发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Review 审查
IF 0.4 4区 哲学
PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0198
Slater
{"title":"Review","authors":"Slater","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0198","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70877459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review 审查
IF 0.4 4区 哲学
PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.54.1.0081
Martel
{"title":"Review","authors":"Martel","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.54.1.0081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.54.1.0081","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70877070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review 审查
IF 0.4 4区 哲学
PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0192
Mckinnon
{"title":"Review","authors":"Mckinnon","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.54.2.0192","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70877410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The New Rhetoric Project Laughs: Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, Dissociation, and the Comic 新的修辞计划笑了：Lucie Olbrechts Tyteca，分离，和漫画
IF 0.4 4区 哲学
PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2020-11-12 DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0450
Amy K. Anderson
{"title":"The New Rhetoric Project Laughs: Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca, Dissociation, and the Comic","authors":"Amy K. Anderson","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0450","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0450","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s 1974 chapter on dissociation in the comic furthers our understanding of the rhetorical possibilities of dissociation, revealing how the concept can dismantle old worldviews and create new ones through laughter. Thanks to issues with translation and the chapter’s obscure examples, however, this text has been largely overlooked by scholars. This article grounds the chapter’s theories in examples with more contemporary resonance as a necessary first step toward understanding the full scope of Olbrechts-Tyteca’s contributions to the concept of dissociation. Considering Olbrechts-Tyteca’s chapter in light of other texts from the New Rhetoric Project also calls attention to the ways that translation practices have shaped scholars’ reception and use of the Project’s concepts.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42754361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
From Association to Dissociation: The NRP’s translatio of Gourmont 从联想到分离：NRP对Gourmont的翻译
IF 0.4 4区 哲学
PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2020-11-12 DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0400
Michelle Bolduc
{"title":"From Association to Dissociation: The NRP’s translatio of Gourmont","authors":"Michelle Bolduc","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0400","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0400","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This study explores the influence of the French Symbolist poet, novelist, and literary critic Remy de Gourmont on Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s conception of dissociation. It proposes translatio—the medieval trope describing a transfer of ideas—as a lens through which to read the significance of Gourmont’s thought on the New Rhetoric Project (NRP). Thus forgoing more traditional comparative approaches such as intertextuality, this study argues that translatio serves here as a particularly valuable conceptual tool: it unveils the evolution of Perelman’s thought over time, and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s significant contribution to it; it also provides a clearer understanding of the relationship between association (in the guise of analogy) and dissociation in the NRP than what is generally understood by scholars of the Traité. More importantly, translatio unveils the features that make their conception of dissociation one of the truly innovative aspects of the NRP.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46658024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Origins of and Possible Futures for Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s Dissociation of Concepts Chaïm Perelman和Lucie olbrecht - tyteca的概念分离的起源和可能的未来
IF 0.4 4区 哲学
PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2020-11-12 DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0385
David A. Frank
{"title":"The Origins of and Possible Futures for Chaïm Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca’s Dissociation of Concepts","authors":"David A. Frank","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0385","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0385","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This essay tells the story of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s “dissociation of concepts,” which they introduced in 1958 and is in use as a tool of criticism by many rhetorical critics. The story begins in England with John Locke’s development of associative reasoning in 1770 and then moves to France, with Remy de Gourmont extending associative reasoning with the concept of dissociation in 1899. Gourmont’s dissociation crosses the Atlantic and is then developed by Kenneth Burke in 1931. In turn, Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca absorbed and expanded Locke, Gourmont, and Burke’s theories of association and dissociation in 1958. They crafted a tool, the dissociation of concepts, that equips rhetorical reasoning with the capacity to navigate between the promise and perils of fission and fusion. Since 1958, many scholars have made productive use of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s innovation. The essay concludes with some possible futures for their dissociation of concepts.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41776207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Theory of Fan-Type Dissociation 扇形离解理论
IF 0.4 4区 哲学
PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2020-11-12 DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0433
M. Camper
{"title":"A Theory of Fan-Type Dissociation","authors":"M. Camper","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0433","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:One of the most important developments in twentieth-century rhetorical theory is Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s insight that concepts, when under strain, can be split or dissociated into two separate terms. Not a simple binary, these terms remain interconnected in a value hierarchy with one term serving as the normative frame for the other. Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca theorize that either term can be dissociated further, producing a fan-type dissociation. Unlike ordinary dissociations, fan-types place three or more terms in hierarchical relationship, resulting in unique rhetorical features. Fanning a dissociation can serve three basic rhetorical functions: purging undesirable elements, preserving less undesirable elements from total devaluation, and purifying desirable elements. Building on these basic functions, rhetors can perform complex rhetorical actions, from intensifying a dissociation’s values to completely undoing a dissociation. Long ignored by theorists and critics, fan-types complicate our understanding of dissociation, argumentation, and value-based reasoning, and therefore deserve more scholarly attention.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43041890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Developments in Dissociation: Past Contexts, Present Applications, Future Implications 解离的发展：过去的语境、现在的应用、未来的启示
IF 0.4 4区 哲学
PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2020-11-12 DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0377
Amy K. Anderson, M. Camper
{"title":"Developments in Dissociation: Past Contexts, Present Applications, Future Implications","authors":"Amy K. Anderson, M. Camper","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0377","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0377","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Dissociation is considered by many to be Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s most innovative and significant contribution to rhetorical theory. Currently on display in American debates over racial justice and public health, dissociation is a nuanced process of conceptual reconfiguration. After exploring how dissociation figures in these debates, the introduction summarizes how scholars over the years have extended and complicated the concept. The introduction then identifies key gaps in scholarship that are addressed by the articles included in this special section, including dissociation’s philosophical genesis, its linguistic manifestations, its structural possibilities, and its role in comedic discourse.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45769779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Verbal Signatures of Dissociation: Epitomizing and Limiting Cases 分离的言语特征：外延化和限制性案例
IF 0.4 4区 哲学
PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2020-11-12 DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0417
J. Fahnestock
{"title":"Verbal Signatures of Dissociation: Epitomizing and Limiting Cases","authors":"J. Fahnestock","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0417","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0417","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The sections devoted to dissociation in The New Rhetoric identify many verbal forms that can express this reconceptualizing line of argument. This article reviews the linguistic options offered in English for epitomizing dissociations, including tautologies and constructions that prompt diverging meanings, orthographical devices like capitalization or subscripts that produce variants of a single word, word schemes like agnominatio and polyptoton that alter core forms, and affixes or modifiers that are either available as antonyms or require forcing apart by subsequent antitheses. Paying attention to the verbal expression of dissociations highlights cases that may or may not qualify as the rich reconceptualizations Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca had in mind. Arguments that involve three distinguished terms may, for example, reach a limit where dissociations merge into arguments from division, a long recognized device in traditional rhetoric/dialectic.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49605980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rhetoric by Accident 偶然的修辞
IF 0.4 4区 哲学
PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2020-11-12 DOI: 10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0353
Nathan Stormer
{"title":"Rhetoric by Accident","authors":"Nathan Stormer","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0353","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This essay presents a concept of rhetoric by accident, which understands accidents in regard to the materiality of affection (i.e., the condition of being affected) and in regard to the unconditioned rhetoricity of affectability. The concept of accidental rhetoric put forth depends on the ontological condition of openness, so first affect is stipulated in relation to the porousness of material life to explain the inevitability of affection and provide the basis for understanding rhetoric by accident. Then the accident is defined in alignment with material openness. Rather than consider accidents in terms of human control over contingencies, accidents are defined by the contingency of purposiveness to affection. That affect occurs without purpose means that beings experience rhetoric without a plan (i.e., by accident). The essay then considers how rhetoric by accident is part of any particular rhetoric’s existence, namely as a horizon of evolution and diversification for rhetoric.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46794276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信