解离的发展：过去的语境、现在的应用、未来的启示

IF 0.3 4区哲学 0 LITERATURE

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Pub Date : 2020-11-12 DOI:10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0377

Amy K. Anderson, M. Camper

{"title":"解离的发展：过去的语境、现在的应用、未来的启示","authors":"Amy K. Anderson, M. Camper","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Dissociation is considered by many to be Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s most innovative and significant contribution to rhetorical theory. Currently on display in American debates over racial justice and public health, dissociation is a nuanced process of conceptual reconfiguration. After exploring how dissociation figures in these debates, the introduction summarizes how scholars over the years have extended and complicated the concept. The introduction then identifies key gaps in scholarship that are addressed by the articles included in this special section, including dissociation’s philosophical genesis, its linguistic manifestations, its structural possibilities, and its role in comedic discourse.","PeriodicalId":46176,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developments in Dissociation: Past Contexts, Present Applications, Future Implications\",\"authors\":\"Amy K. Anderson, M. Camper\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:Dissociation is considered by many to be Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s most innovative and significant contribution to rhetorical theory. Currently on display in American debates over racial justice and public health, dissociation is a nuanced process of conceptual reconfiguration. After exploring how dissociation figures in these debates, the introduction summarizes how scholars over the years have extended and complicated the concept. The introduction then identifies key gaps in scholarship that are addressed by the articles included in this special section, including dissociation’s philosophical genesis, its linguistic manifestations, its structural possibilities, and its role in comedic discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0377\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.53.4.0377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要：分离被许多人认为是Perelman和Olbrechts-Tyteca对修辞学理论最具创新性和最重要的贡献。目前，在美国关于种族正义和公共卫生的辩论中，分离是一个微妙的概念重组过程。在探究了分离在这些争论中的作用之后，引言总结了多年来学者们是如何扩展和复杂化这一概念的。然后，引言确定了本特别部分中的文章所涉及的学术领域的关键差距，包括分离的哲学起源、语言表现、结构可能性及其在喜剧话语中的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Developments in Dissociation: Past Contexts, Present Applications, Future Implications

abstract:Dissociation is considered by many to be Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s most innovative and significant contribution to rhetorical theory. Currently on display in American debates over racial justice and public health, dissociation is a nuanced process of conceptual reconfiguration. After exploring how dissociation figures in these debates, the introduction summarizes how scholars over the years have extended and complicated the concept. The introduction then identifies key gaps in scholarship that are addressed by the articles included in this special section, including dissociation’s philosophical genesis, its linguistic manifestations, its structural possibilities, and its role in comedic discourse.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC Multiple-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy and Rhetoric is dedicated to publication of high-quality articles involving the relationship between philosophy and rhetoric. It has a longstanding commitment to interdisciplinary scholarship and welcomes all theoretical and methodological perspectives that advance the journal"s mission. Philosophy and Rhetoric invites articles on such topics as the relationship between logic and rhetoric, the philosophical aspects of argumentation, philosophical views on the nature of rhetoric held by historical figures and during historical periods, psychological and sociological studies of rhetoric with a strong philosophical emphasis, and philosophical analyses of the relationship to rhetoric of other areas of human culture and thought, political theory and law.