AmbioPub Date : 2026-09-02DOI: 10.1007/s13280-026-02471-2
Kelley E Langhans, Ashley A Dayer, Caren Cooper, Alia M Dietsch, Richard J Hall, Dana M Hawley, Wesley M Hochachka, Becki Lawson, Freya McGregor, Tina B Phillips, Tammah Watts
{"title":"\"It's a good reason to get up every morning!\": Perspectives on how feeding and observing birds affects people's wellbeing.","authors":"Kelley E Langhans, Ashley A Dayer, Caren Cooper, Alia M Dietsch, Richard J Hall, Dana M Hawley, Wesley M Hochachka, Becki Lawson, Freya McGregor, Tina B Phillips, Tammah Watts","doi":"10.1007/s13280-026-02471-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02471-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In light of growing mental health challenges globally, understanding the positive impacts of nature on mental wellbeing is more important than ever. However, the impacts of one of the most common intentional human-wildlife interactions, feeding wild birds, are not well understood. We surveyed 3658 participatory scientists in the USA and Canada who take part in Project FeederWatch to examine associations between wellbeing and bird feeding. Quantitative data showed that most respondents thought feeding and observing birds had a positive impact on their wellbeing over six months of participation, even when other events in their lives did not. Qualitative data revealed that feeding and observing birds positively impacted respondent wellbeing through their emotions, engagement with the activity, and creating a sense of meaning. These findings suggest linkages between bird feeding and positive mental health, while underscoring a need for further research on the mechanisms through which these linkages operate.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148879003","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AmbioPub Date : 2026-08-29DOI: 10.1007/s13280-026-02475-y
Scott A Parsons
{"title":"Ecological traps as a failure mode of niche construction: A diagnostic for the polycrisis.","authors":"Scott A Parsons","doi":"10.1007/s13280-026-02475-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02475-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrating ecological trap theory and niche construction reveals a specific and underexamined category: self-induced traps, in which an organism's own construction decouples the cues guiding its choices from outcomes. Self-induced traps are expected to be rare because selection eliminates construction when costs rebound on the constructor. Traps persist when costs escape this correction, being delayed in time, displaced onto others or other geographies, or hidden below thresholds. Humans are distinctive because our construction extends to the information environment: We build not only the material conditions that degrade outcomes but also the signal environment through which those outcomes would need to be detected. This creates a stacked trap in which proxy rewards reinforce engagement while viability feedback is blocked. Applied to the Anthropocene traps that define the polycrisis, the framework supplies the perceptual mechanism sustaining lock-in and frames solutions towards repairing cue-outcome relationships at the environmental level.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148856791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AmbioPub Date : 2026-08-29DOI: 10.1007/s13280-026-02464-1
Alice Stuart, Sophus O S E Zu Ermgassen
{"title":"Generating a national snapshot of all publicly reported investments in ecosystem and species conservation across public, private, and philanthropic finance.","authors":"Alice Stuart, Sophus O S E Zu Ermgassen","doi":"10.1007/s13280-026-02464-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02464-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scaling up investment in ecosystems is a national and international public policy priority. Evaluations of the total amount spent have been severely criticised, with a lack of transparent reporting, especially of private finance flows, a known limitation. We provide a country-wide snapshot of investment in nature in the UK based on publicly available data, estimating total annual nature finance flows in the UK of ~£1.15bn. Public investment in agri-environment (£389.1m) and grant schemes (£314.8m) accounted for over 60% of identified flows. Private financial flows (£142.4m) consisted of corporate philanthropy (£71.5m), return-seeking investment and loans (£50.7m), and credit and unit purchases (£20.2m). Estimated flows from NGOs and philanthropic grants totalled £388.5m. Interactions between flows mean double counting must be considered when summing. We find major public transparency gaps in nature finance flows, undermining efforts to understand the both the extent of nature finance flows and their effectiveness for nature recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148856819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AmbioPub Date : 2026-08-28DOI: 10.1007/s13280-026-02460-5
Seema Arora-Jonsson
