism, Mignolo turns to the notion of pluriversality as an alternative to universality. However, I argue that this move disavows rather than avoids a universalizing gesture altogether. By getting out of the stalemate of picking a side for or against humanism, a path can be cleared for a critical reconfiguring of humanism and a productive reengagement with the question of the human.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"73 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83127345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Crossfire: postcolonial theory between Marxist and decolonial critiques 交火:马克思主义和非殖民主义批判之间的后殖民理论

IF 1.3 3区社会学

Postcolonial Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2022.2030587

G. Colpani

{"title":"Crossfire: postcolonial theory between Marxist and decolonial critiques","authors":"G. Colpani","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2030587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2030587","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article stages a confrontation between postcolonial theory and the decolonial option on the terrain of their respective engagements with Marxism. While prominent decolonial critics accuse postcolonial theory of relying too much on ‘Eurocentric’ theories, including Western Marxism, the article argues that this critique ignores what has been in fact a long-standing debate between postcolonial theory and its Marxist critics. Thus, the article questions this decolonial characterization and locates postcolonial theory itself in the crossfire of Marxist and decolonial critiques. First, it outlines the main objections that Marxist critics have formulated against postcolonial theory. Next, it discusses the decolonial critiques of postcolonial theory with an emphasis on the role played by Marxism in this confrontation. Finally, it proposes a ‘relinking’ between postcolonial theory and Marxism, understood not as a closure of the debate between these two theoretical formations but rather as an effort to hold that debate open. The article identifies the space of this open debate between postcolonial theory and its Marxist critics as a vantage point from which to articulate a critical response to the decolonial intervention.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"54 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86936160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Decolonial anxieties in a postcolonial world: an interview with Achille Mbembe 后殖民世界中的非殖民焦虑:阿基利·姆本贝访谈

IF 1.3 3区社会学

Postcolonial Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2022.2050587

Joseph Confavreux

{"title":"Decolonial anxieties in a postcolonial world: an interview with Achille Mbembe","authors":"Joseph Confavreux","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2050587","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2050587","url":null,"abstract":"In his latest book, philosopher Achille Mbembe recasts the notion of ‘brutalism’ drawn from architecture in order to describe a contemporary situation in which humanity’s essence is transformed at the same time as its very existence is threatened. ‘Brutalism’s ultimate project is the transformation of humanity into matter and energy’, writes Mbembe in his latest book, entitled Brutalisme. His writing starts out ‘from racialized bodies’ – for which neoliberalism constitutes a ‘gigantic pumping and carbonization mechanism’. But it also seeks to bring both Western and non-Western epistemologies into play in order to release the energies and ideas that can help confront the contemporary feeling of vertigo. Indeed, under the effect of unprecedented technologies, separatist political projects and economic pressures straining bodies and deforming minds, humanity’s essence is being transformed at the same time as its very existence is threatened. In this interview, Mbembe also responds to the anxieties expressed in many a newspaper column over postcolonial and decolonial discourses, as well as the recent reconfigurations of identity politics.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"128 - 135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78552512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Writing rights: suturing Spivak’s postcolonial and de Sousa Santos’ decolonial thought 写作权利:缝合斯皮瓦克的后殖民与德索萨·桑托斯的非殖民思想

IF 1.3 3区社会学

Postcolonial Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2022.2030596

S. de Jong

{"title":"Writing rights: suturing Spivak’s postcolonial and de Sousa Santos’ decolonial thought","authors":"S. de Jong","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2030596","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2030596","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Exchange between postcolonial and decolonial thought has been hampered by intellectual and political divisions despite a shared concern with decentring colonial hegemonies. Against the grain, this article brings the work of Boaventura de Sousa Santos into conversation with Gayatri C. Spivak’s, centring on one key converging issue of concern – human rights. I argue that both thinkers share what I call a ‘reluctant commitment’ to a human rights framework, while recognizing its tainted history and current instrumentalization for hegemonic imperial ends. I identify and weave together the strands that form the basis for their reluctant commitment, their critique of human rights, and their proposals for a reconfigured framework of human rights. The article maps how Spivak and de Sousa Santos aim to reconfigure a liberal human rights frame by suturing it to alternative ethical systems, including responsibility-based systems and other conceptions of dignity. It shows common patterns in their work, including their concern that binary global divisions undermine the supposed universality of the human rights framework and the risks of equating law with ethics. Tracing the deconstructive and reconstructive strategies at work in Spivak’s and de Sousa Santos’ writing helps to break down the walls between decolonial and postcolonial scholarship.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"89 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78249099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Postcolonial responses to decolonial interventions 对非殖民干预的后殖民反应

