Journal of Academic Ethics最新文献_第3页

Michelle L. Boettcher and Cristóbal Salinas Jr., Law and Ethics in Academic and Student Affairs: Developing an Institutional Intelligence Approach Michelle L. Boettcher 和 Cristóbal Salinas Jr.，《学术和学生事务中的法律与伦理》：开发机构智能方法

IF 2.2

Journal of Academic Ethics Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI: 10.1007/s10805-024-09542-7

Evan W. Faidley, Madison E. Evans, Maxwell Parker

引用次数: 0

SACCIA Communication, Attitudes Towards Cheating and Academic Misconduct SACCIA 交流、对作弊和学术不端行为的态度

IF 1.8

Journal of Academic Ethics Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI: 10.1007/s10805-024-09541-8

Ana Stojanov, Annegret Hannawa, Lee Adam

{"title":"SACCIA Communication, Attitudes Towards Cheating and Academic Misconduct","authors":"Ana Stojanov, Annegret Hannawa, Lee Adam","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09541-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09541-8","url":null,"abstract":"Academic misconduct by students is a serious issue that threatens the public trust in higher education institutions. In the current study, we examine whether SACCIA (Sufficient, Accurate, Clear, Contextualised and Interpersonally Adaptive) communication predicts lower academic misconduct via attitudes towards cheating and understanding what ‘counts’ as academic misconduct. Participants (N = 319) completed an online questionnaire in Qualtrics measuring SACCIA-adherent communication, academic misconduct, positive attitudes towards cheating and understanding what constitutes misconduct, along with control variables (Big 5 personality traits and Honesty-Humility). The results indicated that the effect of SACCIA communication on academic misconduct was exerted via attitudes, but not via understanding of what constitutes ‘academic misconduct’. The more SACCIA-conforming the communication was, the lower the positive attitudes towards cheating, and the lower the positive attitudes the less self-reported misconduct. The findings suggest that universities could facilitate negative attitudes towards cheating and subsequently lower misconduct if they communicate about academic integrity in a SACCIA-adherent manner.","PeriodicalId":45961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141526363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Research Ethics in Swedish Dissertations in Educational Science – A Matter of Confusion 瑞典教育科学论文中的研究伦理--一个令人困惑的问题

IF 1.8

Journal of Academic Ethics Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI: 10.1007/s10805-024-09540-9

Marita Cronqvist

{"title":"Research Ethics in Swedish Dissertations in Educational Science – A Matter of Confusion","authors":"Marita Cronqvist","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09540-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09540-9","url":null,"abstract":"In all research, ethical considerations are crucial to reliability and quality and researchers are guided by various national and international documents and ethical committees. Despite different strategies to guide researchers and to ensure quality, there still seems to be uncertainty in educational science about how research ethics should be positioned and handled in practice. The aim of this study is to phenomenologically explore what meanings the phenomenon research ethics are given in Swedish doctoral dissertations in educational research based on how doctoral researchers position, frame and present research ethics in their ethical elaborations. The empirical data consists of 60 doctoral dissertations in educational science at Swedish universities from the past year. The result indicates very different meanings of ethical considerations despite a quite common point of departure in the Swedish Research Council’s guidelines and knowledge of the Ethics Review Act. Some variations can be related to the differences in the studies’ designs, but regardless of such explanations, the conclusion is that consensus regarding ethical considerations in research is largely lacking.","PeriodicalId":45961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141507691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Ethics of Alternative Advising 另类咨询的道德规范

IF 1.8

Journal of Academic Ethics Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI: 10.1007/s10805-024-09537-4

Billie Streufert

引用次数: 0

Understanding and Mitigating the Menace of Predatory Journals: Perspectives of University Teachers in Bangladesh 了解和减轻掠夺性期刊的威胁：孟加拉国大学教师的观点

IF 1.8

Journal of Academic Ethics Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI: 10.1007/s10805-024-09538-3

Umme Habiba, S. M. Z. Ahmed

引用次数: 0

Citation Ethics: An Exploratory Survey of Norms and Behaviors 引文道德：规范与行为的探索性调查

IF 1.8

Journal of Academic Ethics Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI: 10.1007/s10805-024-09539-2