{"title":"The everyday forests we don't see in official reports: A conceptual shift for socially just forestry.","authors":"Seema Arora-Jonsson","doi":"10.1007/s13280-026-02460-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02460-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Forestry is commonly framed through biophysical metrics - canopy cover, timber yields, carbon stocks - defined by global standards that travel into national policies. These definitions frequently displace the lived landscapes in which forests are sustained. This perspective article argues for a conceptual shift: recognizing the everyday work of care and organizing - often unpaid, often feminized, that bring into being and sustain forest landscapes - as central to forest governance. Drawing on research across the Global South and North, I show how technocratic forest definitions and program architectures overlook social reproduction, spiritual values, and affective ties, thereby fueling conflict, eroding legitimacy, and weakening outcomes. I propose an agenda for just forestry that (i) values care work in forests and communities, (ii) recognizes informal organizing in decision-making, (iii) embraces plural values associated with forestry, and (iv) adopts a systemic lens that entails coordination with sectors beyond forestry as well as across scales, from local governance to international climate programs. Reframing forests as lived landscapes - entangled with everyday practices, identities, and relationships - does more than correct blind spots - it offers practical pathways for durable stewardship under climate and biodiversity crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148849636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AmbioPub Date : 2026-08-25DOI: 10.1007/s13280-026-02467-y
Michelle Cleary, Mateusz Liziniewicz
{"title":"\"Rädda Asken\": A scientific perspective on Sweden's efforts to conserve Ash Fraxinus excelsior since 2013.","authors":"Michelle Cleary, Mateusz Liziniewicz","doi":"10.1007/s13280-026-02467-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02467-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since ash dieback was reported in Sweden in 2001, the invasive fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus has caused mortality of Fraxinus excelsior, threatening biodiversity, ecosystem functions, landscapes, and hundreds of associated species. This perspective reviews more than a decade of conservation efforts led by Rädda Asken (\"Save the Ash\"), a citizen science initiative launched in 2013 without dedicated state funding. Public engagement identified nearly 1300 putatively resistant trees, enabled clonal propagation, and established conservation and breeding infrastructure. Research showing that resistance is heritable supports breeding and restoration. However, fragmented financing and limited national coordination have restricted progress. Key uncertainties concern the durability of resistance, maintenance of genetic diversity, secondary pathogens, and the threat of Agrilus planipennis. Sweden's experience demonstrates both the value and limitations of grassroots conservation efforts. Future recovery of ash and its associated biodiversity will require sustained investment in breeding and research, in addition to a coordinated, long-term restoration programme that supports implementation, monitoring and adaptive management.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148817034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AmbioPub Date : 2026-08-22DOI: 10.1007/s13280-026-02469-w
Alanna Marsh, Carly N Cook
{"title":"Conservation beyond protected areas: Understanding stakeholder perspectives on other effective area-based conservation measures.","authors":"Alanna Marsh, Carly N Cook","doi":"10.1007/s13280-026-02469-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02469-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) serve as an important tool to recognise diverse areas for their contributions to conservation, yet implementation remains slow. A key barrier to implementation is the lack of engagement with stakeholders who manage these areas and thus uncertainty about how best to secure their participation. We interviewed stakeholders representing different land uses that could be candidate OECMs in Australia, to capture their perspectives on OECMs and the factors that may motivate or deter their engagement. Stakeholder responses revealed an openness to and interest in OECMs, although many questions that are critical to their participation were raised. Concerns around long-term obligations and conflict between different management objectives were recurrent limitations to engagement. The opportunity for wider recognition of conservation efforts and increased social licence were key motivating factors. Important differences between stakeholder groups indicate that tailored strategies may improve engagement, which is a critical step in progressing OECMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148786841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AmbioPub Date : 2026-08-20DOI: 10.1007/s13280-026-02465-0
Janeide de Assis Guilherme Padilha, Phillip J Haubrock, Teun Everts, Tomáš Martinovič, Ronaldo Sousa
{"title":"Real-time tracking must be at the core of sustainable development goals.","authors":"Janeide de Assis Guilherme Padilha, Phillip J Haubrock, Teun Everts, Tomáš Martinovič, Ronaldo Sousa","doi":"10.1007/s13280-026-02465-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02465-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How close are we to achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs)? No one really knows. As the world enters the countdown to 2030, uncertainty remains. Progress remains fragmented, hindered by data gaps, opaque governance, and politicization that limits scientific communication and real-time policy adaptation. Limitations reveal the need to rethink how sustainability is measured, reported, and governed. Using the SDGs, we argue that monitoring systems fail to capture real-time dynamics, leaving humanity rudderless amid sustainability crises. In an era of big data, future sustainability agendas must evolve into adaptive, data-integrated frameworks capable of continuous feedback and adjustment. However, weaknesses in progress measurement and reporting are not only technical. They also reflect data politics, because decisions over which indicators count, who produces them, how they are validated, and whose infrastructures and funding sustain them are shaped by power relations that may influence what becomes visible and what remains unmeasured.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148786591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AmbioPub Date : 2026-08-20DOI: 10.1007/s13280-026-02455-2