IF 1.3 3区社会学

Postcolonial Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2022.2041695

G. Colpani, Jamila M. H. Mascat, K. Smiet

{"title":"Postcolonial responses to decolonial interventions","authors":"G. Colpani, Jamila M. H. Mascat, K. Smiet","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2041695","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2041695","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the last decade, the terms ‘decolonial’ and ‘decoloniality’ have been deployed in an expansive manner and have gained increasing traction across many theoretical and political domains. Therefore, a critical assessment of the specific decolonial vocabulary is both timely and necessary. The relationship between the decolonial and the postcolonial especially requires more critical scrutiny than it has received so far. This special issue takes a step in this direction by staging critical dialogues between postcolonial and decolonial approaches on different terrains. While decolonial theory tends to operate as an expansive and centripetal force, pulling within its orbit a variety of other theoretical and political formation, our focus is on the original formulation of ‘decoloniality’ – or the ‘decolonial option’ – within the Modernity/Coloniality/Decoloniality (MCD) group. In this introduction, we outline some of the main objections that decolonial critics have formulated against postcolonial theory, and we argue that these critiques have been instrumental in defining the decolonial option itself. While advocates of decoloniality have been very vocal in their critiques of postcolonial theory, we note among postcolonial critics – with some exceptions – a predominant tendency either not to respond to these charges or to downplay them in favour of reconciliatory moves. As an alternative to this tendency, we stress the value of a postcolonial critical response to the decolonial intervention. We argue that postcolonial theories still have something to offer to a critique of the present and the past. In the face of the decolonial claim to have radicalized or surpassed postcolonial theory, we suggest that the postcolonial must speak back and reclaim the value of its critical apparatus in the context of the unfinished struggle for decolonizing knowledge and the social unconscious of postcoloniality.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"48 1","pages":"1 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85626044","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Academic colonialism and marginalization: on the contentious postcolonial–decolonial debate in Latin American Studies 学术殖民主义和边缘化:关于拉丁美洲研究中有争议的后殖民-非殖民辩论

IF 1.3 3区社会学

Postcolonial Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2022.2030576

O. Rosenthal

引用次数: 1

Epistemic daring: an interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak 认识论上的大胆:采访Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak

IF 1.3 3区社会学

Postcolonial Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2022.2030600

G. Spivak, G. Colpani, Jamila M. H. Mascat

引用次数: 2

Postcolonial and decolonial subaltern feminisms 后殖民和去殖民的次等女性主义

IF 1.3 3区社会学

Postcolonial Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/13688790.2022.2030906

L. Ballestrin

{"title":"Postcolonial and decolonial subaltern feminisms","authors":"L. Ballestrin","doi":"10.1080/13688790.2022.2030906","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2022.2030906","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The encounter between postcolonialism and feminism, since the 1980s, has brought about important theoretical and political contributions to both fields, reverberating in the debate on gender to the present day. This article examines how the geopolitical division between North and South has influenced the global feminist debate, engendering a conflictual feminist discourse. This article intends to highlight the political dimension of conflict in those feminist representations brought forward by postcolonial and decolonial interventions, which denounce colonial dynamics inside the movement and question the scope of its representational capacity. I propose the term ‘subaltern feminisms’ to understand these internal dynamics, as put forward by Third World feminisms, in their postcolonial and decolonial diversity. I first explore the theoretical and political transformations that facilitated the encounter between postcolonialism and feminism. I go on to develop the concept of ‘subaltern feminisms’, proposing it as an analytical category that highlights the conflictual dimension within the global feminist agenda. I then argue that decolonial feminism assembles different Latin American subaltern feminisms by articulating and reinstating decolonization as a political project. Finally, I critically examines the concept of ‘coloniality of gender’ as a feminist contribution to the ‘decolonial turn’.","PeriodicalId":46334,"journal":{"name":"Postcolonial Studies","volume":"61 1","pages":"108 - 127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87399076","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3