Samuel V. Bruton, Alicia L. Macchione, Mitch Brown, Mohammad Hosseini

{"title":"Citation Ethics: An Exploratory Survey of Norms and Behaviors","authors":"Samuel V. Bruton, Alicia L. Macchione, Mitch Brown, Mohammad Hosseini","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09539-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09539-2","url":null,"abstract":"The ethics of citation has attracted increased attention in recent discussions of research and publication ethics, fraud and plagiarism. Little attempt has been made, however, to situate specific citation misbehaviors in terms of broader ethical practices and principles. To investigate researchers’ perceptions of citation norms, we surveyed active US researchers receiving federal funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Science Foundation (NSF), and the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). Participants (n = 257) were asked about citation norms they endorse (norm reports), the behaviors they perceive others to engage in (peer reports), and their own citation behaviors (self-reports). Our analyses showed that while considerable discrepancies exist between norm reports, peer reports and self-reports, respondents’ discipline has no significant effect on these. Participants indicated that their own practices and that of their peers falls short of the norms they endorse, but that their own behavior is much less ethically deficient than that of their peers. An exploratory factor analysis revealed that ethically questionable citation behaviors could be grouped usefully into three categories: strategic citations, neglectful citations, and blind citations. Contrary to our hypothesis, the survey showed that greater experience does not always result in better citation practices. A particularly divisive issue pertained to intentionally citing authors from underrepresented demographic groups for reasons of social justice, but broad support for this practice is lacking, although arts and humanities scholars are slightly more supportive. Most researchers view questionable citation practices as negatively affecting their disciplines. Our findings suggest the need for clearer articulations of the citation norms and improved guidance and training about citations.","PeriodicalId":45961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141255404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Persistence of Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching: The Role of Gender Stereotypes 学生教学评价中持续存在的性别偏见：性别刻板印象的作用

IF 1.8

Journal of Academic Ethics Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI: 10.1007/s10805-024-09535-6

Oshrit Kaspi Baruch

{"title":"The Persistence of Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching: The Role of Gender Stereotypes","authors":"Oshrit Kaspi Baruch","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09535-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09535-6","url":null,"abstract":"Student evaluations of teaching (SET) are typically highly biased. In this paper, three experiments are reported, examining gender bias in SET by manipulating lecturer gender and counterstereotypes. Each experiment involved a vignette about a lecture, with a different context: Study 1 − noisy students disrupting the lesson; Study 2 − students asking for consideration; Study 3 − neutral context of a routine lecture. Structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed that the effect of lecturer gender on SET depended on the context and was both directly (Study 1) and indirectly (Studies 2 and 3) mediated by gender stereotypes. The effect of student's gender was indirect and mediated by gender stereotypes in all studies. Counterstereotypical descriptions did not affect stereotypical perceptions in any of the experiments. The findings are discussed in terms of social dominance theory (SDT) and social role theory (SRT). They offer novel insights into the mechanism that explains gender and context bias in SET. In terms of practical implications, SET should be considered with caution, particularly when used for critical decisions such as tenure status. Finally, applying additional assessments and statistical methods to control for gender bias is important.","PeriodicalId":45961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141255448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Balancing Different Legal and Ethical Requirements in the Construction of Informed Consents in Qualitative International Collaborative Research Across Continents - Reflections from a Scandinavian Perspective 在跨洲定性国际合作研究中平衡知情同意书构建过程中的不同法律和伦理要求--斯堪的纳维亚视角的思考

IF 1.8

Journal of Academic Ethics Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10805-024-09536-5

Stinne Glasdam, Katharina Ó. Cathaoir, Sigrid Stjernswärd

{"title":"Balancing Different Legal and Ethical Requirements in the Construction of Informed Consents in Qualitative International Collaborative Research Across Continents - Reflections from a Scandinavian Perspective","authors":"Stinne Glasdam, Katharina Ó. Cathaoir, Sigrid Stjernswärd","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09536-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09536-5","url":null,"abstract":"International research collaborations engage multiple countries, researchers, and universities. This enhances the magnitude of contextual challenges, including legal and ethical dimensions across various jurisdictions, that must be bridged in qualitative research regardless of discipline, also in the construction of informed consents. From a Scandinavian perspective, this discussion paper explores challenges pertaining to the construction of informed consents related to EU data protection legislation, to which research institutions are subject when processing data related to EU residents. Next, it discusses challenges related to different traditions in terms of handling informed consent and research participants’ integrity, including the possibilities to waive anonymity in research. In international, multidisciplinary studies where researchers also operate in relatively ‘unknown territory’, it is especially important to be aware of and reflect on (inter)national possibilities and limitations related to laws, ethics, and culture/traditions in societies and within the academic fields. The variations in laws, ethical guidelines, and traditions in different countries demand that researchers are up to date with laws and ethical guidelines in the studied countries. Their practical implementation in the countries at stake in international, collaborative research endeavours are important, especially since such regulations and guidelines are far from static and change over time. The implementation of good ethical research practice requires democratic, reflexive, and responsive processes in all phases of research. Especially the preparation phase functions as a period to increase and ensure the knowledge and legal/ethical competences of the entire research team to meet the demands in the countries at stake.","PeriodicalId":45961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141166856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Academic Misconduct Epidemic in Pandemic: Institutional Academic Integrity Promotion in Online Education 大流行病中的学术不端行为流行：在线教育中的机构学术诚信宣传

IF 1.8

Journal of Academic Ethics Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10805-024-09534-7

Nalan Erçin Kamburoğlu, Salim Razı

引用次数: 0

Plagiarism and Wrong Content as Potential Challenges of Using Chatbots Like ChatGPT in Medical Research 剽窃和错误内容是在医学研究中使用 ChatGPT 等聊天机器人的潜在挑战

IF 1.8

Journal of Academic Ethics Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10805-024-09533-8

Sam Sedaghat

引用次数: 0