Rafael Villafuerte-Jordán, Miguel Delibes-Mateos, Jenny Anne Glikman, Camilla Sandström, Fredrik Widemo, María Martínez-Jauregui
{"title":"Attitudes toward reactive and proactive wildlife management across Europe.","authors":"Rafael Villafuerte-Jordán, Miguel Delibes-Mateos, Jenny Anne Glikman, Camilla Sandström, Fredrik Widemo, María Martínez-Jauregui","doi":"10.1007/s13280-026-02455-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02455-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human-wildlife interactions present both challenges and opportunities across Europe. Managing these interactions often requires decisions that fall between reactive (taking action after a problem arises) and proactive (anticipating and preventing negative impacts) management. This study examines factors influencing public attitudes toward proactive and reactive wildlife management in six European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom), based on an online survey of 2400 participants. We relied on the cognitive hierarchy framework to explain relationships between management attitudes and factors such as wildlife value orientations, risk perceptions, and perceptions of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Attitudes toward wildlife management were generally shaped by value orientations and risk perception. Mutualism was associated with support for proactive wildlife and human protection, whereas domination was associated with reactive and proactive management aimed at protecting human interests. Higher perceived risk further increased support for proactive management strategies. These results provide practical insights into how public attitudes relate to wildlife management.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148786866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AmbioPub Date : 2026-08-20DOI: 10.1007/s13280-026-02463-2
Michelle Anagnostou, Annette Hübschle, Brent Doberstein, Amy Hinsley, Inés Arroyo-Quiroz, Craig Spencer, Peter Stoett, Rebecca W Y Wong
{"title":"Expert perceptions on women's involvement in illegal wildlife trade networks.","authors":"Michelle Anagnostou, Annette Hübschle, Brent Doberstein, Amy Hinsley, Inés Arroyo-Quiroz, Craig Spencer, Peter Stoett, Rebecca W Y Wong","doi":"10.1007/s13280-026-02463-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02463-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Illegal wildlife trade is often male dominated at harvest, yet women's roles across supply chains are under-examined. This study adds substantially to this growing body of knowledge drawing on 112 semi-structured interviews with law enforcement and illegal wildlife trade experts in South Africa, Hong Kong, and Canada. We show women participate in finance and money laundering, brokerage, logistics, retail, online marketing, and couriering, with occasional leadership. Women are also strategically used to shield men. Drawing on conservation and feminist criminology-specifically women's liberation and strain/marginalization perspectives-alongside an intersectional framework, we interpret role differentiation across contexts. While perceptions-based data and male-dominated enforcement may bias visibility, patterns are consistent. We recommend gender-competent, intersectional counter-illegal wildlife trade strategies and better gender-disaggregated data.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148786199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AmbioPub Date : 2026-08-20DOI: 10.1007/s13280-026-02468-x
Annet Kempenaar, Margo van den Brink, Ir Terry van Dijk, Naim Laeni
{"title":"Setting the scene for bridging differences by design: Environmental, organizational, and program conditions for boundary spanning in climate adaptation planning.","authors":"Annet Kempenaar, Margo van den Brink, Ir Terry van Dijk, Naim Laeni","doi":"10.1007/s13280-026-02468-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02468-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Collaboration and spanning boundaries across parties is needed in climate adaptation planning to combat the impacts of climate change. Spatial designers are amongst the professionals that take up boundary spanning activities in these kinds of complex planning contexts. However, boundary spanning work and opportunities are conditioned by many external factors. Building on existing insights in boundary spanning literature, this study investigated the environmental, organizational and program-related conditions for boundary spanning by spatial designers in two climate adaptation planning programs: Sigmaplan in Belgium and Rebuild by Design in New York/New Jersey (USA). A devastating climate event, a dominant or changing policy paradigm, and the physical and institutional setting emerged as influential environmental conditions for boundary spanning in climate adaptation programs. Boundary spanning by spatial designers was strongly determined by the structure and design of the program, and by the role and the position of the designers within the program.</p>","PeriodicalId":461,"journal":{"name":"Ambio","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148786627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}