British Politics最新文献_第5页

Too left-wing or not populist enough? Using Laclau and Mouffe to rethink Corbynism and future left strategy in the UK 太左翼还是不够民粹?用拉克劳和墨菲来重新思考科尔宾主义和英国未来的左翼战略

IF 1.1 3区社会学

British Politics Pub Date : 2022-07-16 DOI: 10.1057/s41293-022-00212-z

Clare Woodford

引用次数: 0

The Johnson factor: British national identity and Boris Johnson 约翰逊因素：英国民族认同与鲍里斯·约翰逊

IF 1.1 3区社会学

British Politics Pub Date : 2022-06-16 DOI: 10.1057/s41293-022-00211-0

Victoria Honeyman

引用次数: 3

Negotiating secession: Brexit lessons for Scottish independence 谈判分离：英国脱欧给苏格兰独立带来的教训

IF 1.1 3区社会学

British Politics Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI: 10.1057/s41293-022-00210-1

Benjamin Martill

引用次数: 1

Power-sharing and memory-sharing in Northern Ireland: a case study of Healing Through Remembering during consociational volatility 北爱尔兰的权力分享和记忆共享:在联合波动期间通过记忆治疗的案例研究

IF 1.1 3区社会学

British Politics Pub Date : 2022-05-25 DOI: 10.1057/s41293-022-00209-8

C. K. M. Chung

引用次数: 0

The 2016 UK referendum on EU membership and the importance of remaining on point during the campaign 2016年英国脱欧公投，以及在竞选期间保持立场的重要性

IF 1.1 3区社会学

British Politics Pub Date : 2022-03-24 DOI: 10.1057/s41293-022-00207-w

P. Copeland

引用次数: 0

Territorial variation in territorial representation: the local base of Westminster MPs 领土代表性的领土差异：威斯敏斯特议员的地方基础

IF 1.1 3区社会学

British Politics Pub Date : 2022-03-21 DOI: 10.1057/s41293-022-00205-y

K. Stolz, Eric Linhart

引用次数: 0

Britain, Britishness, and exceptionalism within the rhetoric of David Cameron 英国，英国性，以及戴维·卡梅伦的言论中的例外主义

IF 1.1 3区社会学

British Politics Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1057/s41293-022-00203-0

Mike Bolt

引用次数: 0

Dimitri Batrouni: ‘The Battle of Ideas in the Labour Party: from Attlee to Corbyn and Brexit’ Dimitri batroni:《工党内部的思想之战:从艾德礼到科尔宾和英国脱欧》

IF 1.1 3区社会学

British Politics Pub Date : 2022-01-11 DOI: 10.1057/s41293-021-00201-8

B. Ward

引用次数: 0

Understanding drivers of support for English city-region devolution: a case study of the Liverpool City Region. 理解支持英国城市地区权力下放的驱动因素:以利物浦城市地区为例

IF 1.1 3区社会学

British Politics Pub Date : 2022-01-11 DOI: 10.1057/s41293-021-00199-z

David Jeffery

{"title":"Understanding drivers of support for English city-region devolution: a case study of the Liverpool City Region.","authors":"David Jeffery","doi":"10.1057/s41293-021-00199-z","DOIUrl":"10.1057/s41293-021-00199-z","url":null,"abstract":"Metro mayors heading a combined authority represent the most recent innovation in English devolution. City-region devolution has been a key way in which successive Conservative governments have sought to boost local economic growth against a background of local authority austerity, and now form a part of the Johnson government's 'levelling up' agenda. However, the perspective of voters is often overlooked in these debates. City-region devolution is a top-down innovation, with a focus on city-region economics rather than democratic renewal or engagement, and there is so far very little academic literature on identifying the drivers of public support for mayoral combined authorities. This study draws on survey responses of voters in the Liverpool City Region and explores a number of potential drivers of support for the Liverpool City Region combined authority, including party support, English, British and European identity, left-right and other value positions, and the role of place in driving support. It finds that support for devolution to the Liverpool City Region is driven by whether one lives in the centre or periphery of the city region, support for the Labour Party, left-wing, socially liberal and European identities, as well as being female and older. This paper also lays the groundwork for further research into drivers of public support for city-region devolution in England.","PeriodicalId":46067,"journal":{"name":"British Politics","volume":"400 3","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8747885/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41281147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Working-class conservative voters in 2019: voices from a valley in northern England. 2019年的工人阶级保守派选民:来自英格兰北部山谷的声音

IF 1.1 3区社会学

British Politics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-20 DOI: 10.1057/s41293-021-00177-5

Gavin Hart

{"title":"Working-class conservative voters in 2019: voices from a valley in northern England.","authors":"Gavin Hart","doi":"10.1057/s41293-021-00177-5","DOIUrl":"10.1057/s41293-021-00177-5","url":null,"abstract":"This paper highlights the findings from qualitative research into the electoral decision-making processes of working-class Conservative voters from a constituency in northern England. Through focussing specifically upon their primary concerns during the 2019 election, the piece expands upon existing quantitative research. Survey studies have highlighted leadership concerns and Brexit as the primary factors that have driven voters away from Labour and towards the Conservative Party. It is argued here that leadership, Brexit, and economic management were closely intertwined, with party leaders at the centre of broader thinking for these participants. Perceptions of the party leaders were foremost in these deliberations and this has clearly impacted upon the interviewees' thinking on a range of political matters. Additionally, the interviews asked what might influence the participants' future electoral choices. Here, the data suggest a sense of limited, qualified attachment to the Conservative Party and a desire to see the Labour Party move towards what the respondents perceive as a centrist ideological position. The final section considers what these findings may mean for the major parties in future electoral contests. It is suggested that the presidential focus has worked for Johnson so far due to his abilities as a communicator, but the government will have a difficult hill to climb in this parliament if they are to retain the loyalty of these voters in future.","PeriodicalId":46067,"journal":{"name":"British Politics","volume":"17 1","pages":"298-314"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8134824/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45648463